Jump to content

How to get rid of nanobots


Felix

Recommended Posts

Stop thinking about them and they will go away.

 

If you become obsessed by the idea that there are tiny robots inside you, you will eventually become psychotic.

 

In fact telling a doctor that you have tiny robots inside you would probably be enough to get certified.

 

I'd forget about it if I were you and get on with enjoying your life.

 

Nothing will happen to you. However if you become obsessed with the idea there are nanobots inside you, then your health and mind will suffer greatly.

 

Be careful....... there are people playing tricks with our minds....... try to keep your feet at least loosely planted on the ground.

 

 

But don't take the vaccine.......... that has the potential to be a genocide weapon a few months down the line.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Truthspoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delusion calm yourself psychiatrist. Im just peace and love it's normal to want to be sovereign on ouw own bodies. I do not consent vaccines i do not concent chips i do not consent enslavement. I know theyr agenda is to lobotomise any dissident but guess what? I don't give a fuck i'll still speak truth. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Felix said:

I was thinking EMP so far any other ideas ?

 

If you comprehend the concept of intent and the giving of consent .... then on a greater level, you are fine.

If you wish to remove such a thing from the physical form you animate .... then you need to find the frequency to de-animate them!

 

Along these lines ....

 

bitchute video, so it doesn't embed sadly :(

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/V3dIMBggIPn4/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Felix said:

Delusion calm yourself psychiatrist. Im just peace and love it's normal to want to be sovereign on ouw own bodies. I do not consent vaccines i do not concent chips i do not consent enslavement. I know theyr agenda is to lobotomise any dissident but guess what? I don't give a fuck i'll still speak truth. 

 

Why do you choose to believe there are nanobots inside you?

 

In what way does this belief benefit you?

 

 

Edited by Truthspoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
12 hours ago, Truthspoon said:

 

I wouldn't feed the delusion

 

The Technology is real. There are many articles in scientific magazines and websites about Nanobot development. 

No delusion. 

 

While I agree it doesn't help freaking out about them it's not delusional to consider them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
20 minutes ago, shabbirss said:

saw this video about the swab having weird, moving strands in it...

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9OmHPgdA7908/

 

I saw that too. 

Freaky. 

Max Igan highlighted this in one of his videos. 

He has some swab tests to pull apart and investigate but his microscope camera has broken.

He's getting it fixed so I'm looking forwards to his findings sometime soon. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, shabbirss said:

saw this video about the swab having weird, moving strands in it...

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9OmHPgdA7908/

 

That woman freaking out over cotton wool is probably in the top five of the stupidest things I've ever seen in my life. I'd put it up there with flat-earth and reptilian shape-shifting being mistaken for low quality video glitch artifacts.

 

Come on people, show some discernment will ya?

 

It's kind of embarrassing sometimes.....

 

Edited by Truthspoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
16 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:

Come on people, show some discernment will ya?

 

The Con19 swab clearly moves unlike the ordinary cotton bud.. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
10 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:

Can I ask a simple question.... have you heard of static electricity?

 

Mystery solved.

 

 

Why didn't the cotton bud behave the same? 

As I said - waiting for Max Igan to try replicate this. 

I remember seeing someone else do this a while back. 

An Australian activist over on the West Side. 

Can't remember his name. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


i also thought about static...
but the way those fibers move is just freaky
the fibers are twisting and turning, trying to catch each other for a linkup
simple static does not explain it

snapshot taken from Max Igan video

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5z8bilOTBgAT/

 

011.png

 

"Theragrippers" are tiny, shape-changing machines that deliver medicine efficiently to the GI tract

https://hub.jhu.edu/2020/11/25/theragripper-gi-tract-medicine-delivery/

 

theragripper.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by shabbirss
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's only a hypothesis, but it's a better one than the cotton fibres being alive isn't it?

 

To answer your question, it was the cotton bud the separated fibres were attracted to. They are commonly made of a plastic stem with a cotton head, the perfect implement to collect static electricity.

 

 

Edited by Truthspoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, shabbirss said:

theragripper.jpg

 

 

You are conflating different things.


These are not nanobots, apparently all they do is open and close in reaction to temperature, and the activity of these things would not make the cotton fibre behave the way it does. Static electricity however would.

 

 

 

Edited by Truthspoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...