This forum is currently being set up for a PTB mass media attack.

[numnuts]

15 hours ago, northern star said:

So your post is a heads up, letting 'em know we're expecting them.

 

Disempowerment.

[Steph]

What I want to know is when David Icke media will match the Daily Mail contribution to independent fact checkers like fullfact.org. Isn't it terrible that David Icke is so popular compared to reputable media sources and despite generating lots of content, he doesn't pay zip toward erasing content which is false. Take the Daily Mail article in question here as a good example of fake news where the headline describes the story of a man about to kill people and blame it all on David Icke. The article does mention a man carrying a rifle through a rural village where rifles mean something urbanite readers of the Daily Mail would never understand. (amma gonna shoot me some ole tin cans ... as opposed to being all out of bubblegum). It's the country bumpkin people. This behaviour is shocking to them on a level where where his mum had an affair with her second cousin who's shop he is now passing with a rifle he bought from the son of the guy who owned the shop. SCREAM!!!! The terror! What will the neighbours say?

 

Once you take the Daily Mail hype out the article you then notice that the big bit in the headline suggesting the article has to do with David Icke is ostensibly false. Oh! Oh! Wait a minute! I've did a 'find on this page' and after about two adverts and four paragraphs of shite ... there it is ... the actual substance of this ... erm ... "news":

Quote

Another onlooker claimed on social media that the man claimed 'he was the son of David Icke.'

 

Did the mainstream media check this claim before publishing it? Is it fake news? Did the mainstream media use fake news to construct a misleading headline. Does this attack on David Icke by the mainstream media constitute hate speech? Will the independent press complaints commission be of any use to anyone except the extremely wealthy organisation who are not wilfully and deliberately marginalised by a not very independent, pro-censorship, fake news, hate speech filled mainstream media with only pretentions of being journalism from a time when manual non-electronic printing meant only journalists like David Icke would be worth employing as writers because QuarkExpress doesnt suffer bouts of flu when James Gant and Charles Walker and Amie Gordon For Mailonline publish stories misrepresenting reality not so much to spread gossip but to monger it.

 

Analysis of the article shows its just casual mainstream media poison. That's the type of 'journalist' the mainstream media employ. Why would anyone with enough literacy skills to question the validity of mainstream media fake news and censorship have any mainstream media content in their house hold? Have you run out of toilet paper?

 

This kind of fake news has been going on for decades and its notable that when it is finally addressed by nothing less than the President of the United States of America, the first think the fake media did was to start their own "fake news" censorship agencies, call them "independent fact checkers and started having articles deleted, blocked and covered up anywhere they presented information which was at odds with the lies in the actual fake news.

 

So Donald Trump is gone and the Fake News continues with new levels of agression in the form of fullfact.org and poynter but you would have to be an abused child living in a bubble as encouraged by the fake news media to believe the mainstream media anymore and call me clairvoyant but the mainstream media wants absolute control over the minds of the children it keeps in bubbles and at the same time the heavens condemn the Daily Mail and Poynter and all that mainstream media garbage and they need to claim heaven is a mental illness in order to make themselves look like the good when in fact they are a tyranny that cannot escape the inevitability that those children will one day wake up and they will not perceive the heavens as their abusers but the main stream media, the people who own the political parties, the people who control the political parties, the people who have made every blasphemous accusation under the sun who encouraged the building of a surveillance state in which only they could hide ... in tommorrows world, exposed:

 

Every James Gant, every Charles Walker every Amie Gordon. Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide as the shawshank redemption takes its toll on the child abusers of the satanic media. Then we will see what it is to be a jew when people like that make a quick switch to a new religion claiming to be comparably to the victims of the holocaust mentioning nothing about the milling of poisonous rumours before they took god into account. Is this what is meant by anti-semitism whenever corrupt practices are being pointed out. Fake jews tryng to pretend the people they have been abusing are the nazis?

 

I hear Tony Blair is a catholic now. Cackle cackle! Hubble bubble toil and trouble, now he has his reward!  The graven alters, the ritual prayers, the rejection of every other false religion but that. Taste the rainbow he never will because theres Iraqis in heaven whos friends he had murdered. Heaven would be a hell to Tony Blair. God's church on earth has many different temples but none of them are worth shit compared to gods heavenly temple where the young and the naive rejecting the ways of the people of the temple might find a sacred pathway to the place beyond the stars but Tony the phony is going nowhere and as for these "journalists", promoters of hate and war, sewers of rumour while sitting back in their armchairs saying "Im not one of those criminals like a man walking through a country village carrying an air rifle (something like an AK-47 except you need a good aim to kill a wood pigeon at 20 feet). Fullfact.org would definitely agree that these "journalists" did not walk through a country village brandishing a firearm but what fullfact.org would not wish to comment on is whether threse "journalists" played key roles in manufacturing the illegal invasion of Iraq which leads to the Daesh situation today that the UN shouldn't even involve itself in except as a humanitarian mission. The invasion was illegal according to the security council, but according to these "journalists" mass murder is fine and dandy if one side with enough weapons decides to commit mass murder even against the will of its own people. They are concerned about a man in a country village carrying a 2-2 rifle and turn it into a cheap jibe against David Icke using the fact that someone on social media said something that was patently false?

 

David Icke could sue the Daily Mail for dragging his reputation through the mud but how much would it cost David Icke in terms of time and expense when the mainstream media has a whole bunch of other similar places hate mongering the public just like the Daily Mail? David Icke, despite being a wealthier than most of us, is pretty much in the same boat as we are if the media decides to commit a personal attack against us. We don't have any of those fine and wonderful protections of the press complaints commission and the courts to sue the fake news by when they make up false stories about us. On the bright side, very few people actually do but at least we aren't living in the illusion that we afforded any protections like human rights or any of those wonderful things that sound great until you need to have them and suddenly you are being pointed to the bureaucratic maze because in the end it was just a lie by system owned and controlled by people who are serving themselves and calling it "democracy" and "society" and "community" and all those collectivist labels which don't quite fit once you see what is actually available in the thing plagiarising such labels: A system. A system of slavery. Obey obey! Because you will freeze and starve if you do not. Thats what is ultimately meant by the main stream medias democracy.

 

It is no democracy. It is not society and as for it being a community, its value as a community is only so far as the community leaders will be obeyed. On top of all this, the authoritarians in the finest clothing have the cheek to blame liberalism for all of their doings. The only thing liberal about their system is the labels it has stolen to dress itself up in and there is no liberty on offer for anyone except its pets kept on a slightly longer leash than the wild animals like ourselves who recognised morality to be universal in disregard of whatever corrupt laws the "journalists" can force into what they call "law". The journalists who wrote this piece of filth are guiltier than David Icke, and the drunk man with a 2-2 rifle they build their article of shite out of. But fullfact.org would censor such a suggestion. Thats how independent the mainstream medias fact checking network is.

 

It starts with the presumption that the MSM is the truth (inspite of, for example, the brexit referendum and the consequent assessment that the MSM must have been seriously misrepresenting the situation for decades) and it then goes about destroying anything other than the lies being created by the mainstream media.

 

Why do they hate nutty conspiracy theorist David Icke so much? He attract alot of a truthers and the one thing that is poisonous to organised lies is truth.

 

[Illmatic]

We've now got new members advocating the setting up of paramilitary groups to fight the lockdowns and at the same time asking if anyone's got footage of anti-lockdown protests.

 

I think you might be right. Fishy to say the least.

[Macnamara]

On 11/13/2020 at 11:27 PM, jonesthepost said:

Of course they have; but present circumstance throughout the world are pretty dire; if incitement to harm is seen on forums such as this, it can be bloody damaging.

 

yes, posting dodgy content is definately a technique they will use to discredit the wider community through guilt by association

[Grumpy Owl]

19 hours ago, Illmatic said:

We've now got new members advocating the setting up of paramilitary groups to fight the lockdowns and at the same time asking if anyone's got footage of anti-lockdown protests.

 

I think you might be right. Fishy to say the least.

 

Violence is never the answer. I agree that there needs to be some kind of push-back, but a violent uprising will only make matters worse, as it will simply push people to call for a 'reaction', as in 'problem-reaction-solution', which will end up with more civil liberties being taken away and armed militia on our streets. (Thus the rapid acceleration towards the vicious police-state we have all been warned about)

 

We don't have time to scrutinise every single topic and post made here, so if you see anything that looks 'off', please use the Report link so us moderators can take a closer look.

[Bullys Special Prize]

On 11/16/2020 at 1:13 AM, Illmatic said:

We've now got new members advocating the setting up of paramilitary groups to fight the lockdowns and at the same time asking if anyone's got footage of anti-lockdown protests.

 

I think you might be right. Fishy to say the least.

Wrong you paranoid ****

I explained I wasn't advocating any such thing. It was you that went overboard on the paramilitary assumptions. However the group I mentioned was not the best example. YouTube was dead as a dodo yesterday with anti-lockdown marches or protest. And what's wrong with asking about footage of the protest anyway ?

Edited November 20, 2020 by Basket Case
removed insult

[Nobby Noboddy]

1 hour ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

Violence is never the answer. I agree that there needs to be some kind of push-back, but a violent uprising will only make matters worse, as it will simply push people to call for a 'reaction', as in 'problem-reaction-solution', which will end up with more civil liberties being taken away and armed militia on our streets. (Thus the rapid acceleration towards the vicious police-state we have all been warned about)

 

We don't have time to scrutinise every single topic and post made here, so if you see anything that looks 'off', please use the Report link so us moderators can take a closer look.

Violence no, force yes.

Stand down, trust the plan - FTS!

 

We must be ready to fight for our freedom and our values, our wives and our children.

 

No-one here is a 'hater', I respect everyone's right to have a view whether I agree with them or not. Bastards.

[kj35]

I must admit I noticed it starting about a month ago. A significant uptick on new posters who could suddenly...eloquently and nearly convincingly argue against many topics. It was disconcerting....not because I thought they were right but because they were obviously briefed. 

Edited November 16, 2020 by kj35

[Golden Retriever]

1 hour ago, Bullys Special Prize said:

YouTube was dead as a dodo yesterday with anti-lockdown marches or protest. And what's wrong with asking about footage of the protest anyway ?

 

I agree with you about Youtube the last couple of days.  I'm not sure if the protests are fewer in number or if MSM in general are

suppressing coverage of them.

 

Ruptly usually cover protests, like the one below in Rome and Dusseldorf over the weekend.  Citizen's footage on Twitter is probably the best

option.

 

 

[Ethel]

On the off-chance that this thread is referring to myself, I shall clarify my position. In the above post, reference is made to 'sabotage'. In another thread, I was quoted as saying:

 

"If I were in your shoes, working in a pharmacy I'd sabotage the hell out of as many things as possible, especially relating to vaccines, before moving on. Just saying."

 

If anyone has a problem with this, they are clinging to a certain fear-based level of consciousness which needs to be transcended before the human race can move on to something better. Sometimes rules need to be broken. Sometimes 'the rules' are not inherently good. Sometimes obedience to authority is not a virtue.

 

Some people talk a big game, but aren't quite as good as taking action. I haven't broken any laws or created any destruction in the entirety of 2020, but that doesn't mean that I don't see value in breaking rules in the name of the greater good. I don't want things in our society to descend into violence either, but what about self-defence? 

 

Even though I have made posts on this forum about how much I dislike police, I saw a video this evening of a protest in Bristol and watched as a group of people surrounded the police in a circle whilst screaming "shame on you". I did not feel happy or elated by this, I felt the fear of the police, I felt sorry for them. We call this empathy. I have no wish to see the police being harmed, but their job is becoming more and more of a problem, and soon they are going to have to make important decisions about the future, because if they stay in their current vocation, they are either going to end up hurting people, or getting hurt.

 

Violence isn't 'the answer', but people need to understand that if they don't start taking some serious action in their life, and developing their sacred masculine elements, they may eventually be forced into a position of acting in self-defense. It is now that scary.

 

If you think petitions or engaging with the fucking clowns in parliament has any value by this point you are dreaming. I got on a bus today and an announcement came over the tannoy about facemasks being mandatory. I was the only one on the bus not wearing one. I was on the bus for 20 minutes and the announcement didn't come on again, because no other person got on the bus who wasn't wearing a mask.

 

THAT is where we are at people: that a person can be targeted by tannoy announcements on a bus in an effort to shame them into complicance.

 

I hear sirens roughly every 60 minutes throughout the day in a hick town in nowheresville. To try and psychologically manipulate people. That's where we're at.

 

I am currently in need of serious health care and run a very real risk of being told that I can't get it because of a refusal to comply with ramming a cotton swab up my nose, or toxic shite into my body. THAT is where we are at.

 

So please, forgive me if I happen to encourage a pharmacist to sabotage vaccine distribution.

 

TAKE ACTION.

[numnuts]

2 hours ago, Grumpy Owl said:

We don't have time to scrutinise every single topic and post made here, so if you see anything that looks 'off', please use the Report link so us moderators can take a closer look.

 

Sounds like a good plan to me.

[Itsjaybigjay]

1 hour ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

Violence no, force yes.

Stand down, trust the plan - FTS!

 

We must be ready to fight for our freedom and our values, our wives and our children.

 

No-one here is a 'hater', I respect everyone's right to have a view whether I agree with them or not. Bastards.

Exactly. there is a massive difference between insighting people to commit wanton acts of violence and encouraging people to stand up against the violence inflicted upon them by the PTB's lackeys.

[Michael]

On 11/14/2020 at 3:46 PM, northern star said:

Well done Numnuts. Very good point too - havent noticed anything myself on here, but reading that article, so obviously made up, made me realise they are trying to demonise David Icke's message, so the messageboard cant be far behind. There is a real awakening going on where conspiracies are edging more into normie world, as people start realising things arent adding up with the 'real' narrative. Im trying to imagine what they would do to get this place closed down. Probably stop at nothing to frame DI as a danger in the public mind. So your post is a heads up, letting 'em know we're expecting them.

 

I can confirm that all in all there are way more people at the very least speaking out against the official narrative and rate MSM in general overwhelmingly with thumbs down, which is good.

Many didnt go the extra mile to dig deeper, but its good enough if they refuse this Covid crap.

However, a natural consequence of growing bigger in numbers is that their tactics become more extreme and varied, such as a mole, shill or simple troublemakers.

Its good to remind oneself from time to time that this is no game and of course they also read forums like these.

There is no difficulty to access a forum like this as it is for everyone else. They can draw a very clear picture on the mindset.

Its just what they gain is very little for them here. Literally 99% of people here already have a more critical outlook and cannot be brought back anyways. I dont know what they would accomplish.

For instance, ive read some posts (cannot remember the name of the forum member) that actually wanted to comletly dismiss Eicke by using 2 strawman arguments. (just like the good old fact checkers, same tactics)

Most people should be intelligent enough to sort out those that only try to steer trouble or to undermine David Ickes messages. (which doesent mean you have to agree with Icke, but it should still be done in a fair manner)

Edited November 16, 2020 by Michael

[Morpheus]

I must have missed my PM message @numnuts. I'll remember that.

[Morpheus]

On a serious note, I've not noticed any suspicious content from anyone but when I read Grumpy Owls article on cointelpro, it sent me on a massive paranoia trip and is probably the reason I've stepped back a little on commenting and just observed a bit more. I really shouldn't let it bother me but it did have an affect that's for sure. 

 

As for suspicious posters, I reckon <redacted> is a dodgy bloke. Not sure I'd trust him.

Edited November 19, 2020 by Grumpy Owl
Member name redacted

[Grumpy Owl]

5 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

On a serious note, I've not noticed any suspicious content from anyone but when I read Grumpy Owls article on cointelpro, it sent me on a massive paranoia trip and is probably the reason I've stepped back a little on commenting and just observed a bit more. I really shouldn't let it bother me but it did have an affect that's for sure. 

 

As for suspicious posters, I reckon <redacted> is a dodgy bloke. Not sure I'd trust him.

 

No 'naming-and-shaming' in public of any member please, unless you have some good hard concrete evidence to back it up, and if you have please PM one or all of the moderators first.

[Morpheus]

4 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

No 'naming-and-shaming' in public of any member please, unless you have some good hard concrete evidence to back it up, and if you have please PM one or all of the moderators first.

I'm taking the piss dude, hence the winky face. Me and @sickofallthebollocks are more than ok.

[Morpheus]

1 minute ago, Morpheus said:

I'm taking the piss dude, hence the winky face. Me and @sickofallthebollocks are more than ok.

And on top of that, someone else named someone earlier on, by more than one person and you didn't see fit to redact their posts. Therefore @Grumpy Owl can we have some neutral moderation please. 

[sickofallthebollocks]

2 hours ago, Morpheus said:

 

As for suspicious posters, I reckon <redacted> is a dodgy bloke. Not sure I'd trust him.

 

 

 

  Hah! - "ooo you naughty boy!!!?" - Yeah We're good - "ya cheeky fecker yer!!!!!"  Why I oughta!!!! 

 

 

Edited November 19, 2020 by sickofallthebollocks

[Grumpy Owl]

2 hours ago, Morpheus said:

I'm taking the piss dude, hence the winky face. Me and @sickofallthebollocks are more than ok.

 

OK fair enough. But please, to all members, no open 'naming and shaming' anywhere here as I stated earlier.

 

1 hour ago, Morpheus said:

And on top of that, someone else named someone earlier on, by more than one person and you didn't see fit to redact their posts. Therefore @Grumpy Owl can we have some neutral moderation please. 

 

I think you'll find I try to be as neutral as I can, and perhaps I missed this earlier post you mention hence why no action was taken. I don't have the time to trawl through every single post made on this forum, which is why we ask you members to report anything that looks 'off' or falls foul of the forum rules.

[peter]

On 11/17/2020 at 6:54 AM, Grumpy Owl said:

 

Violence is never the answer. I agree that there needs to be some kind of push-back, but a violent uprising will only make matters worse, as it will simply push people to call for a 'reaction', as in 'problem-reaction-solution', which will end up with more civil liberties being taken away and armed militia on our streets. (Thus the rapid acceleration towards the vicious police-state we have all been warned about)

 

We don't have time to scrutinise every single topic and post made here, so if you see anything that looks 'off', please use the Report link so us moderators can take a closer look.

Yes the powers that be love violence  ,that is what they are set up to deal with and affords them so many benefits , if you just ignore the bastards they don't really know how to respond except to incite violence to bring things back to the status quo

Edited November 19, 2020 by peter

[Morpheus]

34 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

 

 

  Hah! - "ooo you naughty boy!!!?" - Yeah We're good - "ya cheeky fecker yer!!!!!"  Why I oughta!!!! 

 

 

[Macnamara]

Intelligence services listen to what they call the 'noise' online which is to say joe and jane public talking on social media in order to guage public opinion

 

In order to shape public opinion they then actively seek to plant false narratives on social media

 

Another thing they do is what they call 'cognitive infiltration' which is a fancy way of saying sowing doubt. So if the public start to find the truth about something the intelligence services will send in their people to sow doubt in the minds of the public in order to make them unsure of themselves because people who are unsure of themselves are afraid to take any sort of action to change their circumstances

 

So for example if you don't believe its safe for the government to roll out an experimental vaccine that uses a new process of transfection, without having done any studies into longterm health effects then you might decide to refuse it and in order to make you unsure of yourself they will have to sow doubt in your mind online and they'll do that by trying to tell you the vaccine will be harmless or a placebo etc to try and disarm your perfectly reasonable and justifiable fears

[numnuts]

Anyone got a video link to Jeremy Paxman's 'Lone Wolf' interview of Michael Chertoff? Or has it now been purged from the web?

[Macnamara]

47 minutes ago, numnuts said:

Anyone got a video link to Jeremy Paxman's 'Lone Wolf' interview of Michael Chertoff? Or has it now been purged from the web?

 

Michael chertoff is a dual israeli-US national whose father was a talmudic rabbi and his mother was a mossad operative

 

In the wake of the 911 attacks he helped author the misnomered 'patriot act' which actually took rights and freedoms AWAY from the US public and he profited from the resultant beefing up of airport security because his company the chertoof group was involved in providing the scanner machines that the TSA installed in the airports made by Rapiscan.....rapey-scan more like...

 

In short a total deep state NWO operative

 

 

Edited November 20, 2020 by Macnamara