Common Law- Just Another Psy Op?

[pi3141]

1 minute ago, RobinJ said:

Perhaps the Alaskans used that route because it was the easiest at that point in time.

 

Of course they did - they faced an emergency situation that required using the system they moved away from.

 

I would have done the same.

 

But it proved a point, without that modern society provided resource, they would have eventually received a letter (again a service provided by society) telling them their relative had died giving them no time to say last goodbyes or even attend the funeral.

 

It just struck me as ironic - them harping on about their freedoms but then they rely on a service they say they didn't need.

 

If that TV crew hadn't been there it would have caused them heartache.

 

So much for being 'independent' or 'self sufficient' 

[Macnamara]

On 6/23/2022 at 8:22 PM, pi3141 said:

Freeman on the Land is a personal philosophy but I think it has no basis in law and even if it had - they own the Police, Courts and Prisons. Do something bad enough and they WILL come and take you away and lock you up.

 

Thats the reality. (imo)

 

why are you conflating 'freeman on the land' with the common law? The common law is the foundation of the british constitution and has been subverted by parliamentary statute

 

Re registering your child the bernician has some interesting things to say about that:

Reflection Upon Refusing To Register A Birth

https://www.thebernician.net/reflections-upon-refusing-to-register-a-birth/

 

But going back to the common law the UK Column have been doing a series about the british constitution and the common law. Here is part 1:

A Dissident's Guide to the Constitution: Episode 1

https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/dissidents-guide-constitution-episode-1

[pi3141]

On 7/19/2022 at 10:34 AM, Macnamara said:

The common law is the foundation of the british constitution and has been subverted by parliamentary statute

 

Agreed, and Freeman on the Land philosophy drew heavily on Common Law.

[pi3141]

On 7/19/2022 at 10:34 AM, Macnamara said:

Why are you conflating 'freeman on the land' with the common law? 

 

 

Freeman on the Land

 

The freeman-on-the-land movement, also known as the freemen-of-the-land (sometimes abbreviated as FOTL[2]), the freemen movement, or simply freemen, is a loose group of individuals who believe that they are bound by statute laws only if they consent to those laws. They believe that they can therefore declare themselves independent of the government and the rule of law, holding that the only "true" law is their own idiosyncratic interpretation of "common law".[3] 

 

Link - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeman_on_the_land

[Macnamara]

2 hours ago, pi3141 said:

 idiosyncratic interpretation of "common law".

 

so stop trying to equate the common law which is the foundation of our constitution with freeman on the land

 

the common law is not a 'psyop'

 

whether Freeman on the land is a psyop is a separate issue

Edited July 20, 2022 by Macnamara

[pi3141]

1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

 

so stop trying to equate the common law which is the foundation of our constitution with freeman on the land

 

the common law is not a 'psyop'

 

whether Freeman on the land is a psyop is a separate issue

 

 

The Freemen on the Land equated Common Law to their movement.

 

Not me.

 

Did you see John Harris talks etc?

 

I did not say Common Law was a Psyop and in fact I did not say Freeman on the Land was a Psyop. 

 

Where's your argument?

 

Once again it seems to fade away and be based on nothing or incorrectly re-framing what I actually said.

 

 

On 6/23/2022 at 8:22 PM, pi3141 said:

While I'm not certain its a Psyop, it seems Freeman on the Land started with good intentions, however I don't think its valid.

 

[Macnamara]

4 minutes ago, pi3141 said:

Where's your argument?

 

the OP says nothing about freeman on the land

 

it says people were discussing the common law more in the wake of covid

 

so why bring it up?

[Macnamara]

8 minutes ago, pi3141 said:

Did you see John Harris talks etc?

 

what does that poor man have to do with common law talk during covid?