Jump to content

Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population?


Recommended Posts

 

1474084391_Screenshot2021-03-02214819.png.c4a30405f2af102c9f689f8f7916e1dd.png

 

The first Swedes were dark-skinned hunters and collectors, who moved to Scandinavia from the south at the end of the Ice Age. There, they were quickly joined by another immigration wave, this time from the east, resulting in stone age Europe's most diverse population, a new documentary by Sweden's national SVT broadcaster has claimed

 

According to SVT, the first modern people who entered today's Sweden were dark-skinned hunter-gatherers who followed the migrating reindeer.

Mattias Jakobsson, a professor of genetics at Uppsala University and a researcher of the Atlas project, which aims to map the genome of Sweden's early population, stressed that unlike present-day Swedes, their ancestors had dark skin, as a legacy of their African origin.

 

"They look was quite similar to the people that at that time lived in today's Luxembourg, Spain and Germany. Their look would be quite unusual today, blue eyes with dark skin."

 

Shortly after their arrival, they blended with people from today's Russia, who brought along a more modern technique for manufacturing tools and arrowheads, SVT reported.

 

However, the report triggered strong reaction on social media, with many Swedes accusing SVT of deliberate propaganda aimed at whitewashing the present-day mass immigration with tales of diversity.

"The indoctrination continues. Of course, these were the Africans coming," one user wrote.

https://sputniknews.com/viral/201902181072533012-sweden-documentary-dark-skin/

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 615
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Of course there is. Because Europe has old money and they want the money. How do you take somebody's money?  You destroy their cohesion.  You destroy their race, their families, their realit

If we go on the website of the United Nations we find this: Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations? United Nations projections indicate that over the

It will in future if they get their way. They want whitey out of the way so they can create a slave race. I don't want minorities to be slaves.   "The man of the future will be of mixed race

Posted Images

4 hours ago, skitzorat said:
According to SVT, the first modern people who entered today's Sweden were dark-skinned hunter-gatherers who followed the migrating reindeer.

 

seeing as everyone in sweden was white until the rothschild-cabal started their 'multiculturalism' (ie sabbatean-jewish supremacism) programme we can only conclude that eating reindeer meat turns people white!

 

So according to this article you cite if we were to conduct an experiment in africa where we fed people there reindeer meat they would all turn into tall, blonde, blue eyed vikings...

 

Can you see how insidiously evil what they are doing is? They are denying our right to exist by writing us out of existence altogether. You can only reasonably assume that this is intended to accompany an actual physical genocide of europeans

Edited by Macnamara
Link to post
Share on other sites

This video is fascinating if you can ignore the "Flat Earth" in the title. This particular video has nothing to do with the Flat Earth, it's analysing the Oera Linda - a Norse Creation account. The Flat Earth aspect comes from the belief that the Garden of Eden was at the North Pole.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/3/2021 at 12:15 AM, Macnamara said:

 

seeing as everyone in sweden was white until the rothschild-cabal started their 'multiculturalism' (ie sabbatean-jewish supremacism) programme we can only conclude that eating reindeer meat turns people white!

 

So according to this article you cite if we were to conduct an experiment in africa where we fed people there reindeer meat they would all turn into tall, blonde, blue eyed vikings...

 

Can you see how insidiously evil what they are doing is? They are denying our right to exist by writing us out of existence altogether. You can only reasonably assume that this is intended to accompany an actual physical genocide of europeans

 

We're being prepared for extermination.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When this all began twelve months ago and the government said people were dying like flies from corona i checked the statistics of how many people died during january 2020 in the UK. 68,000 were on the statistics of people dying of natural causes and otherwise. Now there is no information other than those dying of Covid. I smelled a rat twelve months ago and it wasn't a dead one. The rats are most certainly alive  and kicking and king rats have a lot to do with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

more cultural marxism under a supposedly 'conservative' government (really a globalist one):

Record total of 10,373 foreign criminals are freed to live in Britain instead of being deported

  • More than 10,000 foreign criminals are on Britain's streets and not deported
  • Less than a decade ago in 2012 there was less than 4,000 in the community
  • Many are released to be ‘managed in the community’ but some then abscond

By David Barrett Home Affairs Correspondent For The Daily Mail

Published: 22:03, 5 March 2021 | Updated: 22:03, 5 March 2021

The number of foreign criminals released from prison on to Britain’s streets instead of being deported has topped 10,000 for the first time.

Official figures showed there were 10,373 foreign national offenders living in the community at the end of last year.

This was up more than 160 per cent on 2012, when it was less than 4,000.

Just 3,374 foreign offenders were removed from the country, a staggering 34 per cent fall year on year.

The decline cannot be blamed entirely on the pandemic because numbers have been falling for four years.

David Spencer, of the Centre for Crime Prevention, said: ‘It is an outrage that so many convicted foreign criminals have been left free to roam our streets.

‘The Home Secretary needs to ensure that, where possible, all foreign criminals are returned to their home country once they have served their time.’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9331521/Record-total-10-373-foreign-criminals-freed-live-Britain-instead-deported.html

 

 
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a satanic cult called 'the sabbateans' and they infiltrate all religions and governments and destroy them from the inside out

 

They have infiltrated judaism and are destroying it from the inside out. Certainly Jacob Frank set himself up as a reincarnation of sabbatai zevi and had about 50,000 adherents to his sabbatean-frankist religion in poland alone

 

One family who followed frank were the rothschilds and they bankrolled franks bavarian illuminati which was led by sabbatean frankist adam weishaupt

 

When we dig a little deeper into history we find that things like 'colonialism' and the 'trans-atlantic slave trade' were coordinated by marrano-jews who were 'conversos' to christianity to avoid the catholic inquisition. They professed christianity outwardly but behind closed doors were kabbalists. I suggest that they were SABBATEANS. They dominated the slave trade and bankrolled the corporations that drove colonialism such as the dutch east india company and the east india company headquartered in london.

 

Re the holocaust i would say that prof sutton examined the official documentation surrounding the bolsheviks and the nazis and who financed them and it was the same cabal of wallstreet bankers. I would call that cabal the 'rothschild cabal' as they are all inter-married and the pre-eminant group within them is the rothschilds but others include the warburgs and the rockefellers. They are sabbatean-jews and they created Israel

 

They are pushing 'wokeism' to try and shift the blame for their crimes throughout history onto white working people and BLM and antifa are two of the vehicles they are using to do this

Edited by Macnamara
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/6/2021 at 9:45 AM, Macnamara said:

There is a satanic cult called 'the sabbateans' and they infiltrate all religions and governments and destroy them from the inside out

 

They have infiltrated judaism and are destroying it from the inside out. Certainly Jacob Frank set himself up as a reincarnation of sabbatai zevi and had about 50,000 adherents to his sabbatean-frankist religion in poland alone

 

One family who followed frank were the rothschilds and they bankrolled franks bavarian illuminati which was led by sabbatean frankist adam weishaupt

 

When we dig a little deeper into history we find that things like 'colonialism' and the 'trans-atlantic slave trade' were coordinated by marrano-jews who were 'conversos' to christianity to avoid the catholic inquisition. They professed christianity outwardly but behind closed doors were kabbalists. I suggest that they were SABBATEANS. They dominated the slave trade and bankrolled the corporations that drove colonialism such as the dutch east india company and the east india company headquartered in london.

 

Re the holocaust i would say that prof sutton examined the official documentation surrounding the bolsheviks and the nazis and who financed them and it was the same cabal of wallstreet bankers. I would call that cabal the 'rothschild cabal' as they are all inter-married and the pre-eminant group within them is the rothschilds but others include the warburgs and the rockefellers. They are sabbatean-jews and they created Israel

 

They are pushing 'wokeism' to try and shift the blame for their crimes throughout history onto white working people and BLM and antifa are two of the vehicles they are using to do this

 

Out of likes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It started before the Sabbateans though:

 

https://id3417.securedata.net/solarsabbath/calvin.htm

 

Below is an historically recorded letter of 1489 in response to Chemor a Jewish Rabbi of Arles in Provence, who wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice, as the people of Arles were threatening the synagogues.  What should the Jews do?  This was the reply:

"Dear beloved brethren in Moses: We have received your

letter in which you tell us of  the anxieties and misfortunes

which you are enduring. We are pierced by as great pain to hear

it as yourselves. The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is

the following: As for what you  say that the King of France

obliges you to become Christians: do it; since you cannot do

otherwise...As for what you say about the command to despoil you

of your goods make your  sons merchants, that little by little

they may despoil the Christians of theirs. As for what you say

about their attempts on your lives; make your sons doctors and

apothecaries, that they may take  away Christian lives. As for

what you say of their destroying your synagogues; make your sons

 canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their

churches. As for the many other vexations you complain of:

arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that

they always  mix themselves up with the affairs of State, in

order that by putting Christians under your yoke  you may

dominate the world and be avenged on them. Do not swerve from

this order that we  give you, because you will find by

experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the

actuality of power."

Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:

It started before the Sabbateans though:

 

https://id3417.securedata.net/solarsabbath/calvin.htm

 

Below is an historically recorded letter of 1489 in response to Chemor a Jewish Rabbi of Arles in Provence, who wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice, as the people of Arles were threatening the synagogues.  What should the Jews do?  This was the reply:

"Dear beloved brethren in Moses: We have received your

letter in which you tell us of  the anxieties and misfortunes

which you are enduring. We are pierced by as great pain to hear

it as yourselves. The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is

the following: As for what you  say that the King of France

obliges you to become Christians: do it; since you cannot do

otherwise...As for what you say about the command to despoil you

of your goods make your  sons merchants, that little by little

they may despoil the Christians of theirs. As for what you say

about their attempts on your lives; make your sons doctors and

apothecaries, that they may take  away Christian lives. As for

what you say of their destroying your synagogues; make your sons

 canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their

churches. As for the many other vexations you complain of:

arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that

they always  mix themselves up with the affairs of State, in

order that by putting Christians under your yoke  you may

dominate the world and be avenged on them. Do not swerve from

this order that we  give you, because you will find by

experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the

actuality of power."

 

Genius really, when you think about it. Cunning and patient and calculated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Low birth rates are just an excuse for the globalist bureaucracy for ethnocidal migrant policy, as labor needs are declining due to the rapid development of science and technology. A new “class” of the permanently unemployed is emerging, so there is no need for unskilled labor from other continents that is difficult to employ or even unemployable. In addition, the EU is doing little or nothing to promote the birth rate of indigenous peoples. If the EU + UK has a population of around 500  million, this number does not necessarily have to increase as in the Third World. It can also be reduced. What matters is the quality of life, not  how many people are there. However, due to excessive migration, the quality of life in Europe is declining. In the past, Europe had a much smaller population than it does today, and yet it has given the world top achievements in science, technology, art, philosophy, and so on.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Globalists encourages illegal migration because it takes away sovereignty from European nation states. It is best for them to have as many people in Europe as possible who do not belong to European nations. This weakens nation states and is in line with globalists' intentions to create a unitary superstate - the United States of Europe (USE). That is why Brussels wants to impose migrant quotas on all members. In this way, it creates fast-growing proactive minorities within member states who vehemently support Brussels' denationalization policy. This is a game that Brussels is playing with Europeans without their consent, even without their knowledge.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Besides politicians, the media are the main promoters of the globalist ideology of denationalization. The mainstream media bombards people with globalist propaganda on a daily basis. Politics, left and right, support this anti-national globalist agenda, and confirm more or less everything  in order to denationalize European nations and abolish sovereignty of the nation-states.   Under the influence of the mainstream media, the public gets the impression that it does not matter whether we survive as European nations and even as Europeans. This is one of the reasons for the apparent indifference of people to the problem of excessive migration from other continents to Europe.

 

But people aren’t really indifferent. They are depressed and powerless because the nation states  have turned their backs on them. Globalist activists mislead people with lies and intimidate them with shameful labels that attribute to honest people something they are not, that they are racists and fascists if they feel pain at the thought of being doomed as a nation and as a race. They turn their victims into a criminals. Submission of the "criminals" thus becomes a necessity and an "honorable" mission.

 

It is enough to listen to the propaganda carried out by the media, non-governmental organizations and others in spreading the only correct thinking in relation to the policy of migration and denationalization. Television and radio reports are increasingly similar to brainwashing from some other times that we believed were forever behind us. Journalists are less and less journalists and more and more globalist activists. The goal is to silence opposing voices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anti-racism is, in practice, anti-white racism

 

America is at the forefront of a declaratively “anti-racist” and, in fact, anti-white revolution.    The anti-white racists solved the dilemma in an Orwellian way, with the view that anti-white racism is not racism. The critique of anti-white racism, however, is racism.  

 

American whites have already become a stigmatized, “objectively racist” species responsible for slavery, colonialism, wars holocaust - a species that needs to be eliminated, which some individuals already state clearly and loudly without fear or bad conscience and no one persecutes them for it.   The American online newspaper LifeZette reported:

 

"If you’re a white person employed by the City of Seattle you now must sit through hours of racially themed training telling you how horrible you are, how you are a racist, and how disgusting and repugnant you, your family, and your history are to all other people."  

 

The late professor Noel Ignatiev, a tenured professor at Massachusetts College loudly proclaimed to his class, his final teaching day before retirement:

 

“If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the holocaust, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others!”

 

In the interview, prof. Ignatiev further substantiated his anti-white statements:

 

"The goal of destroying the white race is simply so desirable, it boggles the mind trying to understand how anyone could possibly object to it. Those who object to my advice, knowingly or perhaps unknowingly, are themselves white supremacists. They wish to go on oppressing and exploiting other races and maintaining their own privileged positions of power. That is the conscious and sometimes subconscious motivation of all of my critics. That is why they object to destroying the cancer of humanity known as the white race. That ugly disease, which dares to call itself a people and a culture. (...) Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They are behind most of history’s greatest atrocities. Besides, some of the brothers like to bang white women. Eventually white women can breed out, but my feeling is that if you are a white male, you should kill yourself now. If you are a thoughtful person, with a social consciousness who considers himself white, you will consider suicide. It’s the right thing to do. (...) I think we are witnessing the breaking of the back of the white male power structure. We will still have residual white males that must be dealt with, but I am confident that we’ve won. Eventually, I would like to put white males in concentration camps and work them to death just like they’ve done to everyone else. When they are all dead we can throw a party and dance around their corpses!"

https://diversitychronicle.wordpress.com/2013/11/18/progressive-professor-urges-white-male-students-to-commit-suicide-during-class/

Edited by karantanc
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is ethnicity and race a social construct?

 

Globalist propaganda argues that ethnic and racial affiliation is a social construct without a real foundation. If this is indeed the case, there should be no interracial problem in America, as the largest African-American racial minority is raised in the same American culture as whites. And yet all indications are that interracial problems are. Why?

 

America is like a laboratory for studying what is happening when the white majority is rapidly transforming into a minority.    More babies of minorities are already being born in the US than white children (a phenomenon that is also the case in some parts of Europe), which means that America will become a predominantly non-white continent in a generation or two.

 

Even now, when whites still have a majority, big problems arise - not for minorities, but for increasingly discriminated and stigmatized whites, who have already been opposed by the entire American establishment, whose leading plutocratic elite operates on the principle of divide and rule. How it will be in the future, we can only guess, but there is no indication that it will get better.

 

What is happening in Europe and America is gradually leading to the extinction of Euro-American white civilization and European whites, a goal pursued by globalists who want to create a new, hybrid humanity, a mixture of all races, first in the West and later around the world. If this were to happen slowly, gradually and spontaneously, then no one would feel this as violence against themselves and their ethnic and racial identity. But globalists use Machiavellian methods to achieve their goals, from propaganda and abuse of all kinds of institutions, state and civil, all the way to wars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Ethnic identity gives us meaning.

 

"The impulse to seek meaning and belonging through identification with an ethnic group — which is to say, a collective defined by a myth of common ancestry — can be observed across a wide range of societies. That this form of social identity crops up in so many divergent places suggests that it answers some of our species’ basic psychological needs. Human subjectivity can be profoundly isolating; ethnic identity loosens the boundary between the self and society. Human beings’ singular awareness of our own mortality makes us subject to existential despair; ethnic identity lends the individual’s little life a timeless significance by situating it in a transgenerational story that will outlive her. "

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/08/the-1619-project-isnt-unpatriotic-its-just-anti-whiteness.html

 

The above quote is from an essay by American journalist Eric Levitz. The statement touches on some archetypes, values, beliefs and feelings deeply rooted in the human psyche, which are probably inherent in human communities since ancient times. A person with a different identity from the dominant one in the environment where he lives is isolated from others because he has nothing to do with them. An isolated man lives only for himself, which takes away the meaning of his life. The community of people without a common identity is empty. There is nothing inside community to connect them.

 

We all know this feeling, at least in part, from meetings with acquaintances, perhaps classmates or expatriates, even relatives we haven’t met for a long time. The school community in which we once spent many years together is long gone. When we now meet a former classmate from our youth, we don’t even know who we met. We have nothing to say to each other because we no longer belong to the same identity microgroup. Many Westerners move to southern Europe or southern America when they retire, but do not move to Africa, for example, where it is also warm all year round and the cost of living is relatively low. Because in Africa one would be more or less socially excluded, isolated in a foreign world. But such a life has no meaning.

 

The same goes for a Parisian, a Londoner or a Brussels resident who happened to see that there were no more locals in his block, his street, the quarter, no one he knew because they left where they were once at home, because of immigrants from other continents, which gradually socially isolated the locals, psychologically depressed them and consequently pushed them out of their intimate living environment. They became strangers in their own environment and left. But one day, perhaps in the not-so-distant future, they will have nowhere to run because they will become unwanted "foreigners" everywhere - in their own homeland, which will no longer be theirs.  

 

Belonging to a group with a certain identity, including a nation, culture and race, makes human existence meaningful. Denying this fact is violence against the individual and the group to which he or she belongs. With overwhelming emphasis on the human rights of illegal migrants in Europe, it is more than obvious that Brussels and London do not care about the rights of indigenous Europeans and their plight, the "existential despair" they experience when faced with the disintegration of the micro and macro groups to which they belong. And more than that: any complaints and oppositions of indigenous Europeans regarding phenomena that fall within the framework of planned ethnocide are labeled as racism and fascism and suppressed in the root.

 

Globalists are systematically building a society of atomized, unconnected individuals, as built by former totalitarian regimes, because a society with loose internal cohesiveness is easily manageable. This is the eternal goal of autocrats and their regimes. Atomization and consequent isolation also on ethnic, cultural and racial grounds abolishes organic connections within society and deprives people of social power. It impoverishes them as individuals and deprives them of the meaning of existence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am genuinely interested to know this---and this could be an interesting though rather pointless discussion on our way to the guillotines..at least it will keep us busy while they are sharpening the blades...

 

What colour and race were the first humans? Are we following the Adam and Eve story...or the whole neanderthal, homo this, homo that story?

 

What was in Africa and Australia since the beginning of time? I just cannot see a blonde, blue eyed Scandinavian fellow hunting with a spear in the deep African jungles or Australian deserts, so who was living there? And did they take a lease on that continent from someone?

 

Could it be something like this----Eugenics, race, DNA manipulation seems to be the central theme of this archon force that controls earth. Maybe the whites were the ones intentionally or accidentally bred out of melanin and got recessive genes for eye colour. Wouldn't the original DNA on earth  be closer to the Africans or Aborigines in Australia? What do forum members think?

 

 Anyway, what if this mutated- genes white race was used as the first slave race by the archons in the ultimate irony that they were not even made aware that they are being used as tools.

Then all the scientific knowledge that was passed on to the white people first by the cult through the ages, to further their cause of world domination, making them the frontmen of all the horrors that happened in ‘history’.

The people hunting in frozen tundra or somewhere for reindeer meat probably knew very little of science or maths to go for world domination—while it seems that the ancient cultures of africa, australia etc. had 'pagan' wisdom , humility before god and nature and supposedly some scientific knowledge that they were using prudently..

But the viking that is sent to loot and pillage by (whatever name) cult forces existing at that time, would have very little moral judgement blocking his path. Thus an easy tool and thus the whites were made tools..

 

But so much world domination has been done in their name and they have become  so advanced as nations that now they are unable to accept that  it's their turn now and that's why they are being targeted...

 

For the archon force, we are all just pawns in the game..Once we play roles, we are dispensable ….

 

Now the whites are the fall guys, because they have played their role.

 

In their peculiarly evil and ingenious way, the cult is using even this discontent to their advantage because the white people are more focused on preserving and defending their superiority rather than comprehending that we were all slaves, only occupying different floors? / zones? in the same prison, only that some races had so far been provided with better prison facilities.

 

We have all been played. Let’s swallow our prides, irrespective of race and colour and unite against the real ‘enemy’.

Edited by Kali
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kali said:

What colour and race were the first humans?

 

why wouldn't there be different shades?

 

Quote

Are we following the Adam and Eve story...or the whole neanderthal, homo this, homo that story?

 

The neanderthals cross bred with homo sapiens. Europeans have neanderthal genes

 

Quote

What was in Africa and Australia since the beginning of time? I just cannot see a blonde, blue eyed Scandinavian fellow hunting with a spear in the deep African jungles or Australian deserts, so who was living there?

 

Why only ask about africa and australia? Why not also ask about northern europe and the caucasus and the steppes?

 

Quote

Maybe the whites were the ones intentionally or accidentally bred out of melanin and got recessive genes for eye colour. Wouldn't the original DNA on earth  be closer to the Africans or Aborigines in Australia? What do forum members think?

 

I think that sounds like the seeds of an anti-white agenda

 

Why can't you just accept white people?

 

Do you know what non white people were doing around the world before they ever met a white person? In south and central america they were conquering each other, cutting each others hearts out as sacrifices and in some cases cannibalising each other

 

In asia they were conquering each other and enslaving each other and in africa they were doing exactly the same. What happened in northern europe was that they gained a technological edge over other peoples and now you are angry because they became more dominant on the world stage but do you honestly think for a single moment that had asians or africans or muslim arabs or americans been the ones to gain the technological advancement that they would not have spread their power?

 

Imagine if the mongels had gained the technological edge over islam and then christendom as they marched west

 

Imagine if the empire building incas or aztecs had created ships that could cross the seas and cannons that could blast things to pieces. Do you think they would have stayed in the americas?

 

Quote

Anyway, what if this mutated- genes white race was used as the first slave race by the archons in the ultimate irony that they were not even made aware that they are being used as tools.

 

i see archontic behaviour displayed by all peoples. For example they are discovering more and more about the 'serpent kings' of central america who were sorcerors from the hills

 

Quote

Then all the scientific knowledge that was passed on to the white people first by the cult through the ages

 

You mean the scientific knowledge that white people developed through the empirical method and observation and measurement?

 

Quote

to further their cause of world domination, making them the frontmen of all the horrors that happened in ‘history’.

 

No there were horrors going on all around the world whether white people were there or not

 

Quote

The people hunting in frozen tundra or somewhere for reindeer meat probably knew very little of science or maths to go for world domination—while it seems that the ancient cultures of africa, australia etc. had 'pagan' wisdom , humility before god and nature and supposedly some scientific knowledge that they were using prudently..

 

Whites had pagan beliefs too so i don't know what you are talking about; those pagan beliefs were buried under judeo-christian culture such as freemasonry, christianity and judaism.

 

Despite that the non whites were still war-like warrior cultures as were the vikings. When the white explorers went to places on the other side of the planet from europe, like new zealand, do you know what they found there? They found fierce warriors adept at bludgeoning their enemies to death. The vikings were just better at it

 

An example of pre-white contact culture:

 

20111104-newzea-0652.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

The human, head-chopping-lunatic species:

 

Native american culture:

 

1-native-american-warrior-douglas-barnet

 

asian culture:

 

Mongol.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

 

african culture:

 

th?id=OIP.L4rb4KuaRlpp38UFtoi6BwHaLI%26p

 

european culture:

 

th?id=OIP.AcqYtVyx0o1qxlJzeZ9l3gHaHk%26p

 

So all of our ancestors were crazy weapon wielding scumbags...Great! At least that should unite us, if nothing else...we have the same heritage, all of us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...