Concerned Citizen Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 Guidance-and-SOP-COVID-19-Testing-NHS-Laboratories.pdf (rcpath.org) No harm in giving another link (above) for the NHS 45 cycle reference - see page 16 also on page 2 of following - World Heath Organisation (WHO) - it states 50 cycles. WHO PCR protocol_nCoV_IP200227_Final Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 3 minutes ago, Concerned Citizen said: Guidance-and-SOP-COVID-19-Testing-NHS-Laboratories.pdf (rcpath.org) No harm in giving another link (above) for the NHS 45 cycle reference - see page 16 also on page 2 of following - World Heath Organisation (WHO) - it states 50 cycles. WHO PCR protocol_nCoV_IP200227_Final MIT says forty [ https://medical.mit.edu/covid-19-updates/2020/11/pcr-test-result ]. Fifty sounds crazy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Concerned Citizen Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 Yes, 50 is crazy, but I posted the document link as that is what it states. Even 40 is too high. Here is a link to Carl Heneghan (Oxford professor) - He is interviewed by Andrew Neil. At around 14 mins ish he refers to pcr testing - 25 cycles is the value he indicates is when it gets very sensitive. The week in 60 minutes with Andrew Neil – 3 September 2020 | Live broadcast | Spectator TV Here is a link to a 12 page pdf that deals with the pcr - you may find it informative and of interest. Understanding cycle threshold (Ct) in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR (publishing.service.gov.uk) Page 5 - a graph indicating the Cycle threshold at 25.6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rideforever Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 Can we find somebody who is not a scientist to examine this information? They are all on the payroll. Luckily one of the European Courts did look at information and concluded that at 35 cycles the false positive rate is 97%. This was based on a very recent piece of research done in Sept 2020 by an expert team and published in the Clinical Infectious Diseases Journal. And it's no coincidence that the UK Government has just begun testing with a 2nd type of test called LFT, clearly they know something is wrong with PCR. Details below: https://docdro.id/cfUGarZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.9e99ff3727a52b51047711c51028c847.jpg)
.jpg.e0850aef2895b3e8c638a24da2b8f92e.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.