911 totally new solution that fits and explains the coverup.

[Adrian Evans]

      9/11. Thinking logically. An improbable answer, that fits?

What would be the circumstances, to cause the U.S. government to covertly attack 4 major public targets, within the U.S. simultaneously?

The attack being secretly well planned, as a terrorist attack, to not only fool the world, but the intended enemy targets. Designed as a surprise attack with shock and awe. Hoping, that to do so, would prevent any counterstrike or retaliation. A clean knockout surgical strike.

The nature of the attack suggests that a ground force operation would not be successful, if not foolish and open to public and world enquiry. Any obvious ground or troop engagement would create circumstances that would be detrimental to the US government’s deep coverup of the truth.

So, who could penetrate and set up forward command posts or operational locations, within the US, with a level of secrecy, impunity and hope of no discovery?

Operational locations, that needed to be kept secret, not only by the unwanted squatters but also from the world, by the US.

The only conclusion to this question, is that the unwanted squatters had caused concern, about their potential and powerful abilities to resist removal.

For instance, could it be a network of enemy spy locations with nuclear weapons? Unlikely, as the nature of the explosive attacks negates this suggestion.

Just imagine 4 secret US outposts secretly being discovered in Iran, by the Iranian government. The fact that they exist fearlessly, would suggest a strong resistance capability and an exit strategy. So, to counter this, let’s suggest the Iranians take out the surveillance posts with missiles successfully. Can you imagine a US cruise missile retaliation, because US spies were not arrested or captured, but butchered by the Iranian missile strikes? I think you can. The cruise missile strikes would demonstrate dominance, superiority and a unstoppable capability without the Iranians being in a position to retaliate at that level.

So, the improbable becomes probable. Was this a non-terrestrial infiltration and espionage, with unknown intentions and aims. Who else could create such a problem?

The US military would have certainly considered it a threat, if not an invasion, into US territory, that needed to be expunged.

So, the plan was set. Osama Bin Laden a covert CIA agent, with his unaware puppet terrorist organisation, would threaten a major attack within the US.

Iraq, the outcast nation, would be grilled early on, for information concerning a major terrorist attack in the US and set up as a patsy, for supporting the future attack. A year of planning was undertaken to create the fake attack background story and media evidence.

 

Susan Lindauer a US citizen acted as a "back channel" after diplomatic relations were cut between Iraq and the US. In her book she clearly documents that she asks the Iraqi government about a major US terrorist attack, on many occasions at least 10 months before the attack. Which they strongly denied and investigated with their intelligent services out of fear, of being accused of involvement. She, finally asked them about an attack on the WTC in August. They continued to deny any involvement. The Iraqis were then threatened by the US, with being bombed back to the stone age if they withheld any information concerning this threat.

Then on 9/11 the attack began; with US military forces being stepped down, to prevent unwanted interference. At 8:46am the North Tower was attacked, followed at 9:03am by the attack on the South Tower.

At 9:31 am President Bush calls the events in New York City an “apparent terrorist attack on our country.” The President was deliberately kept out of the loop of the covert operation, for plausible deniability. The look of confusion on his face, when told of the attack, is quite memorable.

Then at 9:37 am the western façade of the Pentagon in Washington, D.C was impacted. Within 51 minutes, an impossible coordinated fake terrorist attack was almost complete.  Three infiltrator locations were destroyed.

On September 10th former Secretary of Défense Donald Rumsfeld revealed that the Pentagon had lost a whopping $2.3 trillion. Well, in hindsight, I now believe that the previous day's announcement was a setup, to fool the more investigative types such as ourselves. A honeypot to suck us in, with a deliberate hidden truth revealed. Various documentaries followed (Jesse Ventura's comes to mind) which cleverly led us away from the more damaging truth. If it's too good to be true then it probably is, comes to mind. You have to admit, it is too easy an easy conspiracy link to believe in and was offered up on a plate literally only the day before.

It seems that the improbability of this third attack, was just too high for the non-terrestrial squatters. So, a full cleansing of the sites after evacuating the fourth site and a possible retaliation was instigated.

From above, starting at 9:57am, an invisible beam weapon was used to transmogrify the buildings at the World Trade Centre to dust. To remove and destroy any evidence or specialised technologies cloaked within the locations at the World Trade Centre. A deliberate scorched earth policy.

This is the usual response of ejected squatters to eviction. Wreck everything useful, before leaving in a fit of pique.

It seems that the Pentagon itself, was just far too overt to attack and could be seen diplomatically as a form of a declaration of war, by attacking directly the US Military’s Department of Defence HQ in reprisal.

 At 10:07am with the retaliation and cleansing operation happening at New York Trade centre, the US 4^th attack was aborted over a safe area near Shanksville. The squatters had realised the situation and had fully bugged out. The 4th target was already being cleansed at the World Trade Centre complex. So, the arrival of an unwanted explosive strike vehicle, would cause questions, if allowed to fly into the destroyed area.

Vey worryingly Pentagon security had been clearly breached. Probably with an advanced transporter system and cloaked agents. Obviously, the Pentagon strike was a surgical removal, taking no chances of a fire fight or as an escape route from the other three major sites.

What else may be suggested from news at that time? Well, the ancient ziggurats in Iraq had been repaired in recent times and the Iraqi improvements to the SCUD missiles strangely advanced. The building of the Iraqi supergun may have been prevented, but it was a highly ambitious technological project, for Iraq at the time. Could this be similar to the strange technological advancements, during the late 30’s, in NAZI Germany. Where historically there have been suggestions of non-terrestrial help via different methods.  It is interesting that Iraq was later invaded under the cause of removing WMDs. Were there extremely highly advanced weapons that were still under construction in Iraq?  Were they either removed from the planet or not declared by the US as actually existing?

There are similar parallels to Saddam and Adolf. Both wanting to expand their living space and reclaim lands that they considered historically theirs. Saddam’s army and military were at the time of invasion, within the world’s top 10 military powers, with proportionally the number 1 spot according to population size.

So, a dictator with ambition to expand his country, may have been a willing partner in return for technological assistance and intelligence concerning US aims and activities within his sphere of influence.

So, is it possible that Saddam and the military targets on 9/11 were directly linked by the off-Earth squatters?

Well, it would explain reasonably and rationally, the illegal invasion by US and British forces into Iraq, against UN demands. To destroy any further incursion or bases on Earth built by these squatters and to neutralise any remaining technological threat.

This certainly explains the reluctance of countries to deeply question, the deep fake evidence as broadcast to the world. They are collaborators of the coverup of this incursion, not wanting the world’s population to be aware of this interference in world affairs.

Later on, the tell-tale signs of nano thermite and demolition explosives were planted at the WTC site and the evidence of the true method of destruction concealed.

Dr Judy Woods evidential science explanation, is totally correct.
As anyone who has read her book, “Where did the Towers go?” she doesn’t explain the reason for the attack, just the evidence of a type of “Dustification” destruction that took place at the WTC.

Many Conspiratorialists believe the transmogrification weapon may have been under US control.

I believe that this technology is known about by US black project scientists, but I think it is a massive leap to think that the US has the ability to "Dustify" the towers from space, and then to actually do so. There is no evidence that they had any prior experience of doing so, with this weapon. With using it for the first time, comes the massive risk of failure or missing the target and taking out say, the Empire State Building. The alien situation continues to be concealed, so consequently so does the alien Dustification beam attack. Dr Judy Wood's evidence and discovery has to be denigrated and strongly denied because of where it leads to. Far easier to create a false trail of nano-thermite and explosives for the amateur conspiracy investigators and quite simple to push it, with shills in the 9/11 truth movements. Quite simply, it is far too difficult to imagine such a technological weapon of this magnitude and controlled accuracy, being under US control. Why would the US hide this non-nuclear ability to devastate enemies and their missile sites or countries from space? There is no reason. Besides what happened at WTC has shown the abilities of this weapon. Why would you hold back and hide this ability, only to use it later and become associated with the attack when its ability becomes public knowledge.

An important point is that all the Countries of the World have continued to support the fake story and are probably accessories after the fact. It's likely that prior to the attack, trusted members of the UN Security Council and allies were informed of the circumstances. This is important, as it explains why there have been no leaks, on such a potential terrible atrocity committed by the US on its own people, in its own borders, rather than a terrorist attack. Even Iran and North Korea are quiet on the matter. So, I can only conclude that the US is innocent of the WTC destruction!

Do you remember Building 7 still being up, in the live BBC broadcast, where they state it had already collapsed. How did they know it was to collapse?

Was the US informed of a forthcoming vengeful Dustification attack, on the WTC complex by the Aliens?

Thinking originally, the improbable, being probable.

What is the real truth?

I hope this mind opening and expanding solution has made you question your own answer.

But remember until any evidence to disprove this theory becomes available, it fits just as well as any other solution.

As Holmes said "When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

This solution is certainly in the improbable camp unless you mull it over.

Adrian Evans 24/12/20