Woodsman Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 Shocking that assuming the PDF information is correct the UK Government is looking at using the Mental Health Act to force vaccines onto the population with those who are refusing and regardless of possible medical issues from this. Time to complain to the MP’s and some serious action to stop this nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAwakened Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 Do you have the PDF? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodsman Posted November 5, 2020 Author Share Posted November 5, 2020 I think it’s now on the news section of David Icke Website? I should add that last time I heard this I contacted some people I know who work high up in the NHS and was told this would not be allowed as consent has to be given from the person who is of sound mind and the UN regulations also state this must happen before a vaccine is given. (So I will check with them again) This might mean plans are to force vaccines on those who disagree with the policies and claim have mental health issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodsman Posted November 5, 2020 Author Share Posted November 5, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lake Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 (edited) All you need to do is keep an eye on this part of the Public Health 1984 act. If it ever changes then there is an issue! https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/22/section/45E Quote 45EMedical treatment (1)Regulations under section 45B or 45C may not include provision requiring a person to undergo medical treatment. (2) “ Medical treatment ” includes vaccination and other prophylactic treatment. By the way, according to that law, the enforcement of face coverings is NOT currently legal as it is a prophylactic treatment as defined in medical and law dictionary! Just keep an eye on that one! Edited November 5, 2020 by lake 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lake Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 To add YOU have to be "of sound mind" and able to make an informed decision. But I am not a fool. They WILL classify YOU as they wish and enforce that which they wish. It is all vastly more 'spiritual' than physical. You will, at some point, 'die' anyway .... Make it of meaning? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve H Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 20 minutes ago, Woodsman said: I think it’s now on the news section of David Icke Website? I should add that last time I heard this I contacted some people I know who work high up in the NHS and was told this would not be allowed as consent has to be given from the person who is of sound mind and the UN regulations also state this must happen before a vaccine is given. (So I will check with them again) This might mean plans are to force vaccines on those who disagree with the policies and claim have mental health issues. how do you define “sound mind” in the current paradigm? Everything is inverted so the truly sane people, ie those that are awake will be deemed to not have a sound mind. It’s all word play. I know, I’ve been fighting psychiatry for years. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Sawdust Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 How do you think I felt when I saw the numbers on the right side of this topic title a few moments ago? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northern star Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 1 hour ago, lake said: To add YOU have to be "of sound mind" and able to make an informed decision. But I am not a fool. They WILL classify YOU as they wish and enforce that which they wish. It is all vastly more 'spiritual' than physical. You will, at some point, 'die' anyway .... Make it of meaning? Just say you're a conspiracy theorist and they will immediately judge you to be not of sound mind. They cant have it both ways 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 50 minutes ago, lake said: You will, at some point, 'die' anyway .... Make it of meaning? This vaccine (mark of the beast) is about your soul, if you take it, you'll never be accepted into God's Kingdom b/c your DNA will have changed. It is only through our DNA (the blood) that God will recognize us. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lake Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 14 minutes ago, alexa said: It is only through our DNA (the blood) that God will recognize us. So you have a 'limited' god? You actually consider that 'God' would not have knowledge of YOU. The physical form is nothing .... Your actions and intent when within it are everything. “To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? Your 'god' is a small god .... I have no god, I am only an infinitesimal part of that which could be given no name by a man. The physical form will expire, it is just the intent that leads to that point. Do not be a coward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northern star Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 (edited) 43 minutes ago, alexa said: This vaccine (mark of the beast) is about your soul, if you take it, you'll never be accepted into God's Kingdom b/c your DNA will have changed. It is only through our DNA (the blood) that God will recognize us. Some non-believers may roll their eyes at this but I do believe there is a biblical war on for the human mind and soul and the changing of the DNA is the essential part of it. They want it all, and the human soul is the most precious, mysterious resource. We should be able to resist on religious grounds. They are trying to destroy religious experience too (Gates has admitted he wants to destroy the religious cortex in the human brain). If you look at this painting by Michelangelo, the part everyone looks at is the touching of the fingers, God giving life to man (the spark to make him a spiritual, rather than just a physical being) But look where his other hand is. The shape on the right is a human brain, and his other hand is where the pineal gland would be (note: protected by angels). Therefore God is the conduit linking man with his spiritual self and his soul. And its here they are trying to create the disconnect. It's a very mysterious gland, and they cant stand the mystery, something Gates and Co cannot control. It's our connection to thought, happiness, and light. A quote: "The pineal gland was once dubbed the “third eye,” which originated for many reasons, ranging from its location deep in the center of the brain to its connection to light. Also, the French philosopher and mathematician René Descartes was fascinated with the pineal gland. He even regarded it as the “principal seat of the soul, and the place in which all our thoughts are formed.” So, you can see why they are so keen to separate us from that which God gave us - our divine connection to God, to the light - a soul. Due to the Great Awakening, they are rapidly losing their grip on mind control. Thats why there is a rush to bring in a synthetic solution, a vaccine. Edited November 5, 2020 by northern star 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jojojo Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 Didn't they change it to only one doctor required to section you when the first lock down happened? I'm sure it's just a coincidence... 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 1 hour ago, Jojojo said: Didn't they change it to only one doctor required to section you when the first lock down happened? I'm sure it's just a coincidence... yes and of course the cabal would just make sure that a psychopathic doctor on their payroll is the one signing off on it all 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serpentine Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 (edited) UKColumn discussed this in Wednesday's edition. https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-4th-november-2020 Whole broadcast worth watching as ever but ~45 minute mark for this piece. Edited November 6, 2020 by serpentine 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mapman Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 The police have been gearing up to use this for a while. Watch PINAC YouTube channels (photography is not a crime) where you tubers are approached by the police for photographing them in public. They used to go all heavy handed “you can’t film me, you can’t film that” but have discovered that the law says that you are allowed to. Instead they now go to “are you alright? You seem distressed? Should we get the mental health crisis teams to talk to you?” It’s sick. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodsman Posted November 6, 2020 Author Share Posted November 6, 2020 I once spoke to a man who said he was with (a sound mind). I laughed and asked him how he knew this and he showed me a medical release certificate from a Mental Home signed from a doctor stating he was sane and with a sound mind. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy Sawdust Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 2 hours ago, Woodsman said: I once spoke to a man who said he was with (a sound mind). I laughed and asked him how he knew this and he showed me a medical release certificate from a Mental Home signed from a doctor stating he was sane and with a sound mind. How come they never gave me one of those when I was discharged? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowmoon Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 23 hours ago, Woodsman said: Time to complain to the MP’s Those shitheads will do nothing, they virtually all voted for this stuff all along. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyprusAvenue Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 Announced today that GPs will receive £12.58 per vaccine administered provided both doses have been given. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 23 hours ago, lake said: All you need to do is keep an eye on this part of the Public Health 1984 act. If it ever changes then there is an issue! https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/22/section/45E By the way, according to that law, the enforcement of face coverings is NOT currently legal as it is a prophylactic treatment as defined in medical and law dictionary! Just keep an eye on that one! "It is unlawful and unethical to force a vaccination or immunisation upon an individual against their will, even during a pandemic with the current laws" [ https://ministryofethics.co.uk/index.php?p=9&q=2 ]. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lake Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 1 minute ago, DarianF said: It is unlawful and unethical to force a vaccination or immunisation upon an individual against their will Yes it is unlawful but 'they' are NOT even working via their own rules. The promotion / enforcement of 'masks' is NOT legal according to their rules. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 1 minute ago, lake said: Yes it is unlawful but 'they' are NOT even working via their own rules. The promotion / enforcement of 'masks' is NOT legal according to their rules. Could a class action lawsuit be a potential solution? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lake Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 2 minutes ago, DarianF said: Could a class action lawsuit be a potential solution? I sadly doubt it. You cannot use their rules against them as they just change the rules or ignore you or use force. What do they not own or control? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarianF Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 1 minute ago, lake said: I sadly doubt it. You cannot use their rules against them as they just change the rules or ignore you or use force. What do they not own or control? They have to have a weakness somewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.