Slavery, black and white, historical and now

[Golden Retriever]

Both the original David Icke Forum and the later one which was attacked in May this year had information about slavery.

 

I would like everyone to contribute again.

 

When researching the roots of the new vice president elect, Kamala Harris, whose paternal ancestors (Hamilton Brown) were Irish Slave traders

in Jamaica, I came across this information. It's astounding

 

"On 3 August 1835, somewhere in the City of London, two of Europe’s most famous bankers came to an agreement with the chancellor of the exchequer. Two years earlier, the British government had passed the Slavery Abolition Act, which outlawed slavery in most parts of the empire. Now it was taking out one of the largest loans in history, to finance the slave compensation package required by the 1833 act. Nathan Mayer Rothschild and his brother-in-law Moses Montefiore agreed to loan the British government £15m, with the government adding an additional £5m later. The total sum represented 40% of the government’s yearly income in those days, equivalent to some £300bn today.

 

One might expect this so-called “slave compensation” to have gone to the freed slaves to redress the injustices they suffered. Instead, the money went exclusively to the owners of slaves, who were being compensated for the loss of what had, until then, been considered their property. Not a single shilling of reparation, nor a single word of apology, has ever been granted by the British state to the people it enslaved, or their descendants.

 

Today, 1835 feels so long ago; so far away. But if you are a British taxpayer, what happened in that quiet room affects you directly.

 

Your taxes were used to pay off the loan, and the payments only ended in 2015. Generations of Britons have been implicated in a legacy of financial support for one of the world’s most egregious crimes against humanity.

The fact that you, and your parents, and their parents in turn, may have been paying for a huge slave-owner compensation package from the 1830s only came to public attention last month. The revelation came on 9 February, in the form of a tweet by HM Treasury: “Here’s today’s surprising #FridayFact. Millions of you have helped end the slave trade through your taxes. Did you know? In 1833, Britain used £20 million, 40% of its national budget, to buy freedom for all slaves in the Empire. The amount of money borrowed for the Slavery Abolition Act was so large that it wasn’t paid off until 2015. Which means that living British citizens helped pay to end the slave trade.”

 

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/29/slavery-abolition-compensation-when-will-britain-face-up-to-its-crimes-against-humanity

 

https://www.jamaicaglobalonline.com/kamala-harris-jamaican-heritage/

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton_Brown

 

 

Edited November 9, 2020 by Golden Retriever

[EnigmaticWorld]

 

 

The White Slaves of Barbary North Africa and the Ottoman Empire
http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-white-slaves-of-barbary-north-africa-and-the-ottoman-empire/

[Golden Retriever]

Out of likes Eng.

 

A disproportionate amount of people involved in the Black Slave trade were Jewish. That's a fact which has and continues to

be suppressed by Government, media and education.

 

No wonder the Jewish Rothschilds and Jewish Montefiores lent the money to the British Government to compensate the disproportionate

Jewish people involved in slavery after abolition. The British taxpayer paid this money WITH INTEREST UP TO 2015.

 

I will find information from a FOI request to confirm this later.

 

 

 

Edited November 9, 2020 by Golden Retriever

[Golden Retriever]

 

[EnigmaticWorld]

I used to think it was strange that Germantown settlers were the first to protest against African American slavery, but now it makes total sense. My TV lied about the German spirit.

[TheAwakened]

I found out about this a couple weeka ago when a Black British Academic was having a debate on Good Morning Britain. I was shocked to my bones.

 

I knew the slave owners were compensated, I knew no apology was said by the British state but i didn't know we contributed to the payments up until 5 years ago.

 

I'm Caribbean this hits my soul its so disheartening to know that legacies of the slave trade keeps cropping up. I do try to empower myself and understand that self-agency is important but even this has its limits.

 

What if that compensation scheme was redirected to offspring of the enslaved People? How might my life be different. 

 

But it doesn't just affect my group this affects all of humanity. Working class Brits who find the trade sickening to the core have paid their taxes to this evil scheme? 

 

Why don't BLM talk about THIS? WHY? 

 

Such superficial situations get pushed like a Black criminal being stopped and search too many times but not where it matters? 

 

Bloody Haiti has been paying France colonial tax and nestle has been complacent with proxy child slavery in West Africa. What about all this?

 

It sickens me. 

 

The enemy is "them" the elites the evil wicked people. They only pretend to us that these issues are dead and buried.

[EnigmaticWorld]

8 minutes ago, TheAwakened said:

I found out about this a couple weeka ago when a Black British Academic was having a debate on Good Morning Britain. I was shocked to my bones.

 

I knew the slave owners were compensated, I knew no apology was said by the British state but i didn't know we contributed to the payments up until 5 years ago.

 

I'm Caribbean this hits my soul its so disheartening to know that legacies of the slave trade keeps cropping up. I do try to empower myself and understand that self-agency is important but even this has its limits.

 

What if that compensation scheme was redirected to offspring of the enslaved People? How might my life be different. 

 

But it doesn't just affect my group this affects all of humanity. Working class Brits who find the trade sickening to the core have paid their taxes to this evil scheme? 

 

Why don't BLM talk about THIS? WHY? 

 

Such superficial situations get pushed like a Black criminal being stopped and search too many times but not where it matters? 

 

Bloody Haiti has been paying France colonial tax and nestle has been complacent with proxy child slavery in West Africa. What about all this?

 

It sickens me. 

 

The enemy is "them" the elites the evil wicked people. They only pretend to us that these issues are dead and buried.

 

So true pal.

 

I still remember Rubio celebrating as Gaddafi got sodomized by a knife.

 

 

Now young black men are being sold in slave markets in Libya. We're ruled by demons, I swear.

[Michael]

Im actually out of words.

This makes you speechless.

[Golden Retriever]

1 hour ago, TheAwakened said:

I found out about this a couple weeka ago when a Black British Academic was having a debate on Good Morning Britain. I was shocked to my bones.

 

I knew the slave owners were compensated, I knew no apology was said by the British state but i didn't know we contributed to the payments up until 5 years ago.

 

I'm Caribbean this hits my soul its so disheartening to know that legacies of the slave trade keeps cropping up. I do try to empower myself and understand that self-agency is important but even this has its limits.

 

What if that compensation scheme was redirected to offspring of the enslaved People? How might my life be different. 

 

But it doesn't just affect my group this affects all of humanity. Working class Brits who find the trade sickening to the core have paid their taxes to this evil scheme? 

 

Why don't BLM talk about THIS? WHY? 

 

Such superficial situations get pushed like a Black criminal being stopped and search too many times but not where it matters? 

 

Bloody Haiti has been paying France colonial tax and nestle has been complacent with proxy child slavery in West Africa. What about all this?

 

It sickens me. 

 

The enemy is "them" the elites the evil wicked people. They only pretend to us that these issues are dead and buried.

 

 

More information for you.  I don't think Wikipedia are up to date on Freedom of Information request. I'll post later. I have to admit I don't know

about gilts, can other members bring more information to light?

 

Slave Compensation Act 1837

 

The Slave Compensation Act 1837 (1 & 2 Vict. c. 3) was an Act of Parliament in the United Kingdom, signed into law on 23 December 1837.

Payments of the bonds to the descendants of creditors was only finalised in 2015 when the British Government decided to modernise the gilt portfolio by redeeming all remaining undated gilts. The long gap between this money being borrowed and its repayment was due to the type of financial instrument that was used, rather than the amount of money borrowed.^]

 

After decades of campaigning, the Slavery Abolition Act had been passed in 1833. The plantation owners in the Caribbean, represented by the London Society of West India Planters and Merchants (now the West India Committee), had opposed abolition. This 1837 Act paid substantial money to the former slave owners, but nothing to the newly liberated people.

 

Slave owners were paid approximately £20 million in compensation in over 40,000 awards for enslaved people freed in the colonies of the Caribbean, Mauritius and the Cape of Good Hope according to a government census that named all owners as of 1 August 1834.

 

University College London has set up a project Legacies of British Slave-ownership which aims to list the individuals who received compensation. They estimate that somewhere between 10-20% of Britain's wealthy can be identified as having had significant links to slavery.  University College London has been pursuing the case with The Centre for the Study of the Legacies of British Slave-ownership at the university. Dr Nicholas Draper from UCL, in his book, The Price of Emancipation: Slave-Ownership, Compensation and British Society at the End of Slavery, states that “Nathan Rothschild and his brother-in-law Moses Montefiore led a syndicate underwriting the issue of three new series of securities to raise £15 million: we don’t know how much they distributed or sub-underwrote. A further £5 million was paid out directly in government stock.

 

Since 2018 numerous freedom of information act requests have been sent to the British Government and Bank of England for the names of those who were paid with the bonds, of which all were denied.

 

The Centre for the Study of the Legacies of British Slave-ownership was created to research its effects"

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_Compensation_Act_1837

 

 

Edited November 9, 2020 by Golden Retriever

[Golden Retriever]

Freedom of Information Act 2000: Slavery Abolition Act 1833 Thank you for your Freedom of Information enquiry of 5January2018.You asked for the following information:“... ’In 1833, Britain used 40% of its national budget to buy freedom for all slaves in the Empire. Britain borrowed such a large sum of money for the Slavery Abolition Act that it wasn't paid off until 2014. This means that living British citizens helped pay for the ending of the slave trade with their taxes'. i] Is it true in 1833 Britain used 40% if it budget to buy freedom for slaves in the Empire? ii] Can you confirm that the borrowed money for the Abolition Act was only paid off in 2014?”I can confirm that HM Treasury does holdinformation within the scope of your request.The Government used£20 million to fund the SlaveryAbolition Act1833.In 1833, this was equivalent to approximately 40% of the Government’s total annual expenditure. This information is available online.Information on the compensation payable under the SlaveryAbolition Act 1833 can be found here:http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11249Information on the UK’s Budget in 1833 can be found on tab A27 of the Bank of England’s ‘A millennium of macroeconomic data’ spreadsheet, which can be found here: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/statistics/research-datasetsIn answering your second question, it may be useful to explain how the UK Government’sborrowing works. The majority of Government borrowing is financed through the issuance of UK Government bonds known as gilts by the Debt Management Office (DMO) and as such, the majority of the Government’sdebt is held in gilts. A gilt is a financial instrument that pays coupons (interest payments) twice per year to the holder of the gilt, up to and including the date on which the amount borrowed is finally repaid. Gilts are typically sold to large investment banks which, in turn, sell the gilts on to end-investors. These banks are known as the Gilt-Edged Market Makers and consist of 19 firms.The Slavery Abolition Act (1835)Loan was rolled over into the Government’s gilt programme, ultimately into an undated gilt, the 4% Consolidated Loan (1957 or after). The term ‘undated’refers to the fact that this gilt was issued with an earliest potential redemption dateof 1957, but it was not compulsory for the gilt to be redeemed at this date. The 4% Consolidated Loan was redeemed on 1February 2015, as part of the Government’s decision to modernise the gilt portfolio by redeemingall remaining undated gilts. More information about undatedgilts can be found on the DMO’s website here: http://www.dmo.gov.uk/responsibilities/gilt-market/about-gilts/Money borrowed to fund the Slavery Abolition Act (1835) was therefore fully repaid in 2015. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/680456/FOI2018-00186_-_Slavery_Abolition_Act_1833_-_pdf_for_disosure_log__003_.pdf

Edited November 9, 2020 by Golden Retriever

[TheAwakened]

I don't know what to think anymore. Its like Jews are in the centre of everything  - especially the Rothschilds. 

[Golden Retriever]

18 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

Freedom of Information Act 2000: Slavery Abolition Act 1833 Thank you for your Freedom of Information enquiry of 5January2018.You asked for the following information:“... ’In 1833, Britain used 40% of its national budget to buy freedom for all slaves in the Empire. Britain borrowed such a large sum of money for the Slavery Abolition Act that it wasn't paid off until 2014. This means that living British citizens helped pay for the ending of the slave trade with their taxes'. i] Is it true in 1833 Britain used 40% if it budget to buy freedom for slaves in the Empire? ii] Can you confirm that the borrowed money for the Abolition Act was only paid off in 2014?”I can confirm that HM Treasury does holdinformation within the scope of your request.The Government used£20 million to fund the SlaveryAbolition Act1833.In 1833, this was equivalent to approximately 40% of the Government’s total annual expenditure. This information is available online.Information on the compensation payable under the SlaveryAbolition Act 1833 can be found here:http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11249Information on the UK’s Budget in 1833 can be found on tab A27 of the Bank of England’s ‘A millennium of macroeconomic data’ spreadsheet, which can be found here: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/statistics/research-datasetsIn answering your second question, it may be useful to explain how the UK Government’sborrowing works. The majority of Government borrowing is financed through the issuance of UK Government bonds known as gilts by the Debt Management Office (DMO) and as such, the majority of the Government’sdebt is held in gilts. A gilt is a financial instrument that pays coupons (interest payments) twice per year to the holder of the gilt, up to and including the date on which the amount borrowed is finally repaid. Gilts are typically sold to large investment banks which, in turn, sell the gilts on to end-investors. These banks are known as the Gilt-Edged Market Makers and consist of 19 firms.The Slavery Abolition Act (1835)Loan was rolled over into the Government’s gilt programme, ultimately into an undated gilt, the 4% Consolidated Loan (1957 or after). The term ‘undated’refers to the fact that this gilt was issued with an earliest potential redemption dateof 1957, but it was not compulsory for the gilt to be redeemed at this date. The 4% Consolidated Loan was redeemed on 1February 2015, as part of the Government’s decision to modernise the gilt portfolio by redeemingall remaining undated gilts. More information about undatedgilts can be found on the DMO’s website here: http://www.dmo.gov.uk/responsibilities/gilt-market/about-gilts/Money borrowed to fund the Slavery Abolition Act (1835) was therefore fully repaid in 2015. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/680456/FOI2018-00186_-_Slavery_Abolition_Act_1833_-_pdf_for_disosure_log__003_.pdf

 

The above is difficult to edit to make easier to read, but basically it's a reply from the UK Government to a FOI request contained within a PDF document

which confirms the loans given by Rothschilds and Montefiores to the British Governments at interest, circa

1833 to compensate Slave owners etc were only repaid by the British taxpayer in 2015. Bloody hell. Do the goyim know?

 

 

Edited November 9, 2020 by Golden Retriever

[zArk]

Incredible to read that the uk gov 

1. Committed to abolish slavery but dodnt cost the repirations 

2. The reprirations were funded by Rothschild

3. Uk gov became an accessory after the fact by giving the reprirations to the running at a loss slave traders

 

The jewish link is interesting as Aaron and Moses had slaves (jews) build Amarna. The slaves that survived scattered into the Norh and South , palestine and Ethiopia

 

The rastafarians would be the children of these slaves and jews of (modern) jerusalem would be the slaves also

 

The children of Aaron and Moses are most likely the rothschilds , sic red coats, the gali high priests. 

 

Just so its clear the 'jew' influence is less jew and more Atenist, more transsexual, more eunuch, more inbred degenerate 

 

[rideforever]

Slavery and racism today is rife in Africa.

The blacks sold from Africa to the European mariners ... those blacks were not any black people ... they were low cast black people.  That's why they were being slaved.   And still continues today.

If slavery was used by the Europeans for 300 years ... well it's a small thing.  Still it continues over in Africa .. and the Middle East ... and other places.

 

Only in the Christian world is there even the concept of getting rid of it.

Why then should white Christians be ashamed ?
They are the only people on the planet who have abolished it, they should be proud.

 

As for "colonialism" ... the Briish invented a legal system that allowed people to exit the feudal world have their own property.  Unheard of.  Colonialism was part of the mechanism for instituting a world culture based on private property; a change of consciousness basically.

So when you see the British sailing around the world they were exiting their own slavery.

Again be proud of that.

Today around the world the British legal system is used because it is the most respected on the planet.

Another incredible thing.

 

And as for India ... India didn't even exist before the British got there.   It was a giant mess of decaying princes riding around on elephants with gold suits.

Even today what works in India?  The roads railways and civli service ... all created largely by the British ... only an insane idealistic people could have sorted India out.

India today with more than 1 Billion of people would never survive without what the British did in only 90 years.   And btw the Mughal Empire that was dying begged the British to administer the country.

Actually the British only went there to trade ... and that's all the administration was about, they were not thieves but traders and had huge networks of trade relationships with Indian people.

All such things were unheard of India ... neither was the law or organised society.

It was 2500 years since the Vedic culture of India existed, a great time ... but long ago.

Today the entire world is doing YOGA ... why?  Because Britain loved India, and not only gave it's greatest graduates from oxford/cambridge to the Indian Civil Service but also loved Indian culture.

The Mughals from Persian have stained the entire Indian culture especially in the North.

And why are there Muslims in India ?   Because of the Mughals.

Britain never did that.   It did not wish to own India, nor breed with India, nor set up a dynasty, nor stain the blood lines.

It was just there to trade but ended up administering the country as the Mughals were so shit that they begged the Brits to do it.

 

The current anti British mentality coming from India is intended only for British audiences.

In India itself most people have a very good memories of the British.

And the new Indian confidence is only based on the injection of foreign dollars which will destroy the country.

The British didn't destroy india, they sent their best men to administer it ... and they did a very very good job.

Like our railways and sewers, built by the Victorians, that era was made of solid stuff.

 

The British were a great people.

But satan is rising and demands the greatest people cut their own heads off.

Such is the world.

 

[rideforever]

Another fundamental perspective on Slavery is this:

... we are all slaves.  Always.  Everything is.

Do you think a carrot wants to be eaten?  It is your slave.

Is that a problem?

 

Freedom doesn't mean shit.  Freedom from what exactly?  From breathing?   From the earth under your feet?

So you say to yourself "I am so free I am not a slave" ... it's just nonsense.

You are totally enslaved to many things you never chose.

And that you will never escape from.

 

And this all masks a greater truth, and that is meaninglessness.

Do you do anything meaningful in your life?

So you work for a company, will you turn up with a f-u-face every day.  Is that how you are going to play it?

For who is that useful?

Can you not see that the company was built by one man, and it shelters you with a job, and you are paid ... can you not give a good account of yourself?

 

That is your only real freedom ... to choose to be an honest man.  To give.

Taking, anyone can do.

But can you give?

 

That is your choice.

And you can choose not to ... for whatever reason.

You can choose to see everything in the worst way.

Or you can ... just try.

 

Here is a situation today ... I will try to do something useful with it.

Nothing more, nothing idealistic, nothing final, nothing permanent.

Nothing forever.

Just here I am ... and I ask myself what is the best thing that can be done with this situation.

 

That is freedom.   To come to some decision about that and then do it.

To not just drift through feeling pissed off.

Dreaming of the evils of "slavery" and the joy of "freedom" and all mindless dreaming.

 

That is a higher perspective on the whole issue.

Even if you wish to enter the light and merge with God ... you will have to normally have a teacher, who will help you.

And so on.

 

We breathe ... inhale ... exhale.   We are never free of anything.

But can we breathe well?

Even God is not free.   Does he not have a shit load of things to do everywhere in the universe?

And you think you are tired ...

 

 

[Golden Retriever]

 

[Golden Retriever]

14 hours ago, WanderingMinds said:

 

To avoid lawsuits and prison time, does The Great Reset (ie. Agenda 2030) partially have to do with governments around the world and Big Corporations working together to "wipe the slate clean"? Watch Video Here

 

 

 

Agenda 30 and the Great Reset are pushing the "green" agenda with electric and hybrid cars having COBALT batteries. There will be

even more mining of Cobalt and I doubt very much if the Corporations worldwide, nor the Government of the Congo will pay a fair price

to the workers, nor improve there diabolical working conditions.

 

Boris Johnson announced last week he wants by 2030 all new cars produced to be electric.  The Chancellor is expected

to hike tax on petrol and diesel in the coming weeks, as a starter to reduce the hundreds of billions of pounds deficit stolen

from the taxpayer in the COVID ROBBERY. Lose, lose for everyone, except the bankers, pharmaceuticals and mega corporations.

 

[Golden Retriever]

On 11/9/2020 at 3:19 PM, TheAwakened said:

What if that compensation scheme was redirected to offspring of the enslaved People? How might my life be different. 

 

But it doesn't just affect my group this affects all of humanity. Working class Brits who find the trade sickening to the core have paid their taxes to this evil scheme? 

 

Why don't BLM talk about THIS? WHY? 

 

Because the people funding Black Lives Matter in the main are Marxist Jews. They imo would like to see more racial tensions between

black and white.

 

Malcolm X knew the score.  The videos of him speaking about this have long since been deleted by the "Ministry of Truth", but

here is some archived audio.

 

Malcolm X on Jewish Economic Control & Censorship

https://archive.org/details/httpsarchive.orgmalcolmxoneconmics

 

The Tribal Roots of ANTIFA

https://www.bitchute.com/video/14GKj5vD7qQ/

 

 

 

[EnigmaticWorld]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[EnigmaticWorld]

[Macnamara]

In the times of the crusades the biggest slave markets were in egypt where there was a 1 million strong jewish colony. There was also the grand lodge of cairo.

 

The childrens crusade was whipped up by some travelling trouble makers who went around europe pouring stupid ideas into the heads of children which tempted them to go on a crusade. Thousands of them were put onto boats and taken to sea believing they were traveling to the holy land under the protection of god and instead the traders sold them at sea to muslim corsairs who took them to the slave markets of egypt. I have a sneaky suspicion of who those traders were behind that betrayal

 

In the end there were so many white slaves in egypt that they were able to rise up and take the country over. They were called the mamlukes

 

Muslim corsairs from northern africa would raid europe as far as the coasts of england and snatch people to sell in the slave markets. Sometimes they would raid entire villages.

 

I don't know when the reparations will be paid for all this.

Edited July 5, 2021 by Macnamara

[EnigmaticWorld]

 

[EnigmaticWorld]

Holy shit.

 

 

[Steelpie]

Racism in the old days wasnt about blacks or whites for most parts, it was based on countries/cultures but mainly religion and greed.
During the 1400s, the Portuguese had begun to enslave Africans, so they were the first whites recorded to take slaves from africa, but that was in small numbers though. Muslim slave caravans brought some black Africans across the Sahara, but very few of these unfortunates ended up in Europe. And the vikings sold british slaves to muslims. Meaning white people were sold as slaves to non white people. And in medieval times most slaves in Europe were white. And dont get me started on ancient rome, egypt, greece for an example. The slaves that were enslaved in africa and brought to america where from other black people that sold them to white people.
According to a large census known as the Domesday Book, in 1086, 10% of the population of England were slaves with some areas up to as many as 20%, all whites. So yes they are dividing you all with this race bullshit that angers you with so much negativity. Racism is so small today, if people would simple stop searching for it everywhere, and stop feeding it then it would slowly go away. Let say a human is born in India, that person would probably become a Hindu. If someone is born in Israel, that person would probably become a Jew. If someone is born and rasied into a nazi family, the chance are very big that the kid would become one himself. People should not be so fast to judge other humans as of today.
How about the native american indians, that were killed in their own country by Europeens. That history is way worse than the african slave trade if you ask me. They erased almost every native people, took over the land, forced those that were still alive to live in specific areas.
They are waging a war against humanity with a weapon called FEAR and NEGATIVITY. The most powerfull tool there is to destroy a human. Fear have a great impact on the human heart. A person that is angry all the time, shorten their lives by 1/3 in statistics. Its not just about racism, but so many other things, people really need to get in touch with their higher self and stay away from false information that brainwases them. Anger is never the answer, as that makes people dumb, and it will destroy you.

 

While im here writing i can put in some other none topic info also!

 

Global warming do not exist!
The sun has different cycles just like everything else, these cycles last for about 400 years. We just ended what was called the little ice age that lasted for 400 years. Now it will be warmer for about 300-400 years. But thats just normal. The carbon dioxide emitted by humans is below 1%. 95%+ comes from water vapor and condensation from clouds as it always been. But clearly none of you hear it, for some weird reason.
We just ended the little ice age that lasted for around 400 years from the 14th century to the 18th century. During the middle ages they had the same warm weather that we are facing today. Yes that is documented. Its getting warmer now for about 300-400 years to come, its the suns cycle and not global warming, thats why it gets warmer and warmer each year. Poor humanity if they are being brainwashed for 300 years to come that global warming is the reason for the warm weather, keeping the humanity in fear. But wonder what they will say when its getting colder again, that the sun is dying due to other climate changes? But they can put out the global warming card to scare people and make money out of it from the ignorance of humanity. While in reality its just normal, yes the sun also have different cycles, just like everything else. Or you all actually belive that the sun is dead and is the only thing without cycles in this universe?
Do you all also belive that the earth have always looked like it does today? The earth is a living thing, it changes after a long periode of time. The land is moving all the time! The only thing school and media does, is creating more stupid humans.

 

The Earth is also changing, the land is moving for an instance and its just normal. The land on this earth have not always looked like it does today. The Earth is a living thing. Its not that complicated as you all make it out to be. Earth like evervything else do change after a long time. Every year Hawaii moves further away from united states towards Russia as an example. Indias land are moving up towards the himalayas each year by 4 centimeters.
The thing is we need more Vegetation. We humans have always lived alongside the nature, no generation have ever lived like our generation have with the comfort that goes with it. (As we know of today). We simple need more vegetation, thats the main reason the water level and rivers have gone down so much. We have no vegetation to hold the water in high soil. So now it steam down so far down in the earth, its destroying it and take away it nutriciens.
For an example much of Indias soil are becoming deserts thanks to this, and that is a huge problem. For 20 years ago people would find water just a few feet down the soil, but today they have to dig more than 40 feet in many areas. Might also explaine the increase in earthquakes around the globe (Theory)" as the land is moving all the time anyway. Its not only the surface that is changing thanks to the vegetation lost, its also the deep earth, that is not normally use to that much waterflow. If we fix our rivers in the next 8 years we could make them go from 40 up to a 67-68% increase in just 20 years. But if we on other hand wait 20 years to fix it, the same amount of water increase would take up to 120 years. For 20 years ago most of the soil we grew food on had a good nutritions base on about 2% today its less than 0,5% in many places thanks to the water level decreasing as of vegetation is being destroyed. Soon we wont be able to even grow food in the soil. Time you all start thinking for yourselfs, and not what you are being told.
Without the vegetation we will slowly die. We need to replant this planet and that is fast. If the insect would die out for an example, we humans would be dead within 18 months. The insect population have gone down 50% the last 20 years (Well these numbers are really hard to get correct). But Time to realise that most of you people who want a change is being manupulated with stories after stories. This is important, and it has nothing to do with global warming. Instead of taking tons of money for global warming that only goes into their pockets as its made up, they should start using it by replanting this planet, and stop demolishing the nature at this speed. Thats the problem we are facing, and not global warming.

 

Try telling someone that everything that person might belive he knows could all be wrong. Impossible!
So you or anyone today knows what happend 130,000 years ago? Seriously?, we hardly know what happend 500 years ago. Theories nothing else, humans always have to put an understanding into everything, even how wrong it is. Take big bang for an example, thats being teached out in schools as solid facts. Illussions and theories is what most of our knowledge is based upon. Take iron for an instance (Fe) from Latin: (ferrum), we do know what we can use it for. We also know how to manipulate it in some ways. But do anyone really know what that material is? All we know is what another human have classifided it as. Just so we can uderstand the material better, but in reality we have no clue what it really is, just what we can use it for to certain points. And thoughts like this is hard for people to understand, as humans always need to have an understanding of everything. All im saying is stop beliving everything you read. Today is all about read and repeat and it have nothing to do with intellect, just how much you care to learn what another human have said.
Most things we humans think we know, might be all wrong. As its most guessing and trying to put an understanding into everything so we easily can understand it. And the endless of brainwashing does not make it any easier. An example on false history teaching that is actually easy to look up, is about Christopher Columbus. He was not the first to discover America, Vikings and even Chinese were there first if you dont count the allready living native indians that did roam these lands. (As we know it of today).  Columbus killed and mutilated over 200.000 people in south america. He threw people to hungry dogs for his amusement, he sold kids as sexslaves, he was a major pedophile. He was a real evil person. And Americans celebrate Columbus day? I used this example with Columbus, as that is an easy one to look up without having to travel or search for old documents and signs.
Also and now they go out with "science facts" that the rainforest is bad for humans as it have hundreds of plants that cause cancer to humans, so its allright to cut it down. Thats for beliving in these so called false scientists. The planet will take a hard blow if the rainforest dissapear. Propaganda, and brainwashing everywhere im telling you. Let say mother Earth is a living thing, which it is. Let say the oil is the earths blood, and the rainforests is the breathing system of this planet. (Just go along its just a fun theory, nothing else). What would happend if the oil and the rainforest never recover again? That would mean the death of this planet.

 

 

Edited August 12, 2021 by Steelpie

[Golden Retriever]

On 11/9/2020 at 2:36 PM, Golden Retriever said:

Out of likes Eng.

 

A disproportionate amount of people involved in the Black Slave trade were Jewish. That's a fact which has and continues to

be suppressed by Government, media and education.

 

No wonder the Jewish Rothschilds and Jewish Montefiores lent the money to the British Government to compensate the disproportionate

Jewish people involved in slavery after abolition. The British taxpayer paid this money WITH INTEREST UP TO 2015.

 

I will find information from a FOI request to confirm this later.

 

 

 

 

Here is the FOI.

 

https://taxjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/FOI2018-00186_-_Slavery_Abolition_Act_1833_-_pdf_for_disclosure_log__003_-2-1.pdf