Jump to content

COVID Vaccine Side Effects


RobinJ
 Share

Recommended Posts

So if I understand you right Macnamara, if you have had a flu vax (recently?) you have a much greater death rate possibility when the COVID vax is rolled out? My sister had a flu jab about a month ago, and I think my asbergers brother did too. Ive always had an aversion to needles and Im big into natural health so I avoid that crap like the plague.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DarianF said:

UK warns patients with severe allergies to avoid Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine after two patients have reactions

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-12-10/uk-regulator-investigating-reactions-to-covid-19-vaccine/12968604

Notice they are only showing the milder cases-compared to the potential side effects list I put up earlier. A lot of the stuff on that list was spinal related, which is where the vegas nerve is of course and the superhighway to everything in the body, along with the connection to the brain and pineal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RobinJ said:

Notice they are only showing the milder cases-compared to the potential side effects list I put up earlier. A lot of the stuff on that list was spinal related, which is where the vegas nerve is of course and the superhighway to everything in the body, along with the connection to the brain and pineal.

 

The media will never report the serious stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Macnamara said:

viral interference'

 

inter-goddam-ferencei   is the way scientists hide the fact that their injections actually damage the immune systems of their victims to make profit.

Scientists these days need special qualifications : lying by using these kinds of words, lying using specially doctored statistics, and marketing for products that they know don't work.

These qualifications are taught in the universities.

 

I read that "Lancet report" couple of days ago about the safety of the Oxford vaccine.  Problem is the only safety they were measuring was side effects of the shot, like fatigue or allergy.

They didn't measure the effect on your immune health ... how the injection actually damages your immune system vs other viruses, like colds, flus, other respiratory diseases.

They say 100% effective yes it may be against the target virus ... but the overall effect is to damage you.

 

That US Military study shows you have 36% MORE chance of get Coronavirus Infections after you have the seasonal flu shot.

Just think of what that means.

 

The new pandemics are probably directly or partially caused by the flushot.

 

In this era, when Big Pharma Scientists do experiments that show their drugs are dangerous, they don't publish them.  They erase them.

Such scum.

And they spend more money on marketing than on R&D ... because it's cheaper to make people believe you are gonna save them, then to actually save them.

They are not scientists.

People like Richard Dawkins and that Neil Tyson ... they are marketeers.  They don't do any science themselves.  They are just talking adverts to promote universities.

They don't do science.

 

It was the same for Isaac Newton, he was sick of the bullshit ... they were pulling bullshit on him all the time as well.   Seems to be on this planet 1% genius 99% sheep, always the same.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

the question is at what point do enough people realise this and reject it enmasse?

 

that's what we have to work towards

It’s not going well for Pfizer 2 people in uk suffered allergic reactions to the vaccine people with allergies told not to take it hopefully this will wake a few more of the sleeping up and get them questioning more . 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, RobinJ said:

So if I understand you right Macnamara, if you have had a flu vax (recently?) you have a much greater death rate possibility when the COVID vax is rolled out? My sister had a flu jab about a month ago, and I think my asbergers brother did too. Ive always had an aversion to needles and Im big into natural health so I avoid that crap like the plague.

 

so without straying into what would be called 'conspiracy theory' by the mainstream we can speak confidently about the existence of a problem with the flu vaccine called 'viral interference' which the scientists say they don't fully understand. My view on that is that if they don't fully understand the mechanisms at work then they shouldn't be rolling these things out on the public

 

The Flu Shot Makes A Flu Pandemic – Worse?

The Flu Shot Promotes Other Viruses

 

Enter 2009, the first major flu pandemic to occur after  mass influenza vaccination had become a reality.  Big pharma did indeed heroically turn out millions of doses of pandemic influenza vaccine.     Unfortunately,  most of the doses did not become available to the general public until after the pandemic was nearly over.  In addition there was the inconvenient finding that individuals who had obediently taken the seasonal flu vaccine the year before were  more likely  to develop pandemic influenza illness that was medically attended.    Public health experts were shocked by these findings but kept their lips sealed as Big Pharma and their sponsored government agencies used  the public spotlight on the flu in 2009 as a springboard to push for an even larger flu vaccination program.   For the first time the flu vaccine was recommended for every American citizen, especially children, who by 2020 were the largest consumers of the shot despite lack of evidence of benefit and the mercury that was allowed to remain in the vaccine.

 

As alluded to above, 2009 was not an anomaly; the flu shot  routinely increases the rate of infection with other pathogens, negating any benefits of the shot.   While many of the studies of this phenomena worked with patients who had freely chosen whether or not to take the flu shot, (Dierig et al., 2014), one study met the gold standard of a blinded, randomized, placebo controlled trial (Cowling et al., 2012).   While it has been generally hypothesized that the mechanism of the increase in non-flu illnesses is viral interference - the observation that illness with one virus may block others  - it was found by Riken et al. (2018)  that the increase in non-flu infections starts in the first 14 days after receipt of the flu vaccine, before any immunity to the flu has developed.  This indicates that like the DTP vaccine and other innactivated pathogen vaccines, the vaccine engenders non-specific immune system changes which increase vulnerability to certain other infections.  Most of the studies on the flu vaccine have focused on children, or found statistically significant results only in children, however one study to find an affect in adults found that while the flu shot appeared to offer cross protection against certain pathogens for this population, the vulnerability to several other pathogens, including coronavirus, was specifically increased.   This study was with regards to "old" coronaviruses, not COVID-19.    The potential of the flu shot to fuel COVID-19, however, was firmly established, and, as we demonstrated above, can now clearly be seen in the COVID data.

Influenza vaccination and respiratory virus interference among Department of Defense personnel during the 2017–2018 influenza season
Author links open overlay panelGreg G.Wolff
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.005

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, rideforever said:

The new pandemics are probably directly or partially caused by the flushot.

 

what's more the scientists KNOW that they are harming people:

 

A riposte to the creatures in the WHO:

Scientists Question Safety of Vaccines (WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit December 2019)

0.29 seconds ''without good science we can't have good communication''

If you don't have the 'science' then why are you rolling out vaccines on a massive scale?

 

0.58 seconds ''we really don't have good safety monitoring systems''

If you don't have good safety monitoring systems then how can you assess if the vaccines are safe or not?

 

1 minute 10 seconds ''we are not able to give clear cut answers about the deaths that have occurred with particular vaccines''

If your vaccines are killing people and you can't understand why then why are you using them?

 

1 minute 20 seconds ''there is some obfuscation at that level''

If you are about 'science' then why would you hide anything? Surely you should lay all the facts on the table so that science can be more accurate. By failing to do that you are anti-science

 

1.57 ''how do we build confidence in this?''

If you have identified that the ADJUVANTS eg aluminium are toxic to health then the question is not how you get people to maintain confidence in a toxic product the question is how you make your product non toxic or you remove it from the market altogether. Why would you look to build confidence in a product that you know is causing harm?

 

2 minutes 50 seconds ''[adjuvants] multiply the reactogenicity, in many instances, and therefore it seems to me that it is not unexpected if they multiply the incidence of adverse reactions that are associated with the antigen, but may not have been detected through lack of statistical power in the original studies''

If your studies lack the necessary data to identify the risks involved in your vaccine then how can you then make an accurate cost to benefit analysis? If they are causing adverse reactions and you don't fully understand why then why are you not pulling the products off the market and why did you use them in the first place?

 

3.20 you say you see local reactogenicity immediately after the vaccine is applied and therefore accept those as vaccine induced adverse reactions and yet sound dismissive of more long term effects which you describe as 'accusations'; that smacks of criminally negligent irresponsibility to me

 

5.07 ''better mechanistic understandings of how these things work''

if you don't understand the mechanisms of your own vaccines then why would you ever inject them not a live human being as you can't be sure what impact that will have on them? You are essentially using people as your guinea pigs

 

5.18 ''if you struggle with the length of follow up''

So you are admitting that you do not look at the long term impacts on the people you vaccinate

 

5.35 ''its also the subject population that you administer the adjuvant to...''

Yes that is why applying a one size fits all approach to medicine is deeply flawed and dangerous and criminally irresponsible

 

6.18 ''a child is being given different antigens from different companies, and these vaccines have different adjuvants and preservatives and so on....something crosses my mind...is there a possibility of these adjuvants, preservatives cross-reacting amongst themselves?''

Yes of course there is. There is also the possibility that vaccine ingredients could react synergistically with other environmental factors such as fluoride, glyphosate and even microwaves, so you have to ask yourself why this doesn't 'cross the mind' of the scientists who make the vaccines and the doctors who administer them? Are they retards or criminals?

 

6.36 ''has there ever been a study on the possibility of cross-reactions?''

 

from 6.48 Dr Chen then goes on to admit that they lack that data and want to give people barcodes which is an admission that upto now they haven't studied the possibility of cross-reactivity and also that even if they create barcodes and use them to look into that the people who are vaccinated during that time will still not have the protection of the knowledge of those studies and will be guinea pigs demonstrating that they are knowingly flying blind

 

7.40 Dr Chen welcomes the emergence of 'large data sets' which means large amounts of people who are acting as guinea pigs

 

8.47 ''in medical school you are lucky if you have a half day on vaccines''

If doctors are lucky to have a half day on vaccines then isn't it about time that we stopped referring to them as 'experts' on the subject of vaccines? I have had more than a half day on vaccines therefore i am more of an expert on vaccines than the GP's who are so eager to inject them into our children

 


 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RobinJ said:

Macnamara

wow! awesome synopsis. Thanks a lot, I will spread the info as far as possible. I think I might make a pdf of that info with the video link embedded too.

 

great, send it viral.

 

There is also this you could post around as well; i've been careful to use mainstream sources so that the normies don't have one of their little hissy fits:

 

Below are seventeen short excerpts from newspapers, medical journals and websites to illustrate several key points:

-the PCR test which was used to justify the lockdowns is not fit for purpose

-the lockdowns are not justified

-the vaccine is not justified nor safe nor will it take things back to normal and possibly causes infertility and a dangerous and potentially fatal immune response

Normality only resumes when people stop complying

 

Contents

Please take a moment to read over the contents

 

  1. Boris admits that the Pfizer jab won't end the lockdowns
  2. Government admits that the vaccine is not 100% safe
  3. Patrick Vallance admits that the vaccine roll out won't end mask wearing, lockdowns or coronavirus
  4. Pfizer CEO warns that he is 'not certain' that the vaccine will stop the transmission of the virus
  5. Government report warns that the lockdowns could kill 75,000 people over five years
  6. Government document admits it is unknown if the Covid vaccine will cause infertility
  7. The British Medical Journal warn that the government are suppressing science to rush through the vaccines
  8. MHRA regulator is not 'independent' as was funded 980,000 by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2017
  9. Public health England document admits that their PCR test does NOT test for infectious viruses
  10. A global team of experts finds flaws with the PCR tests which have been driving the lockdowns
  11. A Portuguese court rules that the PCR tests are not fit for purpose
  12. Dr Hotez testifies that the mRNA vaccine technology killed test subjects
  13. Previous experiments using mRNA vaccines caused 'immune enhancement' in the test subjects leading to their deaths
  14. The British Medical Journal warns that the vaccine trials can't tell if the vaccines will reduce deaths
  15. Ex Pfizer scientist warns that the Pfizer vaccine may cause infertility or death
  16. Ex Pfizer scientist says the second wave does not exist
  17. Over 35,000 scientists and Doctors sign the Great Barrington Declaration saying that only the vulnerable should have been quarantine

1. Boris Johnson warns Pfizer jab 'WON'T deliver knock-out blow' needed to end lockdown as 50 rebel Tory MPs say PM must not 'use vaccine as excuse to keep England closed for even longer' and country prepares for 'FOUR-tier system from December 2'

The premier said science had given the country 'two big boxing gloves' via a possible vaccine and mass testing, but added: 'Neither of them is capable of delivering a knock out blow on its own. The pointed comments came amid signs whole regions of England could be kept under brutal restrictions after the blanket lockdown ends on December 2. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8936191/Government-considers-changing-anti-Covid-tier-December-2.ht

 

2. Coronavirus vaccine will be 'as safe as it can be' but scientist will admit there is no 100% guarantee in honesty-first fight against anti-vaxxers

  • Department of Health and Cabinet Office created task force to promote vaccine
  • Team will advertise jab on social media and TV but acknowledge it is not flawless
  • A source told The Times: 'No clinician would ever say any vaccine is 100% safe'
  • It follows revelations that GPs could offer vaccine on Christmas and Boxing Day 

By Katie Weston For Mailonline

Published: 08:45, 7 November 2020 | Updated: 09:08, 7 November 2020

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8923645/Covid-19-vaccine-campaign-admit-jab-NOT-100-cent-safe-honesty-approach.html

3.Sir Patrick Vallance warns Brits could still be wearing face masks NEXT winter because it will 'take quite a long time' to vaccinate everyone and jabs might not stop the virus spreading

  • The chief scientific adviser said people must still follow social distancing rules
  • No proof that vaccination will stop people transmitting the coronavirus
  • Studies have only proven so far that jabs can prevent Covid-19 disease 
  • Britain today became the first country in the world to vaccinate citizens 

By Sam Blanchard Senior Health Reporter For Mailonline

Published: 12:33, 8 December 2020 | Updated: 13:49, 8 December 2020

Britons might still have to wear face masks next winter, Sir Patrick Vallance said today. The chief scientific adviser said the precaution – new to the UK but standard practice in some Asian countries – could be a long-term fix if coronavirus keeps circulating. Britain today became the first country in the world to start vaccinating citizens against Covid-19, but scientists still don't know whether the jab can stop people spreading the virus.Trials proved that it can prevent the Covid-19 illness, at least temporarily, but only time will tell whether it stops people picking up the virus and giving it to others. Sir Patrick said it would 'take quite a long time' to get the vaccine to everybody in the UK and other top scientists say the virus could become seasonal like the flu.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9030263/Brits-wearing-face-masks-winter-Patrick-Vallance-warns.html

4.Pfizer CEO ‘not certain’ their vaccine stops transmission of Covid-19 as company’s jab approved in UK and evaluated in US

4 Dec, 2020 04:36 / Updated 6 hours ago
The top executive at pharma giant Pfizer said it still isn’t clear if those who receive the company’s vaccine will be able transmit the coronavirus to others, just one day after the UK became the first to approve the inoculation.

While Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said he expects the vaccine rollout to be rapid after it gets the green light from US health officials, following in the steps of Britain, he noted that it remains to be seen whether recipients of the jab can still carry and pass the virus. 

“Even though I’ve had the protection, am I still able to transmit it to other people?” NBC’s Lester Holt asked in an interview on Thursday night, prompting a startling response from Bourla:

''I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now.''

https://www.rt.com/news/508636-pfizer-vaccine-transmission-covid/

5. Lockdown 'could kill 75,000 over five years' - that's the OFFICIAL projection of non-COVID deaths caused by missed cancer diagnoses, cancelled operations and health impacts of a recession. The virus death toll? 42,000
By Ben Spencer and Simon Walters for the Daily Mail
Published: 22:00, 25 September 2020 | Updated: 08:11, 26 September 2020
Nearly 75,000 people could die from non-Covid causes as a result of lockdown, according to devastating official figures buried in a 188-page document. The startling research, presented to the Government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), will further increase pressure on Boris Johnson to hold back on introducing further coronavirus restrictions. The document reveals 16,000 people died as a result of the chaos in hospitals and care homes in March and April alone. It estimates a further 26,000 will lose their lives within a year if people continue to stay away from A&E and the problems in social care persist.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rojection.html

 

6.

FERTILITY-QUOTE.jpg

 

7. Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science

BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4425 (Published 13 November 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4425

 

When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die

Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.

Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.

The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists.

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425

 

8. Press release

MHRA awarded over £980,000 for collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation

MHRA today announced a partnership worth over £980,000 to improve the safety monitoring of medicines in low and middle-income countries.

Published 15 December 2017
From: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mhra-awarded-over-980000-for-collaboration-with-the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-and-the-world-health-organisation
 
9. Public health England document admits that their PCR test does NOT test for infectious viruses:
PCR.jpg
 

10. A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should

1 Dec, 2020 18:59

Among the fatal flaws that totally invalidate the PCR testing protocol are that the test:

  • is non-specific, due to erroneous primer design

  • is enormously variable

  • cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments

  • has no positive or negative controls

  • has no standard operating procedure

  • does not seem to have been properly peer reviewed

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508383-fatal-flaws-covid-test/

11. Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People

November 18, 2020

A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that

“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”

The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown.

The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%.

https://greatgameindia.com/portuguese-court-pcr-tests-unreliable/

 

12. Dr. Peter Hotez Addressing House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Hearing on Coronavirus

March 5, 2020

Excerpt:

"When I say scientific challenge, one of the things we are not hearing a lot about is potential safety problems of coronavirus vaccines. This was first found in the 1960s with respiratory interstitial virus vaccines done in Washington with the NIH and Children's National Medical Center. Some of those kids who got the vaccine did worse and I believe there were two deaths. What happens with certain types of respiratory virus vaccine, to get immunized and when you are exposed to the virus you get this paradoxical enhancement phenomenon. We don't entirely understand the basis of it, that we recognize there's a real problem with certain respiratory virus vaccines. That killed the program for decades and now the Gates foundation is taking it up again, but then we start developing coronavirus vaccines. We noticed laboratory animals that they started to show some of the same pathology that resembled what it happened years earlier. This is going to be problematic..."

13. Immune Enhancement

Studies have suggested that coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as vaccine enhancement, where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus. The mechanism that causes that risk is not fully understood and is one of the stumbling blocks that has prevented the successful development of a coronavirus vaccine.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vaccines-insight-idUSKBN20Y1GZ

14. BMJ Sounds the Alarm: COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Cannot Tell Us if They Will Save Lives

By BMJ October 21, 2020

None of the current trials are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospitalizations, intensive care use, or deaths.

Vaccines are being hailed as the solution to the covid-19 pandemic, but the vaccine trials currently underway are not designed to tell us if they will save lives, reports Peter Doshi, Associate Editor at The BMJ today.

https://scitechdaily.com/bmj-sounds-the-alarm-covid-19-vaccine-trials-cannot-tell-us-if-they-will-save-lives/

 

15. Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition

December 1, 2020

The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:

The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus. The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.

 

https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/

16. Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says "Second Wave" Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, "Pandemic is Over"

Updated on September 29, 2020

Ralph Lopez

In a stunning development, a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says "there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." The "Big Pharma" insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a "second wave" based on "new cases."

Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even "almost all" of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already.

In an interview last week Dr. Yeadon was asked:

"we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six people in a meeting...all based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this coronavirus?"

Dr. Yeadon answered with a simple "yes."

Even more significantly, even if all positives were to be correct, Dr. Yeadon said that given the "shape" of all important indicators in a worldwide pandemic, such as hospitalizations, ICU utilization, and deaths, "the pandemic is fundamentally over."

Yeadon said in the interview:

"Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV all the time, you would rightly conclude that the pandemic was over, as nothing much has happened. Of course people go to the hospital, moving into the autumn flu season...but there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen."

Survival Rate of COVID Now Estimated to be 99.8%, Similar to Flu, Prior T-Cell Immunity

The survival rate of COVID-19 has been upgraded since May to 99.8% of infections. This comes close to ordinary flu, the survival rate of which is 99.9%. Although COVID can have serious after-effects, so can flu or any respiratory illness. The present survival rate is far higher than initial grim guesses in March and April, cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci, of 94%, or 20 to 30 times deadlier. The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26%. The survival rate of a disease is 100% minus the IFR.

Dr. Yeadon pointed out that the "novel" COVID-19 contagion is novel only in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus. But, he said, there are presently four strains which circulate freely throughout the population, most often linked to the common cold.

 

17. The Great Barrington Declaration

The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. 

Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice. 

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza. 

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e.  the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity. 

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.

On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:

 

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.

Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

https://gbdeclaration.org/

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/8/2020 at 5:33 PM, rideforever said:

In Bergamo (north Italy) they were completely wiped out by Covid .. it killed so many people that it was the European Covid epicentre.

Strangely in Milan 35 miles away nothing much happened.

Was there anything that happened in Bergamo that didn't happen in Milan?
Yes ... Yes there was.

In January, a few months before "covid", the Bergamo city decided to vaccinate 220,000 injections into the Bergamo people, for Meningitis and for Flushot.

This did not happen in Milan.

And the effect seems to have been to damage the immune system of Bergamo people ... when "covid" arrived it destroyed them.

 

And so it is very likely that "Covid" has been caused, wholly or in part, by the damage to the immune system caused particularly by the flushot vaccine.  Is it any surprise that as flushot becomes more widespread ... now we have lots of pandemics?

Well overpopulation might also be a problem, but the flushot is a big part of it.  

 

There are lots of big scientific studies providing that flushot damages your immune system for "covid".

 

Here are some:

https://tinyurl.com/y43dhf9r

 

I shared this in the Common Purpose thread:

Quote

The meeting went along the lines of:

There is an influenza virus currently affecting the world which is the real health issue but it is

ultimately nothing to be overly concerned about plainly speaking. People were knowingly wrongly given the wrong flu jab across the UK in winter 2019 following event 201, this resulted in inflammation of the larynx and people complained of having the sensation of broken glass in their throats. Following this, the rhetoric of covid 19 was spun as a virus which could attack immune systems and hence the associated panic until society was shut down resulting in Scenario (1).

 

So it stands to reason that similar 'wrong flu jabs' could have been given to people all over the world, and these are the people who 'got Covid'.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seems possible. Im hearing lots of reports from nurses now that people are showing up with radioactive poisoning and immune deficiency syndrome symptoms AFTER patients have the tests. Some 'tests' have radioactive nanogel on the end of it so its not surprising. Teenagers are a growing group of those affected apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...