Jump to content

Recommended Posts

image.png.88d41eaa41117be6894031b0aaec3940.png

 

THE QUEEN.............................

 

THE FUCKING QUEEN..................................... ''IT DIDN'T HURT AT ALL''

 

WHO EVER IS IN CONTROL HAS ABSOLUTE POWER, 20 YEARS AGO DO YOU THINK THIS QUEEN WOULD ALLOW HERSELF TO BECOME A PAWN

 

NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS WOULD YOU SAME SE THE SAME ADVERT....................... THE QUEEN AND JORDAN (KATIE PRICE) LMFAO

 

WHATS NEXT.......THE QUEEN IN COMPARETHE MEERKAT ADVERTS

 

 

 

FUCK ME.....FUCK OFF

 

WELL IF THE QUEEN AND ELTON JOHNS HAD IT.......IF I GO TO WORK TODAY AND SOMEONE SAYS THE QUEENS HAD HER VACCINE...I THINK IM JUST GUNNA SPARK THEM OUT LMFAO.

Edited by mathewtwatson
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Oprah appears to have turned into Ian Wright with a giant wig.

I haven't watched the interview, but  did Harry talk about how his mother was ritualistically murdered by his grandparents? Or  that his mother was pregnant  with Dodi's child? Or that Liz and Phillip

Posted Images

I don't think so.

All the papers are using stock photo of the Queen, there is no photo of her with a needle in her arm.

I think it's a lie.

They would be terrified of injecting such an old person and if she dropped dead the entire world would stop.

They would never risk it.

 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

She is 95 years old - 

 

Theres a fair chance she will die tommorrow just because shes 95 years old.

 

Its why I didnt get all excited when they revealed some 80 and 90 year olds had died a few days after getting the C19 vaccine - and it was announced the vaccine is murdering old people 

 

Come back when its a lot of 50 yr olds - thats suspicious - but  very old person dies really isnt.

 

 

On topic theres therfore no differrence in risk of her dying by giving her the Jab, and a big risk in making a false claim - theres  not just the usual anti vaxxers but also many who are opposed to mandatory Covid Vaccine who would love the chance to whistle blow on something like this.

 

Edot to add - and this is without including the C19 is a Hoax crowd - who again would love the oppertunity to prove fake vaccinnes etc

 

Edited by Eldnah
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Eldnah said:

 

 

Edot to add - and this is without including the C19 is a Hoax crowd

 

 

Covid killed the flu.

 

EvFY7M9XYAgI8Mq.jpg.629d46284b6abe6f1462f289f11e66d3.jpg

 

As for Lizzie, like what has that crusty rotbags ever done for anyone?

Shes a treasonous cunt.

Or shed be calling out the unlawful arrests & businesses forced to close.

 

What forum is this again?

Edited by oddsnsods
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

"Don't Be Selfish"

 

Says the Leader of the Windsor Mob.

 

Who "Owns" great swathes of Land.

 

And the Oceans.

 

And All the Swans ffs!

 

And Us (They Believe) via the Birth Certificate Scam.

 

Using the British People as redeemed collateral for debt in the form of Unwitting Guinea Pig Labrats,for the Pharmafia.

 

You now need to Opt Out of Organ Donation - Because  apparently they think:

"We Own Your Sorry Asses!

Your Body is Our Property!"

 

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, greatdayforfreedom said:

This is an act of utter desperation by the cult. Sadly, many people will now have the 'vaccine', because the 'Queen' has spoken. There is absolutely no way she had the jab.  Not a chance. 

They wouldn't risk her croaking because of the shot. That would really fuck things up for them. This is just another example of 'do as I say, not as do'.'

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Eldnah said:

She is 95 years old - 

 

Theres a fair chance she will die tommorrow just because shes 95 years old.

 

Its why I didnt get all excited when they revealed some 80 and 90 year olds had died a few days after getting the C19 vaccine - and it was announced the vaccine is murdering old people 

 

Come back when its a lot of 50 yr olds - thats suspicious - but  very old person dies really isnt.

 

 

On topic theres therfore no differrence in risk of her dying by giving her the Jab, and a big risk in making a false claim - theres  not just the usual anti vaxxers but also many who are opposed to mandatory Covid Vaccine who would love the chance to whistle blow on something like this.

 

Edot to add - and this is without including the C19 is a Hoax crowd - who again would love the oppertunity to prove fake vaccinnes etc

 

Interesting username. Wonder who's your Reldnah....

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, northern star said:

gi.gif

 

I allways feel this sort of ill informed guff - undermines arguments against the Monarchy and makes anyone opposed seem petty minded 

 

1) All the Jewels belong to the Crown - ie the state not her - she doesnt own them nor can she sell them

 

2) In what way is she a benefit scrounger - She works and is paid by the state - you may disagree with her job - or how much shes paid - but her job is akin to having a President - 

I find this argument to be stupid and petty 

Are politicians beneist scroungers ( dont answer that poor example) Police , nurses soldiers; social workers, all paid to work by the state are they benefit scroungers too I can think of several non jobs i disagree with - doesnt make them benefits scroungers. 

 

3) The land she owns - all its revenue goes directly to the government - not her - her 'pay (or benefits if you are a dullard) is a percentage of that - Here we need to be careful what you  wish for - If we ditch the monarcy, then that land and revenue is returned to her - we would in fact lose money on that deal.

 

Like wise any ideas for claiming Balmoral or Westminster - forget it  - they will become the residence of President Starmer**

 

Theres a comparison on line of costs of the UK Royals and the French / US / Italian Presidents - She works out a damn site cheaper (partly as she has no dedicated aircraft - the others do) 

 

The point im making here is Its unlikely the UK would save money ditching the queen and potentially it could cost more (would have done with Blair) 

 

 

I feel the same way about arguing against the monarchy as I do against Trident - Use real facts not made up emotive bollocks - I may not want either - but I will challege stupid arguments because they weaken the real case against both. 

 

I hate 'Trident didnt stop 9- 11 etc) It isnt fucking meant to - If thats the depth of your argument go home cretin. And I say this as someone who thinks the UK detterrent should have been scrapped in 1990 ish 

 

 

** More likely to become a Republic under Labour no other reason for choosing Starmer

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

Interesting username. Wonder who's your Reldnah....

 

Its simply Handle backwards 

When the forum changed  over  and i registered here something went screwey and my account didnt work so i 'lost' my old ID - Handle backwards was an unimaginative quick alternative whilst echoing the origional ID making it obvious who I was*.

 

I shouldnt go looking for odd Cabalistic - occult - zionist secret messages or links - there are none and shocking as it is to some on here , disagreeing on a point doesnt make you a mossad operative 

 

 

*To most people theres always one who suddenly spots it and insists on outing me - 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Eldnah said:

 

Its simply Handle backwards 

When the forum changed  over  and i registered here something went screwey and my account didnt work so i 'lost' my old ID - Handle backwards was an unimaginative quick alternative whilst echoing the origional ID making it obvious who I was*.

 

I shouldnt go looking for odd Cabalistic - occult - zionist secret messages or links - there are none and shocking as it is to some on here , disagreeing on a point doesnt make you a mossad operative 

 

 

*To most people theres always one who suddenly spots it and insists on outing me - 

 

listen, you are 100% right to input your opinion. complete respect.

 

Posts can be put on in frustration you can understand that i hope, including the twitter post you reference, but look at it from a different perspective thats all i ask of you.

 

people do die from vaccines and have severe reactions that render them disabled for life this is a fact, and i know not everybody has these reactions but a minority do. This is why this kind of propaganda should be a criminal offence.

 

so what if because the queen has done this and allowed herself to be used like this, what if somebody who wasnt going to have it......thinks, shes had it so i am........and they die, and if this show wasnt put on ITV then this wouldnt happen. What if because of this Queen somebody gets convinced to have the jab who was on the fence, have a severe reaction and they are left in a wheel chair because the left side of their body doesnt work. These are all plausible scenarios. What if this person was your mum, your dad, what if on the back of this you put this in your child and this happened.

 

A real Queen who cares for her people should have said, ''Iv had the jab (she hasnt by the way and il explain why i think this) but it is important that people are given the freedom to choose whats best for them, this is great britain and my british people should not be coerced into something they dont feel is for them for what ever reason.Every citizen should be informed of the pros and cons and then make there own decision that works best for them''.

 

 

A friend of mine tagged me into a whatsapp group of people who were vaccinated........every single person that had the vaccine had a reaction, ie temperature, runny nose, sickness, headaches etc, some worked from home and still had days off to recover. The group got stopped by the team leader because it was actually putting people off has comments were starting to change. Every person...either immediately after or in a day or 2.I was actually shocked because obviously the ''vaccine'' doesnt contain the virus like a traditional vaccine does so if its not a virus causing this what is, so i dived deeper..........and.........the queen felt a slight prick and it was over........no symptoms?! did not happen unless she was given placebo, which is just as likely, but i dont believe that. I dont think she had it at all, i dont think she was comfortable saying what she did, but just my opinion.

 

and on another note about money generation.........................

 

does Tutankhamun make money......................

would Buckingham palace tours as a museum generate income.............does the TAJ MAHAL make money

would the hotels the queen owns(the state as you say ) still make money if she was no longer our queen.

 

you dont think the queen (and royals) has her own private aircraft?

 

 

 

 

calling her benefit scrounger....i think your right....many moons ago, fuck me....orf with his head. 

 

But i think i understand his reasons and frustration.......people will have this vax purely because of her..........and some people will have complications because of her choice to be manipulated into entering a fucking zoom interview....and im still gobsmacked that this as happened and im not on acid!!!!!

 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Eldnah said:

 

I allways feel this sort of ill informed guff - undermines arguments against the Monarchy and makes anyone opposed seem petty minded 

 

1) All the Jewels belong to the Crown - ie the state not her - she doesnt own them nor can she sell them

 

2) In what way is she a benefit scrounger - She works and is paid by the state - you may disagree with her job - or how much shes paid - but her job is akin to having a President - 

I find this argument to be stupid and petty 

Are politicians beneist scroungers ( dont answer that poor example) Police , nurses soldiers; social workers, all paid to work by the state are they benefit scroungers too I can think of several non jobs i disagree with - doesnt make them benefits scroungers. 

 

3) The land she owns - all its revenue goes directly to the government - not her - her 'pay (or benefits if you are a dullard) is a percentage of that - Here we need to be careful what you  wish for - If we ditch the monarcy, then that land and revenue is returned to her - we would in fact lose money on that deal.

 

Like wise any ideas for claiming Balmoral or Westminster - forget it  - they will become the residence of President Starmer**

 

Theres a comparison on line of costs of the UK Royals and the French / US / Italian Presidents - She works out a damn site cheaper (partly as she has no dedicated aircraft - the others do) 

 

The point im making here is Its unlikely the UK would save money ditching the queen and potentially it could cost more (would have done with Blair) 

 

 

I feel the same way about arguing against the monarchy as I do against Trident - Use real facts not made up emotive bollocks - I may not want either - but I will challege stupid arguments because they weaken the real case against both. 

 

I hate 'Trident didnt stop 9- 11 etc) It isnt fucking meant to - If thats the depth of your argument go home cretin. And I say this as someone who thinks the UK detterrent should have been scrapped in 1990 ish 

 

 

** More likely to become a Republic under Labour no other reason for choosing Starmer

 

 

can i also just say i realise that your not saying your pro monarchy or against the monarchy ......just against stupid comments i get that.....but frustration leads to stupid comments, but you are right, we should choose what we say and how we say it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

She hasn't had any vaccine and neither will any of the rest of her family. She is stirring the pot, inciting prejudice against the 'anti-vaxxers'.

 

You know 'they' mean business when even our "head of state" is having a pop at us. Brace yourself, folks. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, mathewtwatson said:

can i also just say i realise that your not saying your pro monarchy or against the monarchy ......just against stupid comments i get that.....but frustration leads to stupid comments, but you are right, we should choose what we say and how we say it.

 

To be honest i couldnt honestly say if im pro or anti either 

 

I would be against a full on Monarchy same as i am a dictatorship - thats easy 

 

But the UK has a constitutional Monarchy - and i do say i dont see the point in changing it - not because im a monarchist but because the alternative costs as much and then have a media circus every 4 years to elect a president.

 

And heres the Rub the UK would ditch the monarchy but in its place would arise a new political elite (as it has in France the US Russia etc etc ) - every bit as egalatarian and whilst you can choose who you vote for - you can only vote for who they chose.

 

 

Im a natural cynic

 

i see no point ditching the queen with all the costs to then bring in an equally elitist system. 

 

Now i know that it doesnt have to be an elitist system that replaces it but do you think it wont be.

 

 

 

So if its concluded im pro then  its only because the change will be expensive and the result be just as shit for us plebs 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a royalist at all, I think they're a scourge on this nation, all they've done is pillage their own people and conquer other nations. Then there's the rest! 🧐

 

If they're wheeling her out they must be getting desperate. I'm not buying these numbers they're knocking out, falsified just like their covid death count. 

 

This feels like it's beginning to unravel for me. Let's see how this goes. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Eldnah said:

 

Its simply Handle backwards 

When the forum changed  over  and i registered here something went screwey and my account didnt work so i 'lost' my old ID - Handle backwards was an unimaginative quick alternative whilst echoing the origional ID making it obvious who I was*.

 

I shouldnt go looking for odd Cabalistic - occult - zionist secret messages or links - there are none and shocking as it is to some on here , disagreeing on a point doesnt make you a mossad operative 

 

 

*To most people theres always one who suddenly spots it and insists on outing me - 

Sorry didn't know about the reference to an old lost ID. Just some of the comments in the post got my antenna tweaking. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I truly believe the establishment is so disconnected from the public that they actually believe most of us are stupid. Remember how Hancock laughed at that old man who had the first jab. Sure he was an old fool but do they think we're all like this, commoners, those of us not from the 'old school'.

 

They think that the public are silly, emotional and childish and should thus be controlled. Of course the reason we wouldn't take a vaccine is because injections hurt, how insightful your majesty, very much too the point, maybe if we were offered a lolly pop after the jab we'd forget all about the ouchie and willingly take it.

 

The Police are no different. Did they think this would play forever. That they could abuse the public and be protected. That there would be a thousand year Reich to hide their sins in time. No! Things will calm down soon. Lockdown will finish and no one will forget what abuses took place. People protested during lockdowns, BLM was in every city. So when these lockdowns finish what do they think the people will do?

 

Happens every Summer like clockwork! Get ready for the BIG ONE! I might even go myself.

 

Damn right things will never go back to normal, you can bet things will change. As soon as the people have enough freedom back, it is on and every injustice that took place will be judged. Every Police force will be heavily scrutinised. It seems defund the Police may just be the threat these thugs will respond to, that's right, smash their Piggy Bank!

 

People, Don't Forget!

 

police.jpg.6a02733e6c4e6f2cf9edf2fa634e7d14.jpg

 

MUST WE BOOT FASCISM FROM OUR KINGDOM AGAIN?

 

201102_r37273.jpg.4eaea920fc0d62fe6b64e192a6d741c5.jpg

 

UNITE & FIGHT - UNITE & FIGHT - UNITE & FIGHT - UNITE & FIGHT - 

Edited by Seconal
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...