jupiter Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 (edited) 12 hours ago, Scogan said: Porn is Freedom of Self Expression... adults can freely choose to act out in various ways... between adults. What IS ILLEGAL is the exploitation of minors, the corruption of minors. How these big internet companies and porn sites are allowed to post their content online that can be easily accessed by a child is a CRIME but not a single one has been jailed over it. Buttons that say ENTER only if you are 18+ are a joke. Most don't even have that step. You wanna know why? The do-gooders don't care, they see the internet as a huge free market of ideas where kids viewing porn is unfortunate but not their problem. The evil-doers don't care, they appreciate inaction by the do-gooders so they can freely exploit children. The ELITE loves all of it. ... there is plenty criminal elite connected evidence about human trafficking and child pedophila , but nobody is doing nothing about it , Pedophiles and criminals have sex slaves in harems and solomons temples , Virgin Islands , naked nuns in Holy Cathedrals and Fuckingthem Palaces , and then people ask who finance such criminal network , its a politically organized criminal organization , , why dont people ask who finance bankers while bankers actually dont do nothing ever in their life , its slaveowners business network union , they are dealing clintons narcotics and exploiting kids in weinstein lollywood . . those criminals have killed journalist Khashoggy and arrested Asange because they exposed their criminal network . https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/13/kings-of-cocaine-albanian-mafia-uk-drugs-crime https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ship-seized-in-1-3-billion-cocaine-bust-is-owned-by-jp-morgan-chase/ https://senatus.net/article/bill-clinton-statue-kosovo/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_trafficking_in_Kosovo https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a32824007/jeffrey-epstein-wealth/ https://www.insider.com/epstein-riyadh-saudi-arabia-private-jet-2019-9 http://gvnet.com/humantrafficking/SaudiArabia.htm Edited April 26, 2021 by jupiter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethel Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 (edited) If parents did their fucking job properly children wouldn't be seeing that stuff on the Internet, or have unrestricted Internet access at all. People who don't sanction and monitor their children's Internet use are bad parents, end of story. As for the adults who use porn, that's their choice. If they end up unable to have intimate relationships any more because of their poor choices, it'll be their problem, too. Edited April 26, 2021 by Ethel typo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scogan Posted April 26, 2021 Share Posted April 26, 2021 3 hours ago, Ethel said: If parents did their fucking job properly children wouldn't be seeing that stuff on the Internet, or have unrestricted Internet access at all. People who don't sanction and monitor their children's Internet use are bad parents, end of story. As for the adults who use porn, that's their choice. If they end up unable to have intimate relationships any more because of their poor choices, it'll be their problem, too. Show me a kid under 24/7 parental surveillance and I'll show you a cemetery plot. It's a fantasy to suggest parents can prevent it 100%. And many kids raise themselves. There is a reason why brick and mortar porn stores have blocked out windows, restrict access based on age, and are not located next to a school. But any kid under 18 can view porn in school on their own device. Google how many teachers and students have viewed porn at school and you might change your mind about parents as the sole gatekeeper to child activity. Brian Rose has a quote I like and is easily adapted; “I do not agree with everything you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” But once you refuse to DEFEND kids I'll smoke your ass. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethel Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 19 hours ago, Scogan said: Brian Rose has a quote I like and is easily adapted; “I do not agree with everything you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” I am not interested in Brian Rose, and that isn't his quote either. It goes back a very long time, and many people have said it. 19 hours ago, Scogan said: But once you refuse to DEFEND kids I'll smoke your ass. Good - we're on the same page then. Given that I was abused by a paedophile at the age of five I have a lot invested in the concept of defending children. But that has nothing to do with parents who are allowing their children to become addicted to technology and look at all sorts on the Internet. Okay? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scogan Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 31 minutes ago, Ethel said: I am not interested in Brian Rose, and that isn't his quote either. It goes back a very long time, and many people have said it. Good - we're on the same page then. Given that I was abused by a paedophile at the age of five I have a lot invested in the concept of defending children. But that has nothing to do with parents who are allowing their children to become addicted to technology and look at all sorts on the Internet. Okay? I can't argue with arrogance or anyone with emotional ties to abuse. It would be like arguing gun control with a uppity family who lost a child to a school shooting. Have a good life. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethel Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 2 minutes ago, Scogan said: Have a good life. Thanks. You too. :-) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 (edited) 20 hours ago, Scogan said: But any kid under 18 can view porn in school on their own device. Google how many teachers and students have viewed porn at school and you might change your mind about parents as the sole gatekeeper to child activity. The problem is that it has become socially acceptable for people under 18 to have a smart phone This means that even those parents who resist the nag factor and refuse to give their children the latest smart-crap will still be unable to protect their children from what other children will show them on THEIR smart-crap All phones should be banned from schools. My generation made it through school without them and we didn't need to have our exam standards lowered to enable us to get into university either I'm so sick of this shit Edited April 27, 2021 by Macnamara 3 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scogan Posted April 27, 2021 Share Posted April 27, 2021 54 minutes ago, Macnamara said: The problem is that it has become socially acceptable for people under 18 to have a smart phone This means that even those parents who resist the nag factor and refuse to give their children the latest smart-crap will still be unable to protect their children from what other children will show them on THEIR smart-crap All phones should be banned from schools. My generation made it through school without them and we didn't need to have our exam standards lowered to enable us to get into university either I'm so sick of this shit Because there is no profit in protecting children; there is a solution, just not a profitable one. We have credit cards that authorize transaction approval in mere seconds. Doing so doesn't violate privacy. In a similar fashion full access to the internet is a simple matter of authorizing user access based on DOB. Everyone with a birth certificate and SSN is already known. What would be wrong with adults applying for internet access, much like applying for credit? Neither violates privacy. The access gatekeeper would be GOOGLE, BING, all search engines. Kids and adults that don't want full internet access would have access to a limited internet (think parental control level). We can make excuses and shrug our shoulders in defeat, but nothing changes unless we push for action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted May 2, 2021 Share Posted May 2, 2021 (edited) Edited May 2, 2021 by EnigmaticWorld Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Observations Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 On 1/10/2021 at 1:11 PM, HistoryIsComplex said: Who the hell is financing this new trend? And what are they trying to teach teenage kids who watch this crud on the internet? Good thread and discussion, thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart dorrans Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 On 4/24/2021 at 2:51 PM, EnigmaticWorld said: I shall have to try and dig up some clip with Ron Jeremy where he admits that a certain demographic is heavily involved in the porn industry. It was very telling. I think it was with Jesse Lee Peterson if I remember correctly. Porn star Ron Jeremy has severe dementia and will not be trialed for rape report says.....complete shocker this one isn't it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 51 minutes ago, Stuart dorrans said: Porn star Ron Jeremy has severe dementia and will not be trialed for rape report says.....complete shocker this one isn't it that reminds me of another high profile jew who was going to face trial: greville janner. he was also said to not be mentally sound enough to be questioned in a court of law despite receiving public funds at that time to attend the house of lords he then died (we are told) and didn't need to be questioned. The jewish home secretary leon brittan who lost the dossier given to him about child abuse in the corridors of power also died before he could be questioned. Then there was jeffrey epstein.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart dorrans Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 23 minutes ago, Macnamara said: that reminds me of another high profile jew who was going to face trial: greville janner. he was also said to not be mentally sound enough to be questioned in a court of law despite receiving public funds at that time to attend the house of lords he then died (we are told) and didn't need to be questioned. The jewish home secretary leon brittan who lost the dossier given to him about child abuse in the corridors of power also died before he could be questioned. Then there was jeffrey epstein.... This is all told in the Babylonian Talmud but we aren't allowed to mention that here because it would be anti-Semitic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 36 minutes ago, Stuart dorrans said: This is all told in the Babylonian Talmud but we aren't allowed to mention that here because it would be anti-Semitic. Can you quote the bit that says so? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart dorrans Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 On 5/2/2021 at 10:54 AM, EnigmaticWorld said: MSM says woman's biggest fantasy is gang rape When I was younger I fantasized about having a man that loved me for who I am. The only women fantasising about gang bangs are commie degenerate perverts who have been brainwashed by the women's lib movement. They have destroyed their own lives with this shit and now they are hell-bent on destroying the lives of other women. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.