GCHQ To Censor All anti-Vaccination Information

[jesuitsdidit]

 

 

 

https://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUKKBN27O0XP

 

 

SUN NOV 8, 2020 / 11:30 PM GMT

Britain's GCHQ to wage cyber war on anti-vaccine propaganda - The Times

 

•  
•  
•  

(Reuters) - Britain's GCHQ has begun an offensive cyber-operation to tackle anti-vaccine propaganda being spread by hostile states, The Times reported.

This latest move by GCHQ, which gathers communications from around the world to identify and disrupt threats to Britain, is an attempt to counter disinformation activities linked to Russia, the report said.

 

[Macnamara]

They don't want us discussing the truth about vaccines...

 

Why are vaccine manufacturers the only people protected from being sued by people who their product damages? Could it be that vaccines damage so many children that the vaccine companies would have been sued out of existence by now if they had not been protected by corrupt governments?

 

Meanwhile most vaccine damaged kids are not allowed to pursue compensation in the vaccine courts and yet despite this over $4 BILLION have been paid out to vaccine damaged children in the US alone!

 

The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) to ensure that children were quickly, compassionately and fairly compensated for vaccine injuries. The 1986 Act, passed by Congress and signed into law by President Ronald Reagan, effectively granted vaccine manufacturers freedom from civil tort liability. A petitioner who asserts that their child has suffered a vaccine injury must file a petition for compensation against the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the NVICP.

The Secretary of HHS is defended by DOJ attorneys from the Civil Torts Branch. As originally conceived, the NVICP was intended to a be a non-litigious compensation program that was supposed to lean toward fairly compensating vaccine-injured children. Petitioners were to meet a “preponderance of the evidence” level of proof to establish that a vaccine injury occurred to merit compensation. This burden of proof is much less than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard that must be met in a criminal proceeding. However, the program has not functioned as Congress envisioned and now functions in a manner that many observers feel is not favorable to petitioners.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...m-proceedings/

[DarianF]

On 11/9/2020 at 12:47 PM, Macnamara said:

They don't want us discussing the truth about vaccines...

 

Why are vaccine manufacturers the only people protected from being sued by people who their product damages? Could it be that vaccines damage so many children that the vaccine companies would have been sued out of existence by now if they had not been protected by corrupt governments?

 

Meanwhile most vaccine damaged kids are not allowed to pursue compensation in the vaccine courts and yet despite this over $4 BILLION have been paid out to vaccine damaged children in the US alone!

 

The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) to ensure that children were quickly, compassionately and fairly compensated for vaccine injuries. The 1986 Act, passed by Congress and signed into law by President Ronald Reagan, effectively granted vaccine manufacturers freedom from civil tort liability. A petitioner who asserts that their child has suffered a vaccine injury must file a petition for compensation against the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the NVICP.

The Secretary of HHS is defended by DOJ attorneys from the Civil Torts Branch. As originally conceived, the NVICP was intended to a be a non-litigious compensation program that was supposed to lean toward fairly compensating vaccine-injured children. Petitioners were to meet a “preponderance of the evidence” level of proof to establish that a vaccine injury occurred to merit compensation. This burden of proof is much less than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard that must be met in a criminal proceeding. However, the program has not functioned as Congress envisioned and now functions in a manner that many observers feel is not favorable to petitioners.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...m-proceedings/

 

"Any decision to roll out mass vaccination programmes for unlicensed COVID-19 vaccines, or indeed any pandemic disease treatments, will be taken nationally, not by the individual companies manufacturing or marketing the product.The current legal framework already recognises that if manufacturers or healthcare professionals are asked to supply an unlicensed medicine in response to a public health threat, it is unfair also to ask them to take responsibility for the consequences of the use of that medicine in the way that they normally would." https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/distributing-vaccines-and-treatments-for-covid-19-and-flu/consultation-document-changes-to-human-medicine-regulations-to-support-the-rollout-of-covid-19-vaccines#civil-liability-and-immunity

[numnuts]

Wow, Russia sure did a great job of recruiting millions of U.K. citizens to work for them online. Where do I hand myself in then? I suppose I will have to surrender my price of 30 rubles too? Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear...  I take it that what they really meant to say was 'Britain's GCHQ has begun an offensive cyber-operation to tackle anti-vaccine propaganda 'supposedly created' by hostile states and being spread by anyone online; not 'Britain's GCHQ has begun an offensive cyber-operation to tackle anti-vaccine propaganda being spread by hostile states'. That's a case of being disingenuous at its finest. Luckily, for them, they had numnuts at the ready to issue an honest translation.

 

On a more serious note, I have very recently, yet again, been subjected to direct interference as a consequence of simply airing my personal opinions, which are solely based on the common sense I was born with. It can't be a coincidence and there can be no greater tyranny and treason than that. Their Nuremberg moments will come, soon enough, and I will be right there in attendance when it happens. No excuses, as 'only following orders' certainly doesn't qualify, and see you soon chaps. You fully deserve all that's coming to you. Cheers.      

Edited November 10, 2020 by numnuts

[numnuts]

7 minutes ago, DarianF said:

"Any decision to roll out mass vaccination programmes for unlicensed COVID-19 vaccines, or indeed any pandemic disease treatments, will be taken nationally, not by the individual companies manufacturing or marketing the product. The current legal framework already recognises that if manufacturers or healthcare professionals are asked to supply an unlicensed medicine in response to a public health threat, it is unfair also to ask them to take responsibility for the consequences of the use of that medicine in the way that they normally would."

 

Not if the manufacturer has still deemed it appropriate to describe the medicine as 'safe' it isn't.

[DarianF]

"Currently there is a prohibition on promoting an unlicensed medicine to healthcare professionals and the public. The UK government is proposing that this prohibition is disapplied to allow (subject to the other restrictions in the HMRs) advertising of any temporarily authorised products under regulation 174, including a COVID-19 vaccine." https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/distributing-vaccines-and-treatments-for-covid-19-and-flu/consultation-document-changes-to-human-medicine-regulations-to-support-the-rollout-of-covid-19-vaccines#vaccine-promotion

 

Literally legalising mass propaganda.

[DarianF]

4 minutes ago, numnuts said:

 

Not if the manufacturer has still deemed it appropriate to describe the medicine as 'safe' it isn't.

 

Yes here is the big problem. Who makes the decision on whether the vaccine is "safe". Is there stringent independent oversight, or do we just take the manufacturer's word for it? What is their incentive to tell the truth, if they are not liable for harm? The whole thing BEGS for corruption. It's a disgrace.

Edited November 10, 2020 by DarianF
Typo

[numnuts]

9 minutes ago, DarianF said:

The whole thing BEGS for corruption. It's a disgrace.

 

It's a mega-bonanza that only the greatest Cunt Chieftains going could ever dream of. Just study Hancock's face closely, whenever you next see the little piece of faeces sitting in the House Of Commons, on TV. You can just tell that he has already been promised loads of shady goodies!

Edited November 10, 2020 by numnuts

[DarianF]

2 minutes ago, numnuts said:

 

It's a mega-bonanza that only the greatest Cunt Chieftains going could ever dream of. Just study Hancock's face closely, whenever you next see the little piece of faeces sitting in the House Of Commons on TV. You can just tell that he has already been promised loads of shady goodies!

 

The same scumbag who says 'follow Covid rules or they will get tougher'? ( https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-54221953 ) Yep, a typical little man making big threats.

[Macnamara]

5 hours ago, DarianF said:

"Any decision to roll out mass vaccination programmes for unlicensed COVID-19 vaccines, or indeed any pandemic disease treatments, will be taken nationally, not by the individual companies manufacturing or marketing the product.The current legal framework already recognises that if manufacturers or healthcare professionals are asked to supply an unlicensed medicine in response to a public health threat, it is unfair also to ask them to take responsibility for the consequences of the use of that medicine in the way that they normally would." https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/distributing-vaccines-and-treatments-for-covid-19-and-flu/consultation-document-changes-to-human-medicine-regulations-to-support-the-rollout-of-covid-19-vaccines#civil-liability-and-immunity

 

yes the government will protect the corporations from any legal backlash for the damage that their vaccines ARE GOING TO CAUSE

 

Then you will have to try and seek redress from the state but the state has the police and army and will simply tell you in not so many words to crawl into a corner and die quietly. They will likely pay you a pittance in 'universal basic income' so that you may see out what will be left of your lifeterm after the vaccine has caused irreversible changes to your body

 

But there will be NO JUSTICE

Edited November 10, 2020 by Macnamara

[DarianF]

Just now, Macnamara said:

 

yes the government will protect the corporations from any legal backlash for the damage that their vaccines ARE GOING TO CAUSE

 

Then you will have to try and seek redress from the state but the state has the police and army and will simply tell you in not so many words to crawl into a corner and die quietly

 

Rolling out an unlicensed, experimental vaccine without legal recourse for victims. Well, what could possibly go wrong

[Macnamara]

Just now, DarianF said:

Rolling out an unlicensed, experimental vaccine without legal recourse for victims. Well, what could possibly go wrong

 

well if you are a normal human being with a family to care about then EVERYTHING can go wrong

 

If you are a psychopathic, statist who believes in diseugenics, population control and the creation of a technocratic gulag system then its a big WIN!