Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population?

[Firebird]

People like to think they are ''different'' and ''above'' biological differences. Put a liberal thinker in prison and he is very likely to team up with people of his own skin colour. Most people, when put under pressure, will show their nature. Anything else is just nice talk during times when it is easy to say you believe in some morally better blabla.

[Macnamara]

39 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:

Did you watch Mark Collett debating Destiny, the bisexual, depraved, meth abusing liberal who cheats on his wife in an 'open marriage'. 

 

no i did not

 

39 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:

 Rob, to his credit. just refuses to register it in his reality....

 

even when it is placed in front of him and explained to him

Edited January 12, 2022 by Macnamara

[skitzorat]

On 1/11/2022 at 6:38 PM, skitzorat said:

*I'm still waiting for examples of the right-wing extremism caused as a reaction to leftist BLM/antifa riots and extremism

offtopic somewhat, but still in relation to the agenda to reduce white European population and destruction of our countries, both ancestrally and in the New World. 

 

Just released data:

 

America Saw A Record 691 Mass Shootings In 2021, 0 Attacks By "White Supremacists"

The United States broke all previous records for mass shootings in 2021. None of the attacks had a white racial or terroristic motive.  The year closed with a total of 691 mass shootings and several hundred deaths related to these incidents in total, according to information collected by the Gun Violence Archive. Estimates reveal that the mass shooters are overwhelmingly black. 

 

The grim milestone was largely ignored by the liberal Brookings Institute, which instead praised the Department of Justice's aggressive crackdown on political activity as the reason for why there weren't any far-right or "white supremacist" attacks. 

 

The FBI's resources are currently preoccupied with soliciting alleged victims of "hate crimes" and "confronting white supremacy," as violent threats to citizens continue to rise to all time highs. 

 

2021 also saw at least 222 school shootings, another record, according to the Center for Homeland Defense and Security’s K-12 School Shooting Database. School shootings, also driven largely by black violence, have steadily increased in recent years, with 2018 and 2019 being the third and second most violent years for school children to date.

 

Assessing school shooter threats often falls under the responsibility of the FBI, though these cases are neglected if the FBI cannot uncover a nexus to white racialist or right-wing beliefs. Last November, the FBI was forced to pay a $130 million dollar settlement to the families of victims of the 2018 Parkland shooting after it emerged that agents showed negligence by ignoring the threat posed by Nikolas Cruz, who went on to murder 17 classmates.   

 

The year closed with 16 cities, ranging from Atlanta to Philadelphia, shattering previous homicide records. The crisis of murder in America's cities has been met with a year over year record drop in clearance rates, according to information gathered by the Murder Accountability Project.  In data released in 2020, only 54% of all murders led to an arrest, the lowest ever recorded. 

Recently, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot publicly begged the Merrick Garland Department of Justice to send federal agents to help battle out of control crime in her city.  

 

The breakdown in public safety and dramatic expansion of homicidal threats has attracted criticism about the priorities of federal authorities when juxtaposed with the expensive, discriminatory and time consuming targeting and profiling of white men who criticize the government, such as the FBI-driven Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot currently slipping through the fingers of federal prosecutors.   

 

Mass media and politically influential Jewish lobbies such as the Anti-Defamation League are continuing to drive the FBI's crusade against "white supremacy" and "hate crimes" going into 2022, even in murder capitals such as Philadelphia, where there were only 63 self-reported "hate crimes," most which are registered as "ethnic intimidation" and vandalism against property .   

 

Contrasting with this moral panic is a jaw-dropping 562 murders in the city during 2021. Only 29% of fatal and 15% of non-fatal shootings ever leading to an arrest. 

 

With data-driven policing being declared "racist," the rising black crime wave that has locked Americans in their homes in 2020 and 2021 is bound to only get worse. 

https://national-justice.com/america-saw-record-691-mass-shootings-2021-0-attacks-white-supremacists

 

Think about the ones they hype up in the media and/or make international headlines; always some autistic/mentally ill/MKUltra'd white kid. They even go so far as to drag their parents through the media circus. Remember this kid recently?

Meanwhile all the black daily mass murders, even school shootings barely get a mention on a local affiliate news station.

 

Not to mention that Waukesha Christmas massacre "car attack" where the Black Supremist mowed down "dancing grannys" and little kids - all white.

GONE from the news within days.

http://www.renegadetribune.com/media-refers-to-black-extremists-deadly-ramming-rampage-in-waukesha-as-a-parade-crash/

 

When affirmative action in schools and diversity hires aren't enough to bring about the socialist "equity" - forget about the harmless removal of grades below c like in California

https://edsource.org/2021/why-some-california-school-districts-are-changing-how-students-earn-grades/664226

or graduating standards altogether, like Oregon just did

https://thefederalist.com/2021/12/15/erasing-all-high-school-standards-because-of-racism-is-actual-bigotry/

 

One could argue even more dangerous, is the complete removal any mention of criminality from real estate.

 

Realtor.Com Censors Crime Map on Its Database in An "An Effort to Avoid Penalizing Black and Latino Communities"

Previously on SBPDL: Real Estate Website Redfin.Com Decides to Abandon Publishing Crime Data in Neighborhoods Because It “Reinforces Racial Bias” Against Blacks

Another real estate website has decided not to add crime data to their database, all in “an effort to avoid penalizing Black and Latino communities.”[Realtor.com nixes crime map in effort to promote fair housing: The listing site will find other ways to integrate safety data in the upcoming months, The Real Deal, December 15, 2021]:

 

https://www.unz.com/sbpdl/realtor-com-censors-crime-map-on-its-database-in-an-an-effort-to-avoid-penalizing-black-and-latino-communities/

 

Third Worldizing America

https://townhall.com/columnists/victordavishanson/2021/12/02/third-worldizing-america-n2599978

 

Fentanyl Officially the Leading Cause of Death for Americans Aged 18 to 45

Mostly small town, Mid-Western, Rust-belt Ohio-types. White, middle class/ impoverished, no hope, bow-beaten from birth by msm and removed from culture/advertisements/movies etc - dying in record numbers of despair.

https://dailystormer.su/fentanyl-officially-the-leading-cause-of-death-for-americans-aged-18-to-45/

VertigoPolitix - The Epidemic of White Male Suicide

https://archive.org/details/vertigopolitix/The+Epidemic+of+White+Male+Suicide.mp4

 

[Firebird]

White progressives can't control what is happening, so what do they do? Internalize the problem, blame it all on white people because they've told themselves they aren't allowed to point the finger elsewhere. The answer is that we simply aren't 'kind' enough, and somehow the violence is caused by the failure of white people. They are not giving enough wealth and opportunity to the non-whites. You can see many white people, usually progressives, really struggle with the topic. They have also told themselves that it is bad to think firstly about yourself, your family and then an extended group, and only after that all people. They turn it the other way around, but in doing so, cause their own decline. From a nature point of view, every healthy specimen is interested in preserving him or herself and family, and then the culture and the extended group.

 

I think the blacks and browns are, as a group, closer connected to that instinct, and many of them know how to play the game. I'm not even talking reproduction here but advancing the interests of your own kind in general. The more positions of power given to non-whites the quicker the end of white people. It's just a fact.

Edited January 12, 2022 by Firebird

[Truthspoon]

21 minutes ago, Firebird said:

 

I think the blacks and browns are, as a group, closer connected to that instinct, and many of them know how to play the game. I'm not even talking reproduction here but advancing the interests of your own kind in general. The more positions of power given to non-whites the quicker the end of white people. It's just a fact.

 

It's not just an instinct though. Blacks and browns are the eternal victims of the world, according to the liberal agenda and critical race theory which has hijacked all the Western institutions, even when they are disproportionately more likely to commit violent crimes, rape and murder.

 

Blacks are also apparently victims of white people, somehow, even though white on black rape is virtually non-existent but the black on white rape of women is reaching pandemic proportions in London, but the media are very careful not to actually report the ethnic identity of the rapists.... in case anyone might discover that blacks perhaps are not quite the innocent and blameless victims of relentless white racism, but do in fact comprise a huge gang network of dangerous criminals committing violent assaults, selling class A drugs, raping and murdering, and playing its part in destroying the social order and peace of our ancient nations.

 

Could you imaging if white people had the same kind of gang network that blacks had? Even if we spent our time in the gang doing shopping for old ladies and picking litter we would still be called 'Hhhhwite supremacists'.... Funny that no one talks about the black gang thing.

Because they want it to exist.... because it keeps whitey in check in the cities... with the threat of violent assault and keeps the white women under a state of mild urban terror and afraid to walk the streets alone after dark.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited January 12, 2022 by Truthspoon

[skitzorat]

1 hour ago, Firebird said:

People like to think they are ''different'' and ''above'' biological differences. Put a liberal thinker in prison and he is very likely to team up with people of his own skin colour. Most people, when put under pressure, will show their nature. Anything else is just nice talk during times when it is easy to say you believe in some morally better blabla.

Exactly because all humans are TRIBAL - its an evolutionary advantageous trait. 

We can't help it even babies prefer they "own race." - in group preference; from infancy to mate selection.

Infants show racial bias toward members of own ethnicity, against those of others

Racial bias begins earlier than previously thought, new insights into cause

 

April 11, 2017

University of Toronto

 

Six- to nine-month-old infants demonstrate racial bias in favor of members of their own race and racial bias against those of other races, two new studies conclude.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170411130810.htm

 

But white ones need to taught they're bad

Toddlers in UK nurseries need to be taught about ‘white privilege’ because equality is not anti-racist enough, woke report claims

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/520170-uk-white-privilege-racism/

 

Nolte: Arizona Department of Education Teaches that White Babies and Toddlers Are Racist

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/03/04/arizona-department-education-teaches-white-babies-toddlers-racist/

 

After all real change wont happen until white kids are being killed too, says CNN

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/chris-cuomo-police-white-kids-b1833446.html

Chris Cuomo says police reform won't happen until white kids start getting killed

 

The word "racism" especially in current context is just another buzz word, coined by (((Lenin))) to smash whitey over the head with.. it's pure tribalism weaponized.

 

But only White/European Ethnic Pride is evil remember, never forget the Austrian Painter and the Aryan Race.

Another pys-op of WW11; "Hitler" "Nazi" "Nationalism" = bad

Thanks to jewish/masonic rewrite of history - never forget 6 gorillion, goy.

 

I refuse to buy into it - especially when conversating with people who come here to this thread to denigrate me and my culture - I dig my heals in - being labelled, or even thought of, as all the supreme pizza epithets under the sun doesn't bother me - I'm immune from such BS, because I can honestly say (to myself and that's all that matters) I don't think any "race" is more supreme than any others. Full stop. I wasn't raised that way, it's not my nature.

 

However, ethnics/cultures are very different and that's a fact; denying race realism is another psy-op weaponized against only whites. "We're all the same! One human family! Don't believe thousands of years of recorded history, modern science and your lying eyes today!"

 

And yes, I personally think European history is fucking amazing, more amazing than Asian history just cos, while interesting because I like a whole-picture world view, it's just not my thang.

 

Another fact is Europeans built modernity and civilization, weapons, science, medicine, electricity, global exploration and documentation of plants to  archaeology and governmental/parliament systems - we exported it to the world. #notsorry 

/end rant. 

 

Edited January 12, 2022 by skitzorat

[skitzorat]

2 hours ago, Truthspoon said:

Could you imaging if white people had the same kind of gang network that blacks had? Even if we spent our time in the gang doing shopping for old ladies and picking litter we would still be called 'Hhhhwite supremacists'..

Reminds me of a news article/post I saw about a year ago.

Some UK Patriots/White Nationalists group - non-political I think, certainly not extreme, just young proud White British boys and girls- went out into the countryside and did a big clean up; litter/scrub etc, posted some pictures online.

Heritage UK got wind of it and felt the need to issue a formal media statement disavowing them.

[RobSS]

36 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

 

You can arguably divide jewry up into several categories:

 

Extremist, non-religious but kosher jews; ADL, Barbara Lecture? etc

 

 

You wrote "etcetera", but in that word are many Jews who aren't interested in the ADL, Zionism, the Talmud, the Kabbalah, finance, big business, or politics. Whilst some Jews may have become Christian, many other Jews in the category I just mentioned are secular, and aren't interested in religion or religious beliefs in any way, shape or form.

 

It's nonsense to tar all Jews with the same brush.  Any intelligent person can see that, including, thankfully, David Icke. 

 

No one I've come across has summed this all up better than Alex Thompson, and what he said in an interview with James Delingpole (31st August, 2021). Here's the transcript from 24'50" into the video, or if you prefer, you can just watch the video, which I've set to start from that time mark:

 

Quote

 

James Delingpole: I have a telegram group and there's a few people on the telegram group who bang on about the “JQ”, which stands for, as you know, the “Jewish Question”, and you know if the world really were being run by evil Jews, and they were the solution of, you know, their explanation for everything that's wrong... if that were truly the case, I would be talking about it, but I think it's nonsense.

 

Alex Thompson: Yeah, it is nonsense... the best two-book riposte is by an Orthodox Rabbi from Boston, Massachusetts, called Rabbi Marvin Antelman, and his catchy book title is, "To eliminate the opiate", and he is one of the few having the understanding of a classic Orthodox Jew... the historical grounding, and the devotion, to trace illuminism and Satanism through Judaism and other religions back before 1776, which is most people's starting point... although, of course, it's clearly just one branch of a much older Luciferian agenda. Anyone who knows anything seriously about the Jews, for example, I teach biblical Hebrew in my Dutch reformed denomination to ministerial students – I try to read rabbinical materials as widely as I can – we know that even in any particular time and place the Jews have not been united about anything, philosophically or religiously, nor do they regard it as essential to be united on all matters.

 

You know they're famously intellectually diverse as a group. You know, we could go any number of ways there, but I'll happily talk to a modern ethno-nationalist. In fact, in both Britain, and the Netherlands, I've spent many happy semi-underground hours talking with them because they're some of the very few men left that will have their own opinion and actually want the best for their future, but if you want to talk the “Jewish question”, then you'd better know something about the Jews, preferably know some Jews... preferably know some Hebrew... know some biblical theology... know some Haskalah ideas – the Jewish Enlightenment – know something about Kabbalah, knowing something about the proportions of Jews who were in each, compared with the proportion of Jews who are simply secular and want to get on with life... you know that's a sine qua non for any discussion of the matter.

 

It was of course dissident Jews, in the late 19th century, who coined the phrase the "Judenfrage", the "Jewish question". There was no leadenness to it back then. It was simply in the same bracket as the “Irish question”, or the “Polish question”. What is this nation and where should it live? Now, that's in all three cases, of course, as with the Scots, as well in the Armenians... you've got up to 10 times as many members of that nation living in diaspora than at home, and ultimately, you know, the English do that too with the Empire, the Anglos around the world, and that skews a nation very greatly again... so these are not simple issues.

 

James Delingpole: Yes, if we were going to pin down the root cause of everything that's wrong with the world, we would probably be talking about the Illuminati?

 

Alex Thompson: Well yes, illuminism and Luciferianism as a philosophy, but you know nobody should look for a historic starting point it's simply, as I say the primacy of the mind, and the mental roots of evil. The same constellation of ideas keeps cropping up in any society. So the idea of, well, I mean: Satanism is a dedication to the Devil in the crudest sense... to fulfil your lusts of various kinds, but the elite kind of Luciferian believes that it's actually doing the world a favour by going for dystopia genocide, and tyranny because it will be such a beautiful, wonderful, harmonious future, "under our Light-bearing", which is the meaning of the word Lucifer, "our Light-bearing god".

 

Many of them believe that they're actually worshiping God, but it's Satan masquerading as God that's Luciferianism. Then, if you go back further, you've got, in the early Christian centuries... in both Judaism and Christianity... you've got Gnosticism... "Gnosis" in Greek... you know, meaning "knowledge"... particularly of the hidden kind... the idea that knowledge will save you. That’s got many other forms, like Hermeticum, but rather than doing an exhaustive study of these, which is particularly hard if you don't have the language in history, as something like we studied, just look at the recurrent ideas coming up... you know, again and again... it's the idea that it would be just wonderful if we could rule ourselves... if we didn't have any God-given boundaries to stop us stealing each other's stuff... if we could just decide for ourselves.

 

C.S Lewis said it best, I think... it's actually in that "Hideous Strength"... isn't it... that one of the characters is made to say, we know jolly well that man running his own affairs means that some of mankind will decide what the rest of mankind gets.

 

James Delingpole: Yes, I haven't got to that bit but, yeah, I'm sure that that sounds like it ought to be the case from that...

 

Alex Thompson: But that's the key node... you know that bridges the gap between, "Oh, I can't believe we have Satanists and Luciferians running society"... to, "Oh, now this is sounding a bit like the technocrats and the globalists that are trying to run the show now.

 

James Delingpole: So before we get into details about, you know the “13”... the black nobility and stuff... what you're saying is that, essentially, this is this age-old battle between Good and Evil that we're experiencing, and this has always been with us, and I've only realised this recently... you know... I've become Christian, you know, real Christian, as opposed to a kind of cultural Christian because I perceive the truth that God is real...

 

 

 

Edited January 13, 2022 by RobSS

[Truthspoon]

11 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

no i did not

 

 

even when it is placed in front of him and explained to him

 

Here it is.... You will find Destiny's loathsome tactics in evading the truths Mark Collett gives perhaps somewhat familiar to those of our wriggling friend here:
 

 

[RobSS]

7 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

No, in that word  [etc etc] are the other extremist, non-religious but Kosher jews, similar to the ADL and Barbara types, like these

 

I deliberately left the link to my post on page 71 so I didnt have to repeat this.

They may not be religious, but they're extremist and kosher as in I bet they don't eat bacon!.

 

 

I had a category for them - many tens of thousands still spew anti-white hatred on Twitter.

See page 71. Secular Israelis still hate goyim and spit in Church doorways.

 

I bet even the liberal/secular jews celebrate Hanukah with their families and many very clearly go out of their way to tear down Christmas at any given chance.

 

VERY few. VERY VERY few, they did in the medevial era but not in modern times.

Not sure why that's relevant to the conversation, but since you bring it up, many more high profile converted jews,  Brother Nathanial, Henry Makkow, where I learn't a lot of information/sources for information - from the horses mouth so to speak - if they weren't ethnically jewish they would be labelled raving anti-semites! 

 

Other high profiles who turn their backs (not Christian) and speak truths like Christopher Jon Bjerkness, Ron Unz, David Cole are considered blood-traitors, but not as much as the ones that convert to Christianity.

 

 

Not all jews, I said that, specifically, but kindly provide counter evidence to my evidence that many 10s if not 100s of thousands do not [hold anti-white beliefs] as a group if you're so intelligent.

 

Yes, I consider myself intelligent, hence from all the non-bias research I've done throughout the years from many sources, of which the evidences I provided are but a sample, I came to a general conclusion, completely devoid of motive,  that many, NOT ALL!! but many, especially powerful influential jews, do hold anti-white beliefs and openly hostile to Europa and working towards Her demise.

 

Its not my problem if you don't allow for any non-judgmental comprehension of pure facts, free from your own closed safe ideology, or just unwilling to search for them.

Granted you believe George Floyd was murdered because he was black, - "because the courts said so" - so you're probably not very good at this.

 

Do you need to bring up David in every reply, Surprised you didn't throw in a quote.

 

But speaking of David, can you imagine how much shit would hit the fan if HE DID lay out facts like I just did? He's already had many run-ins legally with the jews over the years, especially with his talk of "reptiles" and criticism of Israel.

Granted he's a full time conspiracy researcher who's being doing it professionally for 30+ years and has a very esoteric view which is vastly greater than mine, but can you IMAGINE if he say something like I just did in so many words?!

 

Sabbatian Frankists are jews. Freemasonry is Lurianic Kabballah for gentiles. The "cabal" is made of Satanists, many who are ethnically jews.  The Israeli State - some wishing to make Jerusalem the new Capital for the NWO is a jewish State.

Once "Rome" or "Amalek" is destroyed and third temple is built (its all set to go.)

There is a correlation between all those things and it ain't a love of Europa.

 

Surely you're not so blind to see that even saying anything remotely critical of jews is dangerous, especially for a public figure like David? I even mentioned saying what I said could likely get the forum shut down soon as Israel monitors the internet.

 

Thank you, I will listen to it at some point, not a fan of Delingpole, but like Alex a lot, but again, public figures have to tread extremely carefully.

 

Don't feel so flattered, it was more an explanation to the thread/forum as a whole as to why, and how, I laid things out like I did a few pages back... and since you kept harping on about not blaming people, I thought I'd throw in some more context to the jews and they distain for Europa for the casual reader, and for yourself if you were remotely interested in different facets.

 

Not all Jews are extremist and kosher. There are lots of Jews who don't even celebrate Hanukah. There are lots of Jews who don't hate white people and who are none of things you mentioned, so I don't agree with you that all Jews are the problem.

 

 

 

 

 

[RobSS]

8 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:

 

Here it is.... You will find Destiny's loathsome tactics in evading the truths Mark Collett gives perhaps somewhat familiar to those of our wriggling friend here:
 

 

 

 

“The day that China actually eclipses America and stomps it into the dirt is a day that I will wave high my Chinese flag and laugh wildly!” (Mark Collett)

 

 

 

[RobSS]

51 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:

 

the truths Mark Collett gives perhaps somewhat familiar to those of our wriggling friend here:
 

 

Why should anyone listen to Mark Collett's "truths"?

 

Recently, Jayda Fransen, of the British Freedom Party, said that Patriotic Alternative, founded by Mark Collett, is "imploding, it is falling apart", she said, "it is completely finished... it's on the road to nothing".

 

She said PA is imploding because, "the likes of Mark Collett, who is out there blatantly grooming young men into becoming incels, which are good for nothing", etc&etc.

 

Incels are men who hate women.

 

 

 

 

Edited January 13, 2022 by RobSS

[skitzorat]

Not all jews.

Not all blacks.

Not all muslims.

Not all immigrants.

Not all minorities.

Not all gays.

Not all trannys.

Not all.

Not all.

 

Why the hell does *NOT ALL* have to be spelled out by the letter and added as a stock standard proviso to any and all potentially incendiary categorization of a *insert protected group* to some people?!

 

I mean FFS, when I feel it's necessary, I do! And I did!

PS. Bet you can't find me one secular/liberal/non-religious jew that loves a good non-kosher bacon sandwich!

 

I note however no refutations with evidences and explanations as to why to any of my points aren't valid as they stand though, as usual. 

Just the *not all* or *David Icke quote* or *whataboutism* standard reply to anything not agreed with, usually preceded by "I don't agree"

 

"My world view is right and I will argue your point but not back it up with details as to why I don't agree or how I reached a different conclusion or why the conclusion you reached is wrong, but I'm right."

 

One thing I've noticed across your contributions is a theme where you're very fast to counter or *not agree* with someone elses world view/post, provide no data or back up your statements outside joe-normie talking points, David Icke or Bible reference, and yet when showered with endless amounts of really good info provided by many, many others countered to your talking points that could open your mind to the different conspiratorial aspects (which this forum is about), still stay stuck in your normie world view and turn around at the end and say "I don't agree."

I sometimes wonder what you want to gain from these pages by holding onto your worldview so tight, especially on topics such as this thread which is so obviously antithetical to it.

It's quite amazing.

*insert racism* 

[RobSS]

Mark Collett was betrayed by his Jewish friend:

 

 

Edited January 13, 2022 by RobSS

[skitzorat]

That clip was uploaded 2017, but is clearly much older than that because Mark looks like he's in his early 20s - back when he was more extreme in his views. Not sure what that has to do with the price of fish.

Kinda funny it's been uploaded by a zionist channel called Israeli Conflicts and is full of anti-anything-not-worshipping-Israel clips... and of course Mark is called a "Nazi" in the title.

[RobSS]

37 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

That clip was uploaded 2017, but is clearly much older than that because Mark looks like he's in his early 20s - back when he was more extreme in his views. Not sure what that has to do with the price of fish.

Kinda funny it's been uploaded by a zionist channel called Israeli Conflicts and is full of anti-anything-not-worshipping-Israel clips... and of course Mark is called a "Nazi" in the title.

 

Truthspoon said Mark Collett offers truth, but what Mark Collett said, and the way he acted on camera, undermines Truthspoon's claim. The video shows that will easily deceive people.

 

There's still Jayda Fransen, of the British Freedom Party, which I posted about above, which you ignored, and her saying that Patriotic Alternative, founded by Mark Collett, is "imploding, it is falling apart", she said, "it is completely finished... it's on the road to nothing".

 

She said PA is imploding because, "the likes of Mark Collett, who is out there blatantly grooming young men into becoming incels, which are good for nothing", etc&etc. Incels are men who hate women.

 

Edited January 13, 2022 by RobSS

[RobSS]

  

 

1 hour ago, skitzorat said:

Not all jews.

Not all blacks.

Not all muslims.

Not all immigrants.

Not all minorities.

Not all gays.

Not all trannys.

Not all.

Not all.

 

Why the hell does *NOT ALL* have to be spelled out by the letter and added as a stock standard proviso to any and all potentially incendiary categorization of a *insert protected group* to some people?!

 

I mean FFS, when I feel it's necessary, I do! And I did!

 

Is the reason why you don't like to state *NOT ALL* is because you seem to like to tar all Jews with the same brush, and you appear to dislike all Jews, is that right? It's only two little words, so if you were really interested in not offending all Jews, it wouldn't be much for you to type them, but they don't fit in with the negative vibes that you want to send out about Jews.

 

1 hour ago, skitzorat said:

PS. Bet you can't find me one secular/liberal/non-religious jew that loves a good non-kosher bacon sandwich!

 

Even if it is the case, which I don't think it is, so what? What's the big deal here? This is another of your little storms in a tea cup that you like to keep yourself amused with.

 

1 hour ago, skitzorat said:

I note however no refutations with evidences and explanations as to why to any of my points aren't valid as they stand though, as usual. 

 

I didn't need to dispute anything else because the discussion was about whether all Jews should be tarred with the same brush. Everything else you wrote was your usual tactic of deflection from that issue.

 

Edited January 13, 2022 by RobSS

[skitzorat]

36 minutes ago, RobSS said:

The reason why you don't like to state *NOT ALL* is because you like to tar all Jews with the same brush, and you dislike all Jews. It's only two little words, so if you were really not interested in offending all jews, it wouldn't much for you to type those too little words, but no, the two words don't fit in with the negative vibes that you want to send out.

 

No, quite right! I'm not interested in not offending all jews - I'm not interested in not "not offending" anyone for that matter - nor do I care about what others feel about my *vibes* although I'm a "special card-carrying protected minority myself" - I don't cry over words and attitudes that I *think are mean* on the internet.

 

I don't go out of my way to attack anyone/thing without the receipts to back it up either, but of course your types are constantly offended/looking for perceived offense under every rock (especially from white people against protected groups) or needing to virtue signal how noble you are at being so nice (except towards white interests)  

It's so pathetic.

Stop speaking on behalf of others, it's insufferable.

 

Besides which, what jews are here *getting offended* with my posts?!

Is what they do and say (which I documented) offensive to them? I don't think so.

It's offensive to me though!

Is me documenting what they say and do with the proofs offensive to them? Most definitely, it's almost illegal to do so, as I keep pointing out.

 

If they were here *getting offended*, I would kindly ask them what's offensive and to refute my factual non-bias facts, which I primarily first sourced from former jews, and a literary of other non-google/Wikipedia approved sources with links provided and even from their OWN MOUTHS AND TEXTS!

 

It's NOT hateful to quote people.

It's NOT hateful to see and call out patterns of behaviour.

It's NOT hateful to not feel particularly inclined to be warm and fuzzy to a group of people who are openly hostile to oneself and the civilization my ancestors built through their blood and tears, no matter who they are. I'm not a fan of any anti-Western/Anti-European individuals/groups/ideas/agendas - and I'm not afraid to say so.

I realize this comes as a shock to people like you, given you've become so accustomed to so many cucks who constantly bow down to your insufferable social justice.

 

 

 

47 minutes ago, RobSS said:

Even if it is the case, which I don't think it is, so what? What's the big deal here? This is another of your little storms in a tea cup that you like to keep yourself amused with.

YOU kept talking about all these non-kosher jews that are out there.

I don't think there are many, in a bacon-kosher way, even the non-religious ones.But I wouldn't know. It was just me amusing myself, yes.

 

48 minutes ago, RobSS said:

I didn't need to dispute anything else because the discussion was about whether all Jews should be tarred with the same brush. Everything else you wrote was your usual tactic of deflection from that issue.

Hardly a deflection; all the things I said in the discussion were backed up with evidences and directly related to their agenda as a group through many ways to reduce white people or anti-whiteness, anti-Europa.

You need to refute my points and evidences - of what they literally say and do - if you're going to argue I'm wrong.

 

How and what was I deflecting?

You often say this to others too, but never explain the deflection you harp on about.

 

51 minutes ago, RobSS said:

The above is just Fanny Fanackapan gibberish.

Correct. Much like your contributions to the discussion.

 

[RobSS]

1 minute ago, skitzorat said:

 

How can the whole group be responsible for what individuals do?

 

Are all British people guilty as a group because of the actions of Tony Blair and the government that he was in charge of?

 

[RobSS]

4 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

It's NOT hateful to quote people.

It's NOT hateful to see and call out patterns of behaviour.

 

Where have I said that? I've never said anything like that. You just make things up in order to deflect.

 

4 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

 

You misrepresent viewpoints so you can appear to be refuting something, when in reality, you're refuting nothing. I've never claimed that you want to gas Jews.

 

What I'm saying is that not all Jews are bad people. Simple!

 

4 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

YOU kept talking about all these non-kosher jews that are out there.

I don't think there are many, in a bacon-kosher way, even the non-religious ones.But I wouldn't know. It was just me amusing myself, yes.

 

Another little storm in a teacup.

 

4 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

Hardly a deflection; all the things I said in the discussion were backed up with evidences and directly related to their agenda as a group through many ways to reduce white people or anti-whiteness, anti-Europa.

 

Not all Jews are anti-white people. You just make people on the forum look silly when you make out that's the case. 

 

[skitzorat]

1 hour ago, RobSS said:

Where have I said that? I've never said anything like that.

 

1 hour ago, RobSS said:

You misrepresent viewpoints so you can appear to be refuting something, when in reality, you're refuting nothing. I've never claimed that you want to gas Jews.

You have a serious comprehension problem.

 

1 hour ago, RobSS said:

Not all Jews are anti-white people.

Not all blacks commit violent crimes in America.

Not all drag-queen story hour perverts are paedophiles.

Not all refugees rape children and violently murder ethnic Europeans in Europe.

Not all social justice warriors are insufferable, hypocritical do-gooders, full of self-importance and righteousness and hold radical Marxist beliefs.

Not all White men are completely demoralized to the point of life-cuckoldry or despair. 

 

But there's certainly patterns even Blind Freddie wouldn't miss if he took off his ideological spectacles.

 

1 hour ago, RobSS said:

You just make people on the forum look silly

Pot.Kettle.Black.

 

[RobSS]

12 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

 

You have a serious comprehension problem.

 

I ask you again, where have Isaid, "It's NOT hateful to quote people"? or "It's NOT hateful to see and call out patterns of behaviou"?

 

I've never said such things, so why bring up points like that for then?

 

12 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

 

Not all blacks commit violent crimes in America.

Not all drag-queen story hour perverts are paedophiles.

Not all refugees rape children and violently murder ethnic Europeans in Europe.

Not all social justice warriors are insufferable, hypocritical do-gooders, full of self-importance and righteousness and hold radical Marxist beliefs.

Not all White men are completely demoralized to the point of life-cuckoldry or despair. 

 

But there's certainly patterns even Blind Freddie wouldn't miss if he took off his ideological spectacles.

 

Meaningless patterns.

 

12 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

 

Pot.Kettle.Black.

 

 

You wrote, "all the things I said in the discussion were backed up with evidences and directly related to their agenda as a group through many ways to reduce white people or anti-whiteness, anti-Europa"

 

It's the same with the British. The British, as a group, are not responsible for the Iraq war, Likewise, Jews, as a group, are not against white people or anti-Europe.

 

You just want to find a scapegoat for everything that you personally perceive as a problem.

 

Edited January 13, 2022 by RobSS

[skitzorat]

4 minutes ago, RobSS said:

I ask you again, where have Isaid, "It's NOT hateful to quote people"? or "It's NOT hateful to see and call out patterns of behaviou"?

 

I've never said such things, so why bring up points like that for then?

 

I never implied YOU said those things, I said those things - the entire paragraph read:

 

It's NOT hateful to quote people.

It's NOT hateful to see and call out patterns of behaviour.

It's NOT hateful to not feel particularly inclined to be warm and fuzzy to a group of people who are openly hostile to oneself and the civilization my ancestors built through their blood and tears, no matter who they are. I'm not a fan of any anti-Western/Anti-European individuals/groups/ideas/agendas - and I'm not afraid to say so.

I realize this comes as a shock to people like you, given you've become so accustomed to so many cucks who constantly bow down to your insufferable social justice.

 

 

was referring to your schtick that I'm *mean* *hateful* *offensive* by documenting jewish behaviour in their own words towards Europa without the proviso "not all" [jews]- with a dig at the end.

You have a comprehension problem if out of the entire segment of 5 paragraphs, you understood that last paragraph to be me  directly "quoting you" or saying you said/implied those things. *facepalm*

 

2 hours ago, RobSS said:

I've never claimed that you want to gas Jews

The EXACT same comprehension issue.

 

I make my posts clear as day, I even HIGHLIGHTED the relevant part of that one for you!

 

17 minutes ago, RobSS said:

Meaningless patterns.

 

19 minutes ago, RobSS said:

Jews, as an entire group, are not against white people, and you haven't proved that is the case.

*not all jews* feel better now?

 

Now refute all the points I made.

Refute the historical evidences I showed from Roman times throughout the medieval era.

Refute their words, from the Talmud, from their own statements or the many thousands on twitters

Refute all the collective behaviours I documented; NGOs for open western borders, powerful political lobby groups, rich influential radicals, cultural Marxism from the frankfurt school now in western education, influences of the anti-white media, influences in degenerate "hollyweird" and entertainment to repeat just a few.

 

I laid out a substantial amount of evidences and rationale for me seeing and talking about collective behavioural patterns; YOU'RE the party of dispute here.

I'm not going to argue anymore because I'm repeating myself, but still, again, the burden of proof [of your claim I'm wrong] is on you.

 

 

[RobSS]

3 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

 

I never implied YOU said those things, I said those things - the entire paragraph read:

 

It's NOT hateful to quote people.

It's NOT hateful to see and call out patterns of behaviour.

It's NOT hateful to not feel particularly inclined to be warm and fuzzy to a group of people who are openly hostile to oneself and the civilization my ancestors built through their blood and tears, no matter who they are. I'm not a fan of any anti-Western/Anti-European individuals/groups/ideas/agendas - and I'm not afraid to say so.

I realize this comes as a shock to people like you, given you've become so accustomed to so many cucks who constantly bow down to your insufferable social justice.

 

 

was referring to your schtick that I'm *mean* *hateful* *offensive* by documenting jewish behaviour in their own words towards Europa without the proviso "not all" [jews]- with a dig at the end.

You have a comprehension problem if out of the entire segment of 5 paragraphs, you understood that last paragraph to be me  directly "quoting you" or saying you said/implied those things. *facepalm*

 

There's no comprehension problem at all, and you're still deflecting. I've never complained about you documenting Jewish behaviour where you have specific evidence. I brought up a very specific query as to why you blame Jews as a group. I gave the analogy of the British. The British, as a group, are not responsible for the Iraq war, Likewise, Jews, as a group, are not against white people or anti-Europe.

 

You just want to find a scapegoat for everything that you personally perceive as a problem.

 

3 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

 

I make my posts clear as day, I even HIGHLIGHTED the relevant part of that one for you!

 

LOL - You misrepresent viewpoints and just waste you're time wining long posts to make it appear that you're refuting something, but in reality, you're refuting nothing. No problem, at least my replies don't need to be as tediously long!

 

[RobSS]

17 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

 

 

*not all jews* feel better now?

 

 

Not all Jews are interested in or venerate the Star of David!

 

Edited January 13, 2022 by RobSS