Jump to content

Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 617
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Of course there is. Because Europe has old money and they want the money. How do you take somebody's money?  You destroy their cohesion.  You destroy their race, their families, their realit

If we go on the website of the United Nations we find this: Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations? United Nations projections indicate that over the

It will in future if they get their way. They want whitey out of the way so they can create a slave race. I don't want minorities to be slaves.   "The man of the future will be of mixed race

Posted Images

4 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

yes

 

does it make sense to you?

Well yes it does, I was already aware of Coudenhove-Kalergi but never understood why all the leaders decided to treat him like some kind of god.

 

I also believe another part of it is that Jewish people hate homogenous societies so they push for it to become multicultural.

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, ManxCat3 said:

Well yes it does, I was already aware of Coudenhove-Kalergi but never understood why all the leaders decided to treat him like some kind of god.

 

I also believe another part of it is that Jewish people hate homogenous societies so they push for it to become multicultural.

 

Multiculturalism is a way of breaking down social cohesion to create a mass of people with no unifying identity that are then less able to stand united against the cabal

 

It is also a way to overwhelm a target culture and then sideline it through guilt, shaming and political correctness. Once you destroy someones cultural roots they become despondent and more easy to control

 

Finally once you have a rootless population that is divided and balkanised into competing factions you have created a state of chaos which then allows you to step in with the solution of your central control in order to deliver order to the chaos

 

All these peoples are all becoming disconnected from their roots and will become absorbed into the cabals globalised, corporate psuedo-culture which i believe ends in spiritual nihilism which is the state they need people in so that they will willingly accept transhumanism

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wokesters pursuing 'equity' not 'equality' which is not the equality of opportunity but rather the state selecting who gets what on the basis of the bias of the state:

'Black supremacist'? Anti-racism media silent after Tucker Carlson exposes bigoted views of Biden's DOJ civil rights pick

13 Jan, 2021 06:46
Champions of "anti-racism" in the media, academia and Hollywood have gone silent on Joe Biden's pick for the chief US civil-rights lawyer, after Fox News host Tucker Carlson revealed her allegedly racist and anti-Semitic views.

There's been no denouncing of Kristen Clarke by the likes of MSNBC, woke actor Robert DeNiro or leading anti-racism professor Ibram Kendi. Nor have Democrat politicians or leftists rushed to the defense of Clarke, whom President-elect Biden has announced will head the civil rights division of the Department of Justice. Journalist Jack Posobiec said Wikipedia has locked entries to its Kristen Clarke page and doesn't include her racial superiority comments.

Wikipedia has now locked Kristen Clarke’s page while she is up for confirmation. It does not include her racial superiority comments and anti-Semitic beliefs.

https://www.rt.com/usa/512341-civil-rights-pick-racism/

 

 
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone ever seen multi culturalism work successfully?

 

anyone who’s ever been in prison or worked on a large construction site knows people will always stick to their own or gravitate to their own kind if they get chance, if one race is the majority usually the other side will reluctantly go Along with becsuse they’ve no choice, but the first chance they get to escape they will 

 

people talk of London as being a great example of multi culturalism but generally speaking people stick to their own in London 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

Its not meant to work

 

Its a strategy in a war that is being waged against target populations

 

I agree, I just wondered is there some place it’s randomly been a success, maybe Brazil?

 

but yeah human experience tells me it’s almost always gonna end in failure 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Liam3880 said:

I agree, I just wondered is there some place it’s randomly been a success, maybe Brazil?

 

Crime is a major problem in Brazil as is poverty. Just look at the proportion of violent and fatal criminal acts shown on liveleak are in Brazil.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Liam3880 said:

 

I agree, I just wondered is there some place it’s randomly been a success, maybe Brazil?

 

but yeah human experience tells me it’s almost always gonna end in failure 

There's tons of racism and discrimination in Brazil. Its culture is more ''blended'' though as it had generations of different groups intermingling. But its not a ''success''

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now if i had hit someone with an aluminium rod i don't think i would have been let off the hook but apparently if you say that your african heritage is to blame for your behaviours then you can be allowed off for crimes.....like a get out of jail free card.....ie systemic racism against white people.....this is not EQUALITY it is EQUITY where the state decides who gets what on the basis of whatever the bias of the state is (which is against white people):

Consultant anaesthetist struck off for beating his 10-year-old son with broom handle gets NHS job back after blaming his Nigerian 'cultural upbringing'

  • Dr Adekunle Okunuga, 59, caned his young son for misbehaving at school
  • In 2015 the doctor's name ordered to be erased from the medical register 
  • Given all-clear to return to medicine and admitted behaviour was 'excessive'

By Bhvishya Patel For Mailonline

Published: 10:34, 17 January 2021 | Updated: 11:07, 17 January 2021

A consultant anaesthetist who was struck off after he beat his ten-year-old son with an aluminium broom handle has got his NHS job back after he blamed his conduct on his 'cultural upbringing' in Nigeria. Dr Adekunle Okunuga, 59, caned his young son with the kitchen brush for misbehaving at school and made him perform squat thrusts and stand on one leg with his arms in the air while he kicked him. During the assault, he also caned the boy's open palms with a walking stick before finally stopping when he saw his son's blood spatter over the kitchen floor. In 2015, Okunuga's name was ordered to be erased from the medical register after he was found guilty of serious professional misconduct by a disciplinary panel. But earlier this month the order was lifted and he was deemed fit to practise medicine again after the doctor, who worked at University Hospital Coventry, admitted his behaviour was 'excessive and uncalled for'. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9156551/Consultant-anaesthetist-struck-beating-10-year-old-son-gets-NHS-job-back.html

 

...and here we have kamala harris wearing 'the future is female' socks but surely a pro-equality person would say the 'future is human' to include everyone? When you say only one group in something then that is supremacism for example imagine if a chinese person said 'the future is asian' or a white person said 'the future is white' this would be seen and treated as supremacism and yet kamalas supremacism is celebrated. Now lets imagine what kind of policies she will inact if she is not pro-equality but rather pro-equity ie favouring who she wants to favour

REVEALED: The $13 'Future is Female' socks Kamala Harris was wearing in niece Meena's viral TikTok video that are being snapped up across the country

  • The video was posted to social media by Harris' niece, Meena Harris
  • It has racked up over 15.3 million TikTok views and lives on Twitter and Instagram
  • The socks Harris is wearing come from American brand Gumball Poodle 
  • Harris is set to be sworn in by Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Wednesday 

By Holden Walter-warner For Dailymail.com

Published: 06:24, 17 January 2021 | Updated: 07:09, 17 January 2021

Kamala Harris is just days away from being sworn in as the first female vice president, but that's not stopping her from enjoying some viral TikTok fame in a video that has been seen tens of millions of times. Her niece, Meena Harris, posted a video on the social media site on Wednesday, the day the House of Representatives voted to impeach Donald Trump for a record-breaking second time.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9156197/Kamala-Harris-rocks-Future-Female-socks-viral-TikTok-video-posted-niece.html

 

Meanwhile lets see how much white lives matter to the elites...where's the outrage in the british press?...

Survivors of Ireland’s mother-and-baby homes accuse govt of whitewashing ‘illegal’ vaccine trials on children

17 Jan, 2021 12:57
Survivors of Ireland’s infamous mother-and-baby homes have accused the government of failing to properly investigate vaccine trials that they unwittingly participated in as infants.

The Irish government formally apologized on Wednesday for the now-defunct institutions, noting “an appalling level of infant mortality” at the 18 homes. During their 76 years of operation, an estimated 9,000 children died at the shelters, which were often the last resort of unwed pregnant women ostracized by society. The institutions were not shuttered until 1998. 

The government’s five-year investigation also found that a total of 13 vaccine trials involved children living at the homes, describing the tests as illegal and a clear violation of the Nuremberg Code, which was established following Nazi medical experiments on concentration camp prisoners during World War II. 

https://www.rt.com/news/512782-ireland-mother-baby-homes-vaccine-tests/

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

To what end though? skin colour is a development of environmental conditions. It doesn't MEAN anything, except to people who think it makes them racially superior or inferior.

 

People need to change within, not without.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/20/2021 at 4:12 PM, MarpatV2 said:

To what end though? skin colour is a development of environmental conditions.

 

They are trying to create a technocratic world government run by them.

 

In order to do that they need to breakdown national sovereignty and national cohesion. This means undermining national homogenity because that brings cohesion to societies and the cabal don't want that. The cabal want divided, weak and alienated societies that are easier to impose central control over

 

Also they want to remove peoples ancestral claim to land and the way they do that is by destroying the target population demographically.

 

They also want to destroy christianity to remove the idea of God given rights. They want to destroy the family to make the state the provider of values to children. They want to destroy small businesses and self-sufficiency to make people helplessly dependent on their corporations and they want to destroy freedom of speech so that no one can point out all of these things they are doing

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/20/2021 at 4:12 PM, MarpatV2 said:

To what end though? skin colour is a development of environmental conditions. It doesn't MEAN anything, except to people who think it makes them racially superior or inferior.

 

People need to change within, not without.

 

 

Identity isn't solely about colour.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Identity isn't solely about colour.

 

no but lets consider what two conspirators said. First of all we have the rothschild funded barbara spector who said that europe had to 'learn to be multicultural' and that it wouldn't remain 'monolithic' and then there was ex goldman sachs banker and UN migration chief (the late) Peter Sutherland who called for 'undermining national homogenity'

 

So imo what they are trying to do there is destroy ethnic 'homogenity' because when people in certain places look a certain way it becomes easy to point at them and say 'they look such-and-such' and when you can do that to a people you are by implication saying that they belong to that geographic area

 

For example if you said 'they look chinese' then you are by implication arguing that they have an ancestral claim to the land of china

 

So to undermine that they are seeking to undermine the 'monolithic' nature of places so that the populations in that place lose that ancestral claim

 

In the eyes of the conspirators that must be done in order to remake people into global citizens of their world government. They can't have people feeling like they belong to something else

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

no but lets consider what two conspirators said. First of all we have the rothschild funded barbara spector who said that europe had to 'learn to be multicultural' and that it wouldn't remain 'monolithic' and then there was ex goldman sachs banker and UN migration chief (the late) Peter Sutherland who called for 'undermining national homogenity'

 

So imo what they are trying to do there is destroy ethnic 'homogenity' because when people in certain places look a certain way it becomes easy to point at them and say 'they look such-and-such' and when you can do that to a people you are by implication saying that they belong to that geographic area

 

For example if you said 'they look chinese' then you are by implication arguing that they have an ancestral claim to the land of china

 

So to undermine that they are seeking to undermine the 'monolithic' nature of places so that the populations in that place lose that ancestral claim

 

In the eyes of the conspirators that must be done in order to remake people into global citizens of their world government. They can't have people feeling like they belong to something else

 

I get that. I'm just saying there is more to ethnicity and culture, but often leftists think we're all obssessed with skin colour. I'm sure as a Scot, that you wouldn't want to be replaced by other white people from a different country, so to me it's not just about colour.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

 

no but lets consider what two conspirators said. First of all we have the rothschild funded barbara spector who said that europe had to 'learn to be multicultural' and that it wouldn't remain 'monolithic' and then there was ex goldman sachs banker and UN migration chief (the late) Peter Sutherland who called for 'undermining national homogenity'

 

So imo what they are trying to do there is destroy ethnic 'homogenity' because when people in certain places look a certain way it becomes easy to point at them and say 'they look such-and-such' and when you can do that to a people you are by implication saying that they belong to that geographic area

 

For example if you said 'they look chinese' then you are by implication arguing that they have an ancestral claim to the land of china

 

So to undermine that they are seeking to undermine the 'monolithic' nature of places so that the populations in that place lose that ancestral claim

 

In the eyes of the conspirators that must be done in order to remake people into global citizens of their world government. They can't have people feeling like they belong to something else

You would say they look Asian, not Chinese.

 

I thought you were into freedom of movement, etc? if people are free to move where they want there is always the chance that white people may move away from colder climates and other ethnic minorities may move into those places. White people have been imposed on various places throughout the world, to severe detriment of native populations and yet white people complain about being replaced by foreigners. I think its just people who are afraid of outsiders.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

 

They are trying to create a technocratic world government run by them.

 

In order to do that they need to breakdown national sovereignty and national cohesion. This means undermining national homogenity because that brings cohesion to societies and the cabal don't want that. The cabal want divided, weak and alienated societies that are easier to impose central control over

 

Also they want to remove peoples ancestral claim to land and the way they do that is by destroying the target population demographically.

 

They also want to destroy christianity to remove the idea of God given rights. They want to destroy the family to make the state the provider of values to children. They want to destroy small businesses and self-sufficiency to make people helplessly dependent on their corporations and they want to destroy freedom of speech so that no one can point out all of these things they are doing

But surely you must see ancestry is an illusion? it doesnt give ownership of land or any right to it. Celts didnt originate in any part of the UK but came from eastern Europe. Hanging onto ancestral claims is just hanging onto the past, which could be detrimental.

 

So why do you claim christianity has God given rights? can you pick them out of the bible and explain why you think other religions dont have divine rights? are you claiming that adherence to certain religions gives divine rights, like kings use to claim their power?

 

I think you over exaggerate all of this to fit the narrative you want to believe. Free speech has limits as far as I'm concerned as there are too many people out there willing to use such freedoms to cause all sorts of problems. True free speech comes with responsibility yet people think it should allow them to say what they want without consequences.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, MarpatV2 said:

But surely you must see ancestry is an illusion? it doesnt give ownership of land or any right to it. Celts didnt originate in any part of the UK but came from eastern Europe. Hanging onto ancestral claims is just hanging onto the past, which could be detrimental.

 

Could also be a positive thing. A people that feels attached to their heritage will surely be harder to deracinate and destroy.

 

19 minutes ago, MarpatV2 said:

I think you over exaggerate all of this to fit the narrative you want to believe. Free speech has limits as far as I'm concerned as there are too many people out there willing to use such freedoms to cause all sorts of problems. True free speech comes with responsibility yet people think it should allow them to say what they want without consequences.

 

To a certain extent I agree. Bloody smut pushers poisoning my people do my head in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My ancestry is not an illusion either. Thanks.

 

Imagine fully realizing who and what you are. The potential that resides in you, the lineage.

In you resides the blood of Kings, of Emperors, Masters of Land, Sea, and Air.

 

Our history is one of repelling invasion after invasion.

 

With strong men side by side, blood brothers eager to fight or die.

 

Whether Greek, or German, Polish or Norwegian. This invasion threatens us all. Our very shared history, our lands, our race, is threatened. Fear not words slung by incompetents, fear not the politician who is corrupt to the core. Fear the consequences of not acting. Fear the future world your children will suffer in.

 

This war is personal. We do not fight it in a far off land, we fight it where we live. In our homes, in the places our children dwell.

 

We fight this war for the very soil our ancestors cultivated for thousands of years. For the blood that nourished the soil. Our enemies mock us at every turn, they use every dirty tactic to undermine, to traumatize, to kill us. Culturally, racially.

 

They line their pockets with money, printed with our blood. This is a very personal war.

 

We do not kneel.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Life is a game of will and power. Those that have the will to act, are the most powerful.

 

Why is it that we are silenced? Why has our race been subjected to brainwashing against action?

 

How do you subdue a more powerful opponent? You convince them that there is no need to fight, and that the will to action that we feel is in fact a negative thing. Instead of natural.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...