Jump to content

Never about a Cure - Always about the Money!


Recommended Posts

This is older but very important I think!

It was posted before the hack and so lets bring it back.

 

They Actually ADMITTED There's No Money in Curing People

 

A video by Truthstream Media which presents that a Mexican scientist cures the Human Papilloma Virus and that Goldman Sachs asks in biotech research report: 'Is curing patients a sustainable business model?'

 

(I have added this as an attachment as the tube one requires you to have an account and login. It is on Bitchute but I don't trust them for much longer. Also it is easy for you to copy)

 

 

some of the websites shown in the video:

Mexican scientist cures the Human Papilloma Virus

Goldman Sachs asks in biotech research report: 'Is curing patients a sustainable business model?'

New Prescription Drugs: A Major Health Risk With Few Offsetting Advantages

Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs

 

The above still exist and are interesting reading especially the last 2.

Looking at the Goldman Sachs 'Is curing patients a sustainable business model?' article, it really is some piece of work and I shall quote it here:

 

Goldman Sachs analysts attempted to address a touchy subject for biotech companies, especially those involved in the pioneering "gene therapy" treatment: cures could be bad for business in the long run.

"Is curing patients a sustainable business model?" analysts ask in an April 10 report entitled "The Genome Revolution."

"The potential to deliver 'one shot cures' is one of the most attractive aspects of gene therapy, genetically-engineered cell therapy and gene editing. However, such treatments offer a very different outlook with regard to recurring revenue versus chronic therapies," analyst Salveen Richter wrote in the note to clients Tuesday. "While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow."

Richter cited
Gilead Sciences' treatments for hepatitis C, which achieved cure rates of more than 90 percent. The company's U.S. sales for these hepatitis C treatments peaked at $12.5 billion in 2015, but have been falling ever since. Goldman estimates the U.S. sales for these treatments will be less than $4 billion this year, according to a table in the report.

"GILD is a case in point, where the success of its hepatitis C franchise has gradually exhausted the available pool of treatable patients," the analyst wrote. "In the case of infectious diseases such as hepatitis C, curing existing patients also decreases the number of carriers able to transmit the virus to new patients, thus the incident pool also declines … Where an incident pool remains stable (eg, in cancer) the potential for a cure poses less risk to the sustainability of a franchise."

The analyst didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

The report suggested three potential solutions for biotech firms:

"Solution 1: Address large markets: Hemophilia is a $9-10bn WW market (hemophilia A, B), growing at ~6-7% annually."

"Solution 2: Address disorders with high incidence: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) affects the cells (neurons) in the spinal cord, impacting the ability to walk, eat, or breathe."

"Solution 3: Constant innovation and portfolio expansion: There are hundreds of inherited retinal diseases (genetics forms of blindness) … Pace of innovation will also play a role as future programs can offset the declining revenue trajectory of prior assets."

 

What a wonderful way to consider your fellow humans!

What a super great and caring person this Goldman Sachs analyst Salveen Richter must be!

Well here SHE is (with a name tag on):

 

cure18-10-1200.jpg.3486967ae885d6227cf130f3f19486bf.jpg

 

From here: https://ldi.upenn.edu/news/managing-com ... ess-issues

Where they held a invitation-only "Cost of a Cure" conference with the title:

Managing The Coming Tsunami of Genomic and Cellular Therapy Cost and Access Issues

and chatted about such things as:

 

Quote

others predicted that miracle curative drugs and therapies currently in the pipeline toward FDA approval were likely to be launched at prices as high as multiple millions-per-treatment. One area of debate addressed the suggestion that a new "annuity" or long-term mortgage-like financial model was needed to enable marketers and investors to support such million-dollar pricing.

 

 

and consider that As of Q3 2017, total pharmaceutical sales in the United States was estimated to reach around 453 billion U.S. dollars in that year.

Wait! What!

That is four hundred and fifty three thousand million in just the USA, in just one year!

 

ehrppojg.gif.265c15c00234fa9b367cee566ab47a5b.gif

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I will add this here but it could be many threads or it's own.

 

I am having a difficult time posting as this last year has made me very sad to see the non action of the 'mass' of people.

I used to enjoy the creative part of making a thread/post .... but currently that is gone :(

I have open about 60 tabs .... all information (and much which I had to drag back from the "Don't exist anymore mate, sorry" book burning) about main stream medical errors and mistakes which 'kill' so very many.

 

But .... a few images .... and a question! (the rest I shall try to compose into a post .... at some point)

 

I was looking for death rates of third world countries and non western countries to do a comparison .... but it lead me on a path.

 

This image is very telling to me and much can be drawn from it ....

 

world_death_rate_per_1000.jpg.30991b9632ef5ecba826cf6c3c88824a.jpg

 

It is the death rate, per 1000 people, in a country.

For info which is not on the above ....

 

  • Australia 6.62
  • New Zealand 7.03

 

For the rest go here ....

 

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/death-rate-by-country

 

So the top 10 highest death rates:

 

The ten countries with the highest mortality rates in the world are:

  1. Bulgaria (15.433)
  2. Ukraine (15.192)
  3. Latvia (14.669)
  4. Lesotho (14.144)
  5. Lithuania (13.737)
  6. Serbia (13.194)
  7. Croatia (13.17)
  8. Romania (13.099)
  9. Georgia (12.816)
  10. Russia (12.785)

 

The lowest 10:

 

The ten countries with the lowest mortality rates in the world are:

  1. Qatar (1.244)
  2. United Arab Emirates (1.519)
  3. Bahrain (2.416)
  4. Oman (2.446)
  5. Mayotte (2.71)
  6. Kuwait (2.787)
  7. Maldives (2.821)
  8. French Guiana (2.956)
  9. Palestine (3.462)
  10. Saudi Arabia (3.513)

 

Now some may say that 'covid' bullshit is the issue .... well no.

This is the UK:

 

753788327_Screenshot_2021-03-01UnitedKingdom-Deathrate-HistoricalDataGraphsperYear.png.afeeb39bad3f2ff2e70570556f81a906.png

 

This is the US:

 

1788303392_Screenshot_2021-03-01UnitedStates-Deathrate-HistoricalDataGraphsperYear.png.53585ccf39fef7220eeef4faccb8c098.png

 

This is Sweden:

 

387633384_Screenshot_2021-03-01Sweden-Deathrate-HistoricalDataGraphsperYear.png.db1157159911befb6a5c8006757213d4.png

 

 

 

I wonder if you see what I think I may see?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ink said:

I will add this here but it could be many threads or it's own.

 

I am having a difficult time posting as this last year has made me very sad to see the non action of the 'mass' of people.

I used to enjoy the creative part of making a thread/post .... but currently that is gone :(

I have open about 60 tabs .... all information (and much which I had to drag back from the "Don't exist anymore mate, sorry" book burning) about main stream medical errors and mistakes which 'kill' so very many.

 

But .... a few images .... and a question! (the rest I shall try to compose into a post .... at some point)

 

I was looking for death rates of third world countries and non western countries to do a comparison .... but it lead me on a path.

 

This image is very telling to me and much can be drawn from it ....

 

world_death_rate_per_1000.jpg.30991b9632ef5ecba826cf6c3c88824a.jpg

 

It is the death rate, per 1000 people, in a country.

For info which is not on the above ....

 

  • Australia 6.62
  • New Zealand 7.03

 

For the rest go here ....

 

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/death-rate-by-country

 

So the top 10 highest death rates:

 

The ten countries with the highest mortality rates in the world are:

  1. Bulgaria (15.433)
  2. Ukraine (15.192)
  3. Latvia (14.669)
  4. Lesotho (14.144)
  5. Lithuania (13.737)
  6. Serbia (13.194)
  7. Croatia (13.17)
  8. Romania (13.099)
  9. Georgia (12.816)
  10. Russia (12.785)

 

The lowest 10:

 

The ten countries with the lowest mortality rates in the world are:

  1. Qatar (1.244)
  2. United Arab Emirates (1.519)
  3. Bahrain (2.416)
  4. Oman (2.446)
  5. Mayotte (2.71)
  6. Kuwait (2.787)
  7. Maldives (2.821)
  8. French Guiana (2.956)
  9. Palestine (3.462)
  10. Saudi Arabia (3.513)

 

Now some may say that 'covid' bullshit is the issue .... well no.

This is the UK:

 

753788327_Screenshot_2021-03-01UnitedKingdom-Deathrate-HistoricalDataGraphsperYear.png.afeeb39bad3f2ff2e70570556f81a906.png

 

This is the US:

 

1788303392_Screenshot_2021-03-01UnitedStates-Deathrate-HistoricalDataGraphsperYear.png.53585ccf39fef7220eeef4faccb8c098.png

 

This is Sweden:

 

387633384_Screenshot_2021-03-01Sweden-Deathrate-HistoricalDataGraphsperYear.png.db1157159911befb6a5c8006757213d4.png

 

 

 

I wonder if you see what I think I may see?

 

 

The human brain is hard wired for pattern recognition. I'd be cautious of any patterns here I think I see.

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

The human brain is hard wired for pattern recognition. I'd be cautious of any patterns here I think I see.

 

Yes but without it there would not be many threads on this forum!

 

Lets just say ....

 

The UK is a '1st world country' and it has the so very wonderful NHS (which we are all meant to clap like a monkey for) .... but we are one of the worst death rates?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will 'dump' an old post of mine which is about cancer, the Radion Trust (which is the NHS) and other stuff .... it is quite long so I shall put it into a quote and that will make it easy to scroll by lol

Actually I won't oaeemqeo.gif.718c4fb9c49fdeb21df824d2127c419e.gif

 

You can scroll past it or read it as it is on topic ilndksgc.gif.8c713b3e629afb17c673edfe79726249.gif

 

(I have not checked all the links to see if they still exist)

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  

As far as I have found....cancer was understood and in effect cured by Dr Otto Warburg in 1931 when he won the noble prize in medicine, "for his discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme".

 

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1931/

 

All after this would only seem, to me, to reflect his work.

What he said was that cancer can not exist within an alkaline oxygen rich environment....that to exist, cancer requires to ferment sugars.

 

Snip from a speech he gave in 1966

 

In any case, during the cancer development the oxygen - respiration always falls, fermentation appears, and the highly differentiated cells are transformed to fermenting anaerobes, which have lost all their body functions and retain only the now useless property of growth. Thus, when respiration disappears, life does not disappear, but the meaning of life disappears, and what remains are growing machines that destroy the body in which they grow.

 

http://www.ionizers.org/Otto-Warburg.php

 

So cancer is the body's last attempt at continuing 'life'....a natural desperate act.......because of the acidosis 'forced' upon it.

 

Now I have basically given up on trying to impart information to those around me regarding cancer as they either 'go blank' or direct their anger....at me for being a liar!

But I did not know that by 'speaking' to others regarding alternative (read true) cures for cancer, I was breaking a UK law (although it is not a law, it is an act, given the force of law by consent)

 

Cancer Act of 1939

 

The full thing is here:

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/2-3/13/enacted

 

It says two things....the National Radium Trust will be lent money and to prohibit certain advertisements relating to cancer....... I have only taken snips showing that even the use of 'sounds' to tell others about the real cause and cure of cancer....is illegal?

 

4. Prohibition of certain advertisements

(1)No person shall take any part in the publication of any advertisement—

 

(a)containing an offer to treat any person for cancer, or to prescribe any remedy therefor, or to give any advice in connection with the treatment thereof; or

 

(b)referring to any article, or articles of any description, in terms which are calculated to lead to the use of that article, or articles of that description, in the treatment of cancer.

 

(8)In this section the expression " advertisement " includes any notice, circular, label, wrapper or other document, and any announcement made orally or by any means of producing or transmitting sounds.

 

This 'law' has been used recently:

http://www.cancertreatment.net/news/all-cancers/pro-snooker-runs-headlong-alternative-cancer-treatment

 

The National Radium Trust was formed in 1929

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Radium_Trust

 

And was abolished with the introduction of the NHS in 1948

 

http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/thenhs/nhshistory/Pages/NHShistory1948.aspx

 

so the NHS is just a continuation of a want to use radiation on humans!

 

The Radium Trust was granted a supplementary charter in 1939, granting it power to purchase in addition to radium, other radioactive substances and apparatus and appliances required for radiotherapeutic treatment, and the Radium Commission was instructed to make arrangements for the custody, distribution and use of radioactive substances and apparatus and appliances purchased by the Trust.

 

http://www.aim25.ac.uk/cats/81/7260.htm

 

A 'law' that makes it an imprisonable offense to give any knowledge of cancer treatments or cures unless it is by radiation?

Also in legal terms the word 'treatment' can mean management!

When you consider that The National Radium Trust was formed in 1929 and it was known before that date that radium caused sickness

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radium

 

In the mid-1920s, a lawsuit was filed against the United States Radium Corporation by five dying "Radium Girl" dial painters who had painted radium-based luminous paint on the dials of watches and clocks. The dial painters routinely licked their brushes to give them a fine point, thereby ingesting radium. Their exposure to radium caused serious health effects which included sores, anemia, and bone cancer. This is because radium is treated as calcium by the body, and deposited in the bones, where radioactivity degrades marrow and can mutate bone cells. During the litigation, it was determined that the company's scientists and management had taken considerable precautions to protect themselves from the effects of radiation, yet had not seen fit to protect their employees.

 

Also that the death rate ratio given to cancer in the 1950's was 1 in 250.......and now for men is 1 in 2-3.......you may just begin to see a conspiracy lol

 

Hippocrates “Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food”

Thank you for having the strength to share that Suuzzaannee....I began to research cancer after my mother died and it would all seem to point at the human physical forms natural ph state is 7.34 or close to that.

Warburgs paper, which I read (having to look up many words) simply states that cancer cannot exist within an alkaline environment. For this he won the noble prize in medicine. The paper is very hard to find now?

Acidosis would seem, from that which I have learnt, to be an underlining cause in nearly all cancers? But is never written as a cause. If a person is treated for acidosis it is by the use of sodium bicarbonate to increase the ph level!

 

I wasn't going to include the opening of the first post as I thought that you all knew about Warburg!

 

Regarding the video and blood flow, yes blood cells do feed cancer but it would seem to be the type of energy given to each cell which is directive to that cell.

 

This post may be 'jumpy' as I am still trying to get my head around the information....lol

 

If you limit the 'flow' of blood you increase the risk of metabolic acidosis....

http://www.dreddyclinic.com/online_recources/pH/Metabolic_Acidosis.pdf

by 'shock'....

http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=5477

as known in 1969....

http://pmj.bmj.com/content/45/526/518.full.pdf

 

Acidosis seems to come in two ways either metabolic or respiratory....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acidosis

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2012/07/16/chronic-acidosis-a-precursor-to-cancer/

 

There are different forms of acidosis, such as Lactic acidosis....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactic_acidosis

but all would seem to have the same root cause, a pH imbalance.

Also anoxia is a condition characterized by an absence of oxygen supply to an organ or a tissue.

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/anoxia

 

Must say that to 'decode' the medical bullshit is very much like understanding the legalese meanings of law!!

 

This snip:

The resulting experimental signatures of responses to lactic acidosis and hypoxia are evaluated in a heterogeneous set of breast cancer datasets.Our results identify causal roles of lactic acidosis in metabolic reprogramming, and the direct functional consequence of lactic acidosis pathway activity on cellular responses and tumor development.The study also demonstrates the utility of genomic analysis that maps expression-based findings from in vitro experiments to human samples to assess links to in vivo clinical phenotypes.

http://openi.nlm.nih.gov/detailedresult.php?img=2585811_pgen.1000293.g004&req=4

 

to me states that acidosis and a lack of oxygen (hypoxia)....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypoxia(medical)

are primary in the 'cells' madness and the movement of the 'mad cells'.

A cells movement is called haptokinetic migration....

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs000180050498

….I think, but I need to research more

 

Before I forget....everything I have now been reading all seem to point to the fact that acidosis or a pH imbalance is responsible for ALL disease including any form of joint pain....consider the 'buffers' your body use's to attempt to keep the pH balance? Stripping bone, cartilage, muscles, in fact everything because if your intracellular pH changes too much....your body dies.

 

Actually in 1968 a report was done on the connection between metabolic acidosis and heart attacks

http://heart.bmj.com/content/30/4/493.full.pdf

Yes it ends with by saying that a link is not proved but the report was funded by the NHS (read national radium trust) and the National Heart Foundation!!

So they may have been a little bias???

You can see why a Cancer Act to limit any knowledge would be required if all health is dependant on the pH balance of each cell within a body.

 

A single cells pH is called 'intracellular pH' and is written as pHi.

http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/content/22/1/30.long

and from the above link....is known to be a cause of cancer....snip

 

Changes in intracellular pH regulate many cell behaviors, including proliferation, migration, and transformation....

 

Additionally, increased cytosolic pH is a hallmark of transformed cells from different tissue origins and genetic backgrounds, making it a common characteristic of distinct cancers....

 

Cytosol is the actual liquid within each cell which needs to maintain a pH balance!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytosol

 

So what is the pH scale?

Well they say its the 'potential hydrogen' or the 'power of hydrogen'!

It would seem that it is the amount of hydrogen ions (maybe isotopes).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_ion

Ions are a particle (atom or molecule) which has a positive or negative charge rather than being balanced.

If you think of an atom with 8 protons (positive charge) and 8 electrons (negative charge)....then this atom is balanced. Yes you also have neutrons but these have no affecting charge.

Now take an atom with 8 protons and 9 electrons....this is called an ion....because it has a particular polarity (in this case negative).

So a bit of history....

 

In 1909, Danish biochemist, S.P.L Sorensen proposed the use of a logarithmic scale to express the concentration of hydrogen ions (H+) and hydroxide ions (OH -). This scale has become known as the pH scale. Sorensen knew that water had a nearly balanced concentration of positive (H+) and negative (OH-) ions. The positively charged ions are called hydrogen ions and the negatively charged ions are called hydroxide ions. Scientists measured the concentrations of hydrogen ions in pure water, acidic water and alkaline water. The pure water contained a hydrogen ion concentration of 1 x 10-7 moles. The acidic water (hydrochloric acid) contained a hydrogen ion concentration of 1 x 100 moles. The alkaline water (sodium hydroxide) contained a hydrogen ion concentration of 1 x 1014 moles.

The hydrogen ion concentration was found to vary over fourteen powers of 10. A change of one pH unit changes the hydrogen ion concentration by a factor of ten. For example, a solution with a pH of 1 has 10 times more hydrogen ion concentration than a pH of 2; One hundred times more hydrogen ion concentration than a pH of 3 and so forth. This means that a solution with a pH of 1 has one million times more hydrogen ion concentration than a pH of 7. To avoid dealing with these incredibly complex exponential, scientists proposed a simplification. They converted the exponents -7, 0 and -14 to 7, 0 and 14 respectively. Subsequently, the pH scale was established ranging from 0 to 14 with the mid-point of 7 indicating neutrality. Therefore, the scale of ordinary pH values extends from 0 to 14. The pH of a neutral solution is 7. Thus the range of acid pH values extends from 0 to 7, and that of alkaline values from 7 to 14.

 

http://www.coastwidelabs.com/Technical Articles/ph__the_power_of_hydrogen.htm

An image of a pH scale....

http://staff.jccc.net/pdecell/chemistry/phscale.html

 

Bicarbonate is used to repair metabolic acidosis....

http://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/20/4/692.full

 

Alkaline acid food chart.

http://www.wakingtimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Alkaline-Acid-Foods-Chart.jpeg

 

Edward Leadskin stated that it is the negative which creates the energy running then to the positive.

We are electromagnetic beings within an electric plasma field.
 

Take something like smoking, how would this change the pHi or cytosol in a cell....the haemoglobin bonds with carbon monoxide and this is carried to the cells!

 

Apoptosis is 'programmed cell death which seems to be 'mucked up' by the cells pHi imbalance?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apoptosis

 

So you know exactly where I'm coming from....I have learnt that in this life most of what we are told or taught is lies, therefore I can only learn from that which I personally understand. In other words I cannot just take as read any document or accept any statement, as a TRUTH.

 

Even as a very young child I had to 'understand' the nature of that which I was trying to do.

Eg: my sisters were taught to swim, I would NOT be taught, I had to learn to swim myself.

 

I read and 'attempt' to understand each and every link posted....but I find many discrepancy’s within that which I read....such as a good link which was posted having much good information but then states....Garlic should never be used by any human being because it kills brain cells.

 

Now if we search and compile all the current know information on garlic that we can find on the web......50/50 as to if garlic is a wonder food or a poison?

 

So with that in mind.......what I am trying to do is go from the knowledge that the pH balance is of importance, which EVERY thing I read points to, to a functional understanding of why?

 

Right now I am looking at:

 

Cellular respiration

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_energy

 

Enzymes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enzyme

 

electron transport chain

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_transport_chain

 

Cellular waste products

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_waste_product

 

Anaerobic respiration

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic_respiration

 

Static electricity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_electricity

 

If the change within the ions of a cell, create within that cell an imbalance which causes a so called 'cancer'....then this change is either electrical or magnetic.......or more likely the process of physical forms 'life' in this place is linked to static....so we could say that the discharge of the magnetic force between cells, when not balanced, is.............

 

Everything, humans, plants, animals, fish etc all would seem to function within this pH balance?

 

We are meant to resonate with this planet, our vibration, our frequency, our PH BALANCE

 

In pure water, the pH is called 7.

 

So we could say that 1 in 7 million particles is charged the other 6999999  are not, they are balanced. (not correct but using as a number)

 

Humans are meant to 'run' approx 7.34 pH, so just a tad over 1 in 7000000....

 

If you become 6 pH you will have 10 times the amount of ions within you....

5pH you will have 100 times

4pH you will have 1000 times

3pH you will have 10000 times

2pH you will have 100000 times

1pH you will have 1000000 times

0pH you will have 10 million times the amount of charged particles within you!

 

The other way is the same type of graph

 

8pH you will have 0.1 times the amount of ions within you....

9pH you will have 0.01 times

10pH you will have 0.001 times

etc.

 

So if our 'static' interaction, cell by cell becomes unable to frequent (vibration) this place and unable to 'connect' with this place....then that cell would lose its understanding of WHAT it is meant to be?

So it would start to attempt to be all and any thing it could, undefined?

 

Where the internal energy necessary for protein binding comes from is unknown at the present time, but it seems likely, based on research with electrostatic fields on various organisms, that there is an electrical component to the source. Cell walls are arranged in a double layer configuration with positive and negative ion channels built-in.

 

http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2010/arch10/100630biology.htm

 

Looking at as above so below.

 

the cells within our forms, act as our forms act on this planet, act as our planet acts in this suns system, acts as.... .......etc

 

consider the solar wind oxygen content....http://www.srl.caltech.edu/ACE/ACENews/ACENews48.html

 

it acts as a 'blood flow' for this planet incorporating oxygen and hydrogen and helium.

 

I didn't know if the US has the same type of thing....well it has!

 

National Cancer Act 1937

http://legislative.cancer.gov/history/1937

National Cancer Act 1971

http://legislative.cancer.gov/history/phsa/1971

National Cancer Act 1974

http://legislative.cancer.gov/history/phsa/1974

 

But these do not restrict 'advertising'.

 

But it is the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 which now has the supposed legal right to stop any 'advertising' with regard to cancer!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Trade_Commission

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Trade_Commission_Act

 

15 U.S. Code § 52 - Dissemination of false advertisements

a) Unlawfulness

It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, or corporation to disseminate, or cause to be disseminated, any false advertisement—

(1) By United States mails, or in or having an effect upon commerce, by any means, for the purpose of inducing, or which is likely to induce, directly or indirectly the purchase of food, drugs, devices, services, or cosmetics; or

(2) By any means, for the purpose of inducing, or which is likely to induce, directly or indirectly, the purchase in or having an effect upon commerce, of food, drugs, devices, services, or cosmetics.

(b Unfair or deceptive act or practice

The dissemination or the causing to be disseminated of any false advertisement within the provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall be an unfair or deceptive act or practice in or affecting commerce within the meaning of section 45 of this title.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/52


 

The words....by any means....is the open to all and any form of 'book burning' or removing freedom of speech!


 

It comes from here:

Title 15 of the United States Code outlines the role of the commerce and trade in the United States Code.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_15_of_the_United_States_Code


 

Part of which is this:

15 U.S. Code § 45 - Unfair methods of competition unlawful; prevention by Commission

(a) Declaration of unlawfulness; power to prohibit unfair practices; inapplicability to foreign trade

(1) Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful.

(2) The Commission is hereby empowered and directed to prevent persons, partnerships, or corporations, except banks, savings and loan institutions described in section 57a (f)(3) of this title, Federal credit unions described in section 57a (f)(4) of this title, common carriers subject to the Acts to regulate commerce, air carriers and foreign air carriers subject to part A of subtitle VII of title 49, and persons, partnerships, or corporations insofar as they are subject to the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended [7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.], except as provided in section 406(b of said Act [7 U.S.C. 227 (b)], from using unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.


 

Nice that bit....EXCEPT BANKS? ?

FTC Sweep Stops Peddlers of Bogus Cancer Cures

http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2008/09/ftc-sweep-stops-peddlers-bogus-cancer-cures

FTC Halts Bogus Cancer Cures

http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2009/04/ftc-halts-bogus-cancer-cures

You can find the court documents of it being done:

http://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cases/2008/11/081105aljordondefaultjudg.pdf


 

Search on their site to find the cancer 'cures' stopped

http://www.ftc.gov/search/site/cancer


 

Three Federal agencies, FDA, FTC, and USPS, are involved in regulating advertising claims made for health products.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), along with FDA, is responsible for stopping false advertising of most products and services, including over-the-counter drugs, devices, and treatment regimens.

The cases described above demonstrate that the courts generally have not agreed with the arguments put forth for "freedom of choice" in unconventional cancer treatments. Though they are sympathetic to the plight of cancer patients, they see the laws, such as the FDCA, as both fulfilling Congress' intent and playing a necessary role in protecting the public from unproven treatments that might not be safe or effective.

http://miracleii-4u.com/cancer-treatment-laws.htm


 

Your Public Health Service Act of 1944 has a lot to do with this as well.

http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/legislation/ucm148717.htm


 

But its so much to go through!


 

This is good for searching the codes, but again hard work!!

http://uscode.house.gov/browse/[email protected]/chapter3A&edition=prelim


 

It would seem to have a 'natural drug' approved you would need to have 2 tests done which would cost approx $1.5 billion!!!!!

If the tests are not done and passed then....its illegal.


 

So the 'law' in the US is not as yet being used to stop 'persons' talking....but it is there!


 

This is a nice list of all your federal acts....

http://www.thelists.org/a-list-of-federal-laws.html


 

This is a site I have just started to look at which seems interesting?

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/has-cancer-been-completely-misunderstood


 

And this is also interesting....

Turmeric Extract Strikes To The Root Cause of Cancer Malignancy

http://wakeup-world.com/2014/02/10/turmeric-extract-strikes-to-the-root-cause-of-cancer-malignancy/

 

 

 

And you Aussies dont get away with it either!

A quick search and you find:


 

Cancer Council of Western Australia Act 1958

http://www.slp.wa.gov.au/pco/prod/FileStore.nsf/Documents/MRDocument:10973P/$FILE/CancerCncilofWAAct1958_00-00-00.pdf?OpenElement

taken from:

http://www.slp.wa.gov.au/legislation/statutes.nsf/main_mrtitle_6787_homepage.html


 

Cancer Council of Western Australia Act Amendment Act 1964

http://www.slp.wa.gov.au/pco/prod/FileStore.nsf/Documents/MRDocument:10425P/$FILE/CancerCncilofWAActAmAct1964_00-00-00.pdf?OpenElement

taken from:

http://www.slp.wa.gov.au/legislation/statutes.nsf/main_mrtitle_6228_homepage.html


 

And up to date:

An Act to establish Cancer Australia, and for related purposes (2006)

http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2006A00035/Html/Text


 

Haven't had time to find the 'law' which states that in downunderland a 'person' cannot talk about cancer cures....but I bet its there


 

Why....just why....have all around the world acts to control (not cure) cancer unless its the main want of fear and limitation.

 

 

 

I feel that this video presentation gives a very good insight into how the change of charge within a cell (the pHi balance) would cause a 'madness'.

It is very informative and very well presented, along with being entertaining.

It also dispels the 'drama' held by many that their genes 'decide' their health.


 

Given by Bruce Lipton, it is 1 hour and 9 mins and in my view well worth the time.

 

 

 

What I have taken from the Bruce Lipton presentation is:


 

If the environment outside of the cell is acidic, this will change the balance of positive and negative ions within the cell, which could affect the 'movement' of proteins within the cell.


 

If the 'signals' coming into the cell require the creation of proteins, from the genes, which can 'ferment sugars' to sustain the cells energy, then that is what will be done.


 

Or if the genes need to be re-written to then create new 'strings' which may continue the cells 'life', then this will be done, whether or not the 'new' protein is 'mad' or not.

…....

Of course stress and belief are major factors as well.

 

 

While I do not agree with everything stated within this video....I do agree with the description of Ph and the body.


 

 


 

Also begs other questions....one of which is:


 

Are we set as acupuncture needles, on the 'grids' of earth?

 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, ink said:

 

Yes but without it there would not be many threads on this forum!

 

Lets just say ....

 

The UK is a '1st world country' and it has the so very wonderful NHS (which we are all meant to clap like a monkey for) .... but we are one of the worst death rates?

 

Fluoridated water wouldn't be helping. Especially considering the chemicals they actually use. https://fluoridealert.org/issues/water/fluoridation-chemicals/ - but just a small part of the overall picture.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/1/2021 at 7:09 PM, ink said:

 

Yes but without it there would not be many threads on this forum!

 

Lets just say ....

 

The UK is a '1st world country' and it has the so very wonderful NHS (which we are all meant to clap like a monkey for) .... but we are one of the worst death rates?

 

I can't comment on that, but do know that low socioeconomic status is linked to a reduction in life expectancy. Also, lifestyle factors are another.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/26/2020 at 12:48 PM, Odie Hatzcats said:

While i am ready to be suspect of large big pharma companies and the drugs they produce i am now 69 years of age - an old woman although may i say refuse to lie down - and i have been taking neuroleptics for 45 years. The side affects of which some are supposed to be permanent but i have none. no permanent side affects. no damage. it all depends on the individual. Ask yourself this question - if big pharma is only interested in profit why are people living longer? If their drugs don't work? - people are living longer today then they ever did. My quality of life for my age is very good. I intend to live well into my 90s. I don't want immortality unlike some. If it wasn't for better health care then there wouldn't be as many old people.

20210123_164328 (1).jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...