Jump to content

How many countries will Biden invade during his term?

CarpeDiem

By CarpeDiem
in War & Terror

 Share

Recommended Posts

Saved

Saved

Posted
Posted
On 22/01/2021 at 7:23 AM, screamingeagle said:

yes he does because his masters knew he will be gone and the new puppet will reverse the decisions

 

trump only mission was to polarise us public so the unrests can unfold 

 

it is called a theater and it is fot the gullible people 

Looks that way to me, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Grumpy Owl

Grumpy Owl

Posted
Posted
On 1/27/2021 at 7:08 PM, bamboozooka said:

As of January 25, 2021, Biden has “issued 33 executive orders, actions, proclamations, memoranda, and agency directives,” according to CNN. Twenty-one of these, according to the White House website, are executive orders.

The mind-blowing number of executive orders is far from the norm.

For context: former President Bill Clinton signed two in 1993, George W. Bush signed two in 2001, Barack Obama signed five in 2009 and Donald Trump signed four in 2017.

 

hmmm 33

 

Biden probably thought those people wanted his autograph.

 

😆

 

"Could you sign this please Mr President?"

-"Sure!"

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Macnamara

Macnamara

Posted
Posted

Healing bombs? CNN’s love affair with airstrikes continues, as network gushes over Biden attack on Syria

27 Feb, 2021 14:12
Joe Biden’s Syrian airstrikes were hailed by CNN as a masterstroke of diplomacy, delivered with “a scalpel instead of a sledgehammer.” Strangely enough, it sang the same song when Donald Trump launched his own strikes.

Delivered on Thursday by two F-15 fighter jets, Biden’s airstrikes knocked out several facilities the Pentagon says were used by Iranian-backed militias in Syria. The Pentagon described the strikes as “defensive” in nature, and as a response to rocket attacks on US and coalition troops in Iraq. A militia spokesman said one fighter was killed and several wounded.

CNN was ecstatic. In an article published on Friday evening, analyst Nick Patton Walsh described the attack as “minimally lethal” and “a small signal that the Biden administration is not gun-shy.” Unlike President Donald Trump’s “sledgehammer” diplomacy, the “scalpel”-like strike was a reasonable move in Biden’s efforts to bring Iran back into the 2015 nuclear deal, which Trump pulled out of in 2018.

“In the protracted effort to see who will blink first between Tehran and the Biden administration, Thursday’s strikes on Iranian-backed militia in Syria are but a tiny insect floating into both their gazes,” read a particularly florid paragraph, in an article that went on to praise Biden’s cabinet of Iran “experts” and criticize the “damage the last four years of Trump has done to faith in careful American diplomacy.”

That CNN supports Joe Biden, at least compared to Trump, is no surprise. But the liberal network seemingly has a soft spot for airstrikes as a diplomatic tool. When Trump launched his own strikes on the same militia in Syria in 2019, he received some rare praise from CNN.

Trump’s strikes were “a sensible use of force,” analyst Peter Bergen wrote at the time, in an unusual departure from the network’s usual anti-Trump hyperbole.

https://www.rt.com/usa/516769-biden-airstrikes-praised-cnn/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Macnamara

Macnamara

Posted
Posted
On 1/22/2021 at 3:22 PM, Macnamara said:

So two things that stopped during trumps tenure were:

 

-war

-american children being gunned to death in schools, followed by calls in the corporate media to end gun ownership

 

I expect both of those things to kick off again. The israelis need some sort of conflict against iran to get rid of the al aqsa mosque in order to build the third temple. I can't see anyway they would achieve that peacefully except to pull it during an earthquake which they could then blame it on

 

was the attack on the israeli ship a false flag attack to justify sparking a wider conflict?

Benjamin Netanyahu vows payback against 'our greatest enemy' Iran and blames them for attack on Israeli ship - as his forces carry out missile attack on Tehran’s forces in Syria overnight

  • Netanyahu said blast on an Israeli vessel was 'indeed an Iranian act, that is clear' 
  • He said Israel was 'striking back' at Iran, hours after missile alert in Damascus 
  • Biden administration also carried out airstrikes on Iran allies in Syria last week 

By Tim Stickings For Mailonline and Afp

Published: 08:13, 1 March 2021 | Updated: 22:28, 1 March 2021

Benjamin Netanyahu said today that Israel was 'striking back' at its 'greatest enemy' Iran as he blamed the Islamic republic for a recent attack on an Israeli-owned ship. The Israeli PM said the blast on the MV Helios Ray which left two holes in the vessel's side in the Gulf of Oman last week was 'indeed an Iranian act, that is clear'. 'As for a reaction - you know my policy,' he continued. 'Iran is Israel's greatest enemy, I'm determined to block it, we're striking at it throughout the region.' Netanyahu's remarks came hours after Syrian air defences intercepted what they said were Israeli missiles over Damascus, in an area where Iranian Revolutionary Guards and their Hezbollah allies are believed to be present. It also comes days after Joe Biden ordered airstrikes on Syria to target an Iranian-backed militia, with the US president warning Tehran that it cannot act with impunity. But Iran denied the allegation that it was behind the ship explosion, accusing Netanyahu of suffering from 'an obsession with Iran'. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9311537/Benjamin-Netanyahu-vows-payback-against-greatest-enemy-Iran.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Macnamara

Macnamara

Posted
Posted
On 1/22/2021 at 3:22 PM, Macnamara said:

So two things that stopped during trumps tenure were:

 

-war

-american children being gunned to death in schools, followed by calls in the corporate media to end gun ownership

 

I expect both of those things to kick off again. The israelis need some sort of conflict against iran to get rid of the al aqsa mosque in order to build the third temple. I can't see anyway they would achieve that peacefully except to pull it during an earthquake which they could then blame it on

BREAKING: Israel Sabotaged Iranian Ship, Caused Massive Oil Spill on Own Shores

March 12, 2021 by Richard Silverstein

The US reports did not offer details about specific attacks.  But a high level Israeli government official told me that Israel not only had done this, but he offered details on one of the attacks.  But before saying more about this, some background is in order.

A few weeks ago, a then-unknown tanker deposited 1,000 tons of oil into the Mediterranean close to Israeli shores.  The oil eventually washed up on Israel’s beaches causing the worst environmental disaster in the country’s history.  Sea animals were coated in sludge and turtles and a whale died as a result.  Thousands of Israeli volunteered to clean up the mess. Israel’s famous beaches have been off limits for weeks.

At first, Israel blamed a Greek oil tanker which had been in the vicinity of the original oil spill.  But later it admitted that this identification was wrong.  Then the Israeli environment minister, Gila Gamliel, blamed Iran for the catastrophe. She purportedly did so without consulting Israeli intelligence officials, .  She claimed that a, Iranian ship, the Emerald, had left an Iranian port loaded with oil. Its destination was Syria, which maintains regular trade with Iran.  Because of international sanctions, Iran’s ability to sell its oil is limited and it must resort to these sorts of ad hoc commercial relationships.

When Gamliel pinned the blame, there was something like consternation within the Israeli intelligence apparatus.  Officials told the press they knew nothing about her claim and that she hadn’t consulted with them.  It made her look lame and I reported as such here.  But my Israeli source tells me that she was indeed correct.  The Emerald did cause the oil spill.  But how did it happen?  The information conveyed to me by the source is under Israeli military censorship, as you will see below.

This was not a deliberate attack by Iran on Israel as Gamliel claimed.  In fact, It was precisely the reverse.  It was a deliberate attack by Israel on the Iranian vessel.  Israel’s naval commando unit, Shayetet 13 (they were the ones who murdered 10 Turkish citizens on the Mavi Marmara) covertly attached a mine to the Emerald.  The intent was to cause minor damage that would send a message to Iran that its own attacks on Gulf shipping would bring a cost.  This Times of London report written by Haaretz columnist Anshel Pfeiffer confirms my source:

They [Israeli attacks on the Emerald and other Iranian vessels]  would have been planned jointly by Mossad, Israel’s external intelligence service, and military intelligence, which together have responsibility for tracking Iranian targets, and would have been carried out by Flotilla 13, the special operations unit of the navy.

However, the commandos didn’t realize that the Emerald was a rusty old hulk in desperately ill-repair.  Here’s how the Wall Street Journal characterized some of the ships used to skirt Iran sanctions:

Shippers often declare false destinations, use old, rusted tankers to avoid notice, and sometimes transfer oil from one ship to another at sea to avoid detection, regional military officials said.

The Israeli mine, which was supposed to cause minor damage, actually ripped a hole so big that much of the contents of the ship’s hold leaked into the Mediterranean. This is what caused the Israeli environmental disaster: Israel itself.

https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2021/03/12/breaking-israel-sabotaged-iranian-ship-caused-massive-oil-spill-on-its-own-shores/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Macnamara

Macnamara

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 3/2/2021 at 1:02 AM, Macnamara said:

was the attack on the israeli ship a false flag attack to justify sparking a wider conflict?

 

most likely as the israelis love blasting holes in the sides of ships....see post above

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Macnamara

Macnamara

Posted
Posted
On 1/22/2021 at 3:22 PM, Macnamara said:

So two things that stopped during trumps tenure were:

-war

-american children being gunned to death in schools, followed by calls in the corporate media to end gun ownership

 

I expect both of those things to kick off again. The israelis need some sort of conflict against iran to get rid of the al aqsa mosque in order to build the third temple. I can't see anyway they would achieve that peacefully except to pull it during an earthquake which they could then blame it on

 

Now will come the, two minute hate, shrill cries to disarm the public from the woke-marxists leaving only the criminals and the state armed and law abiding people at the mercy of both:

8 killed in string of shootings at THREE different spas across metro Atlanta, Georgia

17 Mar, 2021 00:36 / Updated 2 hours ago
A series of shootings at three different spas in the Atlanta, Georgia area has left at least eight people dead and several others injured. A 21-year-old suspect was taken into custody following an intense manhunt.

Police responded to reports of a shooting at Young’s Asian Massage near Acworth, Georgia – a suburb of Atlanta – on Tuesday, finding five suffering from gunshot wounds when they arrived, Cherokee County Sheriff’s spokesperson Howard Baker told local media. Two were pronounced dead at the scene, while two more victims succumbed to their injuries after being transported to a hospital for treatment.

https://www.rt.com/usa/518304-atlanta-spa-shooting-spree/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
peter

peter

Posted
Posted
On 1/22/2021 at 5:18 PM, oz93666 said:

 

A NWO pupped doesn't cancel funding to WHO ... stop immigration ...say global warming is a con and stop funding that ....  

He was bought and payed for by Israel, controlled opposition comes to mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Mikheil

Mikheil

Posted
Posted

Biden won't be President for long. I suspect they have plans to somehow get Hillary Clinton into the driving seat. I don't know (or care) very much about the top echelons of America. Perhaps, Biden will very shortly shuffle off his mortal coil and join the warmongers invisible.  Then Kackling Kunt Kamal will be president, but who will then become Vice President?  Can they nominate Hillary? Can Pelosi be VP?

 

In both cases, (especially Hillary), if they are appointed as VP, then I wouldn't bet a single cent on the lifespan of Kamal. She will 'suddenly' have a stroke, or heart attack, Just like Forster in South Africa. That would leave Hillary and / or Pelosi to start WW 3 by a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Russia. Which has always been Hillary's dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DarianF

DarianF

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mikheil said:

Biden won't be President for long. I suspect they have plans to somehow get Hillary Clinton into the driving seat. I don't know (or care) very much about the top echelons of America. Perhaps, Biden will very shortly shuffle off his mortal coil and join the warmongers invisible.  Then Kackling Kunt Kamal will be president, but who will then become Vice President?  Can they nominate Hillary? Can Pelosi be VP?

 

In both cases, (especially Hillary), if they are appointed as VP, then I wouldn't bet a single cent on the lifespan of Kamal. She will 'suddenly' have a stroke, or heart attack, Just like Forster in South Africa. That would leave Hillary and / or Pelosi to start WW 3 by a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Russia. Which has always been Hillary's dream.

 

At this point, it's all so clownish, these titles and positions mean nothing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mikheil

Mikheil

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, DarianF said:

 

At this point, it's all so clownish, these titles and positions mean nothing.

Sorry, I disagree, sure it's a bunch of brainwashed clowns, but they MUST present something that the rest of the world's idiots can swallow. Thus, the titles and the bullshit is essential. America is on the point of collapse. It's literally bankrupt as well as morally bankrupt. They are drowning in debt, the Dollar is slipping away, slowly but surely. The American people are soonto be mostly "invaders" from the south. The only way to rally the brainwashed masses is to start a false flag operation that will give the President the chance to launch a nuclear strike, claiming it's "defensive" as the nuclear missiles rain down, the masses will rise up to support "The President" and world peace <excuse the pun>.

 

NATO, the UK and the EU will rally behind "The President" thus ensuring our destruction as well.

 

This will leave Africa, India, Australia and South America and the top Jews, who are buried in their bunkers thousands of feet underground until it's all over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DarianF

DarianF

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mikheil said:

Sorry, I disagree, sure it's a bunch of brainwashed clowns, but they MUST present something that the rest of the world's idiots can swallow. Thus, the titles and the bullshit is essential. America is on the point of collapse. It's literally bankrupt as well as morally bankrupt. They are drowning in debt, the Dollar is slipping away, slowly but surely. The American people are soonto be mostly "invaders" from the south. The only way to rally the brainwashed masses is to start a false flag operation that will give the President the chance to launch a nuclear strike, claiming it's "defensive" as the nuclear missiles rain down, the masses will rise up to support "The President" and world peace <excuse the pun>.

 

NATO, the UK and the EU will rally behind "The President" thus ensuring our destruction as well.

 

This will leave Africa, India, Australia and South America and the top Jews, who are buried in their bunkers thousands of feet underground until it's all over. 

 

I can't take any of it seriously anymore. The office of the president and all that stuff that used to have some air of respectability to it has all been pissed away. It's all just a giant freak show circus to me now and completely meaningless and empty. Might as well put bozo the clown up there I mean seriously what would be the difference.

 

But I understand what you're saying. To the brain dead masses, I guess it still is all legitimate in their eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...
Macnamara

Macnamara

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 1/22/2021 at 3:22 PM, Macnamara said:

So two things that stopped during trumps tenure were:

-war

-american children being gunned to death in schools, followed by calls in the corporate media to end gun ownership

I expect both of those things to kick off again. The israelis need some sort of conflict against iran to get rid of the al aqsa mosque in order to build the third temple. I can't see anyway they would achieve that peacefully except to pull it during an earthquake which they could then blame it on

Dominic Raab FINALLY condemns Iranian attack on tanker in gulf that killed British Army veteran and promises a 'response' after he was accused of IGNORING Israel's calls for action

  • Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab has blamed Iran for a 'suicide' drone strike on tanker that killed two people  
  • Islamist regime launched drone attack on an oil tanker that killed a British Army veteran off the coast of Oman 
  • Foreign Minister Yair Lapid accused Iran of being behind the attack and urged Britain to take action 
  • Mr Raab has now swung out against Iran, blaming the regime in Tehran for the 'unlawful and callous attack'
  • He also vowed to work with British allies 'on a concerted response to this unacceptable attack'
  • Henry Jackson Society think-tank accused the Government of 'ignoring Iran's malfeasances for too long'   

By Jack Wright For Mailonline

Published: 10:07 BST, 1 August 2021 | Updated: 18:35 BST, 1 August 2021 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9849039/Fury-Dominic-Raab-IGNORES-calls-Israel-retaliate-against-Iran-attack-oil-tanker.html

 

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Strummer101

Strummer101

Posted
Posted

 The Biden administration is open to several potential ways to tighten a much-stretched 2001 law that serves as the domestic legal basis for the open-ended “forever war” against terrorists around the world, a senior State Department official told Congress on Tuesday. When Mr. Biden took office, he imposed new limits on counterterrorism drone strikes and commando raids away from conventional battlefields — places like Somalia and Yemen — by generally requiring advance White House permission. And in April, he ordered a withdrawal of American ground forces from Afghanistan, saying that “it is time to end the forever war.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/03/us/politics/biden-war-powers.html

 

Hmmm, well he gets a good headline. It may be rendered academic, if the despicable Iranian regime continues with their brainless 'piracy' manoeuvres.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...