Jump to content

How many countries will Biden invade during his term?


CarpeDiem
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 8/11/2021 at 10:04 PM, Strummer101 said:

Have they used those weapons? 

 

some people have claimed that israel has hit syria with a tactical nuke

 

the port at beirut looked to be struck with a missile of some sort and then there was the pentagon on 911 which was also clearly struck by a missile and not a plane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
On 8/5/2021 at 9:25 PM, Macnamara said:

Israel on the other hand is doing all of that and more

 

... like illegally kidnapping 'nuclear project whistle blowers'. Then wiring their teeth up so that they cannot talk in court. 

 

 

 

 

Screenshot_20210813_010021.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2021 at 12:39 AM, Macnamara said:

 

some people have claimed that israel has hit syria with a tactical nuke

 

the port at beirut looked to be struck with a missile of some sort and then there was the pentagon on 911 which was also clearly struck by a missile and not a plane

Ah, so they have not used them then. 

 

Let's hope shall we that the Supreme Leader can show similar restraint in the coming years, rather than opting to speed the return of the 12th Imam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2021 at 12:43 AM, Macnamara said:

 

john bolton is just a tool of the jewish neocons

We know that - and Iran survived his time in office. What went wrong then? If you claim that the US is/was looking for a pretext to attack Iran on behalf or Israel, there was never a better chance. 

 

And nothing happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2021 at 1:02 AM, Basket Case said:

 

... like illegally kidnapping 'nuclear project whistle blowers'. Then wiring their teeth up so that they cannot talk in court. 

 

 

 

 

Screenshot_20210813_010021.jpg

Iran of course has essentially wired up the teeth of their entire population. In the shape of velayat e faqih.

 

Hey, got any pictures of women who have been given 100 lashes, or been stoned to death, for adultery maybe?

 

Let it never be said that the Supreme Leader is without mercy; this is from the Iranian Penal Code;

 

If an ailing woman or a woman in menstruation has been condemned to death or stoning, the punishment shall be carried out. If, however, she is condemned to flogging, the punishment shall be delayed until she is recovered or her menstruation period is over.

 

Many other examples of their mercy are to be found, or course;

 

file:///C:/Users/Mark/Downloads/Islamic_Penal_Code_of_the_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran.pdf

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Strummer101 said:

We know that - and Iran survived his time in office. What went wrong then? If you claim that the US is/was looking for a pretext to attack Iran on behalf or Israel, there was never a better chance. 

 

And nothing happened.

 

that's not true. Israel has been carrying out assassinations of iranians including that kit of soleimani and also the more recent remote controlled machine gun attack on an iranian nuclear scientist:

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/29/middleeast/iran-mohsen-fakhrizadeh-remote-control-machine-gun/index.html

 

Meanwhile israel has been flying bombing raids in syria

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Strummer101 said:

Ah, so they have not used them then.

 

if they hit syria with a tactical nuke then they have used them but no one has used them except america in japan so its hardly a boast to say ''hey we must be good guys because we haven't nuked our neighbour!'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

that's not true. Israel has been carrying out assassinations of iranians including that kit of soleimani and also the more recent remote controlled machine gun attack on an iranian nuclear scientist:

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/29/middleeast/iran-mohsen-fakhrizadeh-remote-control-machine-gun/index.html

 

Meanwhile israel has been flying bombing raids in syria

 

 

Tell me Soleimani was a good guy? I do not believe that he was. Not on a par with Ghandi, shall we say. 

 

Would you like Iran to possess a nuclear weapon? I do not.

 

Nothing happened, of any consequence whilst Bolton held office. Entirely true.

 

Any old Tom, Dick or Harry has been bombing poor old Syria. Syria has been bombing Syria! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

if they hit syria with a tactical nuke then they have used them but no one has used them except america in japan so its hardly a boast to say ''hey we must be good guys because we haven't nuked our neighbour!'

'If they hit Syria with a tactical nuke....'

 

'If I hit Muhammad Ali with a sweet right cross....'

 

Well neither of those came to pass.

 

Come now, live in the real word.

 

You might wish this has happened, it might suit your particular world-view, but sorry, it did not happen.

 

Let us never speak of this again.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Strummer101 said:

Tell me Soleimani was a good guy? I do not believe that he was. Not on a par with Ghandi, shall we say. 

 

I think to some iranians he was probably seen as a shield against israeli aggression

 

14 minutes ago, Strummer101 said:

Would you like Iran to possess a nuclear weapon? I do not.

 

I don't want anyone to possess nuclear weapons

 

14 minutes ago, Strummer101 said:

Nothing happened, of any consequence whilst Bolton held office. Entirely true.

 

incorrect. Israel carried out targetted hits against key iranian personnel which is an act of war

 

imagine for example if the russians murdered britains top military officer and a bunch of top british scientists. Nato would treat that as a declaration of war

 

14 minutes ago, Strummer101 said:

Any old Tom, Dick or Harry has been bombing poor old Syria. Syria has been bombing Syria! 

 

no not anyone.

 

Al qaeda and al nusra are clearly the creatures of the CIA and mossad

 

They were getting hospital treatment in israel, driving around in US hardware and being given weapons training by british BATT teams who claimed they were training 'moderate rebels' who then would go over and join the non-moderate rebels!

 

That is a proxy war by the zionists

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Strummer101 said:

'If they hit Syria with a tactical nuke....'

 

'If I hit Muhammad Ali with a sweet right cross....'

 

Well neither of those came to pass.

 

Come now, live in the real word.

 

You might wish this has happened, it might suit your particular world-view, but sorry, it did not happen.

 

Let us never speak of this again.

 

did israel use white phosphorus on gazans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Strummer101 said:

Yes, terrible.

 

and do you think that the rebels who are just creatures of the zionist intelligence agencies carried out gas attacks on syrian people that the western media including the new york times then tried to blame on assad in order to justify a ground war in syria that would have led to the deaths of who knows how many people?

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

I think to some iranians he was probably seen as a shield against israeli aggression

 

 

I don't want anyone to possess nuclear weapons

 

 

incorrect. Israel carried out targetted hits against key iranian personnel which is an act of war

 

imagine for example if the russians murdered britains top military officer and a bunch of top british scientists. Nato would treat that as a declaration of war

 

 

no not anyone.

 

Al qaeda and al nusra are clearly the creatures of the CIA and mossad

 

They were getting hospital treatment in israel, driving around in US hardware and being given weapons training by british BATT teams who claimed they were training 'moderate rebels' who then would go over and join the non-moderate rebels!

 

That is a proxy war by the zionists

Mostly a fact-free zone and full of false analogies I am afraid.

 

I will correct tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

no i think it is a country under siege:

 

 

main-qimg-4d67205db3b8a9d820ca77d77364f9

The more that I look at this map, the more I realise that you are winding me up, you must be. Here is why;

 

We know why the US has bases in that part of the world, don't we? Reason No.1 - Oil. To guarantee their energy supply. Most have been there for decades.

 

Reason No.2 - Strategic interest. There is a rather large country, missing from that map, if you head north. You understand my point, I am sure. Nothing to do with Iran then.

 

Would you let me know the number of those bases that were opened, directly to counter any perceived threat from Iran? I would hazard that it will be none of them. I would further wager that many of them were established when the Shah was on the Peacock Throne, in other words, Iran was a US ally.

 

I doubt that the US ever had 8-9 bases in Afghanistan. As of this afternoon, they have zero.

 

I think that you will have been well aware of everything mentioned above. So why the map? It has to be wishful thinking on your part?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2021 at 6:15 PM, Strummer101 said:

The more that I look at this map, the more I realise that you are winding me up, you must be. Here is why;

 

We know why the US has bases in that part of the world, don't we? Reason No.1 - Oil. To guarantee their energy supply. Most have been there for decades.

 

Reason No.2 - Strategic interest. There is a rather large country, missing from that map, if you head north. You understand my point, I am sure. Nothing to do with Iran then.

 

Would you let me know the number of those bases that were opened, directly to counter any perceived threat from Iran? I would hazard that it will be none of them. I would further wager that many of them were established when the Shah was on the Peacock Throne, in other words, Iran was a US ally.

 

I doubt that the US ever had 8-9 bases in Afghanistan. As of this afternoon, they have zero.

 

I think that you will have been well aware of everything mentioned above. So why the map? It has to be wishful thinking on your part?

Is that the best you have got Mr Case? Offer up a reply with some substance, maybe?

 

I see my reply to you 1992 video has also gone unanswered. When you are ready? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2021 at 6:15 PM, Strummer101 said:

The more that I look at this map, the more I realise that you are winding me up, you must be. Here is why;

 

We know why the US has bases in that part of the world, don't we? Reason No.1 - Oil. To guarantee their energy supply. Most have been there for decades.

 

Iran has huge reserves of oil and no rothschild central bank

 

HPV0g.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
13 hours ago, Strummer101 said:

Is that the best you have got Mr Case? Offer up a reply with some substance, maybe?

 

I see my reply to you 1992 video has also gone unanswered. When you are ready? 

 

Quoting yourself and demanding prompt responses..? 

You feeling okay Strummer ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2021 at 12:45 AM, Macnamara said:

 

I think to some iranians he was probably seen as a shield against israeli aggression

 

 

I don't want anyone to possess nuclear weapons

 

 

incorrect. Israel carried out targetted hits against key iranian personnel which is an act of war

 

imagine for example if the russians murdered britains top military officer and a bunch of top british scientists. Nato would treat that as a declaration of war

 

 

no not anyone.

 

Al qaeda and al nusra are clearly the creatures of the CIA and mossad

 

They were getting hospital treatment in israel, driving around in US hardware and being given weapons training by british BATT teams who claimed they were training 'moderate rebels' who then would go over and join the non-moderate rebels!

 

That is a proxy war by the zionists

 

I think this is Strummer's Hasbara reference book.

 

"Bottom line: What will happen if we fail to get the world to care about the fact that Israeli parents in southern Israel need to literally dodge rockets when they drive their children to kindergarten in the morning? What will happen if the world allows Iran, the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism, to get nuclear weapons? What will Israel do if bad press causes American citizens to ask our government to turn its back on Israel? Why do I care so much about the success of your communications efforts? I care because I never want our children to live through what my family and yours lived through the Holocaust"

 

https://www.transcend.org/tms/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/sf-israel-projects-2009-global-language-dictionary.pdf

 

page_1_thumb_large.jpg

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...