Jump to content

Social engineering was behind communism and nazi-fascism and is nowadays behind feminism and antiwhite supremacism


Recommended Posts

Social engineering

 

Wikipedia defines social engineering as a discipline within the “social sciences that refers to efforts to influence certain attitudes and social behaviors on a large scale, whether by governments, media, academia, or private groups, to create desired characteristics of the target population. Social engineering can also be philosophically understood as a deterministic phenomenon where the goals and objectives of the architects of a new social construct are realized. Social engineers use a scientific method to analyze and understand social systems to devise appropriate methods to achieve desired results in humans. "

 

Social engineering is about redesigning society, transforming it in accordance with certain ideological premises based on the interests of the ruling elite. Historically, the most well-known manifestations of social engineering were communism and Nazism. Both were totalitarian systems. A radical transformation of a society that operates according to some of its internal laws is not possible without coercion. Both systems went down in history as extremely brutal systems, using brute force to enforce the will of the ruling elite while eliminating millions of people. Social engineering is therefore a historically-empirically very negative phenomenon.

 

Although totalitarian systems based on social engineering largely failed ingloriously, the ideas of social engineering remained. Modern forms of social engineering, for example, are the abolition of male supremacy in society and white supremacy, which is particularly characteristic of America, but the growing proportion of migrants in Europe also strengthens the tendency to abolish the supremacy of indigenous Europeans. This, of course, is not possible through spontaneous processes, but only through conscious political action based on authoritarian coercion, which effectively abolishes the rule of law.

 

Although social engineers refer to high ideals such as solidarity and human rights in carrying out their ideological projects, the fact is that it is a forced intervention in spontaneous social processes that inevitably favour certain social groups based on gender or skin colour. In itself it means an encroachment on human rights that is not in line with the ideal of equality of abstract citizens, regardless of all their other characteristics, including regardless of gender or skin colour. However, interference with people's rights can also lead to their gradual abolition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tackling social inequalities

 

Social solidarity is to some extent necessary and also ethically justified. However, if socialism begins to assert itself as the leading social ideology, there will inevitably be serious violations of human rights and their brutal elimination, as shown by empirical historical attempts to introduce socialist and communist systems. The end result was low economic efficiency, the poverty of the majority of the population, and the enslaved attitude of the population towards the ruling elite, which was literally the master of the lives and deaths of its subjects. In essence, it was a social regression to the pre-Enlightenment state.

 

Modern social engineers rely on socialist ideals and thus on the left. In both Europe and America, there has been a radical shift from conservatism to progressivism. The rational core of this twist, led from the background by the plutocracy, is the re-totalisation of society through ignoring the constitution and abolishing the rule of law. Plutocracy, in achieving its goals, essentially does not care at all whether it relies on the left or the right. At the moment, the ideology of the progressive left serves her interests more, until recently she relied more on the conservative right. In the next development cycle, it may be again vice versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feminist ideology and the elimination of male supremacy in society

 

The original ideal of feminism was to establish formal legal equality between men and women. Once this was achieved, however, the next goal of feminist movements became the abolition of male supremacy in society. This goal is to equalize the social roles of both sexes, which in practice means the preference of female subjects over men in different social spheres and processes. This is most evident in the realm of politics. There, women’s privileges are even forced by law.

 

It is obvious that this is a constitutionally disputable violation of the principle of equality of abstract citizens, as equality does not involve any form of discrimination. Men and women are equal as abstract citizens, and women's quotas mean a distinction between abstract citizens on the basis of gender, with one gender being preferred over the other, which eliminates the equality of abstract citizens. Half of the representation of women in politics as an ideal situation to eliminate male supremacy in politics is in stark contrast to the equality of abstract citizens, according to which the relationship between men and women in politics can be any, depending on the voters and activities of political actors, not on their gender.

 

The sexes are different in their social functions, so the forced equalization of the social roles of both sexes, which has nothing to do with equality, is destructive for society. One of the consequences of equalizing the social roles of men and women is lowering the birth rate among whites below a level that ensures whites' survival, especially in light of intensive migration to Europe and America from other continents, because migrants have much higher birth rate..

 

The globalist elite, which is creating conditions with its policies where normal population renewal is no longer possible, argues that migrants need to be imported for this reason. The same elite also claims that technology will be so advanced in the near future that robots and artificial intelligence will replace the human workforce to such an extent that a layer of permanently unemployed people will emerge who will become some kind of redundant people. The importation of migrants is therefore completely unnecessary and is clearly not about compensating for the loss of births. Especially when we consider that migrants are mostly without any qualifications and as such are difficult to employ or even unemployable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elimination of white supremacy

 

Another social engineering project being implemented in the West, especially in America, is the elimination of t.i. white supremacy. This is a violation of the principle of equality of abstract citizens on the basis of skin colour. It is essentially racism wrapped in the cellophane of anti-racism. In the name of racial equality, the abolition of the alleged white supremacy actually discriminates against one race, that is, white, in favor of other races, especially blacks. This, of course, causes interracial friction.

Since people’s preference based on their skin colour is not overly convincing, the strategy of social engineers implementing a white supremacy elimination project is also aimed at defaming whites. Hence the term white guilt.

 

"White guilt is the individual or collective guilt of some whites for the damage caused by racist treatment of ethnic minorities such as African Americans and indigenous peoples by other whites, specifically in the context of the Atlantic slave trade, European colonialism, holocaust, and the legacy of those periods."

According to the theory of white guilt, whites were responsible for the slave trade, but in fact blacks themselves took part in it, hunting their victims in the African jungles, which they then sold to Arabs, and they to whites and Jews who also took part in this shameful chapter of human history. Whites are also accused of genocide against Indians, colonialism, wars and the Holocaust. All of these are said to be reasons for not only eliminating white supremacism, but eliminating whites altogether, even though modern generations of whites cannot be held accountable for the actions of their ancestors. We are essentially dealing with a criminal mindset that sees whites as enemies and treats them that way. In fact, the elimination of whites is accelerating in both Europe and America, especially through excessive migration, which, given the low birth rate of the indigenous population, inevitably leads to ethnocide, culturicide and the gradual genocide of the white population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Retotalization of society as a result of social engineering projects

 

With regard to socialism, feminism and anti-racism, there is an abuse of values such as social solidarity, gender equality and racial equality, which are transformed into their opposite. Those who invoke them strive only for power, preferably absolute power, and social-emancipatory values in a perverted form become a tool for conquering it. The future will show what the end result of the abolition of "white supremacy" will be. It is feared, however, that there will be a regression of civilization to the pre-Enlightenment level, in short, a fascism or retotalization of society with all the possible negative consequences that we know from not so distant history.

Edited by karantanc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, karantanc said:

Feminist ideology and the elimination of male supremacy in society

 

The original ideal of feminism was to establish formal legal equality between men and women. Once this was achieved, however, the next goal of feminist movements became the abolition of male supremacy in society. This goal is to equalize the social roles of both sexes, which in practice means the preference of female subjects over men in different social spheres and processes. This is most evident in the realm of politics. There, women’s privileges are even forced by law.

 

It is obvious that this is a constitutionally disputable violation of the principle of equality of abstract citizens, as equality does not involve any form of discrimination. Men and women are equal as abstract citizens, and women's quotas mean a distinction between abstract citizens on the basis of gender, with one gender being preferred over the other, which eliminates the equality of abstract citizens. Half of the representation of women in politics as an ideal situation to eliminate male supremacy in politics is in stark contrast to the equality of abstract citizens, according to which the relationship between men and women in politics can be any, depending on the voters and activities of political actors, not on their gender.

 

The sexes are different in their social functions, so the forced equalization of the social roles of both sexes, which has nothing to do with equality, is destructive for society. One of the consequences of equalizing the social roles of men and women is lowering the birth rate among whites below a level that ensures whites' survival, especially in light of intensive migration to Europe and America from other continents, because migrants have much higher birth rate..

 

The globalist elite, which is creating conditions with its policies where normal population renewal is no longer possible, argues that migrants need to be imported for this reason. The same elite also claims that technology will be so advanced in the near future that robots and artificial intelligence will replace the human workforce to such an extent that a layer of permanently unemployed people will emerge who will become some kind of redundant people. The importation of migrants is therefore completely unnecessary and is clearly not about compensating for the loss of births. Especially when we consider that migrants are mostly without any qualifications and as such are difficult to employ or even unemployable.

 

No.

 

Today is International Women's Day, and as the lone? female voice on this rapidly degrading forum, here are my thoughts why this is wrong.

 

It reminds me of something very funny that a very funny woman said somewhere in response to a man who was angrily asking the following rhetorical questions about Jews--’Who did this…? Who did that…? Who gave women the vote? Who told them to leave the home and go and work outside?’...The woman's  reply was priceless--’Uhh....that would be the women themselves...maybe because they got tired of being used as brood mares and personal chef and cleaner…
So you see, no  conspiracy behind this. Women loved the freedom..A Handmaiden’s Tale and such depictions is not what women fantasize about as they go to sleep, it is men’s w*t dream, not the women’s..

 

As for women's role as men see it...LOL..

 

Let me burst your bubble—women can do without men but not vice versa. Even a man who to all appearances is living alone is being served in some way by a woman trying to keep his body and soul together. 
Why do you think rich divorced women look happy as a bunny? While widowed or divorced men either lurk in dark corners of the web or around the corner of girls’ schools and their health goes to pieces with all the beer and the canned food? The woman in the house and balance of society spiel was to keep women enslaved and the unspoken promise of the patriarchy to its members through the ages, that men felt was their birthright..


I personally know many women quite happy to be women and non-feminists and single ( no-- not LGBTQSRT single, just alone single). The social balance of the idyllic family life of a protective husband and a chirpy wife was a myth. There was and is horrendous atrocity being done in the name of this myth. Women are broken to the point that they become toxic and depressed and then that is labelled as their own fault.

 

We are happy we do not have the biceps to overturn the throne of the supreme consciousness or god, (insert your god’s name here), we are very very happy with our 'tiny brains' that cannot figure out the GPS coordinates for the Map of Hell, maybe we don’t really mind having ‘poor driving skills’ so we cannot parallel park in Hell’s parking lot,  where y’all might be going.

 

The relationship was never equal. Men are cribbing about losing the house slave. Now they have to become very wealthy before they can afford one. They want to decide woman's place. 

 

The story of men’s superiority revolves around the neanderthal premise of needing brawn to club various stuff to death and feeding the frail women who are cowering inside the cave, even that was false. The neanderthal woman was equally capable of all the clubbing to death and who knows maybe she did that after having pick up the bones for the umpteenth time once the guy had finished chomping on the hunted animal’s meat. 

 

Here’s another bubble popper, women were not the weaklings as depicted that couldn’t live without men, nor were they created out of the side of Adam’s rib.

 

They were not equal but more powerful than men. They were the carriers of the ‘feminine’ source of energy that was exploited by ‘masculine’ masonic priests to control the matrix structure. Hence all evil demonic things were falsely labelled feminine witches, black goddesses, etc. to shun and overpower them. In India, the ancient scriptures handle the feminine energy with kid gloves, you do not mess with the goddess. And quite contrary to what I have seen about satanic rituals in movies such as Eyes Wide Shut (with no personal exposure to this), the female played the Catalyst role in sacred spiritual esoteric ceremonies and ‘yagnas’ and was revered- until the patriarchal division was created by the male masons who inverted this female capacity into something evil and instead of the high priestess she was made the harlot in inverted satanism ceremonies---eg. In Nepal—there are kanyakumaris, and it is a country following the inverted goddess worship under the guise of the ‘holy’ form of worship. And is a country with abysmally low respect for women in real life but much loved by perverted male tourists because of the inverted energy field of female form---from reverence to exploitation... 

 

And that’s why females are kept as mind controlled slaves by the cabal stooges to serve the man.

 

Why all the mind boggling focus on establishing women’s place on earth---home, office, wh**rehouse, temple,,, what’s with this obsession... The fall of man is due to this abuse of the energy of creation that we conceptualize as feminine because we are neanderthal shitheads. 

 

Those energies have no gender for crying out loud. Without these divisions and identity labels we could not be controlled for so long. This is a very ancient game.


What we were is none of these stories. Why are we not remembering the beauty of our true ‘pasts’? We were ethereal beings experiencing love and harmony in beautiful ways and not in these violent neanderthal ways of who should be at home doing the dishes, raising the kids, and who deserves to go out for a few drinks in the meanwhile, all in the name of 'ideal' family life.and keeping the peace....

 

our human nature and history has been hijacked and subverted and we are reduced to fighting over 'body parts' and the superiority of one or the other ..If the family balance was indeed as beautiful, we would not be here in this situation right now.

 


 

 

 


 

Edited by Kali
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disease feeds off weak flesh.

As we see nobody is fighting off the decaying of the society.

Nobody says a word.

 

Why?

They are weak in mind body and spirit.

The weakening of ... 'traditional values', the foundations of the society, of the environment foods supply .... the weakening of men, and the weakening of mothers.

How did the weakening happen?

Arrogance - being too good for the past

Selfishness

Greed

Sloth

Stupidity

 

Pretty much everyone has willingly co-operated with these things.

And so pretty much everyone is going to face the consequences.

 

These days there is lots of finger pointing, but not much pointing the finger at one's own face.

 

Interesting the' traditional values' in the West involve telling people over and over again that you reap what you sow, and that this world is corrupt so be none too trusting.

A long way from the utopia of 'equality'.

 

The Environment ... young people are brainwashed about this so they won't notice that all their lives have been willingly destroyed by the powers that be and that they will not be able to have a healthy and wholesome life and family with job security as the banks politicians journalists intellectuals atheists and 'artists' have fucked them forwards and backwards before they were born.

All their concerns are channelled into "The Environment" so they don't throw the aforementioned list of snakehumans off the edge of a cliff.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kali said:

 

No.

 

Today is International Women's Day, and as the lone? female voice on this rapidly degrading forum, here are my thoughts why this is wrong.

 

It reminds me of something very funny that a very funny woman said somewhere in response to a man who was angrily asking the following rhetorical questions about Jews--’Who did this…? Who did that…? Who gave women the vote? Who told them to leave the home and go and work outside?’...The woman's  reply was priceless--’Uhh....that would be the women themselves...maybe because they got tired of being used as brood mares and personal chef and cleaner…
So you see, no  conspiracy behind this. Women loved the freedom..A Handmaiden’s Tale and such depictions is not what women fantasize about as they go to sleep, it is men’s w*t dream, not the women’s..

 

As for women's role as men see it...LOL..

 

Let me burst your bubble—women can do without men but not vice versa. Even a man who to all appearances is living alone is being served in some way by a woman trying to keep his body and soul together. 
Why do you think rich divorced women look happy as a bunny? While widowed or divorced men either lurk in dark corners of the web or around the corner of girls’ schools and their health goes to pieces with all the beer and the canned food? The woman in the house and balance of society spiel was to keep women enslaved and the unspoken promise of the patriarchy to its members through the ages, that men felt was their birthright..


I personally know many women quite happy to be women and non-feminists and single ( no-- not LGBTQSRT single, just alone single). The social balance of the idyllic family life of a protective husband and a chirpy wife was a myth. There was and is horrendous atrocity being done in the name of this myth. Women are broken to the point that they become toxic and depressed and then that is labelled as their own fault.

 

We are happy we do not have the biceps to overturn the throne of the supreme consciousness or god, (insert your god’s name here), we are very very happy with our 'tiny brains' that cannot figure out the GPS coordinates for the Map of Hell, maybe we don’t really mind having ‘poor driving skills’ so we cannot parallel park in Hell’s parking lot,  where y’all might be going.

 

The relationship was never equal. Men are cribbing about losing the house slave. Now they have to become very wealthy before they can afford one. They want to decide woman's place. 

 

The story of men’s superiority revolves around the neanderthal premise of needing brawn to club various stuff to death and feeding the frail women who are cowering inside the cave, even that was false. The neanderthal woman was equally capable of all the clubbing to death and who knows maybe she did that after having pick up the bones for the umpteenth time once the guy had finished chomping on the hunted animal’s meat. 

 

Here’s another bubble popper, women were not the weaklings as depicted that couldn’t live without men, nor were they created out of the side of Adam’s rib.

 

They were not equal but more powerful than men. They were the carriers of the ‘feminine’ source of energy that was exploited by ‘masculine’ masonic priests to control the matrix structure. Hence all evil demonic things were falsely labelled feminine witches, black goddesses, etc. to shun and overpower them. In India, the ancient scriptures handle the feminine energy with kid gloves, you do not mess with the goddess. And quite contrary to what I have seen about satanic rituals in movies such as Eyes Wide Shut (with no personal exposure to this), the female played the Catalyst role in sacred spiritual esoteric ceremonies and ‘yagnas’ and was revered- until the patriarchal division was created by the male masons who inverted this female capacity into something evil and instead of the high priestess she was made the harlot in inverted satanism ceremonies---eg. In Nepal—there are kanyakumaris, and it is a country following the inverted goddess worship under the guise of the ‘holy’ form of worship. And is a country with abysmally low respect for women in real life but much loved by perverted male tourists because of the inverted energy field of female form---from reverence to exploitation... 

 

And that’s why females are kept as mind controlled slaves by the cabal stooges to serve the man.

 

Why all the mind boggling focus on establishing women’s place on earth---home, office, wh**rehouse, temple,,, what’s with this obsession... The fall of man is due to this abuse of the energy of creation that we conceptualize as feminine because we are neanderthal shitheads. 

 

Those energies have no gender for crying out loud. Without these divisions and identity labels we could not be controlled for so long. This is a very ancient game.


What we were is none of these stories. Why are we not remembering the beauty of our true ‘pasts’? We were ethereal beings experiencing love and harmony in beautiful ways and not in these violent neanderthal ways of who should be at home doing the dishes, raising the kids, and who deserves to go out for a few drinks in the meanwhile, all in the name of 'ideal' family life.and keeping the peace....

 

our human nature and history has been hijacked and subverted and we are reduced to fighting over 'body parts' and the superiority of one or the other ..If the family balance was indeed as beautiful, we would not be here in this situation right now.

 


 

 

 


 

I never thought that everybody could understand my point. You simply don't reply to what I have written.  So: la vie est belle, les femmes sont cheres et les enfants sont facile a faire. Enjoy. 

Edited by karantanc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, karantanc said:

I never thought that everybody could understand my point. You simply don't reply to what I have written.  So: la vie est belle, les femmes sont cheres et les enfants sont facile a faire. Enjoy. 

 

I am reporting all your threads to the mods. You are inciting division on grounds of race and colour. All your threads are about Jewish agenda, white supremacy, nazi fascism  and now feminism. You are trying to bring the focus back to the old divisions which David Icke has been trying to say are merely self identities being used to divide us. Karan Tonk/c--Sikh name? Stop talking about women's history and how feminism came about when you know nothing about it. Either it is defending white guilt or how te family was broken or this or that----what did you do when the family was being broken up? How did the evil Juws take the wome out of you rcontrol? Were you sitting on your arse? Or did it happen because the women had been abused for so long tha freedom was welcome. You cannot blame everything on others and everything to be a conspiracy against white males. What have you done but point fingers?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Kali said:

You are inciting division on grounds of race and colour.

This is funny. I respond to attacks on whites. Those who attack whites and burden them with a kind of historical guilt with which modern generations have nothing to do, they create divisions.

10 hours ago, Kali said:

Stop talking about women's history and how feminism came about when you know nothing about it



When I don’t know something, I look at the available resources. If you know more than it is writen in professional articles, then write in professional magazines, instead of wasting time arguing in a lay forum dedicated to people of good will.

 

10 hours ago, Kali said:

You are trying to bring the focus back to the old divisions which David Icke has been trying to say are merely self identities being used to divide us.

Would you speak in your name, rather than David Icke's?

 

10 hours ago, Kali said:

How did the evil Juws take the wome out of you rcontrol? Were you sitting on your arse? Or did it happen because the women had been abused for so long tha freedom was welcome. You cannot blame everything on others and everything to be a conspiracy against white males. What have you done but point fingers?

If you don't understand my thoughts, I can't help you. I have nothing against the equality of women, but I am against the abuse of feminism by the ruling oligarchy. Normal women do not engage in militant anti-masculine feminism. Normal women value men and don’t think they’re just doing them injustice. Normal women know that without men, they would still be living in the stone age.

Edited by karantanc
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
6 hours ago, karantanc said:

Khm, that tells a lot about you. 

There has been no reports regarding your posts. 

And Kali has 'left the building'. 

BC 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much of the most recent identitarianspeak was used to flush out many of the remaining old school types out of the blocking positions they held so that the NWO globalists could more rapidly achieve their aims with the current pandemic.

 

Having flown to and moving freely between targeted counties in recent decades using  mass air transport so that governments couldn't track their activities efficiently and having seemingly  achieved their aims they now want to stop it so that their position isn't similarly subverted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On 3/8/2021 at 2:34 PM, Kali said:

The story of men’s superiority revolves around the neanderthal premise of needing brawn to club various stuff to death and feeding the frail women who are cowering inside the cave, even that was false.

 

Why all the mind boggling focus on establishing women’s place on earth---home, office, wh**rehouse, temple,,, what’s with this obsession... The fall of man is due to this abuse of the energy of creation that we conceptualize as feminine because we are neanderthal shitheads.

 

what have you got against neanderthals? Joe Biden made a disparaging remark about neanderthals recently too.

 

neanderthals are some of the most lied about people in history. Constantly we are told that they were stupid, unsophisticated and couldn't speak. All lies

 

And no we are not all neanderthals as not everyone is descended from neanderthals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what about Coronism and Climatism ,  what about saudi pharaos Slaveownerism and holy sharia Haremism , imperial habsburgs rothshcilds  Oilism , fake Democratism ,  or classdiscriminative genetically prior  aroman caesars  imperial dictate  forever Monarchism  , savilian Caligulism , lolypopes pedophilian Cathedralism , naked kids and nuns raped by priests  in jesuitic vaticanish Sexorcism , what about epsteins  orgy holy temple Solomonism , j.p morgan ships full of blair- clintonian Narcodilerism  &  oversugared Coca-Colonialism , what about global production of weinsteinian Lolywoodism ? .... guess who imperial sold some corona vaccines and  took working class money and then financed Nazism and Terrorism , ..... its all united slaveowners imperial  private  oil  gangster business  attacking slaves and robbing  working class , ... its all  predesigned like 911 , ...  its  empire Corona 007 ....

Edited by jupiter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...