NOT TAKING VACCINE / BEING RESTRICTED / COMMON LAW

[DaleP]

Yeah, I made it dead so that it won't register on their site as coming from this forum.

 

Oh well everyone click on BC's link and you will be tracked.

Edited March 22, 2022 by DaleP

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

3 minutes ago, DaleP said:

you will be tracked.

 

You really think there's a foolproof way to avoid TPTB tracking your online habits..?  

[DaleP]

Just now, Basket Case said:

 

You really think there's a foolproof way to avoid TPTB tracking your online habits..?  

Not TPTB. The website's owner, the author.

Clearly he is against us like they always look down on us.

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

21 minutes ago, DaleP said:

On the subject of "Consent"

 

 

What do you think? @zarkov @zArk @Basket Case

 

He's going to defend his own profession. Lots of words saying, hey - don't even try it.

But saying that - Courts do completely ignore any attempts at using Common Law. 

[DaleP]

3 minutes ago, Basket Case said:

 

He's going to defend his own profession. Lots of words saying, hey - don't even try it.

But saying that - Courts do completely ignore any attempts at using Common Law. 

 

So you gonna have the vaxx then BC.

There is only two options now. Have it or be killed since the law is out da window.

 

Be killed is the easiest way out, providing that you know what to do after you are dead.

 

Edited March 22, 2022 by DaleP

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

I will not be accepting the Vaxx under any circumstances. 

We'll have to see how it rolls out before action plans are formulated. 

[zArk]

1 hour ago, DaleP said:

On the subject of "Consent"

 

 

What do you think? @zarkov @zArk @Basket Case

 

while the above statement of the secretbarrister is partially true in that the people grant Parliament limited sovereign power through a mandate, Parliament is acting / performing as a proxy

 

Claims that Parliament is Sovereign is a commie wet dream.

Communism empowers the State beyond its established position (that of elected ministers expressing the opinion of their constituents) so that (for marxist ethos) it can be devoid of influence from the false consciousness of the proletariat voters and the bias of the bourgeoisie.

 

The claimed principle that parliament is sovereign is nonsense of course/  Parliament derives its limited power from a mandate from the people.

 

It is the people when on the Electoral Register which grants Parliament a limited mandate, time and capacity.

 

The rules it creates are applicable to its subjects (employees, subjects, personages of the State, regulated bodies, persons funded by the State etc etc) however the people are not subject or personages. Ever heard of a Boss of a company employing a manager who then claims to be the Boss of the company? Nope because the Boss would sack the piece of shit. Same with Parliament

This is where common law and court of record (recognised by the State ... well for the time being) assist people to claim their superiority to the State and its decrees.

 

The Monarch is sovereign but subject to its own laws. If parliament create a rule that it is illegal to wear a crown the Monarch is subject to that rule, because it is the Monarchs rule ultimately but the people are not subject to anothers rule in the absence of a trial by jury decision.

 

further .. the secretbarrister is very easy using the word YOU

 

i am not YOU. i am me, zark, and no rule/law/policy of Parliament will state that i am subject to it. YOU is always subject. YOU is the debtor. YOU is liable always.

 

IDS has been speaking out about this turn in mentality because he knows the commies are coming

 

Quote

 

Former Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith encouraged Mr Johnson to break the law, saying he would be seen as a Brexit “martyr” if judges opted to put him in jail for breaching Parliament’s terms.

Mr Duncan Smith told the newspaper: “This is about Parliament versus the people. Boris Johnson is on the side of the people, who voted to leave the EU.

“The people are sovereign because they elect Parliament. But Parliament wants to stop the will of the people.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited March 22, 2022 by zArk

[DaleP]

Thanks for your input zArk. But at the end of the day, we are already living in a society the rules, regulations & laws are not worth the paper it is written on even though you may be correct. Having said this, we shouldn't give up easily and still keep the resistance.

[zArk]

1 hour ago, DaleP said:

Thanks for your input zArk. But at the end of the day, we are already living in a society the rules, regulations & laws are not worth the paper it is written on even though you may be correct. Having said this, we shouldn't give up easily and still keep the resistance.

i think the knowledge of the workings of the system has been the domain of private education for centuries

 

more recently common folk are twigging on which can be initially very perturbing but long term will create more support for a system thats better than most. something worth defending 

[DaleP]

1 hour ago, zArk said:

i think the knowledge of the workings of the system has been the domain of private education for centuries

 

more recently common folk are twigging on which can be initially very perturbing but long term will create more support for a system thats better than most. something worth defending 

I started the Common Law study group but hardly anyone took interest. Says it all about the future you talk about.