Jump to content

Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population?


Recommended Posts

*knock, knock*
Special delivery for Spain!!

 

Biden announces new plan to deport migrants to SPAIN as he blasts 'dangerous' migration
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1624018/joe-biden-immigration-spain-honduras-summit-of-americas-us-politics-latest

 

If it's not Trump telling Europeans to take back ISIS fighters, it's Biden sending us a special delivery. smh

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PETER HITCHENS: Glasto's too white? Rwanda too tough? I have the solution...

By Peter Hitchens for The Mail on Sunday

Published: 22:06 BST, 18 June 2022 | Updated: 22:06 BST, 18 June 2022

 

Sir Lenny Henry worries about the lack of black and brown faces at the Glastonbury Festival. He says: ‘It’s interesting to watch Glastonbury and look at the audience and not see any black people there. I’m always surprised by the lack of black and brown faces at festivals.’

And he has a very serious point. Events such as Glastonbury and the even more self-admiring Hay Literary Festival are summer pilgrimage sites for the Liberal Elite. They go to them to admire each other and themselves. There they are, ageless, virtuous, fashionable, open-minded, or at least that is what they think. But they are also, undoubtedly, as Sir Lenny says they are. And he is absolutely entitled to be worried about it.

 

No doubt the organisers of these events feel bad about the problem that Sir Lenny has identified, and wish to put it right. Well, I have an instant solution. Instead of sending cross-Channel dinghy migrants to Rwanda on expensive aircraft, why not bus them instead to Glastonbury? The vast sums saved, in transport costs and legal fees, could be used to erect good-quality housing and provide food and other necessities, while also paying for them to have free tickets to the festival. No doubt they would enjoy it greatly. There, they and the Liberal Elite can make each other’s acquaintance in friendly and relaxed conditions. Once the event is over, the migrants could be housed permanently on the site, unless they had all by then been invited to share the homes of festival-goers. The mingling of migrants and elite could become a regular event.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10930249/PETER-HITCHENS-Glastos-white-Rwanda-tough-solution.html

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their schools compulsively tell White children how awful it is to be White, how White people enjoy unearned “privilege,” how they benefit from “systems” put in place by and for White people for the sole purpose of oppressing “people of colour.”

Plagued by guilt, the children—almost all of them girls—rush to the sanctuary of “LGBTQ+” identity. Once there, they are turned into hero status. According to Patricia, some teachers at her daughter’s school are more forgiving toward “queer” and “trans” kids who hand in their homework late.

 

 

The Assault on Children’s Psyches

California’s ethnic-studies curriculum is fuelling a mental-health crisis among teenagers.

Leor Sapir

June 20, 2022

https://www.city-journal.org/the-assault-on-childrens-psyches

 

Chanting and invoking Satanic bloodthirsty Aztec gods probably doesn't help much either.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Almost All 5,000 Gang Members In Sweden Are Either 1st- Or 2nd-Generation Migrants

by Tyler Durden
Tuesday, Jun 28, 2022 - 07:00 AM

By Denes Albert of Remix News

The urban crime gangs dominating Swedish cities are almost exclusively made up of immigrants, according to Amir Rostami, a leading criminologist and professor who based his findings on police data.

In Sweden, the number of gang-related crimes is increasing every year, and as a result of mass and uncontrolled immigration, the authorities are losing control over more and more areas where migrant gangs are taking power.

“It is not enough for many immigrants to come to Sweden from a less developed country and enjoy the benefits. They want excitement and want to get rich quickly,” says criminologist Rostami.

Rostami has divided these gang members into two categories. Disorganized criminals are mostly made up of slightly younger members between 20 and 25 years old who have poorer impulse control, less education, and are primarily dealing with weapons and drugs. Then, there are the slightly more mature, rational, and better educated members who are involved in more extensive criminal networks; some of these members are even accountants, people with degrees, and former military personnel. This group is responsible for a huge share of crimes in Sweden, suspected of committing 40,000 criminal acts every year. These criminal networks not only compete with each other, but also work together.  

Rostami sees himself as an example of someone who chose another life. He was born in Iran, came to Sweden with his family as an immigrant, and grew up in the Frölunda district of Gothenburg, which is now considered to be a “sensitive area” where large immigrant populations live. He said his upbringing was fraught with the risk factors of becoming a criminal, but instead of taking the path of crime, he chose to study, according to the Hungarian news outlet Magyar Nemzet.

Regarding migrant gangs, the criminologist highlighted that the business is passed down within the family. He said that fathers and other relatives teach young males in the family to commit crimes. Rostami argues that it is an almost insurmountable task for society to bring these individuals into a crime-free way of life and requires far more resources than are available or can be reasonably allocated to the task.

Police estimate that the number of people active in gang crimes in the so-called “sensitive areas” exceeds 5,000, of whom almost a 1,000 live in Gothenburg. According to Swedish police, almost all registered criminals have an immigrant background.

It is estimated that in about 15 years, each immigrant criminal will cost taxpayers an average of 25 million króna (€2.35 million) over the migrant’s lifetime. This represents a total financial burden of SEK 125 billion króna (€11.7 billion) for society. A shortfall in taxes paid to society, to which these people would have contributed if they had chosen an honest life over crime, must also be factored in.

According to Rostami and police records, all of the country’s convicted gang leaders are first- or second-generation migrants. Twelve of them are still serving their prison sentences, and one of them is on the run and hiding.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/almost-all-5000-gang-members-sweden-are-either-1st-or-2nd-generation-migrants

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leftist Lament 95% of Citizen Science Volunteers Are White: Meaning, Literally No Non-Whites Volunteer to Advance Human Knowledge

Screen-Shot-2022-06-26-at-11_50.40-PM-600x256.png.dbf460df080a6b4ef2f37fdae9e8cb3b.png

In a society that vilifies whiteness, anything too white must immediately be deemed illegitimate.

Regardless of the good it does for humanity, if the endeavor is too white, it is axiomatically wrong.

[Citizen science volunteers are almost entirely white, The Conversation, June 22, 2022]:

 

A few small studies have found that citizen science volunteers tend to be white, well-educated and have high incomes. But this homogeneity of participants is common knowledge among researchers, and few collect detailed demographic data on participants in citizen science.

In our survey, we collected data about race, income and other demographic information. Overall, we received 3,894 responses. Most of the responses – 3,191 – came from the 2016 Christmas Bird Count, the world’s longest-running bird-related citizen science project. Since 1900, thousands of people in the U.S. and abroad have counted birds around Christmas and reported the results to the Audubon Society.

 

Overall, 95% of respondents identified as white. The lack of racial diversity was striking for each sample, with 96% of participants in both the Christmas Bird count and Candid Critters identifying as white and 88% of respondents from SciStarter saying the same. 

Problems from a lack of diversity

https://www.unz.com/sbpdl/leftist-lament-95-of-citizen-science-volunteers-are-white-meaning-literally-no-non-whites-volunteer-to-advance-human-knowledge/

 

 

 

Well we have been told for a while now the outdoors and rural living is "too White" and needs diversity - even farmers markets are a hot bed of White supremacy and hate™

image.png.2e8ccdf404b249c766eaa9d327af1466.png

 

image.png.af1909c06804d6e34b42aceb70a319a3.pngimage.png.daee91868f4a528bc65387eff475313c.png

http://web.archive.org/web/20211204035320/https://wfpc.sanford.duke.edu/projects/identifying-and-countering-white-supremacy-culture-food-systems

 

image.png.8fed358182ef7a8faf1c81ccfeca1137.png

 

I mean, think of all those racist birds!


 

image.png.3c2cedb8b1766fbf6b99af0fed2f3df9.png

https://www.bitchute.com/video/OYXcqb3Dnl2K/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

STEPHEN GLOVER: There's a huge new migrant issue unfolding. So why isn't there any real debate about THIS one?

By Stephen Glover for the Daily Mail

Published: 01:13 BST, 30 June 2022 | Updated: 02:02 BST, 30 June 2022

Some extraordinary figures about population growth were published on Tuesday by the Office for National Statistics, though they attracted very little comment from the BBC or much of the mainstream media.

Between 2011 and 2021, the population of England and Wales grew by a staggering 3.5 million, or about 6.6 per cent. Since during this period net migration was usually running at over 200,000 a year, and occasionally at more than 300,000, the main cause of the rapid expansion isn't hard to fathom.

Most of the population growth took place in the South-East, parts of London (up 22.1 per cent in Tower Hamlets, though there was a 9.6 per cent decline in Kensington and Chelsea) and Eastern England, where it rose by a whopping 8.3 per cent.

Imagine a city the size of Nottingham. Then one as big as Bristol. Add Birmingham. Then Manchester and Liverpool. Pop in Sheffield while you are at it. The combined population of these great cities roughly equates to the increase in the population of England and Wales that has taken place during a mere ten years.

Is it any wonder that vast tracts of the country, particularly in the already congested South and East, are being built and Tarmac-ed over to accommodate a surge in population growth, most of it driven by immigration?

Should we be surprised by the dire shortage of houses when, according to the excellent MigrationWatch whose forensic analysis is unparalleled, at least half the demand for new homes is accounted for by immigration?

Nor need we look very far to explain the pressure on schools, hospitals and GP surgeries which millions of us have experienced first-hand in most parts of the country. The decade that saw a population increase of 6.6 per cent was also a decade of austerity and government cutbacks.

Some people may say that I am referring to the pre-Brexit past. One of the main purposes of leaving the European Union was to get back control of our borders so that immigration could be regulated and controlled.

Yes, we have indeed 'taken back control'. The Government is in charge of our borders. But although there are no authoritative up-to-date figures, partly due to the pandemic, it is possible, if not likely, that immigration is running at near record levels.

In the year ending June 2021, net migration — i.e. the difference between those leaving the country and those arriving — was 239,000. That number was probably slightly limited by the effects of Covid. Nevertheless, it was still higher than the net migration figure for 2012 or 2013.

We won't know the Office for National Statistics net migration figure for the 12 months ending June 2022 until later in the year, but it is a fair bet that it will be considerably higher than that of a year ago.

According to separate Home Office statistics, visas were handed out in profusion in 2021 — 432,279 for students, 280,776 for family visas and 239,987 for work. Overall, EU migration has declined sharply as a proportion of the whole since Brexit, while non-EU migration has risen very significantly.

What strikes me as odd is that there has been almost no public discussion about apparently soaring levels of legal immigration, given that before the EU referendum in 2016 there was so much agonising over the issue.

By contrast, the Government is very exercised about the number of asylum seekers crossing the Channel in small boats, and plans to send some of them to Rwanda if it is able to face down the interfering European Court of Human Rights, and persuade our own judges that it is not inhumane to transport them.

The Government is, of course, right to be concerned by cross-Channel migration. The numbers are by no means insignificant: 28,526 people are known to have crossed in small boats last year, and there could be as many as 50,000 this year.

Moreover, this is an evil trade orchestrated by ruthless people-smugglers who, by putting asylum seekers in unseaworthy boats, expose them to the risk of capsizing and drowning.

So it is a big issue. The wonder, though, is that so much time and energy are spent debating about asylum seekers while few people have noticed the growing numbers of legal migrants that are arriving in this country.

These are certain to put further pressure on our already crumbling public services, as well as housing, where the Government seems unlikely to meet its manifesto target of building an additional 300,000 homes a year by the mid-2020s.

I naturally don't dispute that there are labour shortages which foreign, increasingly non-EU, workers are happy to fill. Despite some Remainer-inspired propaganda, under the Government's new points-based system it is easy for employers to recruit workers abroad for jobs that are relatively poorly paid.

Meanwhile, our universities, some of which are extremely mediocre, are doing their utmost to attract as many foreign students as possible, more than a quarter of whom are Chinese.

The business model of these reputed centres of learning relies on their attracting many thousands of students from abroad. Believe it or not, about 30 per cent of students at one university, namely Liverpool, are Chinese.

But what may be good for businesses happy to recruit industrious foreign workers, or for universities dependent on students from abroad, is not necessarily in the best interests of our already overcrowded island.

In many parts of England, people are fed up with overstretched, underfunded public services, and they don't want to see further swathes of their neighbourhoods concreted over.

In particular, the Government has seemingly given up on people who, while not officially categorised as being unemployed despite often receiving welfare payments, could be encouraged back into the labour market through a judicious combination of carrot and stick. There are reckoned to be several million of them.

But it is much easier for employers to dip into the limitless pool of ambitious and industrious workers who will cheerfully cross the world for a decent, though not necessarily very well-paid, job than it is to attract the long-term underemployed.

Four days after the June 2016 referendum, a prominent politician doubted in his newspaper column whether 'those who voted Leave were mainly driven by anxieties about immigration'. It was, of course, Boris Johnson.

If he was attempting to play down the importance to many Leave voters of regaining control of our own borders, I fear that he was much mistaken, possibly fatally so.

Would it be too cynical to suggest that the Government welcomes the kind of displacement that is taking place? People are encouraged to believe that it is grappling with the problem of the Channel crossings while it is, in fact, ignoring the more alarming wider picture.

The Government may be able to get away with it for a while, but sooner or later what is really happening will begin to sink in. If net migration exceeds pre-Brexit levels over the next few years, as it seems on course to do, there may be hell to pay with voters.

Many of them will reasonably ask: what was the point of taking back control if we end up with something worse than we had before?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10967425/STEPHEN-GLOVER-Theres-huge-new-migrant-issue-unfolding-isnt-debate-it.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All those people coming to an already very highly populated country (England ranks about 5th globally for population density); we're told there's still skills shortages and need to let in yet more people. It's been going on for generations now. When will we accept that this just isn't adding up: immigration doesn't solve our economic problems, or the north/south divide. 

 

Another consequence is a reduction in food self-sufficiency. The UK currently produces about 60% of its food requirements; the lower this figure goes the more vulnerable we are to world shortages, blockades in wartime etc. It's a national security issue. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I saw this on gab a week ago and didn't believe it, despite the other anti-White stuff google images brings up, I didn't think this was legit.. but jimstone posted it and he very rarely posts BS... also many people in this thread saying it works for them too.

http://www.jimstoneindia.com/.zq4.html

image.png.b52f571423ca777a682330fab32659a0.png

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/vhh1wv/google_replaces_shitty_people_with_white_people/

 

also, anyone fancy a baby floaty?

image.png.b159ef466b95081de3462656024aa719.png

 

or maybe check out the worst things about Maine?

bdd9b3cdede2a132.jpg.09614fb94cf699f525372460dbac426a.jpg

Edited by skitzorat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Secretary Mayorkas has failed to defend our homeland and must be impeached

 

In April of this year, we wrote to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary, Alejandro Mayorkas, warning that if he doesn’t immediately reverse course, House Republicans will be forced to hold him accountable for creating and perpetuating the worst humanitarian crisis in modern American history. 

Since we sent that letter, the crisis at our border has only become worse. Monthly southern border encounters reached an all-time high in May, with 239,416 apprehensions, surpassing the previous record for the third consecutive month. 

 

Secretary Mayorkas’s continued refusal to enforce federal immigration law has led to the deteriorating situation at our southern border.  Leaked video recordings revealed that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has decided to drop charges against all illegal immigrant defendants who do not pose a "national security or a public safety threat." 

 

Unsurprisingly, the Biden administration’s definition of a "public safety threat" is extremely narrow. According to previous guidance, an illegal immigrant convicted of driving drunk is not considered a "public safety threat" and is therefore not eligible for deportation. ICE is instituting a backdoor amnesty for nearly all the 2 million illegal immigrants with pending court hearings. 

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/secretary-mayorkas-failed-defend-homeland-impeached

fc1b84bc71f46e4d2c9415926231b65d.jpg.de44633d8b2540fa3e57af666f840ec2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 12:29 AM, Anti Facts Sir said:

Oooh....waycist.

 

'why is there no debate on this issue?' asks a mainstream journalist

 

The short answer to that question is: political correctness

 

The longer answer is to say that the cabal know that people will be upset about the things that the cabal do so they get ahead of it by making it socially unacceptable to say anything about it. They do this by using some sort of derogatory word against anyone who raises a question.

 

So for example it you ask why so many kids these days are experiencing gender confusion and if there might be some connection to endocrine disrupting chemicals that might be gender bending them they (or rather their lackeys) will call you a 'transphobe' even though you may have no fear or hatred towards trans people. It doesn't matter how you actually feel, the point is to shame you into silence.

 

If you question why millions of people from around the world are suddenly over the last couple of decades being flooded into these already crowded little isles then they will call you a 'xenophobe' or a 'racist' even if you have no hatred or animosity towards people from elsewhere and may have even worked, lived, studied or travelled among them. How you actually feel doesn't matter; it is all about shaming you into silence

 

If you questioned the covid narratives then they called you an 'anti-vaxer' or 'anti-science' and if you questioned the warren commissions findings on the assassination of JFK then they called you a 'conspiracy theorist'

 

They will always have a nasty word ready to throw at any dissenting voice. That's how political correctness works and it has the effect of silencing those who have spotted possible problems and consequences and what this does is create a giant public echo chamber full of people who are only consuming mainstream, corporate media who all then parrot the narratives and talking points of those corporate lackeys.

 

That's what we saw with the covid scam: people all parroting the same stuff whilst excluding and attacking any dissenting voice, and that is how they stifle debate so that we are unable now in Britain to have an adult conversation about ANYTHING

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

So for example it you ask why so many kids these days are experiencing gender confusion and if there might be some connection to endocrine disrupting chemicals that might be gender bending them they (or rather their lackeys) will call you a 'transphobe' even though you may have no fear or hatred towards trans people. It doesn't matter how you actually feel, the point is to shame you into silence.

 

I do a bit feel nervous about discussing some of these subjects in public, I guess that's the point. But when I think about our collapsing fertility rates, that should be elevated to a national emergency but is hardly ever discussed in the MSM. How many babies aren't being born to couples who want them? That shortfall must be equivalent to a major epidemic such as covid. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Campion said:

I do a bit feel nervous about discussing some of these subjects in public, I guess that's the point. But when I think about our collapsing fertility rates, that should be elevated to a national emergency but is hardly ever discussed in the MSM. How many babies aren't being born to couples who want them? That shortfall must be equivalent to a major epidemic such as covid. 

 

At the same time as the globalist oligarchs are flooding replacement levels of immigration into britain they also hit the native british population with three doses of spike protein creating injections to kill off the existing population

 

what they intend to remain is a mish-mash society of people with no cohesive identity who will then be more agreeable to being global citizens under an oligarch controlled smart-technocracy

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/19/2022 at 12:41 PM, Macnamara said:

what they intend to remain is a mish-mash society of people with no cohesive identity who will then be more agreeable to being global citizens under an oligarch controlled smart-technocracy

 

Agreed. It's there in the language, just look at how the word "community" is used nowadays. When I was a child, the community was simply the people who happened to live in my local neighbourhood, we didn't think of it being fragmented. But now, every aspect of life has it's own "community", based on race, religion, sexual preference, whatever identity you want. Now we're drip fed with the notion of compartmentalised communities, creating tensions to divert attention away from (which is the essence of magic) the hidden hand re-educating us. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

White pupils are now least likely to go to university after drive to make intakes more diverse

  • DfE stats show white pupils make up smallest ethnic group at elite universities
  • The figures may challenge campaigners' claims that elite universities are racist

By Eleanor Harding Education Editor For The Daily Mail

Published: 22:01 BST, 28 July 2022 | Updated: 22:07 BST, 28 July 2022

White pupils are the ethnic group least likely to attend a top university for the first time, following a national drive to make intakes more diverse.

Department for Education statistics show 10.5 per cent of white youngsters are at an elite university, the smallest proportion of any ethnic group.

Historically, black pupils were the least likely, but in the latest data they overtook their white counterparts with 10.7 per cent now attending.

The data for 2020-21 – the latest available – may challenge the claim by campaigners that elite universities are racist.

In recent years, admissions tutors have been allowed to take an applicant's background into account when considering offering them a place.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11059601/White-pupils-likely-university-drive-make-intakes-diverse.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Macnamara said:

White pupils are now least likely to go to university after drive to make intakes more diverse

  • DfE stats show white pupils make up smallest ethnic group at elite universities
  • The figures may challenge campaigners' claims that elite universities are racist

By Eleanor Harding Education Editor For The Daily Mail

Published: 22:01 BST, 28 July 2022 | Updated: 22:07 BST, 28 July 2022

White pupils are the ethnic group least likely to attend a top university for the first time, following a national drive to make intakes more diverse.

Department for Education statistics show 10.5 per cent of white youngsters are at an elite university, the smallest proportion of any ethnic group.

Historically, black pupils were the least likely, but in the latest data they overtook their white counterparts with 10.7 per cent now attending.

The data for 2020-21 – the latest available – may challenge the claim by campaigners that elite universities are racist.

In recent years, admissions tutors have been allowed to take an applicant's background into account when considering offering them a place.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11059601/White-pupils-likely-university-drive-make-intakes-diverse.html

I say good!

Keep our young people away from those genocidal anti-White Marxist institutions.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, skitzorat said:

I say good!

Keep our young people away from those genocidal anti-White Marxist institutions.

 

they would be better focussing on developing hard skills, trades and knowledge that is directly applicable to reality such as: growing food, building houses, making clothes, raising children and animal husbandry because as the old system breaks down these skills which are the skills of our ancestors will be what sustains us through the turmoil

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Bombadil locked this topic
  • Bombadil unlocked this topic
  • lake unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...