Jump to content

the moment I knew that gravity was not what they tell us it is


amy G
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, alexa said:

 

What makes you think that the earth is going around the sun ?

Well apollos sky chariot was disproven by Ptolemy and the experts are always right, even when they were wrong. Everyone knows that and all the experts are in agreement. Are you stupid?

 

I can't wait until my virtual reality headset installed at birth says the time is 3020 AD, then it will be the case that the earth is dangling on an invisible string as light pours down on it from the sun. Everyone will know it. All the experts will be in agreement, and I will ask of those who don't conform their beliefs to pejority: Are you stupid?

 

Me too! I'm still smarting up since I learned democracy is fraud and the holy heavens as taught in modern christianity isn't quite exactly the way they tell it. If I get any smarter than this I might even comprehend how exposing people diagnosed with cancer to extreme levels of carcinogens can somehow make the diagnosed less inclined to die of cancer. That's how stupid I am. I wish as was as smart as the people who seem to know everything before they didnt know that they knew until some idiot pointed it out. No curviture on the actual earth as seen from earth and everyones looking for intelligent lifeforms on OTHER planets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Steph said:

I'm still smarting up since I learned democracy is fraud and the holy heavens as taught in modern christianity isn't quite exactly the way they tell it.

 

This is no time to bite the bullet with our global incremental consulting.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gravity's air bubble problem ( no problem what so ever )

 

 

I was wondering when this was going to raise it's head again, as I said you are nothing if not predictable,this has been explained to you on more than one occasion,by me and other people, the explanation hasn't changed in that short amount of time which leads me to conclude the following

 

1 you have early onset dementia

2 or the most likely, you are starting to exhibit all the signs of a terrible affliction first brought to light in a 70's Jethro Tull song,and for that I'm truly sorry for you

 

Edited by peter
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, amy G said:

Gravity's air bubble problem:

 

 

 

 

There is no problem, only with waiting for you to answer questions that have you no explanation. 

 

You make all indignation about up and down but offer no reason. Gravity explains down, density is not a vector, it explains nothing. You also afraid to say about why heavy denser objects falls same speed as lighter not as dense object!

 

5yrWrB.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  

15 hours ago, peter said:

the explanation hasn't changed

 

As I recently was just to explaining to @Basket Case:

I'm sorry but explanations are not demonstrable science. This has been explained over and over on this thread.

 

Science fiction writers explain things. To accept explanations in place of demonstrable proof is for low level thinkers. We need to use demonstrable science that can be observed, tested and replicated.

 

Sit back and watch the distractions keep coming, because I can assure you that not one person will come on here with any proof of this purely theoretical gravity.

 

Everything in our world can be explained perfectly once one understands the relative densities that are in play.

 

Here again, we can see gravity's problem with ping pong balls, lamp oil, rubbing alcohol, soda caps, veggie oil, beads, water, cherry tomatoes, dish soap, milk, dice, maple syrup, popcorn kernels, and corn syrup:

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/6e/41/06/6e4106e299f4a4e0c12378dae491c961.jpg

 

I don't think this gets any more clear. Hope that helped and hope you and yours are doing well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, amy G said:

I'm sorry but explanations are not demonstrable science. This has been explained over and over on this thread.

 

Do you understand what self contradiction is? 

 

5 minutes ago, amy G said:

Sit back and watch the distractions keep coming, because I can assure you that not one person will come on here with any proof of this purely theoretical gravity.

 

Ne detraction is happening, only thing happening is your wilful refusal to reply on questions!

 

5 minutes ago, amy G said:

Everything in our world can be explained perfectly once one understands the relative densities that are in play.

 

 

Density is not a force, it possesses no vector. Force given to density that makes it work is gravity.

 

5 minutes ago, amy G said:

Here again, we can see gravity's problem with ping pong balls, lamp oil, rubbing alcohol, soda caps, veggie oil, beads, water, cherry tomatoes, dish soap, milk, dice, maple syrup, popcorn kernels, and corn syrup:

 

 

This is not a problem it is explained perfectly by buoyancy. You are very ignorant of science.

 

Up is up and down is down ---------------- because?  Gravity!

  • I ask you about heavy and weight because the concept is a vector quantity. I suspect you have no education on this. A scalar quantity is the static mass of any objects. When you apply force to scalar mass, it now has weight and a vector. Gravity gives the force. Density gives no force!
  • I ask you about why objects accelerate and you are afraid to respond - density deems that as object reaches equilibrium with surrounds it slows. Therefore you are cornered.
  • I ask you you why air is different pressure for altitude and you are afraid to respond. Air has same density so no explanation for variances in altitude pressure!
  • I ask you why oxygen is not falling lower than nitrogen and you are afraid to respond. Oxygen has more mass and weight to nitrogen. You are cornered.
  • I ask you how people float in aeroplane flying. You give stupid answer that makes no explanation. Air also is in parabolic. Density is debunked on this matter alone.
  • I ask you why fall direction is down - you give stupid answer that makes no explanation. Gravity offers solution, density offers no solution as it is product of gravity!
  • I ask you why Sun and Moon float in the skies. You are afraid to answer - there is no answer.
  • I ask how Sun and Moon move in the skies. You are afraid to answer - there is no answer. Why do they not 'fall down'!

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ytivarg is an unnoticed force in nature which works in the opposite way from gravity, hence the weird spelling. On strange planets people can't see there is no gravity but there is Ytivarg!

 

Instead of volumes which are materially dense falling down (such as an apple on the head of Isaac Newton), volumes which are not materially dense fall upwards causing the hydrogen to be at the planets surface and lead to be at its base!

 

If people say Ytivarg does not exist because they cannot see such a planet, they may be taking a rise out of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Morph said:

I must be missing something here. All of that pretty much closes the case on this gravity fail thread, so why hasn't this Amy G character responded to any of it?

 

It's almost as though they are an ignorant troll getting a new butthole torn for them.

Personally I think it's a bit harsh calling AmyG ,AKA bflat an ignorant troll, I think the problem stems from the fact that he has been handed that many new assholes over this thread and others that confusion has obviously set in and he doesn't  know where to start. This has obviously manifested in his apparent inability to answer any reasonable question put to him in a clear concise and relevant manner.

At least not many of us can say have had a hit song written about them , amyG I didn't know you were friends with Jethero Tull, I am impressed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@peter, you are still having problems differentiating between explanations, questions, and demonstrable proof of our reality.

 

Because you said you do understand the density tower, I thin this picture might help to drive the point home... especially for an Aussie. 😉

 

https://i.redd.it/1pewc8twc1421.jpg

 

Let me know if the point is still not clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The statement  Fuck Me , exclamation mark comes to mind , how many times do we have to see these bloody stupid pictures

In my previous post when I inter-mated you weren't a troll ,of course I was being sarcastic and you have just proved my point once again, well done

To me your just another idiot with a camera and there a plenty of them on Utube so you will fit right in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, peter said:

The statement  Fuck Me , exclamation mark comes to mind , how many times do we have to see these bloody stupid pictures

In my previous post when I inter-mated you weren't a troll ,of course I was being sarcastic and you have just proved my point once again, well done

To me your just another idiot with a camera and there a plenty of them on Utube so you will fit right in

It's sad that asking for demonstrable proof is considered "bloody stupid pictures"  by otherwise intelligent people. It's sad that actually going out in the real world and gathering demonstrable proof is considered "bloody stupid pictures"  by otherwise intelligent people.

 

But that is where they have taken our world, and the people scream science cannot even see the foolishness accepting thoery, falsified theory at that, with all the certainty of scientific fact.

 

Be well, friend.

 

 

Edited by amy G
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, amy G said:

It's sad that asking for demonstrable proof is considered "bloody stupid pictures"  by otherwise intelligent people. It's sad that actually going out in the real world and gathering demonstrable proof is considered "bloody stupid pictures"  by otherwise intelligent people.

 

It is more sad that you are afraid to answer all my questions. I am disappointed that moderating does not make this requirement, but members are able to see you losing this debate so badly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2020 at 4:04 PM, Basket Case said:


l comprehend the 'density' tower.
The very densest of things are at the very bottom, correct ? 

 

 

amyg density.jpg

I thought the mods were interested in attacking posts and not the members of this forum. Anyone reading other threads here have seen this comment. How sad is it when not only do they allow several posts on certain topics only, to attack members of this forum, but joining in?

 

I'm sorry, but it just does not sound like a sane way of discussing these difficult topics.

 

And FTR, the very densest of things only move the bottom and then stop because they have reached an equal or greater density. The same concept applies if a helium balloon was placed on top instead of a ping pong ball. It would rise, but only until it reached an equal or greater density, like your ceiling for example.

 

You can demonstrate all this to yourself.

 

You can repeat this. Every single time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go to the beach , wet sand or dry sand it doesn't matter you can still put your hand into it so its obviously not that dense .

Now get a large heavy rock and rest it on the sand, according to your theory it should sink into the sand and disappear ,what about a house brick sitting sitting on a Styrofoam cup for that matter,  so explain why it doesn't (  I would like you to explain it in your own words ,if you posses any with regards to your brilliant theory) . Speaking of your theory it only seems to be valid when the demonstration  medium is predominantly liquid, rather selective don't you think

2 hours ago, amy G said:

'm sorry, but it just does not sound like a sane way of discussing these difficult topics.

These topics are not difficult except for you as it it not an easy task to convince a logical thinking person that shit actually tastes like honey

Also when you get called out due to your bullshit  why is everything so sad ,you poor victim you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, peter said:

Go to the beach , wet sand or dry sand it doesn't matter you can still put your hand into it so its obviously not that dense .

"Not that dense" is not something empirical we can test, but we can determine the density of wet and/or dry sand. That said, with what amount of force are you exerting with your hand?

 

39 minutes ago, peter said:

Now get a large heavy rock and rest it on the sand, according to your theory it should sink into the sand and disappear

That is just a lie as the rock will stop when its density reaches equilibrium with its environment, exactly as the relative density model predicts and replicates every time we test it.  But this would be a great question for the priests of heliocentrism, the freemason cult leaders who have taken gravity (G) as their God.

 

39 minutes ago, peter said:

what about a house brick sitting sitting on a Styrofoam cup for that matter

This would be another great question for the priests of heliocentrism, the freemason cult leaders who have taken gravity (G) as their God. I mean G can hold water perfectly still on a rock that is traveling multi-directionally at several times the speed of sound while it is also rotating and wobbling.

 

While at the same time - according to you - G cannot even move a house brick through a styrofoam cup!

 

39 minutes ago, peter said:

Speaking of your theory it only seems to be valid when the demonstration  medium is predominantly liquid, rather selective don't you think

This again is just a lie and I am really not used to these posts from you.

 

https://dynaimage.cdn.cnn.com/cnn/c_fill,g_auto,w_1200,h_675,ar_16:9/https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F200902213442-david-blaine-wild-helium-balloon-ride-stunt-moos-pkg-ebof-vpx-00002920.jpg

 

I hope you feel better soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, amy G said:

This again is just a lie and I am really not used to these posts from you.

People that know me also know there is one thing I don't do and that's fucking lie.

Now show me one of your stupid pictures showing your density theory using a medium other than a liquid

 

I'm used to these posts from you though, unfortunately

18 hours ago, amy G said:

That is just a lie as the rock will stop when its density reaches equilibrium with its environment, exactly as the relative density model predicts and replicates every time we test it.

 

19 hours ago, amy G said:

"Not that dense" is not something empirical we can test

 

 

 

So what you are actually saying is the Styrofoam cup is denser than a  house brick and the  and sand is denser than  a large rock, but it's not something we can test ( maybe you can't because you wouldn't like the results)

Your mate Jethro Tull would be proud of you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2020 at 11:24 PM, amy G said:

I'm sorry but explanations are not demonstrable science. This has been explained over and over on this thread.

What hasn't been explained though is how apparently every thing you say is demonstrable science

Just like the FE thread I'm done now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2020 at 7:33 AM, amy G said:

It's sad that asking for demonstrable proof is considered "bloody stupid pictures"  by otherwise intelligent people. It's sad that actually going out in the real world and gathering demonstrable proof is considered "bloody stupid pictures"  by otherwise intelligent people.

 

It is sad when trolls refusing to answer questions because they are not educated and afraid. Density is not a force, it possesses no vector. Force given to density that makes it work is gravity.

 

 

Up is up and down is down ---------------- because?  Gravity!

  • I ask you about heavy and weight because the concept is a vector quantity. I suspect you have no education on this. A scalar quantity is the static mass of any objects. When you apply force to scalar mass, it now has weight and a vector. Gravity gives the force. Density gives no force!
  • I ask you about why objects accelerate and you are afraid to respond - density deems that as object reaches equilibrium with surrounds it slows. Therefore you are cornered.
  • I ask you you why air is different pressure for altitude and you are afraid to respond. Air has same density so no explanation for variances in altitude pressure!
  • I ask you why oxygen is not falling lower than nitrogen and you are afraid to respond. Oxygen has more mass and weight to nitrogen. You are cornered.
  • I ask you how people float in aeroplane flying. You give stupid answer that makes no explanation. Air also is in parabolic. Density is debunked on this matter alone.
  • I ask you why fall direction is down - you give stupid answer that makes no explanation. Gravity offers solution, density offers no solution as it is product of gravity!
  • I ask you why Sun and Moon float in the skies. You are afraid to answer - there is no answer.
  • I ask how Sun and Moon move in the skies. You are afraid to answer - there is no answer. Why do they not 'fall down'!

You respond ok to Peter questions, because they are easy to offer bullshit. Once more you will fail to answer these and all viewers can watch this. You are not on this forum for debating, you have paypal flat earth business for idiots.

 

EDIT: You refer to FE model and fail when requested the map of flat earth. You cannot say sun is North of Australia without map.

Edited by Doctor What
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...