Jump to content

Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population?


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Well then just say it's about revenge instead of saying it's only a matter of white people needing to condemn historical events.

 

If I had my way I would have all white people come back to their homeland anyway, but I'm in a minority there.

 

Also those groups you mentioned are not the ones that have the power of the press, so I'm not saying they're pushing the agenda with those kinds of articles for the most part. They're being used as pawns by people that think less of them than modern Europeans do. They're cutting their nose of to spite their face. Yes they might benefit in the short-term in the war on European culture, but they will be in the crosshairs once we're gone. You only have to look at how the media is now starting this bullshit against Eastern Asians, they'll probably get screwed after us.

Well running away isn't the solution, and won't compensate for the millions killed or raped or kicked from their homes. It's such a horrible feeling. I once had someone try and kick me out of my home. It's really an indescribable sensation of horror. And the sheer numbers and scale. I'm a religious guy. I don't believe our actions can ever make up for our mistakes. But our attitude can. A humble apology and full hearted attempt can come a long way. 

 

If I was a white man living on stolen land like Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, America, etc etc, I'd do the following FOR GOD'S SAKE. 

 

1. I'd get to know tribal elders if possible of the area I live in and be friends with them, while apologising for what my ancestors did. And basically get a spiritual visa from them. 

 

2. I'd push political parties, movements and organisations that work towards indigenous people's rights and receiving of stolen lands and compensation. Step by step, even if it starts with symbolic gestures and kind words. 

 

3. I'd study the native communities language, culture and religion, and try to assimilate as much as I can to them, and learn from them.

 

4. I'd root for natives to become leaders of the lands. 

 

5. I'd make a communication campaign to keep the memory alive of all the victims and extinguished tribes, as well as root for having national days and holidays based on local customs and special dates and events. 

 

Just some examples. 

 

Having the mentality of "yeah so what! My parents stole your land and fucked your daughters and killed your parents, but that's OK, because the Chinese and the ottomans did the same to people" just won't fly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Weedo said:

that I see people openly advocating apartheid racial legal double standards and racial segregation

where?!!!

1 hour ago, Weedo said:

I see that those people have not gotten any form of revenge, nor compensation. They did not get their lands back. They didnt get any blood money.. No eye for an eye. Not even an eye for a thousand eyes. 

Stop commenting on things you clearly know nothing about...Yes... Native peoples of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and even the United States have been on the receiving end of BILLIONS of $ in reparations in leu of spiritual/cultural damage, MILLIONS of hectares of land has been given back and formal apologies by the Heads of State given on multiple occasions and the trauma and nastiness of the past was never whitewashed from our (colonial countries) history books (NZ)...

 

 

I'm totally going to play into your game of entrapment here, but in some ways, western culture is better than some others... we had completely abandoned the backwards an eye for an eye barbaric mentality by the time of the Enlightenment and the great Age of Discovery...

 

..in saying that, there was also a second instalment of a famous Book that highly emphasised turn the other cheek, love thy neighbour and idea has had a profound impact on the West for 2000 years....as opposed to stoning woman to death and cutting heads off.

1 hour ago, Weedo said:

So from my perspective, I see the only peaceful solution to the average non white youth, that white people acknowledge it, and push really hard to show to the world that they are not like the past people.

yeah European youth aren't like their forbearers and haven't been for many, many generations.. my 95 YO Granny died a couple of years ago after holding her great-grand daughter...she wasn't a racist or held any one in contempt for the colour of their skin.. she was 3 and came from a poor fishing village in the far north of Scotland on a boat to NZ so she wasn't privileged either... none of my ancestral lines going back many generations recorded were Elitist.. but they were settlers who bought a ticket to the New World and made a better life for their family than Victorian Britain offered at the time worked hard and made a go of it... so thus, I have no reason to apologise to the Maori people of New Zealand let alone Native Americans or Africans.

 

Furthermore because, from your perspective, you're obviously brainwashed by the Cultural Marxist Critical theories and spout word-for-word what the media is fermenting, there's no helping you get a deeper understand what's going on here... makes me wonder why you're even on this type of "conspiracy" forum if your perspective on this matter is straight out of the Frankfurt School repackaged for the 21stC #alllivesmatter

 

 

This is Leonies Eltern, she was just 13-years-old when she was kidnapped, raped, tortured and murdered by a gang of Afghan asylum seekers in Austria last month. Then there protests because the media released details of the perpetrators ethnicity because it was "racist". Her name will not appear all over the world in newspaper headlines, her name will not be heard on news reports and politicians around the globe will not make statements about her death. There will be no demands to *SAY HER NAME* or *WHITE CHILDRENS LIVES MATTER* on social media. Her death will be swept under the carpet along side the tens of thousands of others, another sacrifice on alter of "tolerance" and forced multiculturalism of Europa...

 

May be an image of 1 person, standing and outdoors

 

Have her eyes been enough? Has her European blood quenched your projection of colonialised peoples so-called, thirst?

Has her life and the 10s of thousands of other European children deaths been enough "revenge" for colonial sins (even though Austria never held colonial possessions)?

Edited by skitzorat
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

I don't understand, aren't we all linked to murderers and rapists, or is there a group of people that have a perfect lineage? I find it hard to believe that there are people that have ancestors that never did bad things. Admittedly some of it is only crimes against their own tribe and not against others. I can also understand that when an outside group causes you pain that it can cause a lot of long-term trauma that is hard to heal.

 

While we may all be part of the human family, we still have to accept that to much of the world, things are often about race or religion. I don't always mean in a negative way though, I'm just saying that a lot of the world still values their heritage or tradition, and has in-group preference. I know Islam takes a difference stance on that though and I don't hold it against you. I mean in the sense that Islam doesn't put as much emphasis on nations or race, and when I say nations, I mean in the traditional sense, not land but a group of people.

Yes of course we all have bad people in our family trees and nations. And according to Islam one should give special preference to one's close ones, which somehow sounds like a bit like familyism, tribeism, nationalism. There is nothing wrong with preferring your own people and giving your son more charity than the neighbour's son. Or helping your own people more than others. Or standing up more for your own kind than others. I think you understand what my point is. That we shouldn't excuse crimes of our own people, or even promote racist laws like the apartheid laws for instance. But I think you know what I mean 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Weedo said:

Well running away isn't the solution, and won't compensate for the millions killed or raped or kicked from their homes. It's such a horrible feeling. I once had someone try and kick me out of my home. It's really an indescribable sensation of horror. And the sheer numbers and scale. I'm a religious guy. I don't believe our actions can ever make up for our mistakes. But our attitude can. A humble apology and full hearted attempt can come a long way. 

 

If I was a white man living on stolen land like Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, America, etc etc, I'd do the following FOR GOD'S SAKE. 

 

1. I'd get to know tribal elders if possible of the area I live in and be friends with them, while apologising for what my ancestors did. And basically get a spiritual visa from them. 

 

2. I'd push political parties, movements and organisations that work towards indigenous people's rights and receiving of stolen lands and compensation. Step by step, even if it starts with symbolic gestures and kind words. 

 

3. I'd study the native communities language, culture and religion, and try to assimilate as much as I can to them, and learn from them.

 

4. I'd root for natives to become leaders of the lands. 

 

5. I'd make a communication campaign to keep the memory alive of all the victims and extinguished tribes, as well as root for having national days and holidays based on local customs and special dates and events. 

 

Just some examples. 

 

Having the mentality of "yeah so what! My parents stole your land and fucked your daughters and killed your parents, but that's OK, because the Chinese and the ottomans did the same to people" just won't fly. 

I'm from New Zealand and your LIST just proves you know NOTHING!

 

1. Not apologising, Maori people would find it insulting to their Mana not to mention fucking weird and the Govt has already done so on my behalf years ago... and I don't need no "spiritual visa" from anyone...

 

2. Already done.. started in the 90s.

 

3. Te Reo (Maori language) has been the second official language since the 90s and as I said I grew up learning it at primary school, it's now compulsory. They openly assimilated with Us - they don't run around in grass skirts eating each other anymore.

 

4. They are already.

 

5. Already exists. Waitangi Day and Matariki. 

 

6. No settler in NZ stole land. Almost all of the deep south/Otago where the first settlers colonised was not unpopulated (too cold) and much of the land in the North Island was legitimately SOLD, for example the whole of the Wellington city area and the Treaty of Waitangi was signed by the major chiefs and the Crown in 1840 agreeing to British control of the country in its entirety.. Yes there was a cultural misunderstanding (both ways) because the Maori didn't have an understanding of individual private ownership and the British didn't know the Maori didn't understand this, however, VAST amounts of land, both private and Crown (public) has been returned to the Tribes including significant locations like Mountains for example and the Lakes and Rivers (Lakes and Rivers even have human-like rights) 

 

My ancestors never killed anyone... And you will find it was British troops under orders of the Crown who did the killing, and selling of guns to other Maori so they could kill each other instead of using clubs before eating them.

 

If you're going to be so arrogant and condescending, at least get your facts straight before mouthing off over things you don't know about.. only makes you look silly.

 

PS.

 

I don't know where you live, but if you're a Muslim from a Mid-Eastern country, I hope you've got your spiritual visa from the Iranian embassy - the modern day Sassanids whom the early Muslims conquered and I hope you ask Zoroaster as well as Mohammod for permission to exist first.

 

 

 

 

The Treaty of Waitangi is New Zealand’s founding document. It takes its name from the place in the Bay of Islands where it was first signed, on 6 February 1840. This day is now a public holiday in New Zealand. The Treaty is an agreement, in Māori and English, that was made between the British Crown and about 540 Māori rangatira (chiefs).

Growing numbers of British migrants arrived in New Zealand in the late 1830s, and there were plans for extensive settlement. Around this time there were large-scale land transactions with Māori, unruly behaviour by some settlers and signs that the French were interested in annexing New Zealand. The British government was initially unwilling to act, but it eventually realised that annexing the country could protect Māori, regulate British subjects and secure commercial interests.

 

The Treaty is a broad statement of principles on which the British and Māori made a political compact to found a nation state and build a government in New Zealand. The document has three articles. In the English version, Māori cede the sovereignty of New Zealand to Britain; Māori give the Crown an exclusive right to buy lands they wish to sell, and, in return, are guaranteed full rights of ownership of their lands, forests, fisheries and other possessions; and Māori are given the rights and privileges of British subjects.

 

The Treaty in Māori was deemed to convey the meaning of the English version, but there are important differences. Most significantly, the word ‘sovereignty’ was translated as ‘kawanatanga’ (governance). Some Māori believed they were giving up government over their lands but retaining the right to manage their own affairs. The English version guaranteed ‘undisturbed possession’ of all their ‘properties’, but the Māori version guaranteed ‘tino rangatiratanga’ (full authority) over ‘taonga’ (treasures, which may be intangible). Māori understanding was at odds with the understanding of those negotiating the Treaty for the Crown, and as Māori society valued the spoken word, explanations given at the time were probably as important as the wording of the document.

 

Early Crown policy

Many Māori prospered economically during the 1840s and 1850s. They supplied vital produce and labour to the fledgling European settlements. Māori agricultural goods found Australian markets, making a significant contribution to New Zealand's revenue. Māori communities obtained loans for flour mills, agricultural implements and ships, and there was investment in Māori health and education.

Despite mutual mistrust at first, by the early 1850s the Treaty relationship seemed generally positive. Amalgamation was a key part of the relationship. Māori would share the rights and privileges of British subjects under a common system as indicated in the terms of the Treaty and early colonial laws.

https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/treaty/the-treaty-in-brief

Edited by skitzorat
added treaty info as FYI
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

I don't see what the issue is if someone does pray to some Pagan deity either, as long as they live by the do no harm principle, what business is it of ours as Christians and Muslims?

Everybody is free to worship whatever they want. My point wasn't trageted at the religion of Odin, which does interest me very much, and I have been inspired by - especially as a dog and crow lover -  but my point was simply an anthropological one in context of the well documented onslaught on Christianity in Europe, that has lead to a new generation of souls without a spiritual identity. Hence they seek a sense of belonging, while they feel an attack against them, which was set up as a reaction to the mistakes of their ancestors. Due to feeling that pressure against them from all directions, they seek to hold on to something that can unite them and defend them on both a spiritual plane and physical one as well. Of course they are falsely made to believe that Islam is the enemy, and Christianity is too complicated and stale, so there is only paganism left. In any case, I belive that most of pagan religions are based on momotheist principles that were corrupted through the ages. 

 

What I am talking of here is quite simple. OK, so you identify as a member of the 'white' nation. Then take responsibility for the mistakes of the 'white' nations past, in as far as you at least clearly separate yourself from the vast criminal section of that nation. Get it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Not that many do mind you, to most people taking an interest in Vikings and Paganism is just symbolic of their roots.

There is a huge trend towards paganism these days, from what I see online. What is the worst part is the tsunami of youth being drawn into witchcraft. Even though I dont see modern Christianity as anywhere near perfect, I still see it as a step backwards in terms of spiritual quality. It is expected in all divine religions though. We are all expecting things to get worse before they get better. 

 

But studying and learning is always good of course. It's just as a Muslim, obviously I see the books of Islam, the gospels, Torah, and tons of other books as way superior and full of truth compared to polytheism and worship of demons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

@Weedo

 

Do you want all people to only be allowed to accept Abrahamic faith and traditions? How will you know if they really believe in it if it is done by intimidation?

I want what God wants, and I at lest hope to be thankful and accepting of whatever God has written for the fellow human family. In the abrahamic religions we are well aware that only God can guide me or anybody. 

 

Personally I just want to be better than everybody else, morally, and ethically. I want God to love me more than anyone else, and to be more a beacon of light than others. That's the competition that I am involved in. And there are times when I actually pray for God to not guide someone, because I want to see them suffer and get punished for what they did. In the Quran, Moses is said to have made a similar prayer against his enemies. This kind of prayer is called a 'curse'. 

 

At the same time Muslims are encouraged to pray for our own guidance in plural. In our version of the Lord's prayer, we ask God to grant US the straight path. We are a spiritual family among mankind. And unlike the satanics we are not physically united yet, and are spread across the world in different nations, races, religions, etc. We are waiting for the promised victory of God in earth, which will see justice served to the very detail. It will be very violent according to all religions. I don't think there is any religion that does not foretell a major cataclysm. 

 

Other people believing or not makes no difference for us. We get judged alone according to our own deeds. And then eternal bliss or eternal suffering. God willing. We will all be reincarnated into new bodies, so your race now won't make any difference. We will all be rotting or burnt corpses eventually anyway. Nobody is getting out of here alive. And our skeletons are all white :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Anyway, feel free to reply Weedo, but I'm logging off and will holla at you another time as I'm sure people are getting annoyed with us clogging up the activity feed.

Alright take care was nice talking. This conversation on this thread actually made me want to log off for a while too. Focus on my studies for a while. You're a good person I believe. Keep it up! Ciao. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

I'm from New Zealand and your LIST just proves you know NOTHING!

 

1. Not apologising, Maori people would find it insulting to their Mana not to mention fucking weird and the Govt has already done so on my behalf years ago... and I don't need no "spiritual visa" from anyone...

 

2. Already done.. started in the 90s.

 

3. Te Reo (Maori language) has been the second official language since the 90s and as I said I grew up learning it at primary school, it's now compulsory. They openly assimilated with Us - they don't run around in grass skirts eating each other anymore.

 

4. They are already.

 

5. Already exists. Waitangi Day and Matariki. 

 

6. No settler in NZ stole land. Almost all of the deep south/Otago where the first settlers colonised was not unpopulated (too cold) and much of the land in the North Island was legitimately SOLD, for example the whole of the Wellington city area and the Treaty of Waitangi was signed by the major chiefs and the Crown in 1840 agreeing to British control of the country in its entirety.. Yes there was a cultural misunderstanding (both ways) because the Maori didn't have an understanding of individual private ownership and the British didn't know the Maori didn't understand this, however, VAST amounts of land, both private and Crown (public) has been returned to the Tribes including significant locations like Mountains for example and the Lakes and Rivers (Lakes and Rivers even have human-like rights) 

 

My ancestors never killed anyone... And you will find it was British troops under orders of the Crown who did the killing, and selling of guns to other Maori so they could kill each other instead of using clubs before eating them.

 

If you're going to be so arrogant and condescending, at least get your facts straight before mouthing off over things you don't know about.. only makes you look silly.

 

PS.

 

I don't know where you live, but if you're a Muslim from a Mid-Eastern country, I hope you've got your spiritual visa from the Iranian embassy - the modern day Sassanids whom the early Muslims conquered and I hope you ask Zoroaster as well as Mohammod for permission to exist first.

 

 

 

 

The Treaty of Waitangi is New Zealand’s founding document. It takes its name from the place in the Bay of Islands where it was first signed, on 6 February 1840. This day is now a public holiday in New Zealand. The Treaty is an agreement, in Māori and English, that was made between the British Crown and about 540 Māori rangatira (chiefs).

Growing numbers of British migrants arrived in New Zealand in the late 1830s, and there were plans for extensive settlement. Around this time there were large-scale land transactions with Māori, unruly behaviour by some settlers and signs that the French were interested in annexing New Zealand. The British government was initially unwilling to act, but it eventually realised that annexing the country could protect Māori, regulate British subjects and secure commercial interests.

 

The Treaty is a broad statement of principles on which the British and Māori made a political compact to found a nation state and build a government in New Zealand. The document has three articles. In the English version, Māori cede the sovereignty of New Zealand to Britain; Māori give the Crown an exclusive right to buy lands they wish to sell, and, in return, are guaranteed full rights of ownership of their lands, forests, fisheries and other possessions; and Māori are given the rights and privileges of British subjects.

 

The Treaty in Māori was deemed to convey the meaning of the English version, but there are important differences. Most significantly, the word ‘sovereignty’ was translated as ‘kawanatanga’ (governance). Some Māori believed they were giving up government over their lands but retaining the right to manage their own affairs. The English version guaranteed ‘undisturbed possession’ of all their ‘properties’, but the Māori version guaranteed ‘tino rangatiratanga’ (full authority) over ‘taonga’ (treasures, which may be intangible). Māori understanding was at odds with the understanding of those negotiating the Treaty for the Crown, and as Māori society valued the spoken word, explanations given at the time were probably as important as the wording of the document.

 

Early Crown policy

Many Māori prospered economically during the 1840s and 1850s. They supplied vital produce and labour to the fledgling European settlements. Māori agricultural goods found Australian markets, making a significant contribution to New Zealand's revenue. Māori communities obtained loans for flour mills, agricultural implements and ships, and there was investment in Māori health and education.

Despite mutual mistrust at first, by the early 1850s the Treaty relationship seemed generally positive. Amalgamation was a key part of the relationship. Māori would share the rights and privileges of British subjects under a common system as indicated in the terms of the Treaty and early colonial laws.

https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/treaty/the-treaty-in-brief

 

The only reason why the Maori were treated with more respect than other colonial victims, is because they kicked their white occupiers asses! 

 

Quote:

 

Page 1. Intolerance towards Māori

 

19th century Intolerance towards indigenous people is typical of colonial societies. Māori, as individuals and communities, were the subject of racism and discrimination as Europeans settled in New Zealand in the 19th century.

However, the extent and nature of intolerance varied. Partly because of their strength in war and political negotiation, Māori were accorded civil rights through the Treaty of Waitangi, more than a century before Aboriginal people became full citizens of Australia. 

 

https://teara.govt.nz/en/ethnic-and-religious-intolerance/page-1

 

.. You can read more about discriminating in that article. 

 

Once head of state of NZ is Maori, and not some European woman, then that is a step. 

 

As a white guy living in NZ, I wouldn't really feel like it was my native land. Maybe I'd feel a spiritual connection to the earth to some extent, but I'd still feel European if I'm ethnically from europe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, gregory-peccary said:

ALL Abrahamic religions are bollocks so god can go fuck herself. Or Allah or whatever you call the bint.

 

Agreed sand people baalocks.

 

Woke sand people even.

 

Its all a power trip, as shown above. You let them in then they start the demands.

Look at their own countries they tolerate nothing, no rights atall.

Fuck sake think we were all born yesterday..or straight off the dingy.

 

Refugees.🙄

 

E6wMjX7XoAUczos?format=jpg&name=large

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, skitzorat said:

where?!!!

Stop commenting on things you clearly know nothing about...Yes... Native peoples of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and even the United States have been on the receiving end of BILLIONS of $ in reparations in leu of spiritual/cultural damage, MILLIONS of hectares of land has been given back and formal apologies by the Heads of State given on multiple occasions and the trauma and nastiness of the past was never whitewashed from our (colonial countries) history books (NZ)...

 

 

I'm totally going to play into your game of entrapment here, but in some ways, western culture is better than some others... we had completely abandoned the backwards an eye for an eye barbaric mentality by the time of the Enlightenment and the great Age of Discovery...

 

..in saying that, there was also a second instalment of a famous Book that highly emphasised turn the other cheek, love thy neighbour and idea has had a profound impact on the West for 2000 years....as opposed to stoning woman to death and cutting heads off.

yeah European youth aren't like their forbearers and haven't been for many, many generations.. my 95 YO Granny died a couple of years ago after holding her great-grand daughter...she wasn't a racist or held any one in contempt for the colour of their skin.. she was 3 and came from a poor fishing village in the far north of Scotland on a boat to NZ so she wasn't privileged either... none of my ancestral lines going back many generations recorded were Elitist.. but they were settlers who bought a ticket to the New World and made a better life for their family than Victorian Britain offered at the time worked hard and made a go of it... so thus, I have no reason to apologise to the Maori people of New Zealand let alone Native Americans or Africans.

 

Furthermore because, from your perspective, you're obviously brainwashed by the Cultural Marxist Critical theories and spout word-for-word what the media is fermenting, there's no helping you get a deeper understand what's going on here... makes me wonder why you're even on this type of "conspiracy" forum if your perspective on this matter is straight out of the Frankfurt School repackaged for the 21stC #alllivesmatter

 

 

This is Leonies Eltern, she was just 13-years-old when she was kidnapped, raped, tortured and murdered by a gang of Afghan asylum seekers in Austria last month. Then there protests because the media released details of the perpetrators ethnicity because it was "racist". Her name will not appear all over the world in newspaper headlines, her name will not be heard on news reports and politicians around the globe will not make statements about her death. There will be no demands to *SAY HER NAME* or *WHITE CHILDRENS LIVES MATTER* on social media. Her death will be swept under the carpet along side the tens of thousands of others, another sacrifice on alter of "tolerance" and forced multiculturalism of Europa...

 

May be an image of 1 person, standing and outdoors

 

Have her eyes been enough? Has her European blood quenched your projection of colonialised peoples so-called, thirst?

Has her life and the 10s of thousands of other European children deaths been enough "revenge" for colonial sins (even though Austria never held colonial possessions)?

Where is apartheid promoted? Just read the first post on here, with you being a star supporter of the pro apartheid side.. 

 

 

Your tactic of saying we may not call to account the millions killer by white people, because there were thousands killed by brown people won't work. 

 

Here are the reasons

 

1 - two wrongs don't make a right 

2 - the sheer asymmetry of the numbers makes it that white people are always more guilty. How many girls were killed and raped by white man intervention in Afghanistan is something only God knows. The crimes committed by the wahhabis and their groups like that taliban, and the amount of school girls they attacked, just because white Americans brought wahabism there.. What about that? How many? It can never compete with with tens or hundreds of girls killed in Europe by afghanis. And the reason why their country is so poor and full of refugees? Sorry to say, but majority white governments again. How many white soldiers are stationed in Afghanistan or other Muslim countries? How many white manned army bases on Muslim lands? You just don't hear about it, and what they do. 

 

I could go on and write for hours about massacres committed by European rooted governments, but here is a little one. How many little cute girls died here? 

 

 

Getting me one girl in Austria is very sad. But on a bigger scale, it is meaningless. What did white men do in Korea? Wasn't that also about a million dead and agent orange to kill the trees? A white Truman dropped the nukes on japanese, while the same people who stole the new Zealand island forced the Chinese to drug the whole country with opium. And how many? It doesn't make a difference to you how the numbers are so totally radically different? Even when the white crusaders took over jeruslam, they were more bloody than anybody else who took it ever since maybe the babylonians. The babylonians at least took prisoners! 

 

The reason behind this is simple. There are competing white blood lines. The white blood lines of the semites and the white blood lines of the reptilian sons of Satan. And the satanic 'aryan' races, which includes the white 'royals' has been in charge. And they love to kill and loot and steal. But the aim is to get rid of those evil people like Bill gates and Co... Who represent those reptilian lines - who are mostly white. While the white Semitic lines are waiting for their turn to take over in the name of God, along with allies from all bloodlines, including the reptilian ones. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Agreed sand people baalocks.

 

Woke sand people even.

 

Its all a power trip, as shown above. You let them in then they start the demands.

Look at their own countries they tolerate nothing, no rights atall.

Fuck sake think we were all born yesterday..or straight off the dingy.

 

Refugees.🙄

 

E6wMjX7XoAUczos?format=jpg&name=large

 

Sand people? Such a condescending comment. And then you expect sympathy from non whites, for your dwindling majority on the land? Seriously.. Look at your own issues. You have the most evil history on earth, and are one of the most evil political and financial centers. 

 

It was your damn empowering of wahabism among others that caused the lack of rights in this lands! Sand people.. Fucking racist scum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Weedo said:

The only reason why the Maori were treated with more respect than other colonial victims, is because they kicked their white occupiers asses! 

 

I said they were warriors, from centuries of waring with each other as before the British turned up they were killing, enslaving and eating each other enmass.... but European technology kicked their skirt covered bums, albeit after much bloodshed and the peace was mutual because the Maori saw what advantages the European culture would provide, like trade, guns etc

 

 

13 minutes ago, Weedo said:

You can read more

don't come here telling ME to read more about MY own country and provide links! you have some freaking nerve.

 

 

13 minutes ago, Weedo said:

Once head of state of NZ is Maori...then that is a step

Firstly, there are no more full blooded Maori left. However, there are currently 29 out of 121 MPs in Parliament who identify as Maori.  People who identify as Maori on the census make up roughly 17% of the population so if anything they're currently over represented. Secondly, there's nothing stopping a person who identifies as Maori getting themselves successfully nominated as Leader of Party and then going on to win an election in their own right. Nothing. They're not victims or oppressed or "systematically" 2nd class or whatever media/cultural marxist talking point you want to add.

 

23 minutes ago, Weedo said:

As a white guy living in NZ, I wouldn't really feel like it was my native land. Maybe I'd feel a spiritual connection to the earth to some extent, but I'd still feel European if I'm ethnically from europe.

That's you... however it is the country of my birth of which I'm eternally grateful for my luck, however, if you haven't noticed, I'm also hugely passionate about my European heritage, specifically Britain (I have dual citizenship and have lived there for almost 10 years in my 20s) so I feel connected to both and I'm not going to stand by on this subforum and not say anything when you come in here talking shit, demonising and denigrating my people and my culture and heritage and demand me (and my children) atone for the past and I'm most certainly not going to let you get away with shit-talk nonsense as above and crow holier than thou in this particular subforum saying I'm condoning rape and murder by not demonising my ancestors! 

 

PS. I notice you NEVER reply to my significant points... you ALWAYS just try and twist the conversation back to White Man Bad...Every.Single.Time.  You're disingenuous and/or brainwashed and obviously have an anti-European agenda and this subforum is not the place for you... unless you bring some constructive points to the table. which, in my opinion, you don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

 

I said they were warriors, from centuries of waring with each other as before the British turned up they were killing, enslaving and eating each other enmass.... but European technology kicked their skirt covered bums, albeit after much bloodshed and the peace was mutual because the Maori saw what advantages the European culture would provide, like trade, guns etc

 

 

don't come here telling ME to read more about MY own country and provide links! you have some freaking nerve.

 

 

Firstly, there are no more full blooded Maori left. However, there are currently 29 out of 121 MPs in Parliament who identify as Maori.  People who identify as Maori on the census make up roughly 17% of the population so if anything they're currently over represented. Secondly, there's nothing stopping a person who identifies as Maori getting themselves successfully nominated as Leader of Party and then going on to win an election in their own right. Nothing. They're not victims or oppressed or "systematically" 2nd class or whatever media/cultural marxist talking point you want to add.

 

That's you... however it is the country of my birth of which I'm eternally grateful for my luck, however, if you haven't noticed, I'm also hugely passionate about my European heritage, specifically Britain (I have dual citizenship and have lived there for almost 10 years in my 20s) so I feel connected to both and I'm not going to stand by on this subforum and not say anything when you come in here talking shit, demonising and denigrating my people and my culture and heritage and demand me (and my children) atone for the past and I'm most certainly not going to let you get away with shit-talk nonsense as above and crow holier than thou in this particular subforum saying I'm condoning rape and murder by not demonising my ancestors! 

 

PS. I notice you NEVER reply to my significant points... you ALWAYS just try and twist the conversation back to White Man Bad...Every.Single.Time.  You're disingenuous and/or brainwashed and obviously have an anti-European agenda and this subforum is not the place for you... unless you bring some constructive points to the table. which, in my opinion, you don't.

You are pretty good at pointing fingers, accusing and insulting. I give you a 9 out of 10 in that. 

 

Furthermore you get a 5 out of 5 in NZ history, but actually I'll give you a 1/10 because AGAIN you dont condemn what was done to the natives, which is clearly documented. You are desperate to explain it away and justify it in whatever desperate way you try to do. 

 

When it comes to defending the rights of downtrodden non white people, you get a minus one million out of ten! That one is straight in hell. You keep just keep escaping and avoiding everything I say, and anything other than give a heartfelt Condemnation. 

 

In any case, I believe strongly that readers will take your side or my side. My side will believe you are just too proud to care and give strong deep emotional condemnation against European white colonial history, as well as more modern white man crimes. 

 

Your side will think I'm fucking with their white pride and I'm just a fucking savage or something, who doesn't appreciate roads built, or Rothschild banks introduced. That it doesn't matter how peoples lands were stolen and stuff, what matters is that the white satanic reptiles are sending a bunch of refugees into their Rothschild satanic land called Europe, with a parliament built in the shape of the tower of Babylon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Weedo said:

Where is apartheid promoted? Just read the first post on here, with you being a star supporter of the pro apartheid side.. 

I have not promoted apartheid. The closet thing I've said to that is saying the Peoples of South Africa haven't faired well since 1994, only the Elites. Stop making shit up you little s-weasle!

 

17 minutes ago, Weedo said:

Your tactic of saying we may not call to account the millions killer by white people, because there were thousands killed by brown people won't work. 

I haven't said that either... I just staunchly say White People have apologised enough for the wrongs of the past 500 years and the fact you dismiss the entirety of recorded history is another s-weasly way you continue to make it White Man Bad. Furthermore, you arrogantly say no land, or apologies have been made, when they actually have of which you ignore, of course...

 

21 minutes ago, Weedo said:

e girl in Austria is very sad. But on a bigger scale, it is meaningless

you're a nasty little s-weasle aren't you.. go read your book of Peace.

 

22 minutes ago, Weedo said:

who stole the new Zealand island

clearly haven't read above, it wasn't stolen.. looking even more silly..

 

23 minutes ago, Weedo said:

Even when the white crusaders took over jeruslam, they were more bloody than anybody else who took it ever since maybe the babylonians

Not as bloody as the Muslim conquest of the Middle East and North Africa. Convert by the sword or die.. no turning the other cheek for anyone.

 

24 minutes ago, Weedo said:

The white blood lines of the semites and the white blood lines of the reptilian sons of Satan. And the satanic 'aryan' races,

More hatred of White People, satanic now! Hey-Zeus Christ.

 

No, Europeans are not Semites.

 

noun
plural noun: Semites
  1. a member of any of the peoples who speak or spoke a Semitic language, including in particular the Jews and Arabs.
     
    Derived from Shem, one of the three sons of Noah in the Book of Genesis: ie; not native European beliefs.
     
    27 minutes ago, Weedo said:

    those evil people like Bill gates and Co... Who represent those reptilian lines - who are mostly white.

    I think you'll find they're only "white" when it suits a narrative.. They have other Tribal allegiances...Most of the bloodlines are interdimensional,  If you were researching the info on this forum you would know this...

     

    Why are you even here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Weedo said:

I'm just a fucking savage

 

Savage wouldn't be the word that came first to my mind... but since you baying for an eye for an eye and the barbaric death of that Austrian child is "meaningless" to you.. well....you said it..

Edited by skitzorat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Coldrum said:

Welcome to Luton 

 

Ahh the Religion of Peace assimilates so well in Europe.. Diversity is our Strength, bigot.

 

But muh sins of colonial history.. that's right, white supremacist.. "you shall pay. Every day. Until the end of time." *sung in tune to Alison Chabloz's (((Survivors)))* 🤣

Edited by skitzorat
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

Ahh the Religion of Peace assimilates so well in Europe.. Diversity is our Strength, bigot.

 

But muh sins of colonial history.. that's right, white supremacist.. "you shall pay. Every day. Until the end of time." *sung in tune to Alison Chabloz's (((Survivors)))* 🤣

Dam them Pagans and wannabe vikings ...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Weedo said:

 

 

 

 

 

oh and Albright is Jewish, albeit crypto... again.. learn some actual history and facts before running your smug fingers across the keyboard. Another Fail.

image.png.c7ec21541783397697e8a68cd3a4b991.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...