How Left & Right Wing Have Been Used In Opposite Tactics

[RobinJ]

So yesterday I was thinking on the politics angle after yet another sparring match with a family member.  I realised that the globalists have been very clever in using the 'right wing' as the cover for their games and to make more people look the other way for a while, as, their 'team' couldn't possibly do such obvious facist/ communist things.

 

The Tory right are currently in power in UK and USA its the same with the Republicans. So I got to wondering, if it had been the more obvious 'socialist lefties' in power when CV was kicked off, my guess that many tory and republican supporters would have seen through it quicker as an obvious agenda because it would not fit the usual narrative.

 

Having the 'wrong team' promote such deep communist ideas is so opposite of how folks have been trained to believe what they supposedly stand for, that it has wrong footed the supporters with slow burn tactics. Its a classic bait and switch method again, as is so much of how the agenda promoters operate. 

Its a bit like the game 'simple simon said' - you keep following more and more difficult tasks until you are so compromised you can't go on and have to surrender.

 

[Scottish rebel]

The media know what theyre doing,turning the right v left,on one channel outlet they will promote & report things 'right' a few hours later 'left',Me,personaly i would say im centre left,but the media know how to play both against each other.

[Scottish rebel]

[RobinJ]

I prefer not to label myself anything except looking for truth, if thats even possible anymore in this age of mass censorship.

[Macnamara]

left, right, left, right.....the march into the technocratic gulag because both are AUTHORITARIAN

 

The two party system is a choice between authoritarian-left or authoritarian-right but never libertarian-left or libertarian-right

 

Always the trend is towards CENTRALISATION of power and never towards DECENTRALISATION of power

 

We don't have capitalism we have STATE-capitalism or cartelism, run by CORPORATE-SOCIALISTS

[RobinJ]

2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

left, right, left, right.....the march into the technocratic gulag because both are AUTHORITARIAN

 

The two party system is a choice between authoritarian-left or authoritarian-right but never libertarian-left or libertarian-right

 

Always the trend is towards CENTRALISATION of power and never towards DECENTRALISATION of power

 

We don't have capitalism we have STATE-capitalism or cartelism, run by CORPORATE-SOCIALISTS

 

Yep. we dont have democracy either. Its all nonsense bullshit marketing to make us hate 'the other side'

[Macnamara]

10 minutes ago, RobinJ said:

Yep. we dont have democracy either. Its all nonsense bullshit marketing to make us hate 'the other side'

 

voting every 5 years for one of the two parties that the system offers up is just a release valve for the public so that they can change the face on the system to make themselves feel better

 

The swiss get to vote on all kinds of things all the time and have much more say in the decision making process of their country

 

We on the other hand have a choice between two parties where the parties themselves choose the candidates that get put forward and where there is nothing to compel the winning party to actually deliver on all the BS promises it made during the election campaign

 

The trend is towards centralised technocracy and no amount of voting in the two party system is going to change that. The only thing that is going to change it is enough individuals looking at their own lives and asking themselves how they do the opposite of what the technocracy wants them to do in all things

[RobinJ]

Agreed.