Jump to content

Are the media censoring references to the Duke of York?


Mikhail Liebestein

Recommended Posts

So just reading a Harry/Megan Celebrity Cofffee Sales piece as I felt it necessary to comment on the headline.  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9050977/Meghan-Markle-gifts-Oprah-Winfrey-hamper-coffee-blends-mark-day-Christmas.html

 

Several posters comments saying references to Harry's uncle were being censored.... And it seems so. 

 

I merely wanted to ask a hypothetical question about what if other Royals started promoting instant coffee.. 

 

"Instant coffee is awful, did she have Harry doing the Brook Bond Red Mountain Fake Perculator Noises in the background? At least it wasn't Maxwell House, the thought of Prince Andrew making slurping noises has me frankly disturbed!" 

Edited by Mikhail Liebestein
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mikhail Liebestein changed the title to Are the media censoring references to the Duke of York?

A 17 year old on a British registered ship is over the age of consent. She's claiming there's a bit of non-consensual BDSM going on with the whole boat thing and if that stands up in a competent court like ... it reached US shores where the Queen has no power then thats illegal on a British ship even if the Duke of York has diplomatic immunity. If it doesnt stand up in court, all he's guilty of is being a divorcee and free to shag whoever he can get to shag him. If that's a crime, I better hand myself over to the cops right now for crimes against chastity. It's none of my fucking business if the russian prostitute sucked his cock while giving him a foot massage. His poor daughters must be livid with Eugenie stoned out her face and Beatrice having meals in restaraunts with not a care in the world about wearing a mask while eating a curry. How unladylike. Next thing you know the Duchess of Wessex will have her turds photographed and plastered over newspapers to prove to William that The Sun shines out of Rupert Murdoch's arse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proof Prince Andrew misled Emily Maitlis: Duke DID stay at Jeffrey Epstein's New York mansion, and secret itinerary shows hours of 'private time' during trip when Virginia Roberts claims he slept with her

  • Sources have confirmed the Queen's second son was indeed a guest at the paedophile tycoon's Manhattan home in April 2001
  • Andrew, 60, told Newsnight's Emily Maitlis last year: 'I wasn't staying there. I may have visited but definitely didn't, definitely, definitely no, no, no activity' 
  • Well-placed sources have confirmed Andrew stayed at Epstein's £60million home on the final night of his pre-Easter visit to the US in 2001 'to save taxpayers' money'
  • But the insiders stressed that neither Epstein, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell nor Miss Roberts were at the property at the time

By Stephen Wright and Richard Pendlebury for the Daily Mail

Published: 22:00, 13 December 2020 | Updated: 13:10, 14 December 2020

Prince Andrew did stay at Jeffrey Epstein's New York mansion during a trip when it is alleged he slept with a trafficked teenager, the Daily Mail can reveal for the first time.

Contradicting his car crash TV interview, sources have confirmed the Queen's second son was indeed a guest at the paedophile tycoon's Manhattan home in April 2001, raising questions about his other recollections of the time.

Andrew, 60, told Newsnight's Emily Maitlis last year: 'I wasn't staying there. I may have visited but definitely didn't, definitely, definitely no, no, no activity.'

But a Mail investigation has discovered both the duke and a Scotland Yard bodyguard did spend a night at Epstein's townhouse, the largest in the city.

It was during this three-day trip to the United States that the prince's accuser, Virginia Roberts, alleges she slept with the father-of-two for a second time after a previous encounter in London – claims the duke has always vehemently denied. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9049237/Proof-Prince-Andrew-misled-Emily-Maitlis-Duke-DID-stay-Jeffrey-Epsteins-New-York-mansion.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's nothing, the future King of England fiddled with his boy bits the other day. Journalists asking the child were astonished when his face turned bright red and he denied touching his boy bits, so we know the future King of England is a compulsive liar.

 

This is tearing into a man's personal life which is no one's business but his own. It wouldn't matter if it was the Duke of York or Scruffy the Toronto tramp. The media will fuck anybody but at least the Duke of York has some immunities from character assassination by them, check out Scruffy's position. If he's a good match for blood types and the unelected media need an organ, guess what happens to scruffy. Your fools to engage in petty right left rich poor bullshit the way this world is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...