Jump to content

Jordan Peterson room


screamingeagle
 Share

Recommended Posts

1563069346891.png.c18a8cd634a6558f1dbec66c2aa59600.png

 

>"And then I told them to give up their nations and collective identities before telling them to clean their rooms and become perfect human beings before interacting with politics in any way!"
>"And those schmucks bought it! Can you believe it?"

 

Anyone really believe that Jordan had the rona?

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Jordan Peterson doesnt like to talk about Jews much either.

 

 

Not sure if you have been following him much, but he has been seriously ill with dealing with his addiction to benzodyazipine (spelling) which he didn't know was a highly addictive anti-depressant. Here is an interview he did with his daughter earlier in the year explaining it all. It sounds horrific and I wonder if his doctor premeditated this like it was a hit on his life. 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

1563069346891.png.c18a8cd634a6558f1dbec66c2aa59600.png

 

>"And then I told them to give up their nations and collective identities before telling them to clean their rooms and become perfect human beings before interacting with politics in any way!"
>"And those schmucks bought it! Can you believe it?"

 

Anyone really believe that Jordan had the rona?

 

Fuck me, talk about live and learn.

Because I avoid the MSM I had no idea that he said he had it 3 months ago.

Of course he didn't have it.....there's no such fucking thing.

I had a lot of time for this man.....Not now. Thanks for pointing this out for me.

My world gets rocked every day just lately.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oddsnsods said:

 

No likes left Odds, but those images are very telling. If only people would background check these damn pied pipers before jumping on bandwagons. That's not to say that I haven't been decieved in the past by people, or that I might not be being decieved by some folks that I still follow, but it seems like nobody wants to investigate anyone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

I am aware that he contributed to agenda 21, but beyond that I don't see it. Do you have anymore info on your point that he's controlled oppo? Same for @oddsnsods as I don't see it. Thanks lads. 👍🏻

 

I will have to have a dig through my meme folders and make a thread so I don't derail this one too much. My view is that he is there to stop people collectivizing against corruption with his individualist nonsense that is bringing Westerners to ruin.

 

 

The company he keeps is shady too.

 

v19fpvbg6k711.jpg.61732a03835211e4e4739f1ab5da4dc7.jpg

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feared this might happen. I think this guy is reaching at best here with little evidence of what he says. 

 

Ok, so my first issue with that video is equating equality between nations as equality of outcome. Anyone who watches Peterson knows he hates ideologies and isms and really hates equality of outcome because in his own words "it's a race to the bottom". 

 

So I don't deny he has worked on agenda 21 but let's look at what he's done thereafter. Stood up for free speech against using pronouns for trans people, good, I hate that shit and it's an infringement of rights. He's also argued against SJW, Karen preaching, feminists, good I hate that shit also. 

 

You state he promotes individualism which I don't agree with as that's a label he hates, he doesn't prescribe to isms. I don't believe telling people to individually work on themselves before they seek to help others, thats good advice. Too many people go around trying to fix other people before fixing themselves first. He then promotes family and the collective once that's achieved, again I see nothing wrong with that. 

 

That doesn't come across as a guy who's seeking to destroy the family unit, bring forward the fourth industrial revolution when he's promoting love for your family. 

 

In addition, you say he keeps shady company, but why are Brett Weinstein, Ben Shapiro, Joe Rogan and Sam Harris are questionable? Can you elaborate? Now Shapiro does have some very conservative views that I certainly don't agree with and his views on gun control, but he is a 1st amendment advocate, so he can't be all bad surely? 

 

I'm happy to be persuaded Nigma, but that video hasn't done it for me. If you have anything that's more compelling please share the same and I am happy to review my position again. 

 

Just an idea, but since he's never been involved in the UN or other such groups since, do you think he may well have wanted to distance himself from it as he knows it's nefarious? Also, and I've watched tonnes of his stuff, I've never heard him brag about producing that document at all. Just a thought. 👍🏻

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Peterson is a globalist conman that is there to lull people back to sleep. While working at the UN, Peterson helped write a Marxist blueprint for one world government communism

i'll wait to see if he is a con man....all his recent work is excelent a more advanced work of Peter Kropotkin 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oddsnsods said:

So he talks about Jewish supremacism & ZOG?

 

if jordan had spoken about 'jewish supremacism & zog' you would never have even heard of his name

 

learn the evil of the bolsheviks from jordan but always remember that they were coordinated by the rothschild cabal, sabbatean cult working through bodies like the masonic b'nai brith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 11/2/2020 at 6:32 AM, screamingeagle said:

i'll wait to see if he is a con man....all his recent work is excelent a more advanced work of Peter Kropotkin 

 

 

 

 

I agree. I don't think JP is a conman, guess it depends on what you think the con is in the first place though. I really enjoy his psychological take on things. His depth of knowledge on the human condition is impressive and he has helped perhaps millions of people better themselves through personal development. He suffers from depression himself so understands the mechanisms needed to keep afloat in this chaotic world. He clearly is passionate about what he believes in and I don't think he's in anyone elses pocket. A true free thinker. His bible talks from a psychological perspective are really good and I'm saying that as a staunch atheist. He's actually softened my views on religion. I used to be quite militant against all religions but now I can understand them from a psychological viewpoint.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our society loves losers.   People with Cancer go on Facebook to be "proud".

And therapists who have totally failed to fix their own problems are now in charge of telling people what to do?

How many drugs is JP on ?
Ritalin , Prozac ... lobotomy?
So ... this is the guy you choose to tell you how to live?

Or how to be fucked up ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/18/2020 at 10:21 PM, rideforever said:

Our society loves losers.   People with Cancer go on Facebook to be "proud".

And therapists who have totally failed to fix their own problems are now in charge of telling people what to do?

How many drugs is JP on ?
Ritalin , Prozac ... lobotomy?
So ... this is the guy you choose to tell you how to live?

Or how to be fucked up ?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

There are many facets to every human being. It seem to me that people are choosing  a small facet or what a person has done in the past to bolster their preconceived opinions as to what the whole individual is actually like  eg EnigmaticWorld with regards to twitter and apparent censorship and the UN  (must be bad)  and Morpheus  is against having to use pronouns for trans people (Peterson must be good). Everyone dose this, and given the fact that no one is perfect ( least of all me )  maybe we should look at the entire person with regards to their position on different topics,before making a judgement on what that person is really like or stands for, particularly for someone in the public eye .

The other thing is bringing things up from the past , peoples attitudes, opinions and actions change over time so people should be judged on what their like now ,not what they did or said  twenty years ago.

This should apply to everyone not just J Peterson

Edited by peter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...