Hitler was framed by Jewish Lockheed Martin in afterlife as Parkinson disease doesn't come in 3 weeks?

[SoulcreatorGod]

G

Arnt use all in for a shock read this.... read it all before you reply or dismiss.

The Nazis are the Jewish that  hidden wavelength receptors mind control was used on Adolf Hitler? Do I have proof? Yes as the last 3 weeks of the war he got 9 years of Parkinson disease in 3 weeks? Only one footage of Adolf Hitler shaking was taken in the last 3 weeks. The CIA claim they just isn't any  fotage of him shacking? How on earth do you do that when there is 100drs if videos? Wtf CIA. Hitler was shacking uncontrollably in final 3 weeks that pro doctors have said was 100% Parkinson disease? How is this possible and there was mass video footage of Adolf Hitler in the month's and years before his death. The CIA claim they Nazis hide the footage of him shacking wtf? How on earth do you hide hundreds of videos of him not shacking in months to years before his death? Nope there is mass fotage and the CIA make no sense how they record him but hide 9 years of Parkinson disease... Idiot's.

Hitler got hit with full blown Parkinson disease because they took him off mind control. They only took him off mind control as proven diseases by the Hidden wavelength receptors called the hidden frontal lobes mind control can stop diseases but not edit DNA..So once off mind control wavelength signal to hidden frontal lobes, Hitler got hit with 9 years of Parkinson disease "because" as we have the proof he got it / 9 years of an disease in weeks 

Why take him off mind control for before he killed himself? Because of cyanide poisoning Everybody would have known it didn't work on him and new lots also....Adolf Hitler could not die from cyanide poisoning why on mind control.

Guy's are quantum computers with the brain being an computer with the proof that quantum computers contain electrons and atom's just like the brain does. The hidden wavelength receptors called the hidden frontal lobes is where your signal goes to and once you die you are uploded.

Read my post in 9/11 theory section up the Top called Who are the deep state? And why did the CIA so 9/11 for... After top part explaining that, it goes on to how I'm the Soul Creator God and how Lockheed Martin CEO in afterlife Lockheed Martin framed God causing more than ww11 he is now trying to say my weapon subconsciousness consciousness is double slit shot experiment caused  the Jewish to be killed.... It's an spiritual weapon and the mass murderer in the afterlife Lockheed Martin's ceo was trying to claim I caused the Jewish to be killed subconsciously consciously Hitler did it because the Jewish trying to wipe out God and subconsciously knew that...  Rubbish the xunts an mass murderer.

PS why does Lockheed Martin have the only true stealth fighter jet? Because Lockheed Martin afterlife brand down technology. The F-22 Raptor can't be exported because it's stealth...It can lock into enemy radar or jets and fire missiles and turn around not being detected at that distance away from lockon.

So really your saying Lockheed Martin made huge breakthrough in stealth jet fighter "+" lockon first breakthrough also? BS. Lockheed Martin in afterlife brand down technology 100%.

Edited November 2, 2020 by SoulcreatorGod

[Eldnah]

It looks like English

[Monoxide 321]

And did you know to make it way more suspicious, that the weather changed to the worst on record once they went in? Not only that but autumn was changed bring the weather way way forward to Winter time? Computer program yes indeed.

 

Way 2 many coincidence here.

 

I'm surprised the CIA haven't bribed the admin yet? They only did 9/11.

 

Reply if you can? You didn't reply to guy above that can't even understand basic English with some easy to correct errors.

 

Thanks for proving it I'm in shock. Can't believe there's an afterlife.

 

Makes sense why America has the only real Stealth fighter. They claimed the f-22 Raptor can't be detected because it can lockon and fire first without being detected? I see the evidence building up and up because they do have the world's only stealth fighter jet that not even the U.K can make.

Apparently Lockheed Martin was english U.K? Looks like it was an ploy because the Americans are the only country allowed to have that F-22 Raptor Stealth fighter. Very fishy that France and the U.K can't make one 20+ years after America did. Definitely afterlife technology brang down.

 

Thanks for huge proof.

Edited November 5, 2020 by Monoxide 321
Errors

[Eldnah]

1 hour ago, Monoxide 321 said:

they do have the world's only stealth fighter jet that not even the U.K can make.

Wrong not having done so is differrent to cannot do, consider Ignoring that stealth isnt binary and lots of aircraft have low observable attributes (eg Typhoon - Rafale)

 

1) Google BAE Replica - The UK demonstrated that it could build a stealth fighter having the production base and required skills in design - thats why its a Tier 3 partner in F35 - thus saving money going it alone in a harrier / Tornado replacement.

 

2) UK is now developing Tempest with  a UK designed stealth fighter to replace Typhoon - unfortunatly Japan opted out but I believe its partnered with Italy and possibly Sweeden. 

3) France are doing the same with Germany

 

2 and 3 are because whilst everyone was happy to join with F35 (except France) the European countries do not want the US to have total domination of the fighter market and more importantly they do not wish to lose all those high tech skills in design and manufacture now that Typhoon and Rafale are finished (in terms of design) 

 

Theres also UK and EU stealth Drone designs 

 

As you can see That neither France or UK and indeed several others are going it alone in down to the massive costs involved not a lack of technical ability.

Never mind that both Russia and China are designing Stealth Aircraft 

 

Nor that the UK may well lead the US in the SSN and ASW stakes - equally high tech and possibly more demanding than aircraft design

 

In short the conclusive proof is built upon a false premise - that stealth = something majic only the US can do. It really isnt regardless of LMs marketing claims.

Edited November 5, 2020 by Eldnah

[Monoxide 321]

That's so funny because they are stealth for a less distance?

 

Knowbody can match Lockheed Martin's afterlife technology and it's why the F-22 raptor can't be exported?

 

Sorry these other jet fighters are all stealth to an distance. What's the point of having an stealth fighter that can be seen by radar before you can destroy it? Only the F-22 Raptor can sees enemy radar and fire on them before being detected.

 

Bro answer this one. How about There lockon see first technology? Once again Lockheed Martin is the only company that can lock onto others Jets and radar towers before being locked on by U.K or Europe lockon?

 

Lockheed Martin is 30 years ahead constantly of any rival company.

 

Yeah afterlife Lovely company hacked the signal going to the frontal lobes as he says.

[Eldnah]

1 hour ago, Monoxide 321 said:

That's so funny because they are stealth for a less distance?

 

Knowbody can match Lockheed Martin's afterlife technology and it's why the F-22 raptor can't be exported?

 

Sorry these other jet fighters are all stealth to an distance. What's the point of having an stealth fighter that can be seen by radar before you can destroy it? Only the F-22 Raptor can sees enemy radar and fire on them before being detected.

 

Bro answer this one. How about There lockon see first technology? Once again Lockheed Martin is the only company that can lock onto others Jets and radar towers before being locked on by U.K or Europe lockon?

 

Lockheed Martin is 30 years ahead constantly of any rival company.

 

Yeah afterlife Lovely company hacked the signal going to the frontal lobes as he says.

 

All of this is easily explained

1) F22  is more advanced than any other fighter aircraft in terms of low observability - The F35 is close - but is also far more maintainable. The export restriction was to keep that advantage.

You are also forgetting thet the YF23 - (Boeing IIRC) wa considered a stealthier aircraft but was over optimised and less versatile than the (Y)F22

 

Theres stuff the UK doesnt export - theres stuff the US will export to the UK** but wont export to other countries - Not exportng it doesnt mean its magical - just its something you know everyones working on - but you want it to be as hard as possible for them to do it. See nuclear weapons as another example.

 

 

**And potentially the UK was a possible if they asked may have got F22

 

As for the other Fighters are stealth at a distance - im not quite sure where you are going there but 

 

A) Things like Tempest havent been built yet so claiming its less advanced than F22 has no basis in fact)

B) Whilst its radar signature is less than that of Rafale and Typhoon - that means yes they can be detected 1st - it does not make F22 invisible. 

 

2) Everything else is a combination of Marketing, journalists, Fanboys, and a complete lack of understanding of how things things work especially Top Trumps.

 

For example All aircraft with low observable charecteristics are optimised against certain frequencies (Missile / fighter ) - which means its less effective against other radar types (long range surveillance) .

 

Top Trumps example 

F22 can see Typhoon 1st - in reality its likely neither aircraft will be looking for he other with radar on - radars like a Torch - you can se it shining long before the person holding it sees you - in other words radar is a big im here banner.

 

Most of the time they will be guided onto each other by AWACS - and yes F22 has the advantage, but all these things work as part of a larger system not in isolation so top trumps a better than b comparisons are flawed.

 

If it goes from BVR to WVR ( which means US AEW screwed up ) Typhoon and Rafale can both be a rather unpleasant experience for F22 - its a big IF though.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited November 5, 2020 by Eldnah

[Monoxide 321]

Bro if what you said is true why is the world buying Lockheed American Martin  F-35 jet fighters? Lmao.

 

But yet Europe and the U.K are close?

 

Please do reply bro?

 

Thanks for your feedback bro and for being polite .

[Eldnah]

1 hour ago, Monoxide 321 said:

Bro if what you said is true why is the world buying Lockheed American Martin  F-35 jet fighters? Lmao.

 

1) Youve forgotten my 1st post - The UK had a scale model of a very advanced stealth design - ( Thats shape and materials) this proved the UK could develop a stealth fighter and LM took them in as a level 1 partner - that suited the UK because it didnt have to spend all the money - ut suited LM becase more sales straight away and less competition. But with sufficient funding the UK could have built its own F35 equivelant.

 

2 Dont forget development times

You have Rafael/Typhoon /F22 -  Tornado replacement (which became F35) /F35

So there being only LM products is more about time lines and defelopment cycles.

The UK especially likes to have 1 US project and 1 Euro project and thus a foot in both camps.

 

 

The US also tends to dominate global sales because it lends countries the money to buy US kit - then theres the quantity factror - the more you sell the less they cost.

 

See UK T45 ships 1 Billion each - in fact they arent they are 500 million each plus the 500million development costs   so total cost 6 billion (6 ships) 

Had they got the 12 planned** then it would have been 9 billion for 12 - (less really as shorter build time saves money).

 

As you can see you spread costs over the number built - and also many parts become cheaper with volume.

 

**Had brown not stretched build times to save money each year then and its no joke then it would have been 8 ships for 6 billion  - the UK in fact paid for 8 got 6, same with SSN paid for 8 got 7 and of course huge increase in carrier costs - BAE gets the blame - but it was Gordon Browns policies to make the budget look better that pushed up costs. 

 

 

1 hour ago, Monoxide 321 said:

But yet Europe and the U.K are close?

 

The UK and France are close - im less sure about Germany but thats because they are partnered with France and France is lead nation.

Sweeden must be good as well.

 

Sweeden and UK / France / others are very good at radar tech - thats going to bleed into LO tech - your going to be looking at what your radar needs to beat.

 

Its why the UK is regarded as Top tier in Submarine design and operation as well as anti sub design and operation - because it spends a lot of money** to be that (for obvious reasons Island - Uboats - to attempts to starve them into submission). and developing one means you need to stay on top of developments in the other.

 

**Which is why less availible for planes and tanks

 

Unfortunatly to many (who should no better) regurgitate the invisible plane nonesense and the idea its stealth invisible vs not stealth big barn door when theres a bit more nuance. 

LM are also keen on this - so keen they tried to trade mark 5th Generation. - they lost

 

1 hour ago, Monoxide 321 said:

 

Please do reply bro?

 

Thanks for your feedback bro and for being polite .

 

 

[Monoxide 321]

13 minutes ago, Eldnah said:

 

1) Youve forgotten my 1st post - The UK had a scale model of a very advanced stealth design - ( Thats shape and materials) this proved the UK could develop a stealth fighter and LM took them in as a level 1 partner - that suited the UK because it didnt have to spend all the money - ut suited LM becase more sales straight away and less competition. But with sufficient funding the UK could have built its own F35 equivelant.

 

2 Dont forget development times

You have Rafael/Typhoon /F22 -  Tornado replacement (which became F35) /F35

So there being only LM products is more about time lines and defelopment cycles.

The UK especially likes to have 1 US project and 1 Euro project and thus a foot in both camps.

 

 

The US also tends to dominate global sales because it lends countries the money to buy US kit - then theres the quantity factror - the more you sell the less they cost.

 

See UK T45 ships 1 Billion each - in fact they arent they are 500 million each plus the 500million development costs   so total cost 6 billion (6 ships) 

Had they got the 12 planned** then it would have been 9 billion for 12 - (less really as shorter build time saves money).

 

As you can see you spread costs over the number built - and also many parts become cheaper with volume.

 

**Had brown not stretched build times to save money each year then and its no joke then it would have been 8 ships for 6 billion  - the UK in fact paid for 8 got 6, same with SSN paid for 8 got 7 and of course huge increase in carrier costs - BAE gets the blame - but it was Gordon Browns policies to make the budget look better that pushed up costs. 

 

 

 

The UK and France are close - im less sure about Germany but thats because they are partnered with France and France is lead nation.

Sweeden must be good as well.

 

Sweeden and UK / France / others are very good at radar tech - thats going to bleed into LO tech - your going to be looking at what your radar needs to beat.

 

Its why the UK is regarded as Top tier in Submarine design and operation as well as anti sub design and operation - because it spends a lot of money** to be that (for obvious reasons Island - Uboats - to attempts to starve them into submission). and developing one means you need to stay on top of developments in the other.

 

**Which is why less availible for planes and tanks

 

Unfortunatly to many (who should no better) regurgitate the invisible plane nonesense and the idea its stealth invisible vs not stealth big barn door when theres a bit more nuance. 

LM are also keen on this - so keen they tried to trade mark 5th Generation. - they lost

 

I guess I just need to ask you how you got this top secret info? Talk is talk and sale pitches. Most the time they all lie about info and technology for more investors? Investors won't buy shares unless they lie to the public about where there going with new technology?

 

Why did the world buy the F-35 for?

 

Why did America claim they spent $1.3 trillion on the F-35 when the F-22 still can't be exported? That means they just robbed the west country's and the F-35 is an lemon from what I hear.

 

The F-35 is an water down version of the F-22 100%.

 

Things just don't add up and all your info is from company's wanting investors. Unless top secret is an thing of the past.

 

Thanks for telling me all your knowledge, but sadly these reports are milked all the way.

13 minutes ago, Eldnah said:

 

[Monoxide 321]

39 minutes ago, Eldnah said:

 

1) Youve forgotten my 1st post - The UK had a scale model of a very advanced stealth design - ( Thats shape and materials) this proved the UK could develop a stealth fighter and LM took them in as a level 1 partner - that suited the UK because it didnt have to spend all the money - ut suited LM becase more sales straight away and less competition. But with sufficient funding the UK could have built its own F35 equivelant.

 

2 Dont forget development times

You have Rafael/Typhoon /F22 -  Tornado replacement (which became F35) /F35

So there being only LM products is more about time lines and defelopment cycles.

The UK especially likes to have 1 US project and 1 Euro project and thus a foot in both camps.

 

 

The US also tends to dominate global sales because it lends countries the money to buy US kit - then theres the quantity factror - the more you sell the less they cost.

 

See UK T45 ships 1 Billion each - in fact they arent they are 500 million each plus the 500million development costs   so total cost 6 billion (6 ships) 

Had they got the 12 planned** then it would have been 9 billion for 12 - (less really as shorter build time saves money).

 

As you can see you spread costs over the number built - and also many parts become cheaper with volume.

 

**Had brown not stretched build times to save money each year then and its no joke then it would have been 8 ships for 6 billion  - the UK in fact paid for 8 got 6, same with SSN paid for 8 got 7 and of course huge increase in carrier costs - BAE gets the blame - but it was Gordon Browns policies to make the budget look better that pushed up costs. 

 

 

 

The UK and France are close - im less sure about Germany but thats because they are partnered with France and France is lead nation.

Sweeden must be good as well.

 

Sweeden and UK / France / others are very good at radar tech - thats going to bleed into LO tech - your going to be looking at what your radar needs to beat.

 

Its why the UK is regarded as Top tier in Submarine design and operation as well as anti sub design and operation - because it spends a lot of money** to be that (for obvious reasons Island - Uboats - to attempts to starve them into submission). and developing one means you need to stay on top of developments in the other.

 

**Which is why less availible for planes and tanks

 

Unfortunatly to many (who should no better) regurgitate the invisible plane nonesense and the idea its stealth invisible vs not stealth big barn door when theres a bit more nuance. 

LM are also keen on this - so keen they tried to trade mark 5th Generation. - they lost

 

 

 

 

You want real info bro? I'm a pro strategies and research this.

 

Crystals with laser's stop photons, well light. Radar wave is light. So all you do in on the reflection edge's is put crystals and they hold the light for 5+ min. last I read I think it said permanently.

 

I just read an post about scientist testing laser's with crystals and that they found they could hold light...the only thing known to Holt light is an black hole bro. Laser's with crystals do just that.

 

I'm so smart and out things together.

 

Lockheed Martin in the afterlife is having me held hostage. They never used to just read all scientist reports and know see how I think and put things together...robed.

 

The afterlife can bring down technology but SoulcreatorGod can really do premonitions. He caused an volcano in New Zealand then the next day an Facebook post claming there would be an rare muduim earthquake in California America, and the next day he posted the media reports that showed an rare medium earthquake happened. He said he did it because the people in the afterlife wanted to see him do one but once he said volcano in New Zealand outskirts they asked if anyone would die. He was like wtf only if you wanted them to. We'll they did and people died, so he made an earthquake for America because of the 9/11 CIA criminals wanted people to die also. PS don't expect another Muslim war, because after he won America the Iraq war, they dilibretly left the country unstable to leave troops in there, after killing 1 million Muslims in Iraq, and CIA killing 300,000 Syrians in Syria, he has put America on notice....love to see America stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons now.

 

PS how did the ISIS get 1,000 brand-new Toyota cars from? Jewish CIA that's who. America's days are numbed.

Edited November 5, 2020 by Monoxide 321

[Eldnah]

1 hour ago, Monoxide 321 said:

 

I guess I just need to ask you how you got this top secret info? Talk is talk and sale pitches. Most the time they all lie about info and technology for more investors? Investors won't buy shares unless they lie to the public about where there going with new technology?

 

Why did the world buy the F-35 for?

 

I told you 

i also pointed out that many partners helped develop it

 

 

1 hour ago, Monoxide 321 said:

 

Why did America claim they spent $1.3 trillion on the F-35 when the F-22 still can't be exported? That means they just robbed the west country's and the F-35 is an lemon from what I hear.

 

The F-35 is an water down version of the F-22 100%.

 

Yay and nay - it doesnt half the same level of LO - however its better than the F22 in some aspects.

 

 

1 hour ago, Monoxide 321 said:

 

Things just don't add up and all your info is from company's wanting investors. Unless top secret is an thing of the past.

 

Everything is from open source technical articles and people who work with the various types - relating non secret facts

 

Its no secret that stealth is optomised to frequency bands etc.

Its no secret thet rarrad has a detection range far in exess of what it sees.

 

1 hour ago, Monoxide 321 said:

 

Thanks for telling me all your knowledge, but sadly these reports are milked all the way.

 

[Monoxide 321]

38 minutes ago, Eldnah said:

 

I told you 

i also pointed out that many partners helped develop it

 

 

 

Yay and nay - it doesnt half the same level of LO - however its better than the F22 in some aspects.

 

 

 

Everything is from open source technical articles and people who work with the various types - relating non secret facts

 

Its no secret that stealth is optomised to frequency bands etc.

Its no secret thet rarrad has a detection range far in exess of what it sees.

 

 

 

Kinda sucks how you read info and Don't know if it's true.

 

What do you make of my 100% Stealth fighter jet? Crystals with lasers freeze up light? Wavelength is light radiation.

 

I have just told you something top secret that would make an 100% stealth fighter jet. Cool a?

Edited November 5, 2020 by Monoxide 321

[Eldnah]

Just now, Monoxide 321 said:

 

Kinda sucks how you read info and Don't know if it's true.

 

What do you make if my 100% Stealth fighter jet? Crystals with lasers freeze up light? Wavelength is light radiation.

 

I have just told you something top secret that would make an 100% stealth fighter jet. Cool a?

 

If you undezrstand certain systems you cancut through some of the sales hype - and have an idea - but you will never no exactly

[Monoxide 321]

1 minute ago, Eldnah said:

 

If you undezrstand certain systems you cancut through some of the sales hype - and have an idea - but you will never no exactly

 

Umm it 100% stops all light energy? Read up on it.

 

Like I said I have just told you how to make an 100% Stealth fighter jet.

[Monoxide 321]

4 minutes ago, Eldnah said:

 

If you undezrstand certain systems you cancut through some of the sales hype - and have an idea - but you will never no exactly

 

I have an scientist mate that confirmed to me it does stop light.

 

When your talking about fake Info I mean what companies tell you. The post are just scintifict reports from none making money / shares scientist.

 

A bit different a.

Edited November 5, 2020 by Monoxide 321

[Monoxide 321]

11 minutes ago, Eldnah said:

 

If you undezrstand certain systems you cancut through some of the sales hype - and have an idea - but you will never no exactly

 

It's about thinking way out side the box. Some like you or Adam Crown would read that article and not think about using it to stop radar waves from detecting jets and war ships. Put it on the sides of jet fighters and fly sideways and the American or jet plane that fly's with the thing spinning around on top of it to detect all jets would fail.... disaster for America.

[Eldnah]

1 hour ago, Monoxide 321 said:

 

Umm it 100% stops all light energy? Read up on it.

 

Like I said I have just told you how to make an 100% Stealth fighter jet.

I wasnt responding to the comment about crystals 

 

- weve perhaps go to crossed purposes there.