Jump to content

Vaccine injuries and medics speaking out.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 487
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

This is a tough post for me to write on here but it needs saying.   Most of the regulars on here will know me a as a fairly frequent poster but usually only post when I’ve got something impo

An important letter. And also worth noting is the fact that the hospital staff generally are not been told to ask any questions about vaccination status on on all these brain and blood clot injuries a

Depopulation.   

Posted Images

As French big pharma firm gets away with a FINE for 2,000 deaths, who can blame vaccine refuseniks for their distrust?  (Refusenicks = people who can see through the lies!)

Although guilty of causing around 2,000 fatalities with a toxic diet drug, none of Servier’s bosses went to prison.
It’s little wonder that Covid-19 vaccine sceptics believe that business, not safety, is big pharma’s main concern.

When everyone at the top of one of France’s big pharma giants avoids serving prison time, and the company faces a fine of just €2.7 million for producing a drug that led to the death of around 2,000 people over 33 years, you start to understand the mistrust at the heart of French Covid-19 vaccine refuseniks.

 

The drug at the centre of the scandal, Mediator, was produced by Servier for use by diabetics, but it ended up being prescribed as an appetite suppressant taken by more than five million people until its withdrawal from the market in 2009, a significant number of whom developed fatal heart problems as a result.

First alerted to the toxicity of the drug in the 1990s, Servier “never took the necessary measures,” said the president of the Paris Criminal Court, Sylvie Daunis, in her deliberation.

 

How would that compare to the treatment expected of those who ran a business that made sausages which led to the deaths of a couple thousand customers? The sausage market would disappear overnight. Big pharma is immune to such effects.

 

This latest scandal tells us something about the substantial number of vaccine refuseniks in La Republique. The French people just do not trust whatever the government and big pharma is telling them anymore, particularly when it’s something new. It’s not so much about vaccines in general – after all, French children need 11 immunisations before they can even start school – it’s about THIS vaccine. 

 

And that is a massive problem for a government wanting to vaccinate an adult population of 52 million. According to official projections, at the current rate, that goal won’t be achieved until April next year, nearly nine months later than initially hoped. Inevitably, that delay will mean further deaths on top of an already grim toll of more than 94,000 lives lost to Covid-19.

 

As recently as November last year, a report from Imperial College found only 25% of adults said they would willingly take the Covid-19 jab if it was available to them. Since then, that figure has climbed to 40%, still low compared to the 77% in the UK. It also means that 60% of the people don’t want the jab. Hesitance might be slowly diminishing, but a study in the Lancet last month found within that 60%, a hardcore of 29% would say a rock-solid ‘Non!’ to any Covid-19 vaccine.

That figure of nearly one in three helps explain why take-up for the Covid-19 vaccine has been markedly slower in France than many other European countries, with just 11.56% of the population immunised so far.

 

However, the damage to public trust is not just a result of the failures of big pharma. The National Medicines Safety Agency (ANSM), the French health police responsible for oversight of the industry, was singled out by the criminal court for its failure to ban the sale of Mediator earlier, and fined €303,000 for its role in the scandal.

 

The people of France are right to ask themselves who they can trust when being asked to take a vaccine. Can scandal-ridden pharmaceutical giants be relied on to put people before profits? Are politicians really on the lookout for what’s best for all, and not just for themselves? Is the ANSM fit for purpose?

 

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/519531-big-pharma-vaccine-deaths-fine/

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another doctor whose pissed off!!

He doesn’t want the vaccine because he’s already tested positive for antibodies ( he’s not a sceptic of it) YET!  But he’s fuming he’s being pressured to take something he doesn’t think he needs as it goes against all the science. In his own words there is not a vaccine that gives any better immunity than catching something naturally. If push comes to shove he has said he will take the Johnson & Johnson so he can travel.  But something is brewing there and he’s pissed off!  Come on Doc. Wake up! 
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/16/2021 at 8:41 AM, Liberty said:

Doctors, Scientists Write Urgent Open Letter Warning About COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns

Screen-Shot-2021-03-15-at-6.31.30-AM-777

POSTED BY: DOCTORS FOR COVID ETHICS MARCH 15, 2021

Emer Cooke, Executive Director, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

28 February 2021

Dear Sirs/Mesdames,

FOR THE URGENT PERSONAL ATTENTION OF: EMER COOKE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY

As physicians and scientists, we are supportive in principle of the use of new medical interventions which are appropriately developed and deployed, having obtained informed consent from the patient. This stance encompasses vaccines in the same way as therapeutics.

We note that a wide range of side effects is being reported following vaccination of previously healthy younger individuals with the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. Moreover, there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents. While we recognise that these occurrences might, every one of them, have been unfortunate coincidences, we are concerned that there has been and there continues to be inadequate scrutiny of the possible causes of illness or death under these circumstances, and especially so in the absence of post-mortems examinations.

In particular, we question whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

As a matter of great urgency, we herewith request that the EMA provide us with responses to the following issues:

1. Following intramuscular injection, it must be expected that the gene-based vaccines will reach the bloodstream and disseminate throughout the body [1]. We request evidence that this possibility was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

2. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that the vaccines will remain entrapped in the circulation and be taken up by endothelial cells. There is reason to assume that this will happen particularly at sites of slow blood flow, i.e. in small vessels and capillaries [2]. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

3. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that during expression of the vaccines’ nucleic acids, peptides derived from the spike protein will be presented via the MHC I — pathway at the luminal surface of the cells. Many healthy individuals have CD8-lymphocytes that recognize such peptides, which may be due to prior COVID infection, but also to cross-reactions with other types of Coronavirus [3; 4] [5]. We must assume that these lymphocytes will mount an attack on the respective cells. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

4. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that endothelial damage with subsequent triggering of blood coagulation via platelet activation will ensue at countless sites throughout the body. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

5. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that this will lead to a drop in platelet counts, appearance of D-dimers in the blood, and to myriad ischaemic lesions throughout the body including in the brain, spinal cord and heart. Bleeding disorders might occur in the wake of this novel type of DIC-syndrome including, amongst other possibilities, profuse bleedings and haemorrhagic stroke. We request evidence that all these possibilities were excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

6. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor on platelets, which results in their activation [6]. Thrombocytopenia has been reported in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection [7]. Thrombocytopenia has also been reported in vaccinated individuals [8]. We request evidence that the potential danger of platelet activation that would also lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was excluded with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

7. The sweeping across the globe of SARS-CoV-2 created a pandemic of illness associated with many deaths. However, by the time of consideration for approval of the vaccines, the health systems of most countries were no longer under imminent threat of being overwhelmed because a growing proportion of the world had already been infected and the worst of the pandemic had already abated. Consequently, we demand conclusive evidence that an actual emergency existed at the time of the EMA granting Conditional Marketing Authorisation to the manufacturers of all three vaccines, to justify their approval for use in humans by the EMA, purportedly because of such an emergency.

Should all such evidence not be available, we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA.

There are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute “human experimentation”, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.

In view of the urgency of the situation, we request that you reply to this email within seven days and address all our concerns substantively. Should you choose not to comply with this reasonable request, we will make this letter public.

 

 

Doctors for Covid Ethics have received their reply from the EMA dated 23rd March 2021. The letter can be found here:

 

https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/reply-from-the-european-medicines-agency-to-doctors-for-covid-ethics-march-23-2021-d6760984dd06

 

They submitted a rebuttal yesterday which pulls no punches! The letter calls for proper scientific evidence from the EMA. Doctors for Covid Ethics question whether the EMA is "shrinking from open debate and the truth", at the behest of "corporate and political actors", whilst migrating "from the consulting room to a geopolitical stage".

 

The EMA is reminded of the Nuremberg Code to which it, and all politicians, are bound including the principle of informed consent. It is suggested that the EMA is therefore, by continuing to authorise Covid "vaccines", endorsing medical experimentation and crimes against humanity.

 

 

https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/rebuttal-letter-to-european-medicines-agency-from-doctors-for-covid-ethics-april-1-2021-7d867f0121e

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

Doctors for Covid Ethics have received their reply from the EMA dated 23rd March 2021. The letter can be found here:

 

https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/reply-from-the-european-medicines-agency-to-doctors-for-covid-ethics-march-23-2021-d6760984dd06

 

They submitted a rebuttal yesterday which pulls no punches! The letter calls for proper scientific evidence from the EMA. Doctors for Covid Ethics question whether the EMA is "shrinking from open debate and the truth", at the behest of "corporate and political actors", whilst migrating "from the consulting room to a geopolitical stage".

 

The EMA is reminded of the Nuremberg Code to which it, and all politicians, are bound including the principle of informed consent. It is suggested that the EMA is therefore, by continuing to authorise Covid "vaccines", endorsing medical experimentation and crimes against humanity.

 

 

https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/rebuttal-letter-to-european-medicines-agency-from-doctors-for-covid-ethics-april-1-2021-7d867f0121e

 

Thanks Eve. That’s a good read.  It looks like they can’t provide the evidence they are being asked for.  Just platitudes of its safety, like the press are doing. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

This rapid response in the BMJ by a consultant based in London makes for interesting reading.

 

The consultant refers to high level of sickness after health service staff receive their Covid injection which is impacting on day to day functioning of the service and which is going unreported. Questions are also raised of longitudinal safety data, bodily autonomy and free and informed choice.

 

https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n810/rr-14

 

Quote

Dear Editor

 

I have had more vaccines in my life than most people and come from a place of significant personal and professional experience in relation to this pandemic, having managed a service during the first 2 waves and all the contingencies that go with that.

 

Nevertheless, what I am currently struggling with is the failure to report the reality of the morbidity caused by our current vaccination program within the health service and staff population. The levels of sickness after vaccination is unprecedented and staff are getting very sick and some with neurological symptoms which is having a huge impact on the health service function. Even the young and healthy are off for days, some for weeks, and some requiring medical treatment. Whole teams are being taken out as they went to get vaccinated together.

 

Mandatory vaccination in this instance is stupid, unethical and irresponsible when it comes to protecting our staff and public health. We are in the voluntary phase of vaccination, and encouraging staff to take an unlicensed product that is impacting on their immediate health, and I have direct experience of staff contracting Covid AFTER vaccination and probably transmitting it. In fact, it is clearly stated that these vaccine products do not offer immunity or stop transmission. In which case why are we doing it? There is no longitudinal safety data (a couple of months of trial data at best) available and these products are only under emergency licensing. What is to say that there are no longitudinal adverse effects that we may face that may put the entire health sector at risk?

 

Flu is a massive annual killer, it inundates the health system, it kills young people, the old the comorbid, and yet people can chose whether or not they have that vaccine (which had been around for a long time). And you can list a whole number of other examples of vaccines that are not mandatory and yet they protect against diseases of higher consequence.

 

Coercion and mandating medical treatments on our staff, of members of the public especially when treatments are still in the experimental phase, are firmly in the realms of a totalitarian Nazi dystopia and fall far outside of our ethical values as the guardians of health.

 

I and my entire family have had COVID. This as well as most of my friends, relatives and colleagues. I have recently lost a relatively young family member with comorbidities to heart failure, resulting from the pneumonia caused by Covid. Despite this, I would never debase myself and agree, that we should abandon our liberal principles and the international stance on bodily sovereignty, free informed choice and human rights and support unprecedented coercion of professionals, patients and people to have experimental treatments with limited safety data. This and the policies that go with this are more of a danger to our society than anything else we have faced over the last year.

 

What has happened to “my body my choice?” What has happened to scientific and open debate? If I don’t prescribe an antibiotic to a patient who doesn’t need it as they are healthy, am I anti-antibiotics? Or an antibiotic-denier? Is it not time that people truly thought about what is happening to us and where all of this is taking us?

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The moving fibers are MORGELLONs.  READ all the way through  (manipulation of 'God gene' VMAT2 gene per Bill Gates)

 

INFO >>

https://morgellonscentral.wordpress.com/2014/12/18/what-are-the-morgellons-fibers/

 

https://morgellonscentral.wordpress.com/what-is-morgellons/

 

https://adrenogate.net/wp/2021/01/25/nanofibers-found-on-q-tips-used-for-pcr-tests-nanofibers-morgellons-disease-chemtrail-artificial-nueral-mind-control-network/

 

So that’s why they were so eager to get all this testing done and were so aggressively jamming those Q-tips so far up everyones nose.

 

At first I thought it might have been a genetic harvesting operation, but this is a lot more deliberate and makes a lot more sense. Unfortunately it doesn’t take forcing a Q-tip up your nose to get infected with these nanoparticles. They’ve been spraying these fibers in the form of Chemtrails for decades now. I’ve heard that nearly 90% of the population would have to have been infected by now. It seems that Morgellons disease is the body responding and trying to expel these nanoparticles that have been embedded within the tissue. Why only a very small portion of the population has this kind of reaction is unknown.

 

 

Bill Gates and VMAT2 gene

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwrJG1jtT4M

 

===========================================================

 

HERE IS MSM DISINFO ABOUT THESE 'CREATURES" - FYI

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-swabs-idUSKBN29P2Q5

and 

https://adrenogate.net/wp/2020/09/24/astrazeneca-trial-vaccine-for-covid-19-causes-insane-neurological-side-effects-volunteer-says-theyve-killed-god-i-cant-feel-god-anymore-my-soul-is-dead-after-the-vaccine/

 

 

Edited by BB_Stormchaser
miss placed info
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Ed8 said:

On the Israeli Bureau of Statistics website they have deaths updated to February 2021 https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/LochutTlushim/2020/פטירות-שנה-חודש.xlsx

 

Deaths there look to be 10-20% higher than this time last year.

Yes - on euromomo it ends on 12 week... It's weird because until now they were uploading stats every week. It's first week they forgot to update the data - last time it was 'little excess' 🙄

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/2/2021 at 1:58 PM, clownworld said:

Anyone know any women who have had any of the vaccines? If they're pre menopausal, ask them about their periods since the vaccine.

 

I know four women who have had it , and their periods have stopped.  Younger women, pressured into it through work (all work in different fields, one in the USA) and they've all had dysmonnorhoea. The media are framing it as "ehrmehgerd yoo guise, lockdown be making hormones go craycray!!" but that's a lie.

 

 

Anyone heard of this at all?

 

Lots of reports on Mumsnet about periods being delayed, or stopping early, or having not arrived at all. My 29 year old friend reported her period came 2 weeks early, then the next one only lasted a few days. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/3/2021 at 1:55 PM, Human10 said:

I find in UK word 'natural' is widely overused...

I read years ago that there is no legal definition of natural . Example. On shampoos , soaps etc... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/19/2021 at 8:17 PM, Mitochondrial Eve said:

I have pinched this from the Stolen History forum from a post by SkyDog.

 

I am not sure what the original source is for this document, but it is a 73 page compilation of evidence of Covid vaccine injuries and deaths and looks very comprehensive.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FCLpbPgBu1Kb-I7Llyxv0m2SosvmsWS6/view

 

 

Similar to my previous post above, I have come across another 75 page document 'Informed Consent Matters' (updated 26th March 2021) which may be from the same original source.

 

It is better organised and presented than the previous document with sections on Covid vaccine deaths, miscarriages, social media testimonies, injuries, news from around the world, frontline workers' experiences, data from VAERS, trial data and laws.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YK0JR_lFy88Zu3rcC3L5NvL_Xr3ib6zY/view?fbclid=IwAR3BQ8psE8KOoUm-SkRfWohZQzPOHhCjgNWBUmdaFhmg1Vwei04NCKbFCLo

 

As it is on Google Drive, is there any chance @Grumpy Owl that you post it on your site as well please like you did before?

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

Similar to my previous post above, I have come across another 75 page document 'Informed Consent Matters' (updated 26th March 2021) which may be from the same original source.

 

It is better organised and presented than the previous document with sections on Covid vaccine deaths, miscarriages, social media testimonies, injuries, news from around the world, frontline workers' experiences, data from VAERS, trial data and laws.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YK0JR_lFy88Zu3rcC3L5NvL_Xr3ib6zY/view?fbclid=IwAR3BQ8psE8KOoUm-SkRfWohZQzPOHhCjgNWBUmdaFhmg1Vwei04NCKbFCLo

 

As it is on Google Drive, is there any chance @Grumpy Owl that you post it on your site as well please like you did before?

That’s really well put together. I’m saving the link.  Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Medics aren’t just speaking out now, there’s published data and very senior medical professionals now admitting direct cause between vaccine, blood clots and death.

 

This from Medscape:

 

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/948769


“The Chair of the European Medicines Agency's vaccine evaluation team, Marco Cavaleri, told an Italian newspaper: "In my opinion we can now say it, it is clear that there is an association with the vaccine. However, we still do not know what causes this reaction."

Also this:

Valneva Jab New Data 

Valneva issued  Part A of the Phase 1/2 clinical trial data for its vaccine in a press release quoting England's Health Secretary Matt Hancock as saying the jab produced "a strong immune response". 

The company said: "VLA2001 was generally safe and well tolerated across all dose groups tested, with no safety concerns identified by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board." It added that the data show: "More than 90% of all study participants developing significant levels of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein across all dose groups tested."

The vaccine, which also induced T-cell responses, will be manufactured in Livingston in Scotland.
 
Meanwhile, Vaccine Deployment Minister, Nadhim Zahawi, said the Moderna vaccine would be "in deployment around the third week of April"....
 
Apart from the dreadful writing style for an academic website they state that antibodies are created as well as T-cells, that’s quite a reaction from an RNA treatment with no off-switch, what could possibly go wrong. 🤦‍♂️
Edited by The Engineer
Adding key quote from source
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

In this explosive interview with Senior Editor Alex Newman of The New American magazine, former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) Dr. Lee Merrit explains her belief that America is currently facing what appears to be biological warfare. Whether the Communist Chinese released the COVID19 virus on purpose or by accident is impossible to know, but the implications are enormous. When it comes to the new vaccines, Dr. Merrit, a former military doctor who studied biological warfare, goes through previous animal studies on the technology and paints a dire picture. However, even though modern medical schools do not often teach it, there are ways to treat viral infections that are time-tested and effective, she concludes.

 

https://m.facebook.com/TheNewAmerican/videos/1035267880287818/


Content removed by Facebook, not surprised.


Original link here:

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/d64sdCyMdi3h/

 

95E6D4DB-2655-482D-BDBC-F5A263E78321.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

Similar to my previous post above, I have come across another 75 page document 'Informed Consent Matters' (updated 26th March 2021) which may be from the same original source.

 

It is better organised and presented than the previous document with sections on Covid vaccine deaths, miscarriages, social media testimonies, injuries, news from around the world, frontline workers' experiences, data from VAERS, trial data and laws.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YK0JR_lFy88Zu3rcC3L5NvL_Xr3ib6zY/view?fbclid=IwAR3BQ8psE8KOoUm-SkRfWohZQzPOHhCjgNWBUmdaFhmg1Vwei04NCKbFCLo

 

As it is on Google Drive, is there any chance @Grumpy Owl that you post it on your site as well please like you did before?

 

Thanks Eve, you still have an account on my forum so you're more than welcome to post stuff like this there. 😉

 

https://thegrumpyowl.co.uk/forum/the-coronavirus-covid-19-pandemic/informed-consent-matters-frontline-workers-testimonies-vaers-reports/

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

MOD NOTE

 

Yet another thread that is spiralling out of control.

 

As per the topic title:

Vaccine injuries and medics speaking out

 

All other general COVID-19 pandemic discussions, use the Mega Thread or find a relevant topic to post in.

 

Off-topic posts will be removed from this thread.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

MOD NOTE

 

Yet another thread that is spiralling out of control.

 

As per the topic title:

Vaccine injuries and medics speaking out

 

All other general COVID-19 pandemic discussions, use the Mega Thread or find a relevant topic to post in.

 

Off-topic posts will be removed from this thread.

Sorry, one of them was me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...