Jump to content

Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population?


Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Doc said:

Anyone gone anywhere near that new Lord of The Rings series yet? 

I seriously love anything Tolkien. After watching the trailer, it looks to woke and just a continuation of Peter Jacksons style.

It's generally got really bad reviews for not being faithful to Tolkien's vision.

Looks like they done the same as with the wheel of time series

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/6/2022 at 5:58 PM, Macnamara said:

So there is a process at work here where the elites just keep expanding the purvue of government and obviously their long range plan was to socially engineer society into acceptance of complete, totalitarian control under a technocracy. 

 

This discussion on individualism vs collectivism has clarified my mind somewhat. Totalitarian better describes their endgame I think, a regime which stops independent collectives from organising themselves outside of corporate/state control. Just like China in fact. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Campion said:

 

This discussion on individualism vs collectivism has clarified my mind somewhat. Totalitarian better describes their endgame I think, a regime which stops independent collectives from organising themselves outside of corporate/state control. Just like China in fact. 

 

yes communism = collectivism

cartelist capitalism = collectivism

 

so what we have is the marxists blaming everything on 'capitalism' but do we really have free market capitalism? If we had free market capitalism we wouldn't have central banks and the state would not have bailed out the banks in 2008. they would have let those failed businesses fail or they would have written down the debts to the ability to pay

 

so what we really have is a command and control economy run through the central banks where big cartels control big pharma, big agra, big oil and big finance. That system was called by prod sutton CORPORATE SOCIALISM but david icke calles it CARTELISM = the same thing

 

those cartels want to consolidate their power into a global government that can micromanage everyone under the excuse of fighting manmade CO2. Such a system where people are controlled according to their energy use is called a 'technocracy'

 

so the communists are the useful idiots of the corporate socialist cartelists who own the big corporations because they keep telling us that the current system is called 'capitalism' and that it is broken and must change

 

The corporate socialist cartelists who run the broken system are the ones who have broken the system because they also want to change the system to a technocracy so they fund the communists to help them destroy society and the system in order that they may remake it into a technocracy

 

The technocracy is not a victory for the workers; it is a victory for the super rich elites behind the corporate socialist corporations

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

No. If you're going to watch it then it's probably best to find a mirror online so you're at least not supporting them.

 

nhw.jpg

 

 

hw1.jpg

 

15 hours ago, Bombadil said:

I seriously love anything Tolkien. After watching the trailer, it looks to woke and just a continuation of Peter Jacksons style.

It's generally got really bad reviews for not being faithful to Tolkien's vision.

Looks like they done the same as with the wheel of time series

Well, last evening I watched 45ish minutes piggy backing on a friend's account... Where to start? It didn't feel like I was watching a Tolkien adaptation whatsoever.

 

The first battle montage was quite in keeping with the visual aesthetic of the Peter Jackson movies but from there on in it deteriorated rapidly.

By the time Lenny Henry appeared as a 'halfling' with, what I can only guess was an Irish accent, I was done really but I persevered with an indifferent mindset.

 

The action scenes were over cooked and obsurd. The acting was wooden and unconvincing. There was no atmosphere and I was unable to suspend my disbelief. It felt like I was watching actors work rather than enjoying the story, of which there seemed little.

 

By the time the BAME elf appeared on screen with his white, heavily cleavaged love interest I felt that the bad reviews were completely justified. Galadriel came off as an angry ultra feminist and Elrond was effeminate and held no gravitas whatsoever. 

 

In the right hands the appendices could have been made into an absolutely epic TV event. It's a real shame. I would have loved to see what a production team filled with true Tolkien afficionados would have done with a billion dollars.

 

The Amazon production is a travesty and in my honest opinion JRR Tolkien will be turning in his grave. The holders of his estate should be ashamed that they allowed Amazon to desecrate his legacy.

 

I know that the race of certain cast members has been a big bone of contention in certain circles but I felt that even if this had not been the case it would still be virtually unwatchable to true Tolkien fans. The general tone is too lightweight/modern for such an epic tale and completely fails to grasp the almost biblical nature of what's at stake in the story. 

 

My grandfather introduced my father to Tolkien's work and my father read the Hobbit to me as a bedtime story when I was about 7. I've read all of his work multiple times. To say I like Tolkien is an understatement. For me Jackson's extended LOTR films are where the 'franchise' ends. The Hobbit movies were a very meh, but a good entry into the world of middle earth for younger viewers I guess. 

 

So to sum up, The Rings of Power is shite. Not exclusively because it has BAME Elves and Hobbits but because it feels forced and shallow. The inclusion of BAME actors doesn't feel organic at all, it's straight up positive discrimination and only serves to alienate viewers. 

 

Tolkien's work is an extension of North European dark age/medieval mythos and should be treated with historical accuracy in my opinion. It's not about race, it's about authenticity. This has no authenticity at all and that is the root of the problem.

 

Edited by Doc
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

Well, last evening I watched 45ish minutes piggy backing on a friend's account... Where to start? It didn't feel like I was watching a Tolkien adaptation whatsoever.

 

The first battle montage was quite in keeping with the visual aesthetic of the Peter Jackson movies but from there on in it deteriorated rapidly.

By the time Lenny Henry appeared as a 'halfling' with, what I can only guess was an Irish accent, I was done really but I persevered with an indifferent mindset.

 

The action scenes were over cooked and obsurd. The acting was wooden and unconvincing. There was no atmosphere and I was unable to suspend my disbelief. It felt like I was watching actors work rather than enjoying the story, of which there seemed little.

 

By the time the BAME elf appeared on screen with his white, heavily cleavaged love interest I felt that the bad reviews were completely justified. Galadriel came off as an angry ultra feminist and Elrond was effeminate and held no gravitas whatsoever. 

 

In the right hands the Silmarillion could have been made into an absolutely epic TV event. It's a real shame. I would have loved to see what a production team filled with true Tolkien afficionados would have done with a billion dollars.

 

The Amazon production is a travesty and in my honest opinion JRR Tolkien will be turning in his grave. The holders of his estate should be ashamed that they allowed Amazon to desecrate his legacy.

 

I know that the race of certain cast members has been a big bone of contention in certain circles but I felt that even if this had not been the case it would still be virtually unwatchable to true Tolkien fans. The general tone is too lightweight/modern for such an epic tale and completely fails to grasp the almost biblical nature of what's at stake in the story. 

 

My grandfather introduced my father to Tolkien's work and my father read the Hobbit to me as a bedtime story when I was about 7. I've read all of his work multiple times. To say I like Tolkien is an understatement. For me Jackson's extended LOTR films are where the 'franchise' ends. The Hobbit movies were a very meh, but a good entry into the world of middle earth for younger viewers I guess. 

 

So to sum up, The Rings of Power is shite. Not exclusively because it has BAME Elves and Hobbits but because it feels forced and shallow. The inclusion of BAME actors doesn't feel organic at all, it's straight up positive discrimination and only serves to alienate viewers. 

 

Tolkien's work is an extension of North European dark age/medieval mythos and should be treated with historical accuracy in my opinion. It's not about race, it's about authenticity. This has no authenticity at all and that is the root of the problem.

 

Thanks for the review. At least I won't waste my time now!

I'll have to look it up, but I read somewhere that Amazon originally only bought the right to the appendices of Tolkien's work. Not sure from which books without checking again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

Thanks for the review. At least I won't waste my time now!

I'll have to look it up, but I read somewhere that Amazon originally only bought the right to the appendices of Tolkien's work. Not sure from which books without checking again. 

Yes, I kind of tend to lump the appendices and the Silmarillion together in my mind for some reason. It's a vast body of work when you go past The Hobbit and LOTR. The Silmarillion was a struggle for me to be honest, had to give it a few goes before getting into the flow. It reads much more like a genuine historical myth rather than a story if you know what I mean . I will edit my post.

Edited by Doc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Doc said:

The Silmarillion was a struggle for me to be honest, had to give it a few goes before getting into the flow. It reads much more like a genuine historical myth rather than a story of you know what I mean .

 

it was uncompleted at the time of tolkeins death wasn't it? His son then had it published but did he edit it at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Macnamara said:

 

it was uncompleted at the time of tolkeins death wasn't it? His son then had it published but did he edit it at all?

Not sure Mac, I think that it was probably finished by JRR but it was edited and published posthumously by Christopher Tolkien with help from a fantasy author. Can't remember who though, will have to look it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Doc said:

Not sure Mac, I think that it was probably finished by JRR but it was edited and published posthumously by Christopher Tolkien with help from a fantasy author. Can't remember who though, will have to look it up.

 

might explain the different feel of the novel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Macnamara said:

 

might explain the different feel of the novel

The guy is called Guy Gabriel Kay. I'm not familiar with his work but he was just in his mind twenties when he helped Christopher Tolkien with the editing!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Doc said:

The guy is called Guy Gabriel Kay. I'm not familiar with his work but he was just in his mind twenties when he helped Christopher Tolkien with the editing!

 

Guy Gavriel Kay
(7 November 1954 – present)

born in Weyburn, Saskatchewan, on 7 November 1954 to Samuel Kay, a surgeon, and Sybil (Birstein) Kay.

1984 marked two important events in Kay’s life: his marriage on July 15th to Laura Beth Cohen, a marketing consultant, and the publication of The Summer Tree, the first volume of the trilogy The Fionavar Tapestry.

https://brightweavings.com/guygavrielkay/

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not Convinced The 1619 Project Lies About History? Look At This Professor’s Forced Confession

September 06, 2022
The 1619 Project’s Nikole Hannah-Jones does not accept correction. Instead, she attacks every critic as a racist or race traitor.
 

In August, history professor James H. Sweet wrote that the 1619 Project illustrated the problem of  “presentism” in history. In an American Historical Association essay, “Is History History?”  he argued The New York Times’s 1619 Project looks at “the past through the prism of contemporary social justice issues—race, gender, sexuality, nationalism, capitalism.”

Sweet almost immediately found himself attacked by a mob of historians for not adhering to the standards of “presentism.” He quickly groveled with a public apology and a walkback of his gentle initial observations.

 

Yet he wasn’t wrong at all. To make the case that all white people should pay black people for what the 1619 Project calls (white) America’s “Original Sin” of slavery, one needs to present all white people as complicit in the enterprise and all black people as innocent and blameless victims. Certainly, the false idea that slavery was unique to America and practiced only by white people is a commonly held belief.

1619 Project creator Nikole Hannah-Jones is not a historian, but a journalist specializing in race issues. So she might be excused for not knowing about the African role in the slave trade, the ubiquitous nature of slavery throughout history (in which no ethnic groups, races, or faiths are exempt), and the fact that many free black people also owned slaves. But Hannah-Jones does not accept correction; she attacks every critic as a racist or race traitor.

As I’ve learned from researching for my new book, “Debunking The 1619 Project,” Hannah-Jones knowingly presents falsehoods about American history and slavery, such as that all white people are morally culpable for slavery and that all black people are blameless. In this episode, she helped the Twitter mob pile onto Sweet, while making the very same point for which he was being attacked.

Hannah-Jones revealed in a Los Angeles Times interview that her favorite novel was “The Known World” by Edward Jones, which is about a black slave-owning family in antebellum Virginia. So she’s aware black slave ownership happened. Yet she insulted and then blocked me on Twitter when I pointed out the racially inconvenient fact that a significant percentage of free black Americans owned slaves. That was one of two lies I have caught her in.

 

After she blocked me, she scolded another tweeter who complained that the left sees American “exceptionalism” in the practice of slavery as “uniquely or distinctly American.” “You should do more reading,” she lectured. “Because there is a difference between a society that permits slavery and engages in slavery, and a slave society, where the entire society is organized around slavery.”

She pointed out that what made American slavery “exceptional” was that “American slavery took place in the only country FOUNDED on the God-given equality and rights of mankind.” She mocked the idea of “using 1,000-year-old history to justify downplaying 150-year-old history”—an admission that American slavery is deliberately being presented in isolation and therefore distortedly.

One of Sweet’s thought crimes had been criticizing the claim of the forthcoming movie, “The Woman King” that “Dahomey’s female warriors and King Ghezo fought the European slave trade.” Sweet, a specialist in African history, pointed out that, on the contrary, “they promoted it” (emphasis added).

While Hannah-Jones was retweeting attacks on Sweet, she was also commenting on “The Woman King.” She noted, “It will be interesting to see how a movie that seems to glorify an all-female military unit of the Dahomey deals with the fact that this kingdom derived its wealth from capturing Africans for the Trans-Atlantic slave trade.”

 

Some commentators on Hannah-Jones’s thread mentioned Zora Neale Hurston’s “Barracoon: The Story of the Last ‘Black Cargo,’” which was based on Hurston’s interviews in 1927 and 1928 with Cudjo Lewis, one of the last survivors of a cargo of slaves brought to American shores illegally in 1860. He had been captured at the age of 19 in a raid employing female warriors from Dahomey—the very subjects of “The Woman King.”

As I discuss in “Debunking The 1619 Project,” Cudjo, of “the Isha subgroup of the Yoruba people of West Africa,” then known by his native name, Kossola, had been undergoing initiation for marriage when his town of Bantѐ was raided in the early morning hours “by Dahomey’s female warriors, who slaughtered [townspeople] in their daze.’”

As Hurston recorded, Cudjo Lewis’s account tells of seeing the severed and rotting heads of family members and being “yoked by forked sticks and tied in a chain” with other villagers on a three-day march to the stockades at Abomey. He was then incarcerated in the barracoons at Ouidah. She commented, “Kossula was no longer on the porch with me. He was squatting about that fire in Dahomey. His face was twitching in abysmal pain…”

As Alice Walker said in her foreword to the book, which was published in 2018, “many black people, years ago, especially black intellectuals and political leaders,” had a problem with the book, which “resolutely record[ed] the atrocities African people inflicted on each other, long before shackled Africans, traumatized, ill, disoriented, starved, arrived on ships as ‘black cargo’ in the hellish West.” She asked, “Who could face this vision of the violent cruel behavior of the ‘brethren’ and the ‘sistren’ who first captured our ancestors?”

Such questions, which defy the facile and false categorization of people as evil or good based on race or ideological inclination, also occupied the novelist Jones in his resonant and beautifully written “The Known World,” which is also a favorite of mine. Good novelists present characters realistically, as having both good and bad characteristics.

Good historians similarly recognize the complexity of human beings. All are all capable of good and evil. Historians do not alter the evidence to make it appear differently.

Historians do not make sweeping, incendiary statements like this one from Hannah-Jones’s lead essay in both the original and book versions: “In response to black demands for [their] rights, white Americans strung them from trees, beat them and dumped their bodies in muddy rivers, assassinated them in their front yards, firebombed them on buses, mauled them with dogs, peeled back their skin with fire hoses and murdered their children with explosives set off inside a church.”

As professor Lynn Uzzell noted, out of the 77 times the term “white” appears in Hannah-Jones’s 1619 Project, 35 times white people are presented as holding “some kind of power or privilege (almost always unearned or illegitimate)” and in 32 cases, “the word is associated with oppression, injustice, or cruelty.”

Kindergartners are being read the 1619 Project picture book, “Born on the Water.” They will be told that people in Africa were “kidnapped” exclusively by “white people,” who “traded another’s child / another’s momma and daddy” whom they viewed as “not human” and to be “bought and sold … alongside horses and chairs.” That is not an accurate depiction of this complex situation, and simplifying in this way encourages racial bitterness.

We know Hannah-Jones knows that white people are not all to blame and that black people also participated in the horrors of slavery, but she pushes such lies anyway. With Hannah-Jones revealing herself to be a liar over and over, there should be no more doubts about the need to take the 1619 Project propaganda out of our schools.

 

 

Mary Grabar, the author of "Debunking Howard Zinn," earned her PhD from the University of Georgia and taught college English for 20 years. She is now a resident fellow at the Alexander Hamilton Institute for the Study of Western Civilization in Clinton, New York. She is also author of the "Debunking The 1619 Project: Exposing the Plan to Divide America" (Regnery, September 7, 2021). Her writing can be found at DissidentProf.com and at marygrabar.com.
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The genocidal anti-White rhetoric which jewish media has been overtly pumping out over the past few years is starting to yield it's desired evil fruit.

 

Black Men in Memphis Are Threatening to Kill More White People

 

After White people were murdered randomly by a Black man, more Black men are threatening to do more of the same.

From Breaking 911, “URGENT: Memphis Police Looking For Men Seen In Video Vowing To Kill White People”:

“On Thursday, September 8, 2022, the Memphis Police Department was advised of threats of violence directed at members of our community,” Memphis PD said in a statement. “These terroristic threats were posted on social media platforms and specific threats to events occurring in the City of Memphis.”

 

“White folks fixin’ to not like black people,” the man says in the posting. “They’re fixin’ to be marching by the riverside, ‘White Lives Matter,’ he adds. “He already shot an old white man. I’m fixin’ to shoot a white old lady.”

 

Directed at members of the community? These terroristic threats were directed at WHITE PEOPLE, but the police are too cowardly to even say it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

Such a strange mind-set, to want to slaughter innocent people randomly. There's no way to justify people letting themselves be brainwashed to be so hateful in a society where we are already seeing racial prejudice in their favour. 

 

It's part of the brainwashing that we don't have enough genuine face-to face community to know each other as individuals. Instead we are taught by the cult's system to generalise about each other according to the demographic categories we assume them to belong to (there's a name for it which I can't remember right now). So the reality of actual people becomes subsumed under the various simplistic stories of eg, all black people are victims of all white people's oppression. And the simplistic stories, being simple soundbites are easier to promote and indoctrinate us with, compared with the truth of a complex and nuanced history. Even 'black and white' is an oversimplification.  Whites as well as blacks absorb this evil from childhood;  it's designed to create one angry group outpouring their feelings onto another group of chastened, willing victims who believe they deserve all this. It's then storing up another history of oppression the other way round, which will have its own programmed response later on. All the while, the cult is becoming more empowered by its control over us. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

Such a strange mind-set, to want to slaughter innocent people randomly. There's no way to justify people letting themselves be brainwashed to be so hateful in a society where we are already seeing racial prejudice in their favour. 

 

its a kind of nihilism that seems to be on the rise alongside moral reletavism

 

there are now a lot of people living with absolutely no internal value system or code of ethics

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of people now feel they have 'skin in the game' of certain issues but if we try to step above the level of human emotions and we move upto the realm of objective thinking and logic we can ask questions like:

 

'are all countries being targetted by the globalist elites for 'diversification' or is it just countries that have a demographic majority of people of european descent?'

or

'if diversification simply means to water down a target population by flooding them with people from another part of the world then does that imply that the people behind it believe there is something wrong with the target population which requires them to be watered down?'

 

When we ask those questions we can see that it is countries with european demographic majorities that are being targetted for diversification whilst India, china, nigeria, egypt, israel and other countries are not being targetted for 'diversification'

 

So then we can ask 'why do the globalist elites feel they need to 'diversify' european societies?

 

Are we in fact witnessing a hate crime on the part of the people behind the globalist agenda? Why do they single out european people?

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not use the diamonds to pay those countries to take their migrants back?

Former Colonies of Elizabeth II Want Their $400 Million Diamond Back From the Crown Jewels

The longest-reigning British monarch died on September 8. But many from her former colonies aren’t mourning.
Jakarta, ID
September 9, 2022, 3:43pm

While much of the western world are mourning the death of Queen Elizabeth II, the UK’s longest-running monarch, some from her former colonies questioned the dark legacy of the monarchy and her rule. In South Asia, the dissent centres on the Koh-i-Noor.

 

As soon as the news of the queen’s passing broke, South Asians across the world started asking for the controversial diamond back. The 109-carat Koh-i-Noor – believed to be the world’s most expensive diamond – has been at the heart of an ownership dispute between the British royalty and some of its former colonies. The dispute over the diamond, estimated to be worth $400 million by some and priceless by others, symbolises a larger protest against the British for downplaying the brutality of their 200-year rule and the scale of their loot. 

https://www.vice.com/en/article/bvm7ad/elizabeth-ii-colonisation-kohinoor-india-pakistan

 

And why don't we hear black lives matter complaining about the rapey globalist United Nations?

 

BOMBSHELL UN DOSSIER

UN aid workers raped 60,000 people as it’s claimed organisation employs 3,300 paedophiles

The dossier claims United Nations aid workers have raped 60,000 people and estimate that the organisation employs 3,300 paedophiles

  • 22:00, 12 Feb 2018
  • Updated: 20:22, 13 Feb 2018

A WHISTLE blower has claimed UN staff could have carried out 60,000 rapes in the last decade as aid workers indulge in sex abuse unchecked around the world.

The claim is in a bombshell dossier that former senior United Nations official Andrew Macleod handed over to DFID Secretary Priti Patel last year.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/politics/5562215/un-aid-workers-raped-60000-people-as-its-claimed-organisation-employs-3300-paedophiles/?utm_source=substack

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweden: Four In Five 'Refugees' Have Vacationed In The Country They Fled From

by Tyler Durden
Friday, Sep 16, 2022 - 07:00 AM

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

A new survey has found that almost four out of five refugees living in Sweden have vacationed in the countries that they originally fled from.

Yes, really.

The survey was conducted by polling firm Novus on behalf of the Swedish online newspaper Bulletin.

It found that 79 per cent of people who arrived in Sweden as refugees, supposedly fleeing war or persecution, have returned to their home country since arriving in Sweden.

“According to the survey, they do not wish, however, to return home permanently,” reports Remix News. “When asked whether they plan to permanently return to their country of birth in the future, just 2 percent say they do, while 16 percent say maybe — 81 percent of those who arrived in Sweden from non-European countries say they do not, primarily because they believe Sweden to be a better country to raise their children.”

The migrants are able to slip in and out of Sweden because there is no punishment for doing so, unlike in countries like Switzerland and Germany, where refugees who return to their home countries without permission face losing their asylum status.

“If someone, a Syrian refugee, regularly vacations in Syria, he cannot honestly claim to be persecuted in Syria,” said then-German Interior Minister Horst Seehofer in 2019.

The results of the survey once again highlight how the vast majority of so-called “refugees” aren’t refugees at all, they’re economic migrants exploiting the emotional cache of the term “refugee” to abuse the system, and in doing so harming the interests of actual refugees.

Over the last 20 years, Sweden has taken in more refugees per capita that any other western country, a process which has seen Sweden go from being one of the safest countries in Europe to the second most dangerous.

The unemployment rate for migrants is four times higher than native Swedes, with some migrant-heavy areas seeing jobless levels as high as 78 per cent.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/sweden-four-five-refugees-have-vacationed-country-they-fled

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lara Logan: Biden’s Invasion of Southern Border Part of Plan For Global Government

Infowars.com
High-level UN source claims globalists plan to bring in 100 million illegal migrants into the U.S. to dissolve the country into a North American Union-type government, she says.

The Biden regime’s controlled collapse of the U.S. southern border allowing millions of illegal aliens to pour into the country is part of a larger plot to establish a world government, according to investigative journalist Lara Logan.

Logan joined Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast on Friday to break down how the massive invasion of millions of illegal aliens into the U.S. is part of a “longterm plan and political ideology to obliterate the sovereignty of this nation and change the way the world looks, forever.”

“It’s not just America’s sovereignty that’s on the chopping block, it’s sovereignty over the world,” Logan told Bannon. “It’s just that this is the place that is the light and the guide for the whole world. And so this is the country that has to fall first in order for the other countries to fall.”

Logan went on to explain that a high-level source within the globalist “cult” at the United Nations told her that the plan involves bringing in 100 million people into the U.S. to then justify combining Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. into one governmental entity.

“And what I learned from a source, who is a very unique source, having infiltrated the Globalist ‘cult’ at the UN level is that he was in high-level meetings that required a number of security clearances where they actually discussed the plan to bring 100 million people into the United States, in order to pave the way for a regional government of US, Canada and Mexico,” Logan said.

“And that was to bring in 100 million people from Latin American countries, together with a strategy of creating these cartels, making life unbearable. It’s called the ‘Push-Pull Strategy,’ where they push people out of these countries, where it’s unbearable living like this and they pull them into the United States.”

She continued, “And then, once you’ve reached that critical number of over a hundred million in this invasion, they will then propose, ‘Well, for your family and friends back home, who need ease of travel, they need a better life and so on and so on – we can do all this better with a regional government than we can with a US Government.’ And they will have enough critical mass inside the country in order to effect that policy.”

Logan warned that under the Biden regime, that globalist plan to dissolve the United States into a regional governmental body has accelerated:

That’s the Globalist plan that we’re working towards. But what we’re already doing is that we’re living under their policy, where they’ve made the right to migrate a ‘human right,’ recognized by the UN in 2018 and that now supersedes our sovereign rights, thanks to the Biden administration and the open border ideologues who are in this government, who were never asked, to be honest, about their strategy on the campaign trail, who have bypassed the legislature and are implementing a strategy and a policy that, not only did no Americans vote for it, because they weren’t given the opportunity but most Americans don’t support.

These claims corroborate a now-deleted UN strategy document from 2001 called, “Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?” that outlines a plan to flood America with 600 million migrants by 2050.

So far, over 5 million illegal aliens have poured into the U.S. since Joe Biden took the White House nearly two years ago.

https://www.infowars.com/posts/lara-logan-bidens-invasion-of-southern-border-part-of-plan-for-global-government/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the United States our southern states, especially Texas, have been predominately Hispanic since around 2004 according to the US Census.  Now, with an open southern border, many other states are being flooded with Hispanics and causing a collapse of certain social and economic infrastructural entities.  The flood of these illegal aliens, most that don't speak English, are decimating tradition, culture, and everyday way of life.  Crime has spiked, so has homelessness and drug use.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...