Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population?

[Truthspoon]

The implications of that video are incredible.

 

What he is saying is that white people did not originate from black Africans but the other way around, that at around 35,000 years ago, white Cro-Magnons entered Africa and mated with the primitive homo sapiens there, this influx of white DNA actually created what we understand as 'black people' as opposed to primitive man-ape type things (archaic humans) which had previously inhabited the continent, this influx of white cro-magnon DNA led to an increase in the cranial capacity of the archaic humans turning them into what we understand as black Africans.

 

Although he does grant that modern humans and archaic humans have a common ancestor 1.3 millions years ago.

 

Amazing. I need to look more into this research..

 

 

 

Edited July 16, 2021 by Truthspoon

[EnigmaticWorld]

 

https://linktr.ee/warmasterhorus

[skitzorat]

It starts here..

 

 

[EnigmaticWorld]

On 7/16/2021 at 7:55 PM, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

https://linktr.ee/warmasterhorus

 

So they banned Horus just before the hitpieces came out so he can't defend himself on normie social media.  Typical.

 

 

[Weedo]

On 7/16/2021 at 7:33 AM, skitzorat said:

Here's a 7min non-politically correct, yet scientifically accurate explanation on perhaps why...

 

 

We have to be careful in believing the "science", as history has proven again and again that scientists abuse and lie as much as religious institutions, for similar satanic reasons. The agenda here looks like it is to further create division and hatred and division among the human family. Already Darwin expressed that same beliefs and showed that he had genocidal intentions:

 

Quote:

 

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state as we may hope, than the Caucasian and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”
― Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man

 

******

 

Darwin was commissioned by the satanic movement to distance people from the biblical account, and make people believe that we are descended from apes, with no white people being closer related to the apes than others. 

 

*****'

 

Another dark Darwinian quote:

 

“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin

 

****

 

If anybody here would like to disprove these quotes, then please do so, but I urge everyone who would like to discuss with me, to show their clear stance towards these quotes, and condemn them, if they are true. I saw screen shots of them years ago I believe, but go ahead and prove them wrong. I'll be thankful for anybody who can debunk these quotes. Thanks 

 

You see, the biblical and Islamic story of creation puts all of mankind into one family under Adam. The only mixing that happened, as far as I know according to the Bible, is what Robert Sephyr ironically goes into as the blood lines of serpents and 'dragons'. This is what Robert sephyr obsession is about lost Atlantic that basically carries thr claim that the same snake people were flooded and almost wiped out, before they took over the world again after the deluge. His claims don't only confirm the biblical narrations of a deluge due to divine punishment (such as Plato described), but also the REPTILIAN bloodlines that even David Icke talks about. The pharaohs also have snakes with crowns on their foreheads while modern ruling families have an obsession with snakes and dragons as well. 

 

Just check out one of many anthropological videos proving the nephelim satanic bloodline theory of the Bible 

 

 

So this whole Darwinian bastard iCal mentality of making assumptions that people mated with humanoids needs to be proven thoroughly. Of course that is very difficult when you have the whole 'missing link' problem, where it hasn't even been proven until today that there is even a smooth transition or in between cases of humans and humanoids (aka homo sapiens and homo homo sapiens). If they truly did mate then where's the missing link? If there was a missing link, then people like Loyd Pye would have no more argument in disproving 'evolution' of humans from hominids, that are basically sasqautsh Bigfoot, which is the reason why they didnt use human tools. 

 

So Robert, who is of the opinion that the Aryan race are basically descendents of the satanic dragon reptilian, likes to bash the Africans without giving much more than titles or headlines of articles from MSM. Let me remind you that not so long ago "science" considered all non white people as officially "savage" people who are incapable of intellect and higher learning. 

 

 

So ladies and gentlemen, of you want to start a tend that goes back to such retarded and ignorant claims, let us come to an agreement, they we critically study each and every scientific paper that Robert seems to throw at us, while expecting us to believe it. We want to know all the details, because I don't believe it. 

 

If we look at the non satanic Darwinian account, which coincides with the satanic bloodline of the aryans concept of Robert, then the story of black people is actually as he said, but there is no account of mating with monkeys or sasqautsh. What happens was that Noah was a survivor of the Atlanten bloodlines, but more purely from the line of Seth, while the majority was from the line of Cain, who some say is a product of Eves marriage to Satan, which was the "forbidden fruit". Others say that the daughters of Adam basically were mating with the fallen angels (reptilian), but bottom line is that there were competing blood lines, and being from the nephililm is not something to be proud of. Robert seems to be proud of his satanic lineage. So. Anyway, why happened was that Noah was white, and his sons were white. And Ham, or his descendents who now occupy Africa, became black as a result of something that Ham did. I think it has to do with intruding into his father's privacy. There is no talk about monkeys or mixed Neanderthal marriages. But I am all ears, as long as we don't act like Covidiots and believe every shit 'scientists' say in MSM articles. In addition Robert is an anthropologist, so it really reminds me of computer science drop out bill gates talking about biology. 

[Weedo]

On 7/16/2021 at 10:28 AM, Truthspoon said:

The implications of that video are incredible.

 

What he is saying is that white people did not originate from black Africans but the other way around, that at around 35,000 years ago, white Cro-Magnons entered Africa and mated with the primitive homo sapiens there, this influx of white DNA actually created what we understand as 'black people' as opposed to primitive man-ape type things (archaic humans) which had previously inhabited the continent, this influx of white cro-magnon DNA led to an increase in the cranial capacity of the archaic humans turning them into what we understand as black Africans.

 

Although he does grant that modern humans and archaic humans have a common ancestor 1.3 millions years ago.

 

Amazing. I need to look more into this research..

 

 

 

You do. And please share your results after looking at the scientific papers please with a critical eye. Most of 'science' - like religion - is bullshit. 

 

Thanks and looking forward to some truth spoons 

[Guest]

For furthering my knowledge / information base / considerations .... @Weedo

 

What does Islam state about the first Genesis and first 'wife' of Adam .... Lilith? (second Genesis being as told in the religious doctrine .... first never being taught)

 

Edit:

Also what are your thoughts on the Kolbrin?

An overview here:

https://grahamhancock.com/whitemany1/

 

Edited July 18, 2021 by ink

[EnigmaticWorld]

17 minutes ago, Weedo said:

 

 

 

Another thing the Germans got right, banning human zoos, while allies still practiced it.

[EnigmaticWorld]

Laurence Fox's statement on British identity and demographics:

 

 

 

[Weedo]

8 hours ago, ink said:

For furthering my knowledge / information base / considerations .... @Weedo

 

What does Islam state about the first Genesis and first 'wife' of Adam .... Lilith? (second Genesis being as told in the religious doctrine .... first never being taught)

 

Edit:

Also what are your thoughts on the Kolbrin?

An overview here:

https://grahamhancock.com/whitemany1/

 

Hi there, 

 

I honestly don't know anything about an equivalent story in Islam, such as lillith, in a direct sense. But personally, I could find a parallel somehow according to my own interpretation. In the Quran it is not forbidden 'fruit', but forbidden 'tree'. And just as in English, the word for tree is used for family trees. So both Adam and eve approached the forbidden tree, could mean that they basically had sex with the wrong people. Adam was said to have been a giant who was about 30+ meters tall, and even in the gospel of Adam I think he stood for weeks or months in the middle of the Euphrates, just feeling miserable for his sin. So it could be that whatever they did wrong corresponds with the other texts you shared of having forbidden mixing of races. 

 

The Quran clearly talks about two races of beings that not only occur as men, but also as animals. They are the jinn and the ins. Satan (which is a descriptive Hebrew word with a meaning close to 'accuser') is usually understood as the head leader of that race, much like a king, who is called iblis in the Quran. The word that is mostly translated as angel is Malak in Arabic. Mlk is resonating with ownership, kingship, etc. So the story goes that you had those 'angels' who existed prior to Adam. (btw I read Islamic narration saying the were million Adams prior to the last one).. The angels, or I like to call them owners of realms, were hanging out, and God created a man called Adam, meaning from earth in Semitic languages. Now the realms that the angels controlled were high realms, such as fire for instance, which iblis was the leader of. I believe that they were 7 angels, and I can go into that later perhaps. So Adam was the eighth, and was given the leadership position. According to the Quran ALL angels revolted at first, claiming that such a bloody and violent and basic creature can not be their leader. So God proved to them the reason why Adam was superior, and it had to do with his unique skills with names. He was able to name things in ways that they couldn't, and so all the angels surrendered to God's will and symbolically prostrated towards Adam, as a form of prostration to God. The same way like people who pray behind the imam (leader), prostrate in the same direction as the imam is prostrating. Anyway what was I getting to??? Hmm

 

So they all agreed that this lowly earth based creature was their leader except iblis, who was God's favorite angel up to this point. He was a great angel who was extremely well versed and used music as worship and he 'accused' Adam and his kids of being worse than him, and that fire is so much better than earth. So he actually asked God to grant him a chance to prove it by showing God that he will cause us to divert from the straight path. God agreed, as every prayer to God is usually answered, with the condition that he can't come close to those who put their safety in God. So that's how the enmity began between the 'children of fire' and the 'children of earth'. 

 

At first Adam was running around naked with his wife, who was somehow created from him, and so came into existence after him. Then after they fucked up, they covered their privates with fig leaves. So you can imagine how they more fit the primitive group, rather than the advanced one. 

 

So when we talk about fire or earth, it is simply that they resonate with these elements more, while there are men on both sides. They both have spirits, and both can occur as animals. An inter marriage between Animals and humans, as described by Osireh in pre dynastic Egypt, is maybe possible, but I think that in order to have viable offspring, one must be from the same species? But on the other hand, in the Quran it is written that God turned some children of israel into swine and apes. So I honestly don't knew about this one. But in Islam snakes are seen as from the jinn family. There is even a narration by the prophet saying that one should never kill a snake in one's home, but ask it to leave (or help it out), because it could be a jinn, whose family could seek revenge for the murder. Also prophet mohamed is known to have said that we should not urinate into holes and crevices, as that could be a snakes jinn home, and they could get seriously upset, and actually look for you to harm you. 

 

At the same time there are narrations in Islamic texts that talk about jinn in human form. Robert Sephyr made a video once about how the gypsies are among the original Atlanten people.. 

 

Quote (from a leading descendant of the prophet) 

 

"Once we were in front of the door of the house of abu ‘Abd Allah, recipient of divine supreme covenant, when a people who looked like Indian gypsies came out with loin cloth and covering on them. We asked abu ‘Abd Allah, recipient of divine supreme covenant, about them and he said, ‘They were your brethren from Jinns.’”

 

Or.. 

 

"Once I went to ask permission to meet abu Ja‘far, recipient of divine supreme covenant. I found saddles of camels lined up in front of the door and noises coming very loud and then a people came out with turbans like those of the Indian gypsies. I asked abu Ja‘far, recipient of divine supreme covenant, about them and said, ‘May Allah keep my soul in service for your cause; today it took a long time to receive permission to meet you. I saw a people coming out with turbans whom I could not recognize.’ He asked, ‘Do you know, O Sa‘d, who they were?’ I said, ‘No, I do not know.’ The Imam said, ‘They were your brethren in religion from Jinns. They come to us for religious instructions, to learn the lawful and unlawful matters and the principles of their religion.’"

 

This narration is example of the possible brotherhood between the races, and that being out of smokeless fire, and resonating with cold blooded reptilian, does not mean one is bad. Actually a jinn can be a very good person and creature according to God of Quran. It is just the former leader of the jinn, and his spiritual followers among the ins and Jin - especially the blood descendants among his clique - who are the enemy. There has however been always the issue of marriage between them, and also rivalry and mistrust. Another group of people who are considered from the jinn line are the Kurds.. 

 

There is actually historic narrations from Israelite sources, that say 

 

"Jewish sources trace origins of people of Corduene to marriage of Jinns of King Solomon with 500 beautiful Jewish women.^{[40][41][42][43][44]} The same legend was also used by the early Islamic authorities to explain origins of Kurds." 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_Kurds

 

Before I post the following narrations, let me say that I have about 3 people on this earth outside my family, that I SUSPECT are true friends. One of them is an Iraqi kurd who is like a Kurdish prince, where I can almost see fire in his eyes. He always tells me how he loves hot weather, even if it's 50 degrees celcius. (and he was blonde as a child with light eyes). 

 

Anyway, some Islamic source on that.. 

 

Quote:

 

 

asked Abu Abdullah, peace be upon him, and I said: We have a people of the Kurds, and they are still coming by selling, so we mix with them and pledge allegiance to them? He said: O Aba Al-Rabee ', do not mix with them, for the Kurds are one of the neighborhoods of the jinn. God Almighty has revealed the cover for them, so do not mix with them.

 

And this.. 

 

 

https://books.google.com.eg/books?id=wcUQAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA54&lpg=PA54&dq=kurds+are+jinn&source=bl&ots=Jl0vVP7rMI&sig=ACfU3U1MghzRm4aN1ATp4Md-Wvmzxq60ow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjoj_7Ji43sAhUDx4UKHf1mB744UBDoATAHegQICRAB#v=onepage&q=kurds are jinn&f=false

 

So you can see that even during the quite recent times of grand children of prophet mohamed - about 1400 years ago - still intermarriage was looked down upon. 

 

The link you shared that includes fragments of those lost books is great. It sounds realistic to me, and considering the power this little island called Britain displayed, it must be that they have some written secrets. And the fire people, or advanced jinn are definitely running the show there until today. 

 

Everything about these people is Osiris based.. 

 

 

Anyway, I'm getting tired, so maybe continue tomorrow God willing. Still have a lot of things I'd like to say. But in order to not make this too off topic, I'll post some relevant Islamic narrations complementing the Christian ones concerning why Ham's kids became black... 

 

Quote:

 

 heard Ali Bin Muhammad Al-Askary  saying: ‘Noah lived for two thousand five hundred years. One day he fell asleep in the ship, so a wind descended and uncovered his honour. So Haam and Yaafas (japeth) laughed, and Saam (Shem/Sem) rebuked them and forbid them from the laughing. And every time Saam covered something which the wind uncovered, Haam and Yafas would uncover it. 

So Noah paid attention to it and saw them, and they were laughing. So he said: ‘What is this?’ So, Saam informed him of what had happened. So Noah raised his hands to the sky and supplicated and was saying: ‘O Allah! Change the water (seed) of Haam until he does not beget except for the black. O Allah! Change the water (seed) of Yafas!’ So Allah Changed the water of their ribs.

Therefore, all the black (people), wherever they may be, are from Haam, and all of the Turks and Al-Saqaliba, and Gog, and Magog, and the Chinese, are from Yafas wherever they may be, and all the white, besides them, are from Saam. 

And Noah said to Haam and Yafas: ‘Allah has Made the offspring of the both of you as followers to the offspring of Saam up to the Day of Judgement, because he was righteous with me and your (both) being disobedient to me. So the traits of disobedience of the both of you would not cease to be in the offspring of you both, in the apparent, nor would the traits of righteousness cease to be in the offspring of Saam, in the apparent, for as long as the world remains’.

 

‘Amir AlMomineen (Ali son of Abi Taleb) said: ‘Marry a brunette (nor very white nor too dark), of large eyes (and) buttocks, of a medium stature’.

 

Here from a Talmudic source :

 

The Jewish (Talmudic) scholars, he said, advanced two explanations for Ham and his children being turned black. According to Brackman, “The more important version of the myth, however, ingeniously ties in the origins of blackness — and of other, real and imagined Negroid traits — with Noah’s Curse itself. According to it, Ham (or his son Canaan – ed.) is told by his outraged father that, because you have abused me in the darkness of the night, your children shall be born black and ugly; because you have twisted your head to cause me embarrassment, they shall have kinky hair and red eyes; because your lips jested at my exposure, theirs shall swell; and because you neglected my nakedness, they shall go naked with their shamefully elongated male members exposed for all to see.” 

 

Anyway, one thing I HAVE to say in case any black person reads this, I'm order to show them that they don't have to feel bad or inferior because of these stories. Even if true, the basic law of life is that if one acknowledges and learns from a mistake, then one becomes better than before having done it. Basically sins turn into blessings. So being black, if one makes the best out of it, can make you better than whites, who don't make the best out of their heritage. Same counts for all the jinn races. The last sentence in the Quran is "from jinn and ins (Plural naas) "  the Quran also says that God did not create jinn and ins except to worship Him, and that we are one nation. So even if a large section of humanity is jinn 'reptilian', we must unite and be respectful of each other. There are good and bad jinn and ins. 

 

There is a chapter in the Quran called the chapter (literally 'picture') of the Jinn:

 

Say, "It has been revealed to me that a group of the jinn listened and said, 'Indeed, we have heard an amazing Qur'an. Jinn:1

 

It guides to the right course, and we have believed in it. And we will never associate with our Lord anyone. Jinn:2

 

Jinn and ins marriages always took place and sometimes they were successful. It is also said that queen sheebas mother was a jinn, that her king father married, as he was upset with the women of his kind. 

 

Another narration showing brotherhood and respect between the two races :

 

Quote:

 

On one of the occasions of my meeting with abu Ja‘far, recipient of divine supreme covenant, when I went to see him he asked me to wait. I waited until the sun became very hot on me. I tried to follow the shadow for cover against the sun. Not very long thereafter a people came out of his presence that looked like locusts dressed in large gowns and very pale and slim due to extensive worshipping. Their beautiful scene made me forget my trouble. When I went in the presence of the Imam he said, ‘I am afraid I caused you hardships.’ I said, ‘Yes, it was difficult but, by Allah, I forgot other things when I saw them. A people passed by, the like of whose beauty I had not seen before. They looked like locusts and pale and slim due to worshipping a great deal.’

“The Imam said, ‘O Sa‘d, did you see them?’ I said, ‘Yes, I saw them.’ The Imam said, ‘They are your brethren from Jinns.’ I (the narrator) asked the Imam, ‘Do they come to you?’ He said, ‘Yes, they come to us for religious instructions and to learn the lawful and unlawful matters.’”

 

O Musa! Be generous to the beggar when he comes to you by beautiful words, or giving easily because he may have come to you from neither from the humans nor from the Jinn. The Angels of the Beneficent come to test you

 

So you see its not just about these two races, there is more. I think they are 8 in total and maybe next time if anybody wants to hear, I can explain why. 

 

Love, peace, harmony between all surrendered-to-the-truth races of people. 

[skitzorat]

On 7/16/2021 at 8:28 PM, Truthspoon said:

The implications of that video are incredible.

 

What he is saying is that white people did not originate from black Africans but the other way around, that at around 35,000 years ago, white Cro-Magnons entered Africa and mated with the primitive homo sapiens there, this influx of white DNA actually created what we understand as 'black people' as opposed to primitive man-ape type things (archaic humans) which had previously inhabited the continent, this influx of white cro-magnon DNA led to an increase in the cranial capacity of the archaic humans turning them into what we understand as black Africans.

 

Although he does grant that modern humans and archaic humans have a common ancestor 1.3 millions years ago.

 

Amazing. I need to look more into this research..

 

 

 

Here's a paper

 

 

[Weedo]

12 hours ago, skitzorat said:

Here's a paper

 

 

 

Thanks 

 

I read the early parts of it, and although I graduated with a bachelor of science in biology from an accredited university, this is almost Chinese for me. I wouldn't call myself a biologist, as I didn't pursue that career and study further. But all-in-all when looking back, I think the money and time invested into the free masonic mind control 'education' camps were an utter waste and traumatic experience. 

 

So, anyway, from the little understood, there are DNA samples found of ancient bones of 'hominids', such as big foots, and then they talk about other human-like bones that predate both the big foot Neanderthals and the humans on earth today. Then from the DNA extracted from those random bone samples, they figured out that some human samples have more in common with the DNA from one than the other. 

 

OK some fun trivia is that humans share 99.9% of identical DNA, while we share 96% of DNA with chimps, and 90% with cats. Source

 

So the article says that some humans are more closely related to this bone they found than others. What people like Robert Sephyr are trying to say is that those ancestral creatures were more primitive, because of cranial volume, as well as tool found around those bones. 

 

Cranial size:

 

Is the blue whale more intelligent than us? 

 

 

Is this tall guy with a bigger cranial volume more intelligent than the small guy, because of cranial size? 

 

 

 

Tools as measure of genetic intelligence? 

 

Well ignoring prophetic texts showing that Adam and Eve used to run around naked in the wild, without tools, weapons, metalwork, or writings, let us just ask a question:

If we are going to judge people's genetic intelligence by their tools, then does that make us and the likes of Bill gates more genetically superior and less 'primitive' than our grandparents. 

 

If some idiot like Elon Musk decides to burry himself with a Tesla, iPad, helicopter, nano bots in a Astra zenica vial, and some buetooth headphones, can future anthropologists say that he was less primitive than someone who buries himself with handwritten letters, pens and paper, and maybe a horse carriage? That is nonsense! Just because people are living in tune with nature, does not mean they are stupid. 

 

The ancient pre Neanderthal creatures, if they were human, could have been just like us. 

 

So if the scientific paper is saying that Bob is more related to Mary who lived a million years ago, than Sue, then that doesn't say much. It doesn't prove that Mary was an animal. 

 

What is the difference between humans and animals? 

 

The only difference is that humans are aware of good and evil. And at some point of biblical history, even the first man wasn't aware of that. Humans have a conscience, and have the ability to consciously chose right and wrong decisions. Animals can never feel shame in any way. So, anyway, lack of tools, or smaller cranial volumes, does not show if they belonged to our family or not. Also, they could be from a pre-adamic ancestor too, or relative, who got genetically expressed more in some descendants than others. 

 

**'*' 

 

I don't agree with what the likes of Robert sephyr are doing. It is exactly what the fallen angel did, when he felt superior to Adam, and therefore refused to give him his due respect. The likes of Robert think that superiority in humanity is measured in tools, such as highly advanced covid shots, face masks and rocket propelled grenades. It gives him and his followers a kick of superiority complex, and feeling accomplishment, just because they are white Caucasian looking. The truth is that superiority is based on merit of actions and accomplishment. The minister of defence in London is not superior to Alexander the great, or Ceasar, just because he can be buried next to a nuclear bomb, with an iWatch strapped around his wrist. (or a Rolex). I went on Robert Sephyrs YouTube page and literally watched every single video, until the last few, because it got a bit frustrating. I commented almost on each one, and when I would question him in the comment section, I would never get a response. But I really lost respect when I joined his live chat, and he seemed to block me after asking questions. I knew that I was blocked, because simultaneously I was in the live chat of Adam Green typing away. Anyway, each one of us has a unique 0.1% of DNA, but claiming that we have animal ancestry is not proven to me in any way. Neither that those archaic creatures that they talk about are less intelligent than us. Thanks ciao

[Truthspoon]

There's a specific ratio of brain size to body mass which dictate overall intelligence.

 

So a whale is not necessarily more intelligence than a man because it has an enormous body.

 

But two hominids or humans or roughly the same size, one of whom has a larger cranial capacity can generally be understood scientifically to have more intelligence because of the operation of this specific ratio.

 

 

 

 

[Weedo]

1 hour ago, Truthspoon said:

There's a specific ratio of brain size to body mass which dictate overall intelligence.

 

So a whale is not necessarily more intelligence than a man because it has an enormous body.

 

But two hominids or humans or roughly the same size, one of whom has a larger cranial capacity can generally be understood scientifically to have more intelligence because of the operation of this specific ratio.

 

 

 

 

 

According to Cairo (2011), EQ has flaws to its design when considering individual data points rather than a species as a whole. It is inherently biased given that the cranial volume of an obese and underweight individual would be roughly similar, but their body masses would be drastically different. Another difference of this nature is a lack of accounting for sexual dimorphism. For example, the female human generally has smaller cranial volume than the male, however this does not mean that a female and male of the same body mass would have different cognitive abilities. Considering all of these flaws, EQ should be a metric for interspecies comparison only, not for intraspecies comparison.^[15]

 

 

Generally, small mammals have relatively larger brains than big ones. Mice have a direct brain/body size ratio similar to humans (1⁄40),

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encephalization_quotient

[skitzorat]

2 hours ago, Weedo said:

Thanks 

it wasnt for you. It was for truthspoon. in saying that your reply was predictable.. "ropert is satan."

[EnigmaticWorld]

On 7/16/2021 at 6:29 AM, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Check the comments.

 

Comments are now switched off. Typical.

 

Imagine being English and still donating to English Heritage when you are given no say in how your heritage is portrayed.

[Weedo]

1 hour ago, skitzorat said:

it wasnt for you. It was for truthspoon. in saying that your reply was predictable.. "ropert is satan."

 

So our brain-body ratio being the same as that of a mouse was also something you predicted that I'd say? 

[skitzorat]

Europe is not white. **APPLAUSE** Says the refugee. Sounds legit.

 

 

‘Europe is NOT white. Europe is not a white man, also! There is no democracy in Europe without ethnic minorities. And there is no democracy in Europe without black women in stages like these. And also, there is no democracy without equity and equality, of course. But also, there is no equality without the voices of ethnic minorities in Europe – and here [in this room] – I don’t see a lot of them here.’

 

The overwhelming white crowd then applauds and cheers for a few moments.

 

‘So I don’t know if MY Europe is yours, or is yours’, pointing to all the white faces in the room.

 

‘I think that it’s important understanding that ecology, democracy, prosperity, is NOT a white thing, it’s a human thing. And also that it’s important, very important to understand that equality is not enough. We NEED social justice in Europe.’

 

Joacine Katar-Moreira, an African woman from Guinea-Bissau, a highly unstable African country, is running for the European Parliament elections through the far left Portuguese party LIVRE. During a conference last Monday (March 25th) in a very crowded theatre room in Brussels, the black feminist and political activist, with a ‘very useful’ Ph. D in African studies, made an outlandish claim (among many others in her speech): Europe is not white and is not democratic without black women.

https://www.defendevropa.com/2019/news/europe-not-white-african-woman-elections/

Edited July 20, 2021 by skitzorat

[skitzorat]

[Macnamara]

REPLACEMENT migration = genocide of the native population

Record 430 migrants cross Channel in single day: Four Sudanese asylum seekers in paddle boat are among the hundreds of men, women and children who reached UK yesterday in biggest ever landfall

• At least 430 migrants made the journey across the Channel to the UK yesterday 
• Monday's figure passes the previous daily high of 416 set in September 2020 
• Crossings have continued despite Priti Patel's vow to make journey 'unviable'

By Jack Wright For Mailonline

Published: 07:07, 20 July 2021 | Updated: 07:55, 20 July 2021

At least 430 migrants made the journey across the English Channel to the UK yesterday in a new record for a single day as the overseas crossing becomes the preferred route for people-smugglers. 

A group of more than 40 people, including women and young children, were seen walking ashore after one beach landing on the Kent coast yesterday, while another 50 migrants arrived elsewhere. The BBC reported that the group including four Sudanese men who paddled across the Channel.

Monday's figure passes the previous daily high of 416 set in September 2020. High numbers of crossings have continued this summer despite Home Secretary Priti Patel's vow to make the Channel crossings 'unviable'. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9805277/Record-430-migrants-cross-Channel-single-day.html

Edited July 20, 2021 by Macnamara

[Macnamara]

The politics of race: the demographic connundrum

 

In a world where common law has been kicked aside and therefore individual freedoms are no longer protected and are trampled daily under the jackboot of parliamentary 'statute law' which is passed by a political class that have shown themselves time and again to not represent the will of the british people we see the elevation of 'democracy' which is essentially rule by the majority.

 

Rule by majority is a numbers game and in a numbers game demographics are everything which is why the israeli zionists obsess about demographics because they know that if they allow large influxes of non jewish people into israel those people will then tip the balance of power away from the israeli people (if they were white then this would be termed 'white supremacism' by the left but because they are jewish they are not accused of 'jewish surpremacism' ie the desire to not be a demographic minority)

 

This is why the democrats are flooding migrants into the US because they will tip the democratic scales away from those who perceive the US to be a nation and who believe that individual rights are protected against overbearing government by the US constitution and towards a collectivised and all powerful state that doesn't recognise people as individuals but rather as an amorphous blob that needs to be pounded into the shape that they want.

 

The more immigrants that the globalists can flood into countries the more those countries cease to exist as a national identity with a cohesive social bond. Instead they become hotbeds of competing interests all vying to gain the political upperhand over other demographics so that they can impose THEIR values onto the rest of society.

 

Notice that when countries rejected colonial rule this is not termed black or brown supremacism for wanting to maintain control over their own territories but when european countries seek to reject demographic overlay (colonisation ie the creation of colonies of people from outside of that place) then that is termed 'white supremacism' which just demonstrates the double standard at work here which shows that nothing the left does is really about ethics or morality but rather about deception because if morality is not applied equally to all then it isn't morality and that is why the lefts concept of 'equity' instead of equality is a selective morality and therefore is not morality at all.

 

If demographics change a society then is it 'racist' to want to discuss the issue of demographics? Surely such a matter is one of the most pressing issues of our day and yet no one is talking about it.

 

In a woke world where the term 'racist' is shouted at anyone who does want to discuss demographics, is it even possible to have an adult conversation about demographics?

 

When we consider that woke people WANT demographic shift we can realise that they don't want discussion about demographics and therefore the adults in the room are going to need to discuss the matter regardless of what woke people want because they are not acting in good faith.

[EnigmaticWorld]

2 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

When we consider that woke people WANT demographic shift we can realise that they don't want discussion about demographics and therefore the adults in the room are going to need to discuss the matter regardless of what woke people want because they are not acting in good faith.

 

I'm replying to this in this thread as I don't want to go too off-topic with demographic talk in the other thread.

 

The woke do seem the most vocal, but not all Brits no they're being replaced. When the average person on the street was told about it, the majority were against it.

 

On 7/5/2021 at 12:44 PM, EnigmaticWorld said:

https://odysee.com/@LauraTowler:3/we-were-never-asked:2

 

[EnigmaticWorld]

@Macnamara

 

PA was smart with the survey though. They used demographic articles from The Daily Mail and The Guardian, basically from the left and right so they can't say it's a right-wing conspiracy theory.

 

[EnigmaticWorld]

 

[Macnamara]

11 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

The woke do seem the most vocal, but not all Brits no they're being replaced.

 

the daily mail is the most widely read newspaper and they report on the influx of migrants over the channel every single day

 

the information is out there but no one wants to take responsibility for anything

 

the police don't take responsibility for fighting crime anymore (they just monitor 'hate speech' and protests)

 

the journalists don't take responsiblity for holding politicians to account for their endless lies

 

the lawyers don't take responsibility for human rights

 

the teachers don't take responsibility for properly educating the kids so that they are numerate and literate

 

the doctors don't take responsibility for preventing the roll out of an experimental injection that has killed more people then any prior government health drive

 

the nurses don't take responsibility for anything other then making tictok dance videos

 

The border force is not taking responsibility for stopping people crossing our border illegally

 

No one is taking responsibility for anything

Edited July 20, 2021 by Macnamara