Jump to content

Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population?


Recommended Posts

Of all the repetitive words anti semitic has to be some of the worst. OK there are lots of words to condition us to a created war. The dirty bastards, they don't play fair huh?

 

What about the other people who suffered in the war, the Ukrainians for example who never got a word untill it suited them, and now that bastard Boris is still on TV with his little yellow blue and Union Jack badge. Prick. Bald prick. 

 

Civil war, divide, take the rage out on each other. It's been building for so long. I saw in Cyorus how the UN divided the island with their green line to keep each side apart- for safety. 

 

Some of the Greeks say that the people on the boats are 'soldiers'. They know something is very wrong. The refugee 'crisis' is in lots of places, I suppose it's the war on Europe isn't it? Cameron offering a referendum was just part of keeping the country in stalemate / divided / frustrated.

 

We will go through the mangle, and some will come out the other side. During the wars there was always music and drinking and dancing somewhere else. 

 

There will be wars and rumours of wars is a rather clever line, I think of it quite often. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ford Foundation Has Spent over $100 Million in Support of Amnesty, Mass Migration

Spencer Lindquist
27 Aug 2022703

The Ford Foundation (FF) has poured over $100 million into a variety of organizations that advocate for mass immigration, amnesty, and a weaker border.

The Foundation has provided immense financial backing for what it calls a “well-coordinated, innovative, and fearless immigrant rights movement.” 

They boast that “This movement has secured policies that limit local law enforcement collaboration with federal immigration authorities in more than 600 cities and counties.” The FF partners with regional, state, and local advocacy groups to oppose “the use of criminal justice measures for immigration purposes.”

The FF claims that it supports immigration because it “enriches and deepens America’s democracy by making it more culturally, socially, and politically diverse,” but it is apparent that the foundation hopes to politically mobilize immigrant populations. “We will support immigrant communities and their allies to influence government,” the foundation’s website reads.

In order to both weaken America’s immigration laws and to politically mobilize immigrant populations, the Ford Foundation has given at least $114 million to a variety of nonprofits, activist networks, and other organizations since 2008.

https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2022/08/27/ford-foundation-spending-100-million-amnesty-mass-migration/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4.9 Million Illegal Aliens Crossed US Border In 18 Months Since Biden Took Office: Report

 

Nearly 5 million illegal immigrants have crossed U.S. borders in the 18 months since President Joe Biden took office, according to a new report.

A total of 4.9 million illegal aliens, including some 900,000 “gotaways” who evaded apprehension and have since disappeared into American communities, have entered the country by the end of July, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) said in a statement on Aug. 16.

“Roughly the equivalent of the entire population of Ireland has illegally entered the United States in the 18 months President Biden has been in office, with many being released into American communities,”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/4-9-million-illegal-aliens-crossed-us-border-in-18-months-since-biden-took-office-report_4678365.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11127657/Americas-immigration-crisis-laid-bare-DailyMail-coms-depth-analysis.html

 

No invasion here. Nothing to see.

 

Meanwhile the cultural destruction and ethnic replacement genocide of Europa continues at 2015 pace.

image.jpeg.b1bab7b8a81a8966a5cff2cf1ff74486.jpeg

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/25/2022 at 9:09 AM, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

It's fitting that the image features the Statue of Liberty, seeing as this quote wasn't originally on it, and it was added 20 years after it was dedicated:

 

"Give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…"

 

Written by Emma Lazarus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Lazarus#Early_years_and_education

I was about to say this!

 

 

meanwhile...

 

She was also an important forerunner of the Zionist movement. Lazarus argued for the creation of a Jewish homeland thirteen years before Herzl began to use the term Zionism. Her "Epistle to the Hebrews" was reprinted by the Federation of American Zionists in 1900

 

Its lines appear inscribed on a bronze plaque, installed in 1903,[2] on the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty.[3]

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul Krugman Whites are not the future in America

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Krugman#Early_life_and_education

 

[White rural Americans] "....in the end, they're not the future.....the power that they have will go away"

 

Oprah Winfrey: Old White people have to die to solve racism.

 

 "......in the South — there are still generations of people, older people, who were born and bred and marinated in it, in that prejudice and racism, and they just have to die."

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2022 at 8:15 PM, Bombadil said:

The whites weren't native. they were introduced

 

Suggests a question, of how long does it take to become native? Yes, they weren't native at the time they were introduced, but that's true for the Aussie Aboriginals too. 

 

I'd suggest that one factor, apart from being born somewhere, is to fully identify with the place you're living in, rather than somewhere else. These days many people have a dual identity along the lines of, say, Irish-American or Bangladeshi-British, or Afro-Caribbean, so are to some extent alienated and aren't really native to anywhere. Just how the globalists want us. 

 

I've not heard of a British-Australian identity as such, though I think they still belong to the British monarchy so perhaps "white" Aussies are a mixture of fully native and semi-native. 

Edited by Campion
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Campion said:

 

Suggests a question, of how long does it take to become native?

 

white australians are not natives of australia

 

the story of how many of the those whites ended up in australia is an interesting one though as many of them were sent there against their will as prisoners because australia was being used as a penal colony by the british government

 

people were being sent there for some pretty petty crimes so when people say 'the british' did this or that i don't really see it that way because the story of the british people is one of them being screwed by the elites in london whether it was through being pushed off the land, made into fuedal serfs, conscripted into armies, press ganged into navies or cleared from their homes in clearances and forced onto boats

 

So things are not always so clear cut but they are not the 'natives' of that land

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

i guess you could say that they are the creators of the country that is 'Australia' though

I remember a conversation with a Kiwi friend at work. He told me that the Maori cannibalised the people who were living in Aotearoa when they arrived. I don't know for sure how accurate that is. No point me posting links because they all contradict each other. I cant tell which is true.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

I remember a conversation with a Kiwi friend at work. He told me that the Maori cannibalised the people who were living in Aotearoa when they arrived.

cannablism is one of the threats made in some maori hakas

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fears asylum seeker plans could cause major issues in Fenland
https://www.fenlandcitizen.co.uk/news/fears-asylum-seeker-plans-could-cause-major-issues-in-fenlan-9271873/

 

'The report points out that: "There is relatively tight, and increasingly expensive, private sector rented housing provision in Fenland" and that any move to house asylum seekers in the district would have the potential to restrict properties for other people in need of accommodation.

 

It goes further to suggest the "consequential impact on supply could create further inflation in rents at a time when the cost of living is causing people to struggle".'

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/2/2022 at 11:46 PM, Macnamara said:

the story of how many of the those whites ended up in australia is an interesting one though as many of them were sent there against their will as prisoners because australia was being used as a penal colony by the british government

 

On 9/2/2022 at 11:46 PM, Macnamara said:

So things are not always so clear cut but they are not the 'natives' of that land

 

It's a complex story, as people are still emigrating there so roots in the land will vary greatly. As it happens, we've traced our own family tree in the British Isles about as far as the first European exploration and emigration to Aus/NZ*. That's about 10 or 12 generations, and I feel native here, so for those families who've worked on the Australian land and seas for that long, I'd have no hesitation calling them native, if they want it, whatever the circumstances of their ancestors who originally arrived; the sins of the fathers and all that. 

 

* I've just realised how 'colonisation' vs 'migration' is yet another politicised stick used to beat up the white Europeans. We're made to feel guilty about our moves round the world (colonisation). 

Edited by Campion
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Campion said:

 

 

It's a complex story, as people are still emigrating there so roots in the land will vary greatly. As it happens, we've traced our own family tree in the British Isles about as far as the first European exploration and emigration to Aus/NZ*. That's about 10 or 12 generations, and I feel native here, so for those families who've worked on the Australian land and seas for that long, I'd have no hesitation calling them native, if they want it, whatever the circumstances of their ancestors who originally arrived; the sins of the fathers and all that. 

 

* I've just realised how 'colonisation' vs 'migration' is yet another politicised stick used to beat up the white Europeans. We're made to feel guilty about our moves round the world (colonisation). 

Native is quite a open term really. Maybe first true settlers may be better. I guess it depends how far back in time you go. Seeming as Antediluvian historians such as Graham Hancock have now effectively been proven right, by the establishments findings on migration to the Americas being vastly further back in history  than originally accepted, the true first settlers needs to be revised again. I guess instead of natives, i.e.: aboriginals, maybe previous populators of the land would be a fairer name?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Campion said:

It's a complex story, as people are still emigrating there so roots in the land will vary greatly

 

Coming back on topic (this thread was what originally got me into this forum), part of the anti-white agenda is to make us feel less native, and disconnected from nature in our homeland by flooding our senses with technology, international input instead of local, hating our history and having alienated identities. Just consider the religious phrase 'in the world but not of it.' It's designed to give the belief that our true home is somewhere else rather than the land under our feet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Campion said:

It's a complex story, as people are still emigrating there so roots in the land will vary greatly. As it happens, we've traced our own family tree in the British Isles about as far as the first European exploration and emigration to Aus/NZ*. That's about 10 or 12 generations, and I feel native here, so for those families who've worked on the Australian land and seas for that long, I'd have no hesitation calling them native, if they want it, whatever the circumstances of their ancestors who originally arrived; the sins of the fathers and all that. 

 

* I've just realised how 'colonisation' vs 'migration' is yet another politicised stick used to beat up the white Europeans. We're made to feel guilty about our moves round the world (colonisation). 

 

I get what you are saying. There is no doubt that white people created the nation known as 'australia'. I agree about how the whole colonialisation narrative is twisted because a colony is a settlement of people: a 'colony' and yet when colonies of people from around the world form in britain they are euphemistically called 'communities' and the wider process renamed as 'multi-culturalism' implying that one form of colony making is positive whilst the other is negative

 

The woke morality is very easy to understand. Basically if it involves white people its bad and if it involves non white people its good

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Macnamara said:

The woke morality is very easy to understand. Basically if it involves white people its bad and if it involves non white people its good

 

"Woke" is a delusion: they are pawns of the elite, who need scapegoats to cover up their crimes so that ordinary people get the blame. At the moment it is the white working and middle classes who are in the firing line, and imo the plan is that we will only start to resist when we are sufficiently diluted to make any opposition into a brutal struggle, which they will exploit. 

 

I need to do more research but at the moment I put the start of the West's decline at the time of the first world war. It was after that trauma we started to become demoralised at the idea of progress, had smaller families, left our religion and looked more to government to solve our problems. This accelerated with the depression and WW2, and since then we have been ever more drawn into a life of technology and individualism under the umbrella of an increasingly powerful state. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Campion said:

"Woke"

 

I've noticed that a lot of people here talk about waking up or awaking to things like the conspiracies and cult agendas. Can the similarity be a coincidence? I'm picking up on this because I'm also interested in spirituality where people talk of having awakenings, this probably derives from Buddhism because Buddha means an awakened person. It's off topic here, so I'll take it up in another thread. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Campion said:

 

"Woke" is a delusion: they are pawns of the elite, who need scapegoats to cover up their crimes so that ordinary people get the blame. At the moment it is the white working and middle classes who are in the firing line, and imo the plan is that we will only start to resist when we are sufficiently diluted to make any opposition into a brutal struggle, which they will exploit. 

 

I need to do more research but at the moment I put the start of the West's decline at the time of the first world war. It was after that trauma we started to become demoralised at the idea of progress, had smaller families, left our religion and looked more to government to solve our problems. This accelerated with the depression and WW2, and since then we have been ever more drawn into a life of technology and individualism under the umbrella of an increasingly powerful state. 

 

Yeah. It makes people think our problems just stem from "silly wokies", as if it's just political correctness gone mad, like woke ideology just came from nowhere. The reality is that it's by design though. I agree about them turning us into rootless individualist consumers too. I think a better term is 'hyperindividualist' though because some people think collectivism is a dirty word, even though it's the natural state of the tribe. Caring about your tribe does not mean that the individual has to give up his own personality. People like Peterson have done a lot of damage with their encouragement of individualism.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Campion said:

individualism under the umbrella of an increasingly powerful state. 

 

Edit: not only a powerful state, but a state-corporate complex coupled with a phoney individualism. We're hardly self-sufficient, that's the point. 

 

48 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Yeah. It makes people think our problems just stem from "silly wokies", as if it's just political correctness gone mad, like woke ideology just came from nowhere. The reality is that it's by design though. I agree about them turning us into rootless individualist consumers too. I think a better term is 'hyperindividualist' though because some people think collectivism is a dirty word, even though it's the natural state of the tribe. Caring about your tribe does not mean that the individual has to give up his own personality. People like Peterson have done a lot of damage with their encouragement of individualism.

 

Agreed. Although for a lie to be convincing it has to be covered over with some truth: we do need social justice, I have no problem with SJ itself. The problem is, the SJ warriors have fallen for the deception about who is causing the injustice; with its conclusion that if we remove the white people (at least from power if not altogether), then the injustice will similarly disappear. 

 

When the white peoples have been reduced to minorities everywhere and are no longer useful as sacrificial scapegoats, we will have served our purpose and the agenda will move on. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Campion said:

 

Edit: not only a powerful state, but a state-corporate complex coupled with a phoney individualism. We're hardly self-sufficient, that's the point. 

 

 

Agreed. Although for a lie to be convincing it has to be covered over with some truth: we do need social justice, I have no problem with SJ itself. The problem is, the SJ warriors have fallen for the deception about who is causing the injustice; with its conclusion that if we remove the white people (at least from power if not altogether), then the injustice will similarly disappear. 

 

When the white peoples have been reduced to minorities everywhere and are no longer useful as sacrificial scapegoats, we will have served our purpose and the agenda will move on. 

 

Agreed. We're under attack by people that lash out at the wrong people. Our borders wouldn't be flooded if powerful people didn't allow it. And the people in positions of power that do allow it, they probably have far more links to colonialism and slavery than us working class and middle class white folk, but do these progressives go for them? Not really, they attack "whiteness" as a whole. It's madness how they don't see that these peerage brats that pit foreigners against us are far more guilty of what they hate. I'm at the point where I think the average progressive doesn't care about the evils of slavery and colonialism, and that they're just happy that it's their turn to be the attack dogs for the elites. These progressives don't bother to look into history to see that we were enslaved and pillaged too.

 

 

It's fair to say that Europeans have been dominant in recent history, but that's only so the elites could use the Occident as a base of operations to plunder the world in my opinion, especially from Britain. It's not like other groups weren't barbaric before us though, and some other people are still more barbaric than us.

 

1066.jpg

 

They often ignore the fact that Britain was conquered in 1066, when they installed all their money lenders and carved up our land. And now elites are scapegoating us by calling us the old colonial evil order, so they can get normies to support their new order that they want to build from the ashes of our destruction. Normies are too blind to see that the new order is just colonization and enslavement of the entire planet.

 

The irony is that elites want developed nations out of the way because they think the rest of the world make better slaves. So these nutty progressives are promoting racism and enslavement of people that the elites think make for better cattle.

 

And even though the Occident doesn't have a perfect past, the West today is very altruistic. Most westerners don't support foreigners being oppressed anymore. We send more aid than most people too. It might not always get to the people that need it because of corruption, but we're not devils and we try to help at least. Once we're gone the world is screwed.

 

potp.jpg

 

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...