Jump to content

False Flags have evolved


Dawn
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Lusitania - World War I
Pearl Harbor - World War II
The Gulf of Tonkin - Vietnam
9/11 - The War on Terror
Covid-19 - Upcoming War on China


What do all these false flag operations have in common? They were executed to garner American support for foreign wars! 

 

Joe Biden is the casted fall guy. His “dealings” with China will increasingly be exposed by the MSM until finally the mainstream understands that there was never a deadly virus. Although, instead of recognizing that it was our own government that did this... AGAIN.... it will be China’s fault that we got duped into wearing masks. It will China’s fault that American small businesses got wiped out. And it will be China’s fault that our media was compromised. Americans and allies will fully support going to war. 

 

Both sides of the aisle, intelligence agencies, medical authorities, and country heads around the globe were in on this.
 

That is why everything was so (intentionally) unconvincing throughout this scamdemic. They left so much room to debate whether the virus was deadly. They left so much room to debate if masks were effective or lockdowns were warranted. They wanted the populace to be divided on these issues. Now they are reporting just enough bad info about the new vaccines to keep everyone arguing about that. When in actuality, I don’t think they ever planned on distributing the vaccine. Won’t that earn much needed confidence in the under fire pharmaceutical industry, if someone holds back the vaccine at the last minute due to safety concerns. That will imply that all other vaccines are safe. Just like exposing QAnon as a psych op will drown out the real information on Saturnian child sex trafficking and sacrifice that was starting to see light.
 

In the end...everyone will get to say they were right about 50% of the stuff. A few sacrificial bodies will be laid on the alter to appease our sense of justice. Economies will be trashed and young, poor, patriotic men and women will join the military in droves and go off to fight China. 
 

The NWO finished up in the Middle East, and its time to put the next game piece on the map. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Dawn said:

The Lusitania - World War I

 

Not a false flag - You can argue it was used as an excuse or that Germany was right to sink it - but Germany did sink it and thus i wasnt a false flag

 

9 hours ago, Dawn said:

Pearl Harbor - World War II

 

Since the Japanese really did conduct the attacks its not a false flag - im not sure how the Japanese attacking Pearl harbour can be claimed as perpertrated by the US to start a war. 

 

Even if you argue they let it happen - the fact remains the Japanese attacked.

 

Now if you want to argue that the US forced Japan into a position where it felt it had no choice then I agree they did (whether that was the US intent or not is another debate) but that doesnt make it a false flag.

 

9 hours ago, Dawn said:

The Gulf of Tonkin - Vietnam

 

Again not a false flag - The 1st incident occurred (you can argue the US deliberatly provoked it - but NV agreed it happenned) . But the 2nd  didnt happen so it wasnt a false flag - You could claim it was deliberate  hoax,  Or as the USN climed later a confused ship shooting at false radar images. Either way it was used to justify the war

 

9 hours ago, Dawn said:

9/11 - The War on Terror

 

If you believe the operation was planned by the CIA - then yes this is a false flag

 

9 hours ago, Dawn said:

Covid-19 - Upcoming War on China

 

Since nobody has equated C19 to war - im not sure thats a valid claim on any level . Nor can it be a false flag.

 

You seem to be very confused about what a false flag is  - simply put its attacking yourself and blaming another -  

 

Pearl harbour cannot ever be a false flag - 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From The Corbett Report

 

 

 

"In naval warfare, a “false flag” refers to an attack where a vessel flies a flag other than their true battle flag before engaging their enemy. It is a trick, designed to deceive the enemy about the true nature and origin of an attack.

 

In the democratic era, where governments require at least a plausible pretext before sending their nation to war, it has been adapted as a psychological warfare tactic to deceive a government’s own population into believing that an enemy nation has attacked them.

 

In the 1780s, Swedish King Gustav III was looking for a way to unite an increasingly divided nation and raise his own falling political fortunes. Deciding that a war with Russia would be a sufficient distraction but lacking the political authority to send the nation to war unilaterally, he arranged for the head tailor of the Swedish Opera House to sew some Russian military uniforms. Swedish troops were then dressed in the uniforms and sent to attack Sweden’s own Finnish border post along the Russian border. The citizens in Stockholm, believing it to be a genuine Russian attack, were suitably outraged, and the Swedish-Russian War of 1788-1790 began.

 

In 1931 Japan was looking for a pretext to invade Manchuria. On September 18th of that year, a Lieutenant in the Imperial Japanese Army detonated a small amount of TNT along a Japanese-owned railway in the Manchurian city of Mukden. The act was blamed on Chinese dissidents and used to justify the occupation of Manchuria just six months later. When the deception was later exposed, Japan was diplomatically shunned and forced to withdraw from the League of Nations.

 

In 1939 Heinrich Himmler masterminded a plan to convince the public that Germany was the victim of Polish aggression in order to justify the invasion of Poland. It culminated in an attack on Sender Gleiwitz, a German radio station near the Polish border, by Polish prisoners who were dressed up in Polish military uniforms, shot dead, and left at the station. The Germans then broadcast an anti-German message in Polish from the station, pretended that it had come from a Polish military unit that had attacked Sender Gleiwitz, and presented the dead bodies as evidence of the attack. Hitler invaded Poland immediately thereafter, starting World War II.

 

In 1954 the Israelis hired a number of Egyptian Jews to plant bombs in American and British cinemas, libraries, and other civilian targets to be blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood or other malcontents. The plan, known as the Lavon Affair, was part of an effort to convince the British to retain their military presence in the occupied Suez Canal zone. Several bombings took place, but the British were ultimately forced out after Nasser nationalized the canal in 1956.

 

In 1962 the US Joint Chiefs of Staff authored a document called Operation Northwoods calling for the US government to stage a series of fake attacks, including the shooting down of military or civilian US aircraft, the destruction of a US ship, sniper attacks in Washington, and other atrocities, to blame on the Cubans as an excuse for launching an invasion. President Kennedy refused to sign off on the plan and was killed in Dallas the next year.

 

In August 1964 the USS Maddox, a US destroyer on patrol in the Gulf of Tonkin, believed it had come under attack from North Vietnamese Navy torpedo boats, engaging in evasive action and returning fire. The incident led to the Gulf of Tonkin resolution authorizing President Johnson to begin open warfare in Vietnam. It was later admitted that no attack had occurred, and in 2005 it was revealed that the NSA had manipulated their information to make it look like an attack had taken place.

 

In June 1967 the Israelis attacked the USS Liberty, a US Navy technical research ship, off the coast of Egypt. The ship was strafed relentlessly for hours in an apparent attempt to blame the attack on Egypt and draw the Americans into the Six Day War, but amazingly the crew managed to keep it afloat. In 2007 newly released NSA intercepts confirmed that the Israelis knew they were attacking an American ship, not an Egyptian ship as their cover story has maintained.

 

In the fall of 1999, a wave of bloody apartment bombings swept through Russian cities, killing 293 people and causing widespread panic. Although blamed on the Chechen terrorists that the Russians were fighting in the Second Chechen War, FSB agents were caught planting the exact same type of bombs as in the other blasts later that month. The government claimed that the bomb was part of a security exercise and Vladimir Putin came to power as the next Russian President on the back of the terror wave later that year.

 

In 2001, attacks in New York and Washington are blamed on Al Qaeda as a pretext for invading Afghanistan. In the months leading up to the event, American negotiators had warned Afghanistan’s Taliban that they were interested in securing right of way for proposed pipeline projects, and the US would achieve this with either a carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs. The Bush administration’s first major national security directive, NSPD-9, a full-scale battle plan for the invasion of Afghanistan, including command and control, air and ground forces, and logistics, was drafted and sitting on the President’s desk to be signed off on September 4, 2001, seven days before the 9/11 attacks. The invasion proceeded as planned in October.

 

These are but a few of the hundreds of such incidents that have been staged over the centuries to blame political enemies for attacks that they did not commit. The tactic remains in common use today, and will continue to be employed as long as populations still blindly believe whatever their governments tell them about the origins of spectacular terror incidents."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Odie Hatzcats said:

From The Corbett Report

 

 

 

"In naval warfare, a “false flag” refers to an attack where a vessel flies a flag other than their true battle flag before engaging their enemy. It is a trick, designed to deceive the enemy about the true nature and origin of an attack.

 

In the democratic era, where governments require at least a plausible pretext before sending their nation to war, it has been adapted as a psychological warfare tactic to deceive a government’s own population into believing that an enemy nation has attacked them.

 

In the 1780s, Swedish King Gustav III was looking for a way to unite an increasingly divided nation and raise his own falling political fortunes. Deciding that a war with Russia would be a sufficient distraction but lacking the political authority to send the nation to war unilaterally, he arranged for the head tailor of the Swedish Opera House to sew some Russian military uniforms. Swedish troops were then dressed in the uniforms and sent to attack Sweden’s own Finnish border post along the Russian border. The citizens in Stockholm, believing it to be a genuine Russian attack, were suitably outraged, and the Swedish-Russian War of 1788-1790 began.

 

In 1931 Japan was looking for a pretext to invade Manchuria. On September 18th of that year, a Lieutenant in the Imperial Japanese Army detonated a small amount of TNT along a Japanese-owned railway in the Manchurian city of Mukden. The act was blamed on Chinese dissidents and used to justify the occupation of Manchuria just six months later. When the deception was later exposed, Japan was diplomatically shunned and forced to withdraw from the League of Nations.

 

In 1939 Heinrich Himmler masterminded a plan to convince the public that Germany was the victim of Polish aggression in order to justify the invasion of Poland. It culminated in an attack on Sender Gleiwitz, a German radio station near the Polish border, by Polish prisoners who were dressed up in Polish military uniforms, shot dead, and left at the station. The Germans then broadcast an anti-German message in Polish from the station, pretended that it had come from a Polish military unit that had attacked Sender Gleiwitz, and presented the dead bodies as evidence of the attack. Hitler invaded Poland immediately thereafter, starting World War II.

 

In 1954 the Israelis hired a number of Egyptian Jews to plant bombs in American and British cinemas, libraries, and other civilian targets to be blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood or other malcontents. The plan, known as the Lavon Affair, was part of an effort to convince the British to retain their military presence in the occupied Suez Canal zone. Several bombings took place, but the British were ultimately forced out after Nasser nationalized the canal in 1956.

 

In 1962 the US Joint Chiefs of Staff authored a document called Operation Northwoods calling for the US government to stage a series of fake attacks, including the shooting down of military or civilian US aircraft, the destruction of a US ship, sniper attacks in Washington, and other atrocities, to blame on the Cubans as an excuse for launching an invasion. President Kennedy refused to sign off on the plan and was killed in Dallas the next year.

 

In August 1964 the USS Maddox, a US destroyer on patrol in the Gulf of Tonkin, believed it had come under attack from North Vietnamese Navy torpedo boats, engaging in evasive action and returning fire. The incident led to the Gulf of Tonkin resolution authorizing President Johnson to begin open warfare in Vietnam. It was later admitted that no attack had occurred, and in 2005 it was revealed that the NSA had manipulated their information to make it look like an attack had taken place.

 

In June 1967 the Israelis attacked the USS Liberty, a US Navy technical research ship, off the coast of Egypt. The ship was strafed relentlessly for hours in an apparent attempt to blame the attack on Egypt and draw the Americans into the Six Day War, but amazingly the crew managed to keep it afloat. In 2007 newly released NSA intercepts confirmed that the Israelis knew they were attacking an American ship, not an Egyptian ship as their cover story has maintained.

 

In the fall of 1999, a wave of bloody apartment bombings swept through Russian cities, killing 293 people and causing widespread panic. Although blamed on the Chechen terrorists that the Russians were fighting in the Second Chechen War, FSB agents were caught planting the exact same type of bombs as in the other blasts later that month. The government claimed that the bomb was part of a security exercise and Vladimir Putin came to power as the next Russian President on the back of the terror wave later that year.

 

In 2001, attacks in New York and Washington are blamed on Al Qaeda as a pretext for invading Afghanistan. In the months leading up to the event, American negotiators had warned Afghanistan’s Taliban that they were interested in securing right of way for proposed pipeline projects, and the US would achieve this with either a carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs. The Bush administration’s first major national security directive, NSPD-9, a full-scale battle plan for the invasion of Afghanistan, including command and control, air and ground forces, and logistics, was drafted and sitting on the President’s desk to be signed off on September 4, 2001, seven days before the 9/11 attacks. The invasion proceeded as planned in October.

 

These are but a few of the hundreds of such incidents that have been staged over the centuries to blame political enemies for attacks that they did not commit. The tactic remains in common use today, and will continue to be employed as long as populations still blindly believe whatever their governments tell them about the origins of spectacular terror incidents."

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Eldnah said:

 

Not a false flag - You can argue it was used as an excuse or that Germany was right to sink it - but Germany did sink it and thus i wasnt a false flag

 

 

Since the Japanese really did conduct the attacks its not a false flag - im not sure how the Japanese attacking Pearl harbour can be claimed as perpertrated by the US to start a war. 

 

Even if you argue they let it happen - the fact remains the Japanese attacked.

 

Now if you want to argue that the US forced Japan into a position where it felt it had no choice then I agree they did (whether that was the US intent or not is another debate) but that doesnt make it a false flag.

 

 

Again not a false flag - The 1st incident occurred (you can argue the US deliberatly provoked it - but NV agreed it happenned) . But the 2nd  didnt happen so it wasnt a false flag - You could claim it was deliberate  hoax,  Or as the USN climed later a confused ship shooting at false radar images. Either way it was used to justify the war

 

 

If you believe the operation was planned by the CIA - then yes this is a false flag

 

 

Since nobody has equated C19 to war - im not sure thats a valid claim on any level . Nor can it be a false flag.

 

You seem to be very confused about what a false flag is  - simply put its attacking yourself and blaming another -  

 

Pearl harbour cannot ever be a false flag - 

 

 

 

Yeah the Lusitania and Pearl Harbor weren’t traditional false flags, they just knew something was going to happen and let it unfold in order to a justify a war. 
 

Bay of Tonkin was just made up. 
 

That’s why I entitled this, False Flags are evolving. Initially we just provoked, then we invented, then we carried out the attack ourselves, now it has become a year long psychological operation. But the underlying theme of us blaming someone else for us wanting to go to war is the constant. It is an attack on the American people, each time we are lied to by our government. 

War with China was always the plan. Just watch. It’s happening. My feed was full of governors posing with Chinese officials today. That is the play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Dawn said:

 

Yeah the Lusitania and Pearl Harbor weren’t traditional false flags, they just knew something was going to happen and let it unfold in order to a justify a war. 
 

 

They werent false flags at all - nor could they have predicted the Lusitania - It was siezed upon to justify US entry - but if the Lusitania hadent been sunk - they would have pointed to the number of ships or another action (The Zimmerman saga for example) 

 

Quote

Bay of Tonkin was just made up. 

 

No 1st attack was real - 2nd didnt happen we agree - but its entirely possible the initial reports by the ship were honest error  - that it had confused false signals and was shooting at clouds.

After that then it was manipulated as you say 

 

Still not a false flag though

 

 

Quote

 

 


 

That’s why I entitled this, False Flags are evolving. Initially we just provoked, then we invented, then we carried out the attack ourselves, now it has become a year long psychological operation.

 

False flags go back to before Ghengis Khan - theres been no evolution of provoke to carry out - they are differrent strategies

 

Quote

But the underlying theme of us blaming someone else for us wanting to go to war is the constant. It is an attack on the American people, each time we are lied to by our government. 

 

Deception operations Psy ops but not false flags

 

 

Quote

War with China was always the plan. Just watch. It’s happening. My feed was full of governors posing with Chinese officials today. That is the play. 

 

I will say to you what I saud 3 yrs ago when this claim was made - China is arming as the West disarms**- If the US is planning on a war its going the wrong way about it.

 

 

**It has belatedly  started to halt the decline 

Edited by Eldnah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eldnah said:

 

 

 

 

I will say to you what I saud 3 yrs ago when this claim was made - China is arming as the West disarms**- If the US is planning on a war its going the wrong way about it.

 

 

 


The West never disarmed, they just stopped telling us about their weapons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dawn said:


The West never disarmed, they just stopped telling us about their weapons. 

Dont talk rubbish -

 

Whilst there may be a few troops, boats, special forces teams sneakig around unrecorded - its bloody obvious that theres been a huge reduction in numbers in the various Navies Armys and Airforces.

 

The Idea theres secret fleets of battle ships and B2 bombers is farcical. 

 

On top of which the various countries monitor each other so when the UK says its scrapped 200 tanks Russia has the right to confirm this.

 

Russia also has the right to fly over NATO countries and vice versa to look at bases - its called open skies.

 

So this West all lying about defence cuts is proven to be wrong because Russia itself confirms it true

 

   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Eldnah said:

Dont talk rubbish -

 

Whilst there may be a few troops, boats, special forces teams sneakig around unrecorded - its bloody obvious that theres been a huge reduction in numbers in the various Navies Armys and Airforces.

 

The Idea theres secret fleets of battle ships and B2 bombers is farcical. 

 

On top of which the various countries monitor each other so when the UK says its scrapped 200 tanks Russia has the right to confirm this.

 

Russia also has the right to fly over NATO countries and vice versa to look at bases - its called open skies.

 

So this West all lying about defence cuts is proven to be wrong because Russia itself confirms it true

 

   

 

 


I was talking more in terms of psychological operations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dawn said:


I was talking more in terms of psychological operations. 

 

See what your saying - My point still stands viz hardware 

 

As for Psyops / disinfo campaigns  and indeed just planning industrial / economic domination Russia and China are the best at those.

 

China especially - Our governlments think 5 yrs is a long time - but China thinks 25 yrs is only a short time -  

 

If we dont start looking at the long game - then we will all be owned by China. See Japans domination of the motor industry as an example of where the long game seriously screws over Western short sightedness. 

Its something we will need to grasp post oil or if we intend to leave the planet - because short termism seriously hinders us.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a good chance that a war would likely be on the West, not China. We have been totally weakened because of subversion. We're all fighting each other, they just have to sit back and watch. Once the powder keg that is our nations explodes, it will only take outside forces to come and finish us off.

 

We are a golden calf that has been milked dry, ready to blow away like dust.

 

We wouldn't be handing tech to them if we had benevolent leaders, surely?

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sick of the "West" ... it's disgusting.

It's a disgrace.

If these people live by watching sodomy-TV and kill the whites all day long ...

The white people of the West have died.

Somewhere ... sometime they died.

 

I am happy to go to China or the ME or Indonesia Australia .... anywhere but here.   This is the continent of the undead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, rideforever said:

I am sick of the "West" ... it's disgusting.

It's a disgrace.

If these people live by watching sodomy-TV and kill the whites all day long ...

The white people of the West have died.

Somewhere ... sometime they died.

 

I am happy to go to China or the ME or Indonesia Australia .... anywhere but here.   This is the continent of the undead.

 

We screwed up when all started becoming Americanized. We should have tried to stick to our own culture, not MTV and Hollywood.

 

China might not be as decadent, but everything is about society as a whole there. The individual has no value. Anyone that has watched gore vids will know what I mean. You could get in a car accident there and people just walk by and do nothing to help their countrymen.

 

Why does it take a Brit to save a drowning person? They all just stand by and watch.

 

 

I don't want to be too harsh on them though because people are starting to not care about each other here either.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

We screwed up when all started becoming Americanized. We should have tried to stick to our own culture, not MTV and Hollywood.

 

Just want to add that that is not a dig at Americans. I know there are still plenty of good Americans. I'm more talking about things American corporations have exported all over the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Why does it take a Brit to save a drowning person? They all just stand by and watch.

 

Swimming probably not much in the Chinese curriculum, not sure it is valued in the East.

Anyway, better to be with "primitive" people who haven't sold their soul, then with the nation of lifeguards who have.

Somethings can be fixed, others cannot.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rideforever said:

 

Swimming probably not much in the Chinese curriculum, not sure it is valued in the East.

Anyway, better to be with "primitive" people who haven't sold their soul, then with the nation of lifeguards who have.

Somethings can be fixed, others cannot.

 

 

True. They could have tried to link arms or something though.

 

I think gore vids are better examples of their lack of empathy, but I didn't want to post that kind of stuff here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

gore vids

 

What is that ?

 

Something else I notice is that people think what is on the internet  is ... what a nation is.  But it's only what's on the internet.

Internet is full of weirdos sharing weirdo material that is dark for one reason or another.

It's all boring.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rideforever said:

 

What is that ?

 

Something else I notice is that people think what is on the internet  is ... what a nation is.  But it's only what's on the internet.

Internet is full of weirdos sharing weirdo material that is dark for one reason or another.

It's all boring.

 

 

Talk to expats that live there or have lived there. People walking by while others suffer is not just a meme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

There is a good chance that a war would likely be on the West, not China. We have been totally weakened because of subversion. We're all fighting each other, they just have to sit back and watch. Once the powder keg that is our nations explodes, it will only take outside forces to come and finish us off.

 

We are a golden calf that has been milked dry, ready to blow away like dust.

 

We wouldn't be handing tech to them if we had benevolent leaders, surely?


I don’t believe there was any subversion by the Chinese. Just like 9/11 was a justification for taking over the Middle East, Covid, election fraud, and their supposed infiltration of big tech will be the justification for taking over China. But it’s all lies. Our leaders did it. They’ve been running a China smear campaign for years. We manufactured problems, blamed them on the Chinese, and soon the solution will be war. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@rideforever

 

One thing I forgot to add is that many of them don't help each other as much there because scammers often complain that you hurt them if you try to help them, then they try to sue you.

 

I think things are getting a bit better with the younger generation there though, but the older 'Lost Generation' from the Mao era are pretty dog eat dog. Living through famine and cannibalism probably does that to a person though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually...I don’t think I was thinking big enough. Maybe it’s all fake news. If China and the USA both have the goal of having more control over their citizens...they might work together. They don’t have to go to war, they can just say they are going to war, manufacture the media coverage, and skim 100 billion dollars off the war budget. Being “at war” gives both countries carte blanche to take away freedoms, crash the economy, increase levels of fear, and whatever else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dawn said:

Being “at war” gives both countries carte blanche to take away freedoms, crash the economy, increase levels of fear, and whatever else. 

 

Yep. They're in an AI arms race. I read something a while ago about America and the basic premise was that China will keep developing it's AI and surveillance, and if America doesn't do the same then it will fall behind.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Yep. They're in an AI arms race. I read something a while ago about America and the basic premise was that China will keep developing it's AI and surveillance, and if America doesn't do the same then it will fall behind.

 


Actually, I STILL wasn’t thinking big enough was I... Lots of others played along with Covid on a global level. The UK, Italy, Canada, Germany, The World Health Organization etc. America and China being “at war” would actually give THE WORLD carte blanche to crash the economy. Whether a country was directly involved as an ally or not, it is very believable that a war between the US and China could affect every nation. Every country would have an excuse to increase surveillance, initiate socialism, and impose liberty killing restrictions. War times..ya know. Yeah...a war between China and the US could just be a Trojan horse for the great reset. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...