Jump to content

Government to put flouride in water?


shadowmoon
 Share

Recommended Posts

There are many types of water filters from water purifying tablets to reverse osmosis and Nanofiltration. However when it comes to drinking water, 60% of our body and 73% of our brains, for those conscious and concerned, it is probably best to make sure that the water that we drink is pure, nutritional in minerals & elements and importantly devoid of all unnatural chemicals.

 

It is true that the Chlorine added to our drinking water keeps the water from hosting bacteria, however once it has completed its brilliantly engineered journey to your home, it should then be made healthy and not just 'safe and clean'.

 

Just as our electricity travels miles upon miles having been transformed from up to 400kv and stepped-down to the ~230v we use safely in our homes, so is our water pumped for miles in a state that is required for such a system. A fantastic system and a cornerstone of a modern society I'm sure you'll agree, but to reach us in this form and still be 'safe' to drink requires additives such as Chlorine. As for Sodium Fluoride, it is absolutely not needed and the science behind the discovery for its dental use is as ridiculous as it is old an unnecessary in a modern society advanced enough to brush their own teeth.

 

- FYI, a four year old can do it.

 

 

The story of fluoridation begins with a mystery staining of the teeth first described by dentist Dr. Frederick McKay in Colorado in 19012 and, independently in Naples in 1902 by Dr. J.M. Eager, an American dentist stationed in Italy. Over the following years, McKay became aware of several cases that suggested that the water supply might be responsible for the staining. He also noted that decay rates were much lower in areas with endemic dental staining than they were in other adjacent areas.

 

In the United Kingdom, an Essex dentist Mr. Norman Ainsworth had found dental staining similar to McKay's description of “Rocky Mountain Mottled Teeth”. As part of a study for the Medical Research Council in 1925, Ainsworth examined over 4,000 children and, for the first time, produced a statistical comparison of decay rates between populations with the staining and those without. This study showed that those living in areas where mottled teeth were commonest tended to have much less dental decay.

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/4812863

 

 

If you think there's not the will to use chemicals en mass to alter the behaviour of the people, then think again. In the 60's the U.S Government made illegal all Psychedelic drugs. Why? Because psychedelic drugs make people more liberal minded. I'll say that again 'Psychedelic drugs make people more liberal minded'. Imagine what a conservative government, reliant on the vote of the people would think if a large part of society was becoming liberally minded where in no small part it was due to the use of psychedelic drugs.

 

Where as Coffee, Alcohol, Sugar and Opium and Cocaine tend to make people more conservative minded (self centred, uncaring, own task orientated or egotistical) and all of these drugs, whether legal or not have been the cause of some of the most horrific Wars in our history, not to mention the slavery the addiction and the Cartels. Yeah some may be legal but there's one dirty blood soaked history washed out of those pure white crystalline powders.

 

So a chemical with a proven dental effect was their reasoning. Maybe that was once appropriate but I (as I'm sure of most other people) am able to brush my teeth, 'shit, I can floss too', so I don't need dental drugs pumped into my drinking water like it's still 1902 and dental hygiene is still to become commonplace, as I assume common hygiene was too, for the poor masses, back then. This does not come under the same reasoning as fortifying foods with vitamins to combat diseases of deficiencies (which fluoride is not), which again fine but for healthy, responsible (ie able to clean oneself and eat a healthy balanced nutritional diet), mature people, we actually don't need shit pumped into our food and drink because.....'My Body, My Rules'.

 

"Hey, maybe they should Caffeinate the water so that we can poop regularly. Fluoride in our water....its a poison! What amount of poison is ok, huh?...None, because....its still a poison. Who's up for Dementia, anyone, Parkinson's maybe...no, how about Alzheimer's. All neurodegenerative diseases. There may be a 'safe' consumption limit, but hit that limit again and again, everyday for a lifetime and then see how 'safe and clean' that drinking water really is".

 

A little poison each day will kill you little by little, remember we're 60% water.

 

When your water is pure, fresh and clean then you are ready to open up its magical properties. Water is much, much more.

 

 

- THE GREAT CULLING OF OUR WATER

https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/great-culling-our-water/

 

Beautiful-Water-Inspired-Art-001-550x785.jpg.3f16efaea4a6b00e595bd2f98358afbe.jpg

 

71hdoRDj9cL._SL1500_.jpg.52358506170f1d49af2616d6d86fc3a1.jpg

Edited by Seconal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Seconal said:

There are many types of water filters from water purifying tablets to reverse osmosis and Nanofiltration. However when it comes to drinking water, 60% of our body and 73% of our brains, for those conscious and concerned, it is probably best to make sure that the water that we drink is pure, nutritional in minerals & elements and importantly devoid of all unnatural chemicals.

 

It is true that the Chlorine added to our drinking water keeps the water from hosting bacteria, however once it has completed its brilliantly engineered journey to your home, it should then be made healthy and not just 'safe and clean'.

 

Just as our electricity travels miles upon miles having been transformed from up to 400kv and stepped-down to the ~230v we use safely in our homes, so is our water pumped for miles in a state that is required for such a system. A fantastic system and a cornerstone of a modern society I'm sure you'll agree, but to reach us in this form and still be 'safe' to drink requires additives such as Chlorine. As for Sodium Fluoride, it is absolutely not needed and the science behind the discovery for its dental use is as ridiculous as it is old an unnecessary in a modern society advanced enough to brush their own teeth.

 

- FYI, a four year old can do it.

 

 

The story of fluoridation begins with a mystery staining of the teeth first described by dentist Dr. Frederick McKay in Colorado in 19012 and, independently in Naples in 1902 by Dr. J.M. Eager, an American dentist stationed in Italy. Over the following years, McKay became aware of several cases that suggested that the water supply might be responsible for the staining. He also noted that decay rates were much lower in areas with endemic dental staining than they were in other adjacent areas.

 

In the United Kingdom, an Essex dentist Mr. Norman Ainsworth had found dental staining similar to McKay's description of “Rocky Mountain Mottled Teeth”. As part of a study for the Medical Research Council in 1925, Ainsworth examined over 4,000 children and, for the first time, produced a statistical comparison of decay rates between populations with the staining and those without. This study showed that those living in areas where mottled teeth were commonest tended to have much less dental decay.

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/4812863

 

 

If you think there's not the will to use chemicals en mass to alter the behaviour of the people, then think again. In the 60's the U.S Government made illegal all Psychedelic drugs. Why? Because psychedelic drugs make people more liberal minded. I'll say that again 'Psychedelic drugs make people more liberal minded'. Imagine what a conservative government, reliant on the vote of the people would think if a large part of society was becoming liberally minded where in no small part it was due to the use of psychedelic drugs.

 

Where as Coffee, Alcohol, Sugar and Opium and Cocaine tend to make people more conservative minded (self centred, uncaring, own task orientated or egotistical) and all of these drugs, whether legal or not have been the cause of some of the most horrific Wars in our history, not to mention the slavery the addiction and the Cartels. Yeah some may be legal but there's one dirty blood soaked history washed out of those pure white crystalline powders.

 

So a chemical with a proven dental effect was their reasoning. Maybe that was once appropriate but I (as I'm sure of most other people) am able to brush my teeth, 'shit, I can floss too', so I don't need dental drugs pumped into my drinking water like it's still 1902 and dental hygiene is still to become commonplace, as I assume common hygiene was too, for the poor masses, back then. This does not come under the same reasoning as fortifying foods with vitamins to combat diseases of deficiencies (which fluoride is not), which again fine but for healthy, responsible (ie able to clean oneself and eat a healthy balanced nutritional diet), mature people, we actually don't need shit pumped into our food and drink because.....'My Body, My Rules'.

 

"Hey, maybe they should Caffeinate the water so that we can poop regularly. Fluoride in our water....its a poison! What amount of poison is ok, huh?...None, because....its still a poison. Who's up for Dementia, anyone, Parkinson's maybe...no, how about Alzheimer's. All neurodegenerative diseases. There may be a 'safe' consumption limit, but hit that limit again and again, everyday for a lifetime and then see how 'safe and clean' that drinking water really is".

 

A little poison each day will kill you little by little, remember we're 60% water.

 

When your water is pure, fresh and clean then you are ready to open up its magical properties. Water is much, much more.

 

 

- THE GREAT CULLING OF OUR WATER

https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/great-culling-our-water/

 

Beautiful-Water-Inspired-Art-001-550x785.jpg.3f16efaea4a6b00e595bd2f98358afbe.jpg

 

71hdoRDj9cL._SL1500_.jpg.52358506170f1d49af2616d6d86fc3a1.jpg

 

Recent post. FYI: http://fluoridealert.org/news/according-to-fluoride-action-network-the-nas-strengthens-findings-on-fluorides-neurotoxicity/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its an old story. You want your workers docile, simple and not to bright. Just like slaves where bred, in fact the word 'mutha-fucka', was a literal description of a perverse act used to create docile slaves by blind folding the male son.....

 

Im under no illusions there is an ancient ruling class, unseen, a hidden hand and they fool the seen leaders into believing these things they do. Although they're wrong, because they believe it, they don't exactly lie but they don't tell the truth.

 

Takes a suspicious, conscious and foolless mind to see through this bs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Press release:

 

Study: "Safe" Water Fluoride Levels Linked to Hip Fractures:

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/study-safe-water-fluoride-levels-linked-to-hip-fractures-301272607.html

 

Study conclusion:

 

"The risk of hip fractures was increased among Swedish women who had the highest levels of urine fluoride excretion and the highest estimated fluoride intake from beverages and food relative to women with the lowest levels of each exposure. Our findings, which are consistent with the effects of high fluoride exposures observed in RCTs (resulting in a denser but more fragile skeleton), suggest that long-term consumption of tap water with a fluoride concentration of 1mg/L, which is below the 1.5mg/L maximum concentration recommended by the WHO, may adversely affect bone health in postmenopausal women."

https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/EHP7404

 

Further research & information:

 

http://fluoridealert.org/researchers/

 

http://fluoridealert.org/issues/health/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
3 minutes ago, DarianF said:

The ADA and the NTP: Science versus Propaganda

https://fluoridealert.org/content/bulletin_02-22-22/

 

@sock muppet that's a start ;-)

 

Quote from the article linked:

“is concerned about the National Toxicology Program’s forthcoming state-of-the-science report examining whether there is a causal relationship between fluoride exposure and potential neurodevelopmental and cognitive effects.”

And they should be! The science, including at least four studies funded by U.S. government agencies, overwhelmingly shows that fluoride can lower IQ  (Bashash, 2017, Green, 2019) and increase symptoms of ADHD (Bashash, 2018), when exposed to fluoride during fetal development and when bottle-fed with formula made up with fluoridated water (Till, 2020).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sock muppet said:

 

Quote from the article linked:

“is concerned about the National Toxicology Program’s forthcoming state-of-the-science report examining whether there is a causal relationship between fluoride exposure and potential neurodevelopmental and cognitive effects.”

And they should be! The science, including at least four studies funded by U.S. government agencies, overwhelmingly shows that fluoride can lower IQ  (Bashash, 2017, Green, 2019) and increase symptoms of ADHD (Bashash, 2018), when exposed to fluoride during fetal development and when bottle-fed with formula made up with fluoridated water (Till, 2020).

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...