Jump to content

Sarah Everard murder case and calls for '6pm curfew for men'


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Velma said:

 

"Wayne Couzens joined the MPS on 10 September 2018. His first posting was to South Area where he joined a response team covering the Bromley area.

 

"He then moved to the Parliamentary and Diplomatic Protection Command on 1 February 2020 where his primary role was on uniformed patrol duties of diplomatic premises, mainly a range of Embassies."

Cheers for clarifying Velma, bit misleading that tweet. Also someone on there posted this pic regarding man on left but going by your dates probably not him

 

 

Ewikvg9WUAgOIc5.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flicking through some old (March 7th) papers, and came across what I think was the first major piece on this story...a 33 year old woman gone missing on her way home in London. What struck me most was the alleged "last CCTV image" of her. 

 

It looks like our Patsy friend. The woollen hat, the face mask, it all helps to obscure the features, but the hair and the shape of her brow don't look like the photo we're always shown of "Sarah".

 

1200.jpg?width=300&quality=85&auto=forma

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

Flicking through some old (March 7th) papers, and came across what I think was the first major piece on this story...a 33 year old woman gone missing on her way home in London. What struck me most was the alleged "last CCTV image" of her. 

 

It looks like our Patsy friend. The woollen hat, the face mask, it all helps to obscure the features, but the hair and the shape of her brow don't look like the photo we're always shown of "Sarah".

 

1200.jpg?width=300&quality=85&auto=forma

Yes it does. Have you got a link to the article?

edit. Found it. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9357949/amp/Met-Police-officer-Wayne-Couzens-arrives-court-face-charges-murder-kidnap.html

Edited by Liberty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Liberty said:

Yes it does. Have you got a link to the article?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9335333/Missing-Sarah-Everards-family-tell-desperation-police-search-continues-four-days-on.html

 

This is a different article to the one actually in that morning's paper (which I still have)...but essentially the first part is what they put in on the day, a lot of the rest seems added in later. They used the same CCTV image in the print version. To me that looks like the Patsy woman, and the "disguise" helps distract from that.

Edited by Anti Facts Sir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9335333/Missing-Sarah-Everards-family-tell-desperation-police-search-continues-four-days-on.html

 

This is a different article to the one actually in that morning's paper (which I still have)...but essentially the first part is what they put in on the day, a lot of the rest seems added in later. They used the same CCTV image in the print version. To me that looks like the Patsy woman, and the "disguise" helps distract from that.

Yes and it’s maybe a deliberately very grainy image.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The two minute hate

 

In orwell's dystopian novel '1984' the state holds 'two minute hates' where the public gather and hurl abuse at onscreen depictions of the enemies of the state

 

In our own time and society its beginning to feel more and more like a lot of the 'protests' are really just deep state controlled two minute hates. This latest one for this young lady, Sarah Everard, which has simply been hijacked by marxist-feminists is obviously a two minute hate against men and the BLM protests that were unharassed by the police and therefore state-sanctioned are a two minute hate against whitey.

 

Will the extinction rebellion protests morph into two minute hates against the general public and their cars?

 

Basically the deep state wants hate thrown at anyone as long as it isn't against them as that is when you can always be sure the police will go in their heavy handedly to crack down

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Velma said:

 

He's been charged. The trial is set for the Autumn, if he even makes it.

 

 

Whatever happened to 'innocent until proven guilty'? He'll never get a fair trial. The mob has already made the decision for the jury.

Edited by DarianF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd go as far as to say the whole thing was worked out, and the end-result determined, before the public even know about this "event". They just played it out to the public in a way that got the desired reaction. You can't have a "trial" for a "crime" that has no normal "perpetrator" and no normal "victim". It'll just be a media circus, and used to push through whatever agenda it was designed to bring about.

 

Already, we have Bojo The Clown saying plain clothes police will now hang around pubs and clubs "in order to keep women safe". Well how convenient that this kind of surveillance is to be introduced when adherence to CV19 "rules" and monitoring of social behaviour is so important to them

 

The old chestnut for intrusive laws always used to be "it's for safety of the children". Now, "it's for safety of the women".

Edited by Anti Facts Sir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

Flicking through some old (March 7th) papers, and came across what I think was the first major piece on this story...a 33 year old woman gone missing on her way home in London. What struck me most was the alleged "last CCTV image" of her. 

 

It looks like our Patsy friend. The woollen hat, the face mask, it all helps to obscure the features, but the hair and the shape of her brow don't look like the photo we're always shown of "Sarah".

 

1200.jpg?width=300&quality=85&auto=forma

 

Kind of like Tiffany Dover. Could be anyone under there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Free Range said:

when they are sufficiently panicked they rally around these sources

 

I read something recently about how the feminisation of men has caused women to look more towards the state for the protection, traditionally asigned to the husband. Obviously its a generalisation but made me look at the Clapham event again. The bizarre call for a 6pm curfew for men.

If it was staged im not sure what the copper as the perpetrator was meant to achieve

I'm still a bit puzzled by that as well. Part of it I think is they want to create confusion through illogical and contradictory rules or responses to events. And also to divide people - those who see through the obvious bullshit from those who don't.

 

The Covert Human Intelligence Sources Bill came into effect on March 1st which means UK police, security services and many other agencies can now authorise criminal activity - including rape, torture and murder. https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/2783 So assuming the cop was authorised to kill her he did nothing wrong in the eyes of the law. but women will sure feel safe with only police allowed on the streets after 6pm!

 

(edit) this version of the bill is easier to read -

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/949806/Covert_Human_Intelligence_Sources_Draft_Revised_Code_of_Practice_FINAL.pdf

Edited by BossCrow
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2021 at 2:57 PM, Beachcomber said:

This is starting to feel very George Floydish, I understand it’s shocking because he’s police but the publicity around this is mental. I’ve never known a mis per/ murder case get quite so much publicity even though it’s had the saddest result. What I mean is unfortunately ppl do get killed, thousands go missing every year, it’s a horrible world but this case has really got literally everyone talking, why? It’s building a massive storm - 97% of women have been assaulted!! Reclaim the streets! Curfews on all men, wtf? 

Why this case? Even bloody Doris Johnson has sent his condolences?? Makes you wonder to what end, what have got they planned, wonder what they’re discussing right now? 
Feels like this particular case is going to have the same type of power towards the hatred and mistrust of men as the floyd case has for BLM with all the pre planned media and social media storm. Divide and conquer! 

Oh and she was 33 and went missing on 3/3... 🤷‍♀️ 

She was 33

 

Went missing 3/3

 

at around 21:30 (2+1=)3:3

 

3+3= 6

 

33,33,33 = 666

 

most likely a hoax but who knows.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Covert Human Intelligence Sources Bill came into effect on March 1st 2021 which means UK police, security services and many other agencies can now authorise criminal activity - including rape, torture and murder. https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/2783 So if the cop was authorised to kill Sarah Everard (if she died) he acted perfectly legally.

 

this version of the bill is easier to read -

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/949806/Covert_Human_Intelligence_Sources_Draft_Revised_Code_of_Practice_FINAL.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DarianF said:

 

Whatever happened to 'innocent until proven guilty'? He'll never get a fair trial. The mob has already made the decision for the jury.

The MET and the Media already judged him and the mob took the bait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

I'd go as far as to say the whole thing was worked out, and the end-result determined, before the public even know about this "event". They just played it out to the public in a way that got the desired reaction. You can't have a "trial" for a "crime" that has no normal "perpetrator" and no normal "victim". It'll just be a media circus, and used to push through whatever agenda it was designed to bring about.

 

Already, we have Bojo The Clown saying plain clothes police will now hang around pubs and clubs "in order to keep women safe". Well how convenient that this kind of surveillance is to be introduced when adherence to CV19 "rules" and monitoring of social behaviour is so important to them

 

The old chestnut for intrusive laws always used to be "it's for safety of the children". Now, "it's for safety of the women".

 

They also want better lighting and more CCTV to keep us ladies safe.

 

Why don't they let us weaklings arm ourselves, with guns or knives?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BossCrow said:

The Covert Human Intelligence Sources Bill came into effect on March 1st 2021 which means UK police, security services and many other agencies can now authorise criminal activity - including rape, torture and murder. https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/2783 So if the cop was authorised to kill Sarah Everard (if she died) he acted perfectly legally.

 

this version of the bill is easier to read -

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/949806/Covert_Human_Intelligence_Sources_Draft_Revised_Code_of_Practice_FINAL.pdf

 

Murder was well within his remit then, sanctioned by the state, for the desired public response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Velma said:

The MET and the Media already judged him and the mob took the bait.

 

This whole thing is so dodgy, it's almost comical, the way it's all being played. One massive psyop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

This whole thing is so dodgy, it's almost comical, the way it's all being played. One massive psyop.

 

Yep, and this morning it's a total news blackout. Watching breakfast news at the moment they haven't mentioned it at all and I just checked The Mirror, BBC, Sky, The Guardian news websites and theres nothing on the front pages at all, Nothing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PsyOp or not.. 

Real woman or not.. 

What is happening is that a new movement is being formed. 

"Don't trust / hate Men.." 

 

But it's not just a man who has committed this atrocity. 

It's a police man - a man of the Law. 

 

This is far from the first time a police officer has committed such crimes. And it won't be the last.. 

 

Why aren’t police officers held to a higher account ? 

Why do they KEEP THEIR PENSION after losing their jobs for sexual and violent CRIMES ? 

Why is there such a very low level of convictions from complaints and allegations against police officers ? 

 

Where is the media campaign to improve the vetting process for police officers ? 

Where is the media campaign to keep us all safe from criminals within the system ? 

 

We all know why.. We all know how the Force covers for and protects their own. But it shouldn't. 

 

We all know why the media doesn't ask the right questions and why we're being distracted. 

 

The media is owned by the Scum at the top that enjoy sexual violence.. 

 

Rob Warner on the Crimebodge channel has some extremely valid points on this latest in a long line of police officer crimes..

 

THE BIG QUESTION THE MEDIA WON'T ASK..  

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

 

You still seem to buy into the left right illusion & what you would class as left all voted for the Corona act.

 

Thats why I like that post so much as it obviously triggered so many compliant COVIDIOT slavery spreading liberals, who only ever react to media manipulation & psyops. As Simon explained much better than I can in the post I quoted.

 

There is no left or right..only freedom vs slavery!

I think everyone in government are Blairites.  Just posing as opposition.  The copper was in a high up position therefor a position of trust. They have every right to protest but I’m seeing those most vocal of freedom saying they should not and it’s all about women v men. It isn’t. It’s about abuse of power, and the fact police cover up after their own. With police in service with crimes against their name. (Unbelievable that could happen) Sure some will hijack it and turn it into that as with the patsy woman. But it isn’t about that. 

Edited by Liberty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Liberty said:

I think everyone in government are Blairites.  Just posing as opposition.  The copper was in a high up position therefor a position of trust. They have every right to protest but I’m seeing those most vocal of freedom saying they should not and it’s all about women v men. It isn’t. It’s about abuse of power, and the fact police cover up after their own. With police in service with crimes against their name. (Unbelievable that could happen) Sure some will hijack it and turn it into that as with the patsy woman. But it isn’t about that. 

 

The policeman joined in 2018 how was he high?

 

They (emotional reactionaries) are making it all about men & women yes & being herded into a synthetic movement..which will end in more state control.

 

The woman was wearing chequered running bottoms & was age 33. Im not buying it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

The policeman joined in 2018 how was he high?

 

They (emotional reactionaries) are making it all about men & women yes & being herded into a synthetic movement..which will end in more state control.

 

The woman was wearing chequered running bottoms & was age 33. Im not buying it.

 

 

He was in the Parliamentary and diplomatic protection thus in possession of a fire arm for his work. Not all police get to that stage especially in just a few years of joining. All very suspicious on that front. 

 

There are those who seek to make it all about men v women but it isn’t that.  I think that is for each individual to decide why they are there and not for us to presume. . If they are there about the abuse of power and police protecting their own with officers on duty that have actual crimes against their name then I support that. We don’t want coppers that are criminals or anyone in a position of power as a criminal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...