Jump to content

Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population?


Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Michi713 said:

This is the situation.  Populations in developed countries are in chemical induced fertility DECLINE.  Economies are being propped up by importing (for now) less chemically contaminated, still fertile people from the south. 

 

we've been over this point so many times.....we don't need mass immigration to prop up the economy. That is just the excuse of the people behind the UN who are pushing what they call on their own website 'replacement migration'

 

There is mass youth UNEMPLOYMENT across europe ok? There are europeans crying out for jobs

 

What mass immigration does is DRIVE DOWN WAGES so that europeans who do get jobs are now earning less and those that don't get jobs end up caught in whats called the 'poverty trap' which is to mean that the state is giving them such generous benefits that they earn more not working then working in a low paid job so they are not incentivised to work

 

To pay for those benefits the working population then have to be taxed

 

You can add to all of this the issue of AUTOMATION which is going to strip away MILLIONS of jobs over the next decade. Europe does not need labour from outside of europe. That is simply not true and is used as an excuse by ideologues with a sinister agenda

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As always you put me in my place Captain. 

 

To say the decline in fertility doesn’t enter the equation is to ignore the immediate future of developed countries.  ‘They’ are still running off the old model in which they need consumers for their crap.  Not producers.  
 

Infertility by chemical poisoning was not intended by the elite leaders of the world because their precious selves are affected too.  That’s why I say they are propping up the old model.  There are still lots of kinks to be worked out with automation.   

Yes there is a depopulation plan.  

More like a shift of population and depopulation.  Lucky ones get to go to developed countries while the agrarian cultures are being relocated or made infertile.  Because they don’t serve a purpose in the system and their land can be re-greened or used for monoculture. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Michi713 said:

As always you put me in my place Captain. 

 

pardon an old sea dog matey...

 

11 minutes ago, Michi713 said:

To say the decline in fertility doesn’t enter the equation is to ignore the immediate future of developed countries.  ‘They’ are still running off the old model in which they need consumers for their crap.  Not producers. 

 

I don't believe so. That is the whole point of the 'great reset' which you can be sure they have been planning for a very long time

 

For some reason they didn't do it in 2008 when the global economy crashed. They decided to prop up the system through 'quantitative easing' so that they could 'kick the can down the road'

 

Why did they do that for another 13 years? I don't know, i'll have to think about that one. Clearly some key piece of their plan wasn't in place but it certainly bought enough time for silicon valley tech billionaires to build bunkers in remote corners of new zealand

 

But global trade is slowing down. There are shortages of everything. The brakes have been screeched on. The great reset MUST include a financial reset but also they want to place humanity onto a more subsistence existence eg synthetic meat and insect burgers and working from home, if you even have a job anymore that is as the AI and robots take over the jobs.

 

We got remoulded into a service economy where we don't manufacture anything anymore. We used to be the workshop of the world and now we churn out barristas and various media flimflammery. 'Great' some might say 'beats working in a rough old shipyard or noisy factory' but the problem is that we now don't have any value in the grand scheme. We have become what kissinger calls 'useless eaters'

 

The solution is not to choose between noisy factories or media flimflammery; the solution is small scale, localised cottage industry

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

So fvcking what?

 

Indeed!

 

But these people can't accept there are differences between ethnicities, and preferences among different ethnicities. They hate the fact that nature is about differences. They talk so much about diversity but they seem to hate it with a passion, having the desire for one human race, one global culture, one system in place. No more differences because that's hurtful and offensive.

 

Real diversity, competition and differences are what nature is all about. They can try to control it but it's pointless in the end.

Edited by Firebird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2021 at 10:12 PM, Macnamara said:

 

pardon an old sea dog matey...

 

 

I don't believe so. That is the whole point of the 'great reset' which you can be sure they have been planning for a very long time

 

For some reason they didn't do it in 2008 when the global economy crashed. They decided to prop up the system through 'quantitative easing' so that they could 'kick the can down the road'

 

Why did they do that for another 13 years? I don't know, i'll have to think about that one. Clearly some key piece of their plan wasn't in place but it certainly bought enough time for silicon valley tech billionaires to build bunkers in remote corners of new zealand

 

But global trade is slowing down. There are shortages of everything. The brakes have been screeched on. The great reset MUST include a financial reset but also they want to place humanity onto a more subsistence existence eg synthetic meat and insect burgers and working from home, if you even have a job anymore that is as the AI and robots take over the jobs.

 

We got remoulded into a service economy where we don't manufacture anything anymore. We used to be the workshop of the world and now we churn out barristas and various media flimflammery. 'Great' some might say 'beats working in a rough old shipyard or noisy factory' but the problem is that we now don't have any value in the grand scheme. We have become what kissinger calls 'useless eaters'

 

The solution is not to choose between noisy factories or media flimflammery; the solution is small scale, localised cottage industry

I don't really have a suggestion as to why 2008 happened when it did, but I think the reason it didn't usher in the revolution that we're seeing now is because the smartphone wasn't advanced/ubiquitous enough at the time.

 

My dad didn't even have an email address back then, but nowadays he's right up to date with the latest Samsung model, streaming apps, etc. People today are more tech-savvy in their 60s than they were in their 40s, all because the smartphone has made the internet accessible to anyone and everyone, which seems to have been the vital step towards pulling us into a curated sub-reality.

 

It's also possible that the Long March wasn't quite complete yet, whereas I couldn't name a single institution or industry that hasn't been fully subverted at this point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Matistuta said:

For some reason they didn't do it in 2008 when the global economy crashed. They decided to prop up the system through 'quantitative easing' so that they could 'kick the can down the road'

let me take a crack at this one.

i think it may be more simple then you think, its all about tech these days, we needed someone like elon(and if it wasnt going to be him it would have been Billie gates most likely) to shoot satellites into space and create this grid or smart grid as some are calling it. 

I for one actually do believe what people say about tech being 50 years at least ahead of what the public knows of, so thats the only thing that i dont really understand about it, was it just to make it seem more realistic i mean would the public not have accepted them having satellites in space then can see how much carbon a human is producing.

just a shot in the dark but think really could be probable.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

British towns that are no-go areas for white people: Muslim author's study of mosques reveals children 'attacked for being white', parents making families live under Taliban-like rules and women who can't leave home without permission

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9648477/Author-visited-Muslim-mosques-Britain-reveals-no-areas-white-men.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Firebird said:

British towns that are no-go areas for white people: Muslim author's study of mosques reveals children 'attacked for being white', parents making families live under Taliban-like rules and women who can't leave home without permission

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9648477/Author-visited-Muslim-mosques-Britain-reveals-no-areas-white-men.html

 

It's nearly funny. 

 

If anyone else (like people living in the areas) had pointed that out in the last 38 years, they'd have been slated for racism - or hate speech bordering on terrorism.

 

The media have been a big part of that conditioning & policing.

 

They've fanned the flames of discontent by pushing racism against whites in reality - it's not newly introduced with the BLM BS - just magnified or escalated by it.

 

And now that they want the disharmony unleashed, they've been campaigning about ethnic minorities causing the spread of Indian variant in these areas. So when we're locked down again, it'll be fine to blame the Asians. And just to add more spark to the powder keg,  the c*nting Mail are suddenly making it alright to express disapproval of those ethnic minorities. Cue the release of pent-up resentments with the minorities now suddenly fair game.

 

If the Satanists get their way, a blood bath will ensue.

 

Is it too much to hope that people will see how they're being played?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

A New York City-based psychiatrist told an audience at the Yale School of Medicine in April that she had fantasies of “unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way.”

Dr. Aruna Khilanani spewed the race-hating virtual remarks — in which she also said she’d walk away from the shooting “with a bounce in my step” and that white people “make my blood boil” and “are out of their minds and have been for a long time” — at the Ivy League institution’s Child Study Center on April 6.

 

 

https://nypost.com/2021/06/04/nyc-pyscho-fantasizes-about-shooting-white-people-in-yale-talk/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/29/2021 at 2:32 AM, EnigmaticWorld said:

1622194857759.jpg.d84f47d23a7fa0a9b806856c4cf5bffc.jpg

 

So fvcking what?

 

I've never been attracted to people who aren't of majority Euro decent - like 95 lol, except maybe the odd Maori albeit the ones with strong euro features and just mocha coloured skin lol but still, some Maori people (especially a lot of the woman) are very attractive for a South Pacific ethnicity - compared to Pacific Islanders and Indigenous Australians....

 

and guess what... whenever I've been 'open' about it... when it's come up in conversation - I don't walk around screaming "ONLY WHITEYS TURN ME ON" but I've been ruthlessly demonised as a closet-racist. I've had to explain that sexual attraction (no matter how much you fluff it up, that's the first thing that triggers a desire to get to know someone) is not something that is taught or learned in the same way as real racism is, that initial lusting is not driven by thought processes...  but no... Wokeys think everyone has to have the desire to mate with everyone else or you're a racist..... in exactly the same way (and % above) of straight men who do not find trannies sexually attractive! and they now call that transphobia! activists are even calling for "work to be done in social clubs/sports teams" to change attitudes... lol good fkn luck with that one!  

 

Dating apps have even recently removed the ethnicity filters (but kept the age/body dimensions etc) so you can't filter out or filter in your preference.

 

No matter how 'evolved' and so-called enlightened the woke-tards and social engineers think they are, and expect everyone else to be too... you simply cannot change primal instincts and the fact that we are a clan-based people (and that goes for all of humanity) who evolved over 100s of thousands of years to be a community in order to survive and thus we're pre-programmed from the moment of birth to seek out and be comfortable with our "in group" because its safe- its basic evolutionary psychology and even logic.... there are even studies in developmental psych that clearly evident babies and toddlers showing a strong racial bias... 'white fragility' nutters claim that to be a product of inbuilt structural racism, of course, that somehow white peoples subconscious racism rubs off on baby in its important developmental phases...FFS!

 

I coped so much shyte so often about being openly only attracted to euros I made up a little rhyme to really rub it in the faces of people who ruthlessly try and defame me in social situations:

 

"I've got a strict policy....

No Fat,

No Black,

No Rice,

No Spice."

 

That always shut them up :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've not read this whole thread, so sorry if this is a duplication.

 

They always start with moulding the kids' minds.

 

I'm glad some people, like this mum, speak up when they learn of it.

 

"Mother EXPLODES at School for Teaching 5-Year Olds How to Masturbate, Perform Anal Sex" https://rumble.com/viepkf-mother-explodes-at-school-for-teaching-5-year-olds-how-to-masturbate-perfor.html?mref=23gga&mc=8uxj1

Edited by Tinfoil Hat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A jewish religious leader is leading the charge to have assisted dying legalised in the Uk

 

Isn't it interesting that of all the causes to get behind in the UK the jewish religious leadership are trying to legalise assisted dying and at this time too when we know that the covid jabs are going to start making people very sick.....apparently we brits just can't die quick enough for some people

We all deserve the right to dignity and compassion in death: Leading Rabbi JONATHAN ROMAIN is heading a campaign for a right-to-die law. In this moving essay, he explains his change of heart — and challenges us ALL to join the divisive debate

By Rabbi Jonathan Romain For The Daily Mail

Published: 00:32, 26 June 2021 | Updated: 01:44, 26 June 2021

When a friend or loved one is ill, one question springs instinctively to our lips: 'Is there anything I can do for you?'

We say it without stopping to think. It's a natural, heartfelt response — we want to make life easier, to alleviate suffering.

But for many people with terminal illness, either enduring great pain or the terror of a death without dignity, the one thing they truly want cannot be given. Anyone helping someone to take their own life runs the risk of facing the full force of the law — and the possibility of 14 years in jail.

To help somebody to die is illegal in this country. The law regards assisted dying not as compassion but as murder.

That's why I am campaigning to allow doctors to help the terminally ill to die. And at last, I believe politicians in Britain are willing to listen.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9727153/Rabbi-Jonathan-Romain-deserve-right-dignity-compassion-death.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to political correctness the shooting of white people does not warrant any protest or riot:

Portland Police Reassure Antifa That Man Shot by Police Was White to Avoid Riot

by Paul Joseph Watson

“Nothing to worry about folks, we just killed a white guy!” joked Chris Menahan.
 
Portland Police moved to reassure Antifa extremists that a man they shot in the back was white in order to avoid a riot after it was erroneously reported the victim was black.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

According to political correctness the shooting of white people does not warrant any protest or riot:

Portland Police Reassure Antifa That Man Shot by Police Was White to Avoid Riot

by Paul Joseph Watson

“Nothing to worry about folks, we just killed a white guy!” joked Chris Menahan.
 
Portland Police moved to reassure Antifa extremists that a man they shot in the back was white in order to avoid a riot after it was erroneously reported the victim was black.
 

 

Is this the story where there is an image of side by side of the same person and one has been deliberatly highlighted t make him apear white whilst the other is clearly black ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, whatthefoxhat said:

Is this the story where there is an image of side by side of the same person and one has been deliberatly highlighted t make him apear white whilst the other is clearly black ?

 

I don't know but the key point here is that whenever a white person is shot by the police there is never any outrage or riots.

 

The implication being that it is ok to shoot white people according to communist antifa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Bombadil locked this topic
  • Bombadil unlocked this topic
  • lake locked and unlocked this topic
  • lake unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...