Jump to content

Who Is Financing The "Incest Fantasy" Or "Sex In The Family" Porn That Is Mushrooming All Over The Internet???


HistoryIsComplex
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Scogan said:

Porn is Freedom of Self Expression... adults can freely choose to act out in various ways... between adults.  What IS ILLEGAL is the exploitation of minors, the corruption of minors.  How these big internet companies and porn sites are allowed to post their content online that can be easily accessed by a child is a CRIME but not a single one has been jailed over it.  Buttons that say ENTER only if you are 18+ are a joke.  Most don't even have that step.  You wanna know why?

 

The do-gooders don't care, they see the internet as a huge free market of ideas where kids viewing porn is unfortunate but not their problem.

 

The evil-doers don't care, they appreciate inaction by the do-gooders so they can freely exploit children.

 

The ELITE loves all of it.  

 

... there is plenty criminal elite connected evidence about human trafficking and child pedophila  ,

but nobody is doing nothing about it ,

Pedophiles and criminals have sex slaves in  harems and solomons temples , Virgin Islands , naked nuns in Holy Cathedrals and Fuckingthem Palaces , 

and then people ask who finance such criminal network , its a politically organized criminal organization , 

 ,  why dont people ask who finance bankers while bankers actually dont do nothing ever in their life ,  its slaveowners business network union , they are dealing clintons narcotics and exploiting kids in weinstein lollywood . .

those criminals have killed journalist Khashoggy and arrested Asange because they exposed their criminal network  .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/13/kings-of-cocaine-albanian-mafia-uk-drugs-crime

 

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ship-seized-in-1-3-billion-cocaine-bust-is-owned-by-jp-morgan-chase/

 

 

 

 

 

https://senatus.net/article/bill-clinton-statue-kosovo/

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_trafficking_in_Kosovo

 

 

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a32824007/jeffrey-epstein-wealth/

 

 

 

https://www.insider.com/epstein-riyadh-saudi-arabia-private-jet-2019-9

 

 

http://gvnet.com/humantrafficking/SaudiArabia.htm

 

 

clinton lolitas 2.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

clinton epstein.jpg

Edited by jupiter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If parents did their fucking job properly children wouldn't be seeing that stuff on the Internet, or have unrestricted Internet access at all. People who don't sanction and monitor their children's Internet use are bad parents, end of story.

 

As for the adults who use porn, that's their choice. If they end up unable to have intimate relationships any more because of their poor choices, it'll be their problem, too.

Edited by Ethel
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ethel said:

If parents did their fucking job properly children wouldn't be seeing that stuff on the Internet, or have unrestricted Internet access at all. People who don't sanction and monitor their children's Internet use are bad parents, end of story.

 

As for the adults who use porn, that's their choice. If they end up unable to have intimate relationships any more because of their poor choices, it'll be their problem, too.

 

Show me a kid under 24/7 parental surveillance and I'll show you a cemetery plot.  It's a fantasy to suggest parents can prevent it 100%.  And many kids raise themselves. There is a reason why brick and mortar porn stores have blocked out windows, restrict access based on age, and are not located next to a school.  But any kid under 18 can view porn in school on their own device.  Google how many teachers and students have viewed porn at school and you might change your mind about parents as the sole gatekeeper to child activity.  

 

Brian Rose has a quote I like and is easily adapted;   “I do not agree with everything you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

 

But once you refuse to DEFEND kids I'll smoke your ass.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Scogan said:

Brian Rose has a quote I like and is easily adapted;   “I do not agree with everything you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

 

I am not interested in Brian Rose, and that isn't his quote either. It goes back a very long time, and many people have said it.

 

19 hours ago, Scogan said:

But once you refuse to DEFEND kids I'll smoke your ass.  

 

Good - we're on the same page then. Given that I was abused by a paedophile at the age of five I have a lot invested in the concept of defending children.

 

But that has nothing to do with parents who are allowing their children to become addicted to technology and look at all sorts on the Internet. Okay? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Ethel said:

 

I am not interested in Brian Rose, and that isn't his quote either. It goes back a very long time, and many people have said it.

 

 

Good - we're on the same page then. Given that I was abused by a paedophile at the age of five I have a lot invested in the concept of defending children.

 

But that has nothing to do with parents who are allowing their children to become addicted to technology and look at all sorts on the Internet. Okay? 

 

I can't argue with arrogance or anyone with emotional ties to abuse.  It would be like arguing gun control with a uppity family who lost a child to a school shooting.  Have a good life.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Scogan said:

But any kid under 18 can view porn in school on their own device.  Google how many teachers and students have viewed porn at school and you might change your mind about parents as the sole gatekeeper to child activity. 

 

The problem is that it has become socially acceptable for people under 18 to have a smart phone

 

This means that even those parents who resist the nag factor and refuse to give their children the latest smart-crap will still be unable to protect their children from what other children will show them on THEIR smart-crap

 

All phones should be banned from schools. My generation made it through school without them and we didn't need to have our exam standards lowered to enable us to get into university either

 

I'm so sick of this shit

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

The problem is that it has become socially acceptable for people under 18 to have a smart phone

 

This means that even those parents who resist the nag factor and refuse to give their children the latest smart-crap will still be unable to protect their children from what other children will show them on THEIR smart-crap

 

All phones should be banned from schools. My generation made it through school without them and we didn't need to have our exam standards lowered to enable us to get into university either

 

I'm so sick of this shit

 

Because there is no profit in protecting children; there is a solution, just not a profitable one. We have credit cards that authorize transaction approval in mere seconds.  Doing so doesn't violate privacy.  In a similar fashion full access to the internet is a simple matter of authorizing user access based on DOB.  Everyone with a birth certificate and SSN is already known.  What would be wrong with adults applying for internet access, much like applying for credit?  Neither violates privacy.  The access gatekeeper would be GOOGLE, BING, all search engines.  

 

Kids and adults that don't want full internet access would have access to a limited internet (think parental control level).

 

We can make excuses and shrug our shoulders in defeat, but nothing changes unless we push for action.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...