Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population?

[TheAwakened]

Has anyone heard of ''the replacement theory'' its a conspiracy to replace the indigenous European populations of Western Europe mainly and also the White American/Canadian/Australian populations. 

 

I'm Black so I'm naturally NOT inclined to research this because it doesn't affect my demographic. But being a researcher and open minded I have noticed this trend of White portion of the population either declining percentage wise or in outright in actual sheer numbers.

 

London is a perfect example:

 

White British - 44% (2011)

White British - 59.7% (2001)

White - 79% (1991)

 

Countless articles online stating the declining White population:

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8491551/US-population-growth-driven-minorities-white-population-declining.html

 

https://theconversation.com/the-us-white-majority-will-soon-disappear-forever-115894

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/race.world

 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2099502/white-british-population-has-fallen-by-more-than-half-in-just-20-years-in-parts-of-uk-as-country-becomes-more-segregated/

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/white-britons-will-be-minority-2070-says-professor-8600262.html

 

https://apl.wisc.edu/data-briefs/natural-decrease-18

 

Quote

In 2016, more non-Hispanic whites died than were born in twenty-six states; more than at any time in U.S. history. Some 179 million residents or roughly 56 percent of the U.S. population, lived in these 26 states In contrast, non-Hispanic white (hereafter referred to as white) deaths exceeded births in just four states in 2004 and seventeen as recently as 2014. White deaths also exceeded white births in the nation as a whole for the first time in U.S. history in 2016, according to data from the National Center for Health Statistics. When births fail to keep pace with deaths, a region is said to have a "natural decrease" in population, which can only be offset by migration gains. In seventeen of the twenty-six states with white natural decreases, the white population diminished overall between 2015 and 2016. Our analysis of the demographic factors that cause white natural decrease suggests that more states are likely to experience it in the future.ⁱ

 

But, why? 

 

Multiculturalism doesn't exist - its a codeword (in my opinion) of ''let the those poor overseas people do our shitty jobs'' 

 

Here's another video -

 

 

Why has this allowed to happen?

 

I could be spiteful and say this typical line ''well whites went to Asia and colonised and took advantage of those lands etc'' BUT those people living there are Working Class English people who probably had little to no input of colonisation of the Indian subcontinent. 

 

I've noticed in the video they said ''white and black get on'' or something.

[EnigmaticWorld]

32 minutes ago, TheAwakened said:

I'm Black so I'm naturally NOT inclined to research this because it doesn't affect my demographic.

 

It will in future if they get their way. They want whitey out of the way so they can create a slave race. I don't want minorities to be slaves.

 

"The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals." - Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi

 

^These kind of folks are the real supremacists. Their views about certain demographics making ideal slaves hinges on their IQ, if that isn't racist I don't know what is. They want a populace that will just work, but not ask questions. Europeans, Japanese and South Koreans are use to a better qaulity of life, not because we're better people, but because we are fortunate enough to have grown up in developed nations.

 

They're not doing this because they want to help minorities, they have destabilzed most of their nations after all. They want to bring the Western nations down to everyones level so none of us have the chance to prosper. We should be helping less developed nations better themselves, but instead they seem to just want to take away anyones chance at bettering themselves.

 

32 minutes ago, TheAwakened said:

 its a codeword (in my opinion) of ''let the those poor overseas people do our shitty jobs''

 

And do them for less.

 

Edited December 2, 2020 by EnigmaticWorld

[TheAwakened]

Why does the UK Gov allow so many mosques to be built? Something I always wondered...

[Macnamara]

  

23 hours ago, TheAwakened said:

I'm Black so I'm naturally NOT inclined to research this because it doesn't affect my demographic. But being a researcher and open minded I have noticed this trend of White portion of the population either declining percentage wise or in outright in actual sheer numbers.

 

Why has this allowed to happen?

 

I could be spiteful and say this typical line ''well whites went to Asia and colonised and took advantage of those lands etc'' BUT those people living there are Working Class English people who probably had little to no input of colonisation of the Indian subcontinent.

 

If we go on the website of the United Nations we find this:

Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?

United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.

Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.

https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.asp

 

So right there on the UN website they are telling us that they are talking and thinking about what they call 'replacement migration'. They use the argument that certain countries have ageing populations and therefore need their populations boosted through MASS migration. But does this argument make any sense when you think about it?

 

We are moving into the 'fourth industrial' revolution which is going to be about AUTOMATION and the rise of ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. AI is basically working alongside humans on all kinds of tasks and it is studying human behaviour so that it can then phase out the humans and replace them. With the whole covid flu-hysteria thing we are seeing a situation emerge where people are afraid to go into hospitals because they believe that they may contract a deadly virus so what's going to start happening is that people will communicate with their doctors remotely for example by phone.

 

If you go into a GP's surgery now and explain a health issue to them they turn to their computer and start tapping data into it. Then they might ask some questions and tap more info into the computer and basically what is happening is that the computer is diagnosing the problem and then tells the doctor what drug to prescribe the person.

 

I have a complete medical guide book and in it there are flowcharts with questions that in theory then lead you to the correct diagnosis but i think that is essentially what process is going on in the doctors computer. So flowcharts are replacing human knowledge and judgement. The doctor is becoming increasingly sidelined and is acting as nothing more than an interviewer of the patient and an inputer of data into the computer but those jobs can be done by artificial intelligence over the phone. So what we are going to see is doctors being increasingly replaced by artificial intelligence that will diagnose and prescribe remotely, over the phone. Surgery too is becoming more high tech and an increasing role will be played by robots.

 

That's just one example of how AI is replacing humans in the workplace so between automation and the destruction of the economy through the covid-flu-hysteria lockdowns there is going to be MASS unemployment which then undermines the idea that the country needs a massive influx of young workers from abroad to replace the ageing workers

 

So then you have to ask: why are they doing it then?'

 

The answer is that it is part of an old process. So just as now is the 'fourth industrial revolution' we have, in this country, already undergone such epochal shifts as the 'agricultural revolution' and the 'industrial revolution'. So what happened to the average working british person in these shifts?

 

Britain used to be a largely agrarian economy driven by wind, water, horse and human power. The agricultural revolution saw methods change that created greater yeilds but left less left over for nature to scavenge and it also saw the transient work force that used to move across the countryside in the summer time looking for work pushed off the land and into cities. This process was cemented by the 'Enclosures Acts'

 

Once in the cities the workers then got swept along in the next shift: the industrial revolution where the exploitation of coal and the development of steam saw production increase and humans made to work long hours in poor working conditions.

 

Whilst all this was going on the powerful people in the country were looking for raw materials to exploit elsewhere which lead to 'imperialism' and 'colonialism'. I would argue that the network who were driving this was the freemasonic network NOT the british working class who were themselves being exploited. Yes working british people did end up in the colonies abroad but often it was because they were deported or they were cleared off their own ancestral lands and pushed onto boats. Some were deported as convicts who might have only stolen a loaf of bread out of hunger, some went as indentured workers bound to a master for a predetermined period of time before they could be released and some were deported as political prisoners or prisoners of war eg the jacobites were often deported to the west indies

 

So in these processes driven by the powerful, freemasonic elites the british working people have invariably been screwed over and once again they are being screwed over in this latest, elite driven shift which they themselves are calling 'the great reset' which is seeing the small private businesses of british people destroyed so that the freemasonic elites mega-corporations can grab all the market share

 

Those freemasonic elites are the same people playing all the 'replacement migration' games because as well as remoulding the economy, they are also remoulding society. They don't give anyone any democratic say in these matters, they just impose their will on the working people, same as they always have.  By flooding migrants into target countries they can water down the people who have a sense of cohesive identity and this creates a new soup of people with all kinds of languages, religious beliefs, cultures, values and so on and those people then don't have much societal cohesion because they lack unity of all the above aspects. This new chaos suits the freemasonic elites because they follow the imperialistic tactic of 'divide and rule' and they know that a divided work force can't stand together against them. Also by destroying cohesive identities they pave the way to a more global form of society that would live under a world government run by the freemasonic elite

Edited December 3, 2020 by Macnamara

[Macnamara]

23 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

"The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals." - Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi

 

Coudenhove-kalergi was involved with the freemasonic hapsburg royals. Together they were involved with the pan-european group out of which grew the EUROPEAN UNION which is simply a vehicle to breakdown nation states in order to build a larger superstate

 

That superstate would in turn then merge with other superstates such as the african union, the asian union and the north american union etc etc

 

Each of these would form a step on the path towards their goal of world government which would crystalise when the unions all merged. The unions are coordinated through the TRILATERAL COMMISSION which was set up the rockefellers.

 

The coudenhove-kalergi plan was to flood immigrants into europe to create a mestizo underclass who would be ruled by a sabbatean-jewish, spiritual elite class

 

These sort of ideas go back for example to plato who wrote his 'republic' which envisioned a world run by an elite of 'philosopher kings' and that is how the illuminati see themselves. They see themselves as an elite and they are seeking to build a neo-fuedal world where there is no middle class, but instead there exists only the elites and an underclass of serfs

 

The 'great reset' is them making their move to destroy the middle class and create a two class, neo-feudal society where the masses are controlled by technology in what is called a 'technocratic system' (rule by experts). So for example when politicians are asked why boris has locked us down when the facts don't support that as the correct approach to use boris argues in his defence that he is simply bound by the advice of 'experts' in the SAGE team. Well the problem with this is that we didn't vote for those 'experts' and also who decides who is an 'expert'? None of us voted for a chris whitty or a patrick vallance to run our country.

 

Any dictator can simply declare their agents to be 'experts' and then defer all responsibility for their own tyrannical acts to their 'experts'

 

So that's what we are seeing happening: the development of a technocracy run by the technocratic class who use things like 'track and trace', 'immunity passports', facial recognition, digital currencies, universal basic income, social credit scores etc etc to monitor and micro-manage the mestizo serf class who have all lost their own individual sense of identity and their own history of their ancestors journey that led them to that place

Edited December 3, 2020 by Macnamara

[EnigmaticWorld]

3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

Coudenhove-kalergi was involved with the freemasonic hapsburg royals. Together they were involved with the pan-european group out of which grew the EUROPEAN UNION which is simply a vehicle to breakdown nation states in order to build a larger superstate

 

That superstate would in turn then merge with other superstates such as the african union, the asian union and the north american union etc etc

 

Each of these would form a step on the path towards their goal of world government which would crystalise when the unions all merged. The unions are coordinated through the TRILATERAL COMMISSION which was set up the rockefellers.

 

The coudenhove-kalergi plan was to flood immigrants into europe to create a mestizo underclass who would be ruled by a sabbatean-jewish, spiritual elite class

 

These sort of ideas go back for example to plato who wrote his 'republic' which envisioned a world run by an elite of 'philosopher kings' and that is how the illuminati see themselves. They see the selves as an elite and they are seeking to build a neo-fuedal world where there is no middle class, but instead there exists only the elites and an underclass of serfs

 

The 'great reset' is them making their move to destroy the middle class and create a two class, neo-feudal society where the masses are controlled by technology in what is called a 'technocratic system' (rule by experts). So for example when politicians are asked why boris has locked us down when the facts don\t support that as the correct approach to use boris argues in his defence that he is simply bound by the advice of 'experts' in the SAGE team. Well the problem with this is that we didn't vote for those 'experts' and also who decides who is an 'expert'?

 

Any dictator can simply declare their agents to be 'experts' and then defer all responsibility for their own tyrannical acts to their 'experts'

 

So that's what we are seeing happening: the development of a technocracy run by the technocratic class who use things like 'track and trace', 'immunity passports', facial recognition, digital currencies, universal basic income, social credit scores etc etc to monitor and micro-manage the mestizo serf class who have all list their own individual sense of identity and their own history of their ancestors journey that led them to that place

 

No likes, but well said.

[rideforever]

Of course there is.

Because Europe has old money and they want the money.

How do you take somebody's money?  You destroy their cohesion.  You destroy their race, their families, their reality.

You import millions of foreigners so that the white people don't even know who's country it is.

Then you re-write history and say Black people own the UK.

It's all a lie.

And if you steal somebody else's house, you will reap what you sow ... when people come to destroy you and your family and your children and they will take your house.

Black white brown ... there is the same law.

You love your own people, your blood, you guard your community. 

You guard and protect what your ancestors built with their hands.

Or you are a fallen and insincere phoney person, who is heading for the grave.

So what should a black person do in the UK?

Well that's the whole point.

Once you bring foreigners in ... it's inhumane to remove them, so the destruction begins.

In the Bible since ancient times the conquerors have known that to steal people's wealth, you have to destroy their race - you do this by bringing in foreigners who settle have families, then you can't push them out.  In the Bible the Assyrian comquerors who bring in 5 types of foreigners to totally destroy the lands they were stealing.  The Roman did the same thing.

I was born in England.

But my parents were from foreign countries.

What should I do?

Should I lie now ... and say it's okay, that foreigners are destroying the white people who built England?

Is that what I should say?

No.

Because I am not a liar.  I am man, and I know the law.

I know that I have been a tool of manipulation, of destruction.

I will not help them destroy the white people of England.

Moreover, I will help the white people, because England is white, it is Albion.

It is a ship I was born on, a ship that has carried me my whole life, and I will serve it.

Because that is honour, and I am no thief.

If these people do not remember who they are; I will remember it for them.

 

[EnigmaticWorld]

39 minutes ago, rideforever said:

But my parents were from foreign countries.

 

Nothing wrong with that pal, I have Indonesians and Filipinos in my family. As long as people like you and OP recognize that people are being pitted against each other, that's the main thing. You're both cool with me

Edited December 3, 2020 by EnigmaticWorld

[Firebird]

This may or may not be controversial here, but I prefer countries/societies that stick to one culture, broadly. It creates stability. Just looking at all the European cities can tell me enough. That replacement in London is not anything about extinction though as more white people move to the countryside.

 

I think the biggest issue is there's a lot of progressives, white progressives, that hate their own race. They have this 'white guilt', and they also hate their history and Christianity. They also hate the rural and are often urban dwellers. They have such a hate for their own roots that indeed they would accept millions of Africans and Asians and idolize the poor black and brown people while totally vilifying poor white people. It's pretty obvious what is going on. Just ask a white progressive about their views on poor black and brown folks and poor white folks. They hate the white worker class.

Edited December 3, 2020 by Firebird

[Itsjaybigjay]

3 minutes ago, Firebird said:

This may or may not be controversial here, but I prefer countries/societies that stick to one culture, broadly. It creates stability. Just looking at all the European cities can tell me enough. That replacement in London is not anything about extinction though as more white people move to the countryside.

 

I think the biggest issue is there's a lot of progressives, white progressives, that hate their own race. They have this 'white guilt', and they also hate their history and Christianity. They also hate the rural and are often urban dwellers. They have such a hate for their own roots that indeed they would accept millions of Africans and Asians and idolize the poor black and brown people while totally vilifying poor white people. It's pretty obvious what is going on. Just ask a white progressive about their views on poor black and brown folks and poor white folks. They hate the white worker class.

You cant really blame the progressives tho, in one way you should pity them, they have been brainwashed from an early age by the media and the uneducation system. but sadly i think its too late for them the brainwashing goes too deep to reverse with most of them.

[EnigmaticWorld]

4 minutes ago, Firebird said:

That replacement in London is not anything about extinction though as more white people move to the countryside.

 

Move into the cities and it's gentrification, move away and it's white flight. You can't win.

 

There won't even be any flight in future either.

 

[rideforever]

The Europeans have earned their wealth.  With their blood and sweat.

And everyone else should earn their own wealth.

Globalism is degeneration and theft, it is a philosophy of organised thievery by phoney soulless hasnamuss.

Beware anyone who tells you they will give you things for free.

Fool's gold.

This is why if you steal, you steal from your own self ... because to live from stealing you get weaker, and your heart blacker.

Then you perish.

Perish not from the challenges of life ... but from turning against what is good.

 

Globalism of the Soul is when the spirit of human beings is strong and they all build their own worlds, they love their own blood, each race and nation is a lineage, it is a line of creation, passed generation to generation.

What we have now is the Globalism of Evil where people are told to be passive and weak and steal and take handouts and be rules like insects.

 

Turn to the light.  Each man, each soul, of each colour.

Turn to the light.

Edited December 3, 2020 by rideforever

[EnigmaticWorld]

Aug. 5, 2007

 

Quote

But a massive new study, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America, has concluded just the opposite. Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam -- famous for "Bowling Alone," his 2000 book on declining civic engagement -- has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings. The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/05/world/americas/05iht-diversity.1.6986248.html

[Macnamara]

2 hours ago, rideforever said:

What we have now is the Globalism of Evil where people are told to be passive and weak and steal and take handouts and be rules like insects.

 

what globalists want is for people to be dependent on their corporations because then they can't bite the hand that feeds them. This then gives them total control over everyone. For this reason they always seek to crush tenacity and self-reliance whilst breeding state dependence

 

Slavery= being a helpless victim of a dominating force

[Macnamara]

2 hours ago, Firebird said:

I think the biggest issue is there's a lot of progressives, white progressives, that hate their own race. They have this 'white guilt', and they also hate their history and Christianity. They also hate the rural and are often urban dwellers. They have such a hate for their own roots that indeed they would accept millions of Africans and Asians and idolize the poor black and brown people while totally vilifying poor white people.

 

Feminists have spoken about how glossy magazines depict naked women and how this teaches women to view themselves and each other through the eyes of men as sex objects. They call this the 'male gaze'

 

The phenomenon that you describe above where white progressives hate themselves comes about through their immersion in communistic literature, culture and propaganda which teaches them to view the world through the eyes of sabbatean-jews

 

Lets call this the 'sabbatean-jewish gaze'

 

The sabbatean-jewish gaze has the following attributes:

 

-anti-life

-pro-centralised power (authoritarian)

-anti-white

-anti-christian

-pro-self worship

-anti-nation state

-anti freedom of speech

-pro moral reletavism

-pro corporate

-pro globalism

 

many of these attributes align with satanism

Edited December 3, 2020 by Macnamara

[Liam3880]

It did seem to change without me even noticing

 

Growing up in the 90s, If someone was from say Manchester or London or Liverpool, id see them as quite cool, probably tough, not the sort of person I’d want to mess with, usually a working class white person 

 

Now it seems  totally reversed, you’ve almost got to go out to Essex/Kent to meet that sort of person, or 5/10 miles away from Manchester to meet that sort of person

 

Now sure how that happened so fast, perhaps something to do with how social housing was allocated or changing demographics, but it’s shocking how it changed so much 

[Macnamara]

5 minutes ago, Liam3880 said:

It did seem to change without me even noticing

 

Growing up in the 90s, If someone was from say Manchester or London or Liverpool, id see them as quite cool, probably tough, not the sort of person I’d want to mess with, usually a working class white person 

 

Now it seems  totally reversed, you’ve almost got to go out to Essex/Kent to meet that sort of person, or 5/10 miles away from Manchester to meet that sort of person

 

Now sure how that happened so fast, perhaps something to do with how social housing was allocated or changing demographics, but it’s shocking how it changed so much 

Shocking claims Tony Blair led a mass migration conspiracy to ensure Labour's rule

TONY Blair betrayed Britain for his own political ends by overseeing a massive conspiracy to flood the country with millions of migrants, an explosive book has claimed.

By Nick Gutteridge

PUBLISHED: 11:03, Sat, Feb 27, 2016 | UPDATED: 16:15, Sat, Feb 27, 2016

The controversial Prime Minister cynically dismantled UK border controls so that two million migrants could settle in the country - and vote for him in future elections. 

He then gagged Labour officials and his most senior ministers, telling them not to discuss immigration in public under any circumstances for fear of a backlash, it is alleged. 

The Labour leader knew the British people would ferociously oppose his conspiracy if they realised what was happening.

So he banned politicians from discussing even the positive aspects of immigration in case doing so brought the public’s attention to the huge numbers of people entering the country from abroad, the book claims.

The disturbing conspiracy claims have been put forward by award winning investigative journalist Tom Bower, who interviewed 200 MPs, ministers and civil servants from the Blair years to build up a picture of his Government. 

Shocking interviews claim to show how the former prime minister betrayed the electorate for political and ideological reasons, with one saying he “shudders” at the thought that such a man was ever trusted with running the country.

They also accuse Blair of hushed up members of his own party as he carried out a great multiculturalism experiment without the permission or backing of the British people. 

Blair and Labour had barely mentioned immigration in their campaigning ahead of the 1997 election, and did not actively portray themselves as pro-immigration. 

But as soon as he had the keys to Downing Street the book reveals the new Prime Minister ordered border chiefs to open the floodgates, even telling them to reclassify unskilled asylum seekers as people moving to Britain for work so that he could drum up the economic benefits of mass migration. 

He also appointed a fervently pro-immigration minister to the border control brief, who astonishingly ruled against deporting failed asylum seekers because it would be too “emotional” for them, it is claimed.

As a result Britain’s population was swelled with more than two million foreigners during the Blair years, the vast majority of whom would back the Labour party who let them in and lavished them with benefits at future elections. 

According to the claims the aim of the project was to make the country “see the benefit of a multicultural society”. Government insiders have also said that Blair did not see it as his job to “control immigration” to Britain. 

But the controversial leader knew his conspiracy was against the British people’s wishes from the very start, telling ministers and officials: “Don’t mention the advantages of immigration in public because they won’t even want that.” 

Instead he quietly relaxed rules on allowing foreign spouses and students in and effectively opened up an asylum seeker free-for-all in which nobody was ever deported, even if their application to stay in the UK failed. 

The book says 350,000 asylum seekers benefited this way. In 2002 alone, Blair gave the go-ahead for 150,000 work permits with most of the recipients, including the unskilled, going on to become UK citizens.

Some of the most shocking revelations centre around the role of former immigration minister Barbara Roche, who was handpicked for the role by Blair and served from 1999 to 2001. 

During this period she quietly adopted policies – with her leader’s approval – that dramatically changed the face of the UK forever. 

Upon her appointment, it is said she told a senior immigration official: “Asylum seekers should be allowed to stay in Britain. Removal takes too long and it’s emotional.”

She changed the rules to allow more work permits to be issued, especially to people who would previously have been considered asylum seekers. 

Stephen Boys Smith, who was then head of the Home Office’s immigration directorate, said: “It was clear that Roche wanted more immigrants to come to Britain. She didn’t see her job as controlling entry into Britain, but by looking at the wider picture in a ‘holistic way’ she wanted us to see the benefit of a multicultural society.”

Former Labour speech writer Andrew Neather allegedly told the author of the book that the aim was to “rub the right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date”.

According to the book an extraordinary row between then Home Secretary, Jack Straw, and Blair illustrated the divisions within the Government. 

Mr Straw reportedly asked the then-prime minister: “Isn’t immigration the sort of issue which can blow up in our face?” 

But Blair simply replied: “Immigration won’t be an issue. Immigration is good for Britain.” 

The revelations come as Britain prepares for a referendum on its membership of the EU, to take place on June 23. 

Immigration is expected to form a key part of the debate, with Europe undergoing an unprecedented migration crisis which has brought the Schengen zone to the brink of collapse. 

The Blair government oversaw mass migration from eastern European countries who gained membership of the 28-nation bloc and there are concerns that Turkish citizens could gain the right to move to Britain when they are granted visa-free travel within the EU from October. 

 

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/648008/Tony-Blair-Labour-immigration-asylum-seekers-UK-Brexit-EU-referendum

 

Edited December 3, 2020 by Macnamara

[Macnamara]

 

''Oh thiiiiiiings can only get betteeeeeer, they can only get bet-er-er, now i found you!''

'What a result!': The human rights 'leftie lawyers' celebrating after Priti Patel raged at them for grounding Jamaica-bound deportation flight - meaning two rapists and a murderer among 23 criminals still in UK

• One planned flight descended into chaos after 23 serious criminals appealed.
• Michael Antonio White, convicted of murder, was taken off yesterday's plane 
• He was sentenced to life in prison after shooting his victim 6 times in a drug deal
• In all, 23 criminals submitted appeals which led to them avoiding deportation
• MPs, celebrities and lawyers believe some may be Windrush descendants
• They also claim others have been trafficked into the UK and forced into crime 

By Dan Sales For Mailonline

Published: 16:46, 3 December 2020 | Updated: 19:12, 3 December 2020

Lawyers who helped stop 23 criminals including rapists and killers being deported to Jamaica toasted their success after halting their removal, declaring ‘What a result'.

The barristers were from a number of firms acting in tandem with campaign groups Movement for Justice and Detention Action.

Solicitors from companies including Cranbrook Legal and Clarendon Park Chambers said they worked into the early hours to stall the transfer before celebrating the news of their success. 

It plunged a Home Office flight to return 50 Jamaican nationals into chaos yesterday as 23 serious crooks submitted last-minute appeals – including human rights claims – which led to them avoiding deportation.

Model Naomi Campbell, Line of Duty star Thandie Newton, James Bond actress Naomie Harris and historian David Olusoga were among celebrities who signed an open letter demanding none of the offenders be removed, at least for the time being.

They believe some may have been Windrush descendants or had been trafficked to the UK and forced into crimes. 

Michael Antonio White, convicted of murder in 2003 after shooting a man six times, was taken off the plane after a last-minute appeal. 

Others who dodged deportation yesterday included the two rapists, two convicted of attempted murder and others convicted of supplying Class A drugs and possessing firearms. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9014869/The-human-rights-lawyers-celebrating-Priti-Patel-raged-Jamaican-deportation-plane.html

 

[TheAwakened]

3 hours ago, Firebird said:

This may or may not be controversial here, but I prefer countries/societies that stick to one culture, broadly. It creates stability. Just looking at all the European cities can tell me enough. That replacement in London is not anything about extinction though as more white people move to the countryside.

 

I think the biggest issue is there's a lot of progressives, white progressives, that hate their own race. They have this 'white guilt', and they also hate their history and Christianity. They also hate the rural and are often urban dwellers. They have such a hate for their own roots that indeed they would accept millions of Africans and Asians and idolize the poor black and brown people while totally vilifying poor white people. It's pretty obvious what is going on. Just ask a white progressive about their views on poor black and brown folks and poor white folks. They hate the white worker class.

Me too I prefer societies that have one cohesive culture. Countries with wildly different divergent cultures groupings living amongst each other don't work. 

 

I would prefer to live in the Caribbean contributing to the local economy to develop the Country - for example Saint Lucia which is where my Father is from. I believe out of respect for my ancestors I should better my people. That doesn't mean I hate White People and it makes sense to me. I'm contributing to a nation (paying taxes to the government) not long ago enslaved my ancestors.

 

Also your other point about White progressives hating the White working class, I get that impression from the media as well. I understand and accept that White Working class People have been disadvantaged by the people who you would think would not disadvantage them. Like sending petty criminals in Australia, Irish slaves in the Americas and the ongoing situation of actively ignoring the plight of the Working class Indigenous Brits.

 

If I was a East London cockney I would be disgusting at the government on how my neighbourhoods have turned into Islam City with mosques on every corner. Is that racist? Is that bad for saying that as I'm a product of immigration? No, because in my view (that I'l rarely utter in real life) believe certain groups of people should never be allowed to enter the UK en mass such as conservative Muslims. Its a ticking time bomb and in some cases - literal!

 

If I went to Castries, Saint Lucia to discover a massive mosque built in the middle of the town I'd be... concerned...

 

I know the UK Gov sold out their own people for a globalist agenda. 

[EnigmaticWorld]

I still wonder when this will get memory holed. It's too much honesty for todays woke culture. Unfortunately society has confused in-group preference with hatred for others.

 

 

[TheAwakened]

20 minutes ago, Liam3880 said:

It did seem to change without me even noticing

 

Growing up in the 90s, If someone was from say Manchester or London or Liverpool, id see them as quite cool, probably tough, not the sort of person I’d want to mess with, usually a working class white person 

 

Now it seems  totally reversed, you’ve almost got to go out to Essex/Kent to meet that sort of person, or 5/10 miles away from Manchester to meet that sort of person

 

Now sure how that happened so fast, perhaps something to do with how social housing was allocated or changing demographics, but it’s shocking how it changed so much 

Where I live in London I barely see any White working class people. Its mostly Black Brits - is that progress? the displacement of the original inhabitants of an area? 

[EnigmaticWorld]

20 minutes ago, TheAwakened said:

Where I live in London I barely see any White working class people. Its mostly Black Brits - is that progress? the displacement of the original inhabitants of an area? 

 

It's just the future unfortunately. Uprooted people are easier to rule over, probably. The original inhabitants feel uprooted from their traditions too, so everyone is uprooted. We just have to make sure we don't turn on each other, because the elites no doubt see this as some hunger games bs. My concern is a major financial collapse. If millions of people have come to Europe for a better life, then we suddenly can't offer it to them anymore, what happens? I would hope they take it up with our governments and not us. lol

Edited December 3, 2020 by EnigmaticWorld

[Nobby Noboddy]

10 minutes ago, TheAwakened said:

Where I live in London I barely see any White working class people. Its mostly Black Brits - is that progress? the displacement of the original inhabitants of an area? 

I live near Marlborough in Wiltshire. Dead rural. There's one old black man I see a lot and apart from that it would only be tourists. It's actually a bit weird in one sense because I come from closer to London but in another it's like it would have been in the middle ages and that begs the question about whether 'good or bad'.

 

Personally I'm pleased and proud to be a white European and steadfast in my love and respect for people of other races who feel the same about themselves.

 

No homogenisation! Love the differences!

[Macnamara]

1 hour ago, TheAwakened said:

If I was a East London cockney I would be disgusting at the government on how my neighbourhoods have turned into Islam City with mosques on every corner. Is that racist? Is that bad for saying that as I'm a product of immigration? No, because in my view (that I'l rarely utter in real life) believe certain groups of people should never be allowed to enter the UK en mass such as conservative Muslims. Its a ticking time bomb and in some cases - literal!

 

It's actually far more sinister than that. The agenda doesn't just involve flooding migrants in to the UK

 

There is another dimension to what they are doing. In parallel to an open borders policy they are also pushing a psychological warfare aspect too which I'll discuss more about in a minute. But first lets pause to reflect on the fact that the wall street bankers (sabbatean rothschild cabal) created the league of nations after world war one and then after world war two they created the United Nations which is a de facto world government

 

Whilst doing this they also created globalised institutions such as the world bank and the IMF and the bank for international settlements. The rockefellers gifted the land that the UN offices were then built on in new york and david rockefeller openly spoke about his globalist ambitions. So those are the people ultimately behind this.

 

When the sabbatean-jewish, marxist, frankfurt school was kicked out of germany they went to the USA where the bankers like the rockefellers helped them get tenure in US universities where they started teaching what they called 'critical theory' which was a process of constantly criticising EVERY aspect of america and its way of life in order to teach US youth to hate america and to see it through the sabbatean-jewish gaze (to ultimately demoralise them and prepare them for the demise of their nation)

 

Critical theory however NEVER offered up any solution to any problems that it raised about america. I suggest this is because their TRUE intentions were to advance communism as a road to technocratic control by the likes of the rockefellers and obviously they couldn't admit that because then the students would recoil in horror and see through the whole scam.

 

Overtime critical theory has evolved into 'critical race theory' which is now about pushing a narrative that all white people are either overtly racist or unconsciously rascist and therefore born with an original sin which they must repent for through white guilt and reparations. The likes of the rockefellers keep their wealth offshore where the taxman can't reach it so any reparations would of course have to be squeezed, through taxation out of the working white population thereby destroying the middle class and creating a two class neo-fuedal state

 

The idea that white people are inherently evil is an incredibly toxic one because it then justifies any counter action taken against whites including violence because after all it is all simply pay back for perceived historical wrongs. However when we dig into those perceived historic wrongs we find that things are not quite how the sabbateans would have us believe for example the slave trade was largely controlled by sabbatean-jews as was the sugar industry which brings us to another quasi-religious element to critical race theory which is scapegoatism with white people being turned into the scapegoats to be sacrificed on the alter of globalism

 

Globalism is nothing more than the complete takeover of the global economy by the sabbatean mega-corporations and their total capture of all national governments

 

So what we are seeing alongside the deliberate MASS immigration, orchestrated by the sabbateans is the demonisation of white people in the eyes of black people and therefore a painting of a target on the backs of white people which will make them a target of hate for perceived wrongs which they in fact had nothing themselves to do with but for which they are now expected to atone and hate themselves for

 

It will lead to random acts of violence against whites because they are flooding people in and then conditioning them to hate us and blame us for all of their problems

Edited December 3, 2020 by Macnamara

[Macnamara]

2 hours ago, TheAwakened said:

Where I live in London I barely see any White working class people. Its mostly Black Brits - is that progress? the displacement of the original inhabitants of an area? 

 

Migrants are being trafficked from north africa by non governmental organisations who are sending boats to north africa where the migrants push themselves offshore in rubber dinghies

 

The NGO's then pick them up and bring them over the Med to southern europe where they then travel overland to britain

 

When someone activates a rescue beacon at sea the procedure is for the rescuer to return them to the nearest port which in this case would be in northern africa, but that is NOT what is being done

 

So when i say that MASS migration is being orchestrated i mean it is being deliberately done by well funded groups who are carrying out an agenda to breakdown and destroy european nation states. They are in effect, waging war by another means against europe but are getting away with it because the corporate elite who own the mainstream media and who have captured government are the ones funding them to do it!

Edited December 3, 2020 by Macnamara