Jump to content

Private Criminal Prosecution of Parliament | Top Legal Team Engaged (important)


Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...




Notice of Intended Private Criminal Prosecution by the Trustees of the People’s Union of Britain [PUB], alleging mass murder by UK Government policy, which will be served by recorded mail and email upon Sajid Javid, Secretary of State for the Department of Health and Social Care, can be read in full at the PDF linked below.

Notice of Intended Criminal Prosecution

Following many painstaking months of evidence gathering, the prosecution has posed the most serious kind of questions which could ever be asked of government ministers, in relation to the ever-growing abundance of prima facie evidence, which shows that Midazolam has been used to commit murder by government policy in UK care homes, under the cover of ‘a deadly pandemic’.

However, in the absence of an appropriate and timely rebuttal of our allegations with material evidence [not mere hearsay], we will finalize our evidence files and lay charges of mass murder by government policy in a Magistrates Court, demanding that every chief police officer immediately opens an investigation into all care home deaths since March 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Here you are (but I am sending partly)


The following Notice of Intended Private Criminal Prosecution for mass murder by UK Government policy is an amended version of the notice served upon the Secretary of State for the Department of Health and Social Care last week, which will also be served by email and registered post.






1.According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus”. However, the genome sequence for SARS-COV-2, released in January 2020, proved that the test to identify its presence was created in the absence of virus samples1. We therefore contend that no virus isolate of SARS COV 2 exists, and that a disease called Covid 19 has not caused excess deaths in the UK.


2.Our assertion is supported by public documents confirming that no pure isolate of the virus exists2. Furthermore, publicly available death data proves that the so called “first wave of COVID”, and excess deaths in England, only occurred ONCE the pandemic was announced and lockdowns commenced on 23/03/2020, and that a “virus” which was not a HCID, may have been in circulation as early as October 2019.3 


3.On 3rd March 2020, the UK Government scientific advisor echoed the Prime Minister, when he said: “Let me be absolutely clear that for the overwhelming majority of people who contract the “virus”, this will be a mild disease from which they will speedily and fully recover as we’ve already seen”. In line with this, on 13/03/2020, the threat from the virus was officially downgraded from a HCID to a NOID by the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens [ACDP].4.


4.However, this decision to downgrade from HCID to NOID was highly controversial because of the WHO’s declaration of a worldwide High Consequence Infectious Disease [HCID] two days previously on 11/03/2020, upon the advice of Neil Ferguson of Imperial College. In other words, the downgrading is an implicit contradiction of Ferguson’s triggering of a worldwide health emergency.                                                                                                                                                      


5.Remarkably, following the private announcement of the downgrading on 13th March 2020, and the subsequent public announcement of the downgrading on 19/03/2020, there appears to have been a premeditated decision to use this unproven ‘pandemic’ as justification to impose measures and medication which went on to kill people. This was in turn used to justify the lockdown measures, which themselves were one of the driving forces of the deaths they claimed to be trying to avoid. This premeditation to cause deaths of course amounts to mass murder by government policy.


6.There is support for this argument when we look at government policy decisions, which simply put, make no sense. On 17/03/2020, 4 days after the private downgrading mentioned above, the NHS wrote to all hospitals asking them to free-up the maximum possible number of beds by urgently discharging any patients they could.1


7.Many of these patients were discharged to care homes, some of which were given ultimatums forcing them to take more patients than they were equipped to provide care for. In addition, the NHS cancelled all ‘non-urgent’ treatments. 


8.Why was this policy invented at all given scientific advice on 03/03/2020, and why was it not reversed, given the downgrading on 13/03/2020 by the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens?


9..It is our contention that the excess deaths in the first wave occurred AS A RESULT of the relentless implementation of this policy, which was coupled with the inappropriate use of respiratory depressing medications such as Midazolam during the same period. This is how the excess deaths occurred. They were NOT because of a novel virus, isolation of which, according to long held standards, has never occurred.


10.Our extrapolated data on community Midazolam prescribing supports the above allegation, along with the data on how and where deaths during this time period occurred.


11.Following the letter of 17/03/2020 from the NHS, bed occupancy in England reduced from the usual 90% to an average of 63% in the spring quarter of 2020. In addition, there was no influx of ‘large numbers of inpatients requiring respiratory support’. Accident and emergency (A&E) departments saw a huge decrease in attendances and overall admitted patient care decreased significantly during the same period.


12.Of those patients who were admitted to hospital and residents who were discharged to care homes, the outcomes can only be described as devastating. We assert that those outcomes were engineered. When we look at mortality, figures show that hospital and care home death ratios increased during the “first wave” lockdown period2.   


13.Shockingly, 91% of “with COVID” deaths during the first lockdown were of people with any sort of disability3. It is impossible for a ‘virus’ to discriminate in such a manner, and therefore we contend these deaths must have been as a result of very nefarious policies. These policies were blanket DNRs and mandatory prescribed medications, two factors which have contributed to most other “non disability” deaths during the first lockdown period.                                        


14.Data proves that up to 13/05/2020, deaths in care homes from all causes were 159% higher than at the start of “the COVID-19 outbreak”4. In April 2020, the ratio of excess deaths in English care homes was almost three times that of the prior five years’ average. It is not a mere coincidence that during the same month, prescribing of Midazolam increased by more than 100%5. There is a clear correlation between policy, prescribing of Midazolam and deaths, which simply cannot be overlooked.


15.Further,more during the period 2 March to 12 June 2020, 18,562 residents of care homes in England died, supposedly “with COVID-19”, including 18,168 people aged 65 and over. This represented almost 40% of all deaths involving “COVID-19” in England during this period 6


16.In addition to the above, during the first lockdown there was an unbelievable policy change in care homes7. The change restricted access for residents’ families. This removed crucial oversight of treatment along with safeguards. Also, support services such as SALT, chiropody, physiotherapy and in house GP visits, were removed.


17.Simply put, care homes were turned into death camps and their inmates were targeted for elimination. Staffing levels dropped due to a policy of self-isolation for anything akin to a sniffle, and this further pressured care homes who then had a ratio of staff to patients that was unworkable.


18.We contend this was not an accident, and instead was done by design. Only a fool, or perhaps a madman, would implement such policies and not realise the inevitable consequences. Only a fool or a madman would say they were necessary after the down grading of Covid 19 from an HCID to a NOID on 13/03/2020.


19.As we have already stated, we assert that the above were premeditated policies, to cause excess deaths in care homes (as well as in the community generally).  It is without doubt that family surveillance in care homes, at a time when staff limits were stretched, could have stopped avoidable deaths. Furthermore, had support services been available, we very much doubt that the over prescribing of respiratory depressing medication would have been either necessary, or allowed to transpire.


20.Bizarrely, in addition to the above, all official inspections were suspended during the first lockdown, leading to less and less oversight. Very worryingly, the use of blanket DNRs,8 (now acknowledged as a fact by Matt Hancock), as well as do not admit to hospital orders, were imposed, and undoubtedly led to countless avoidable deaths.


21. Lockdown restrictions eased at the start of June 2020 and up to the start of the second national lockdown, there was NEGATIVE excess deaths in care homes (a ratio of 0.96 versus expected levels). This fall in deaths

Edited by dewin
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22.We therefore contend that the initial wave of deaths during the first lockdown were driven by policy decisions by this government and Midazolam prescribing. These deaths were in fact accelerated deaths, rather than excess deaths, and these accelerated deaths were created for political and policy gain, to feed a narrative of a deadly pandemic which simply did not, and still does not, exist.


23.Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford professor, has labelled lockdowns “the single biggest public health mistake in history”9.  95% of hospital COVID-labelled deaths occurred DURING lockdown. How is this possible if lockdowns save lives?


24.We contend that lockdowns kill, but moreover that they are designed to do so. However, lockdowns alone do not provide the significant number of deaths needed to create the illusion of a pandemic. This is the primary reason we have looked at Midazolam prescribing during this period.


25.It is a well-known fact that Midazolam is a respiratory depressing drug1. It creates the very respiratory symptoms of so called “COVID-19”. Used in copious amounts in conjunction with lockdowns, Midazolam led to premature deaths. The data we have extrapolated on community Midazolam prescribing supports this, along with the pertinent observations above, about where and how accelerated deaths occurred.


26.Given our assertions that government policy and Midazolam prescribing have caused accelerated deaths, and our assertion that this was designed and premeditated by certain individuals within and advising this government, we have some questions that we wish to put to you.


27.Our allegations described above are of the most serious kind. In the absence of satisfactory answers from you to our questions and given the supporting evidence we are presenting with this notice, we wish to make clear that we will assume you cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt, that what we have asserted about a government premeditated policy of mass murder is false.


28.Let us be clear, this is your chance to answer the questions posed and give proof that our allegations and assertions are wrong. If you can do that by bringing evidence to the contrary of ours, we will accept that we have perhaps misinterpreted our evidence, albeit in good faith.


29.However, you will need to produce sufficient material evidence to rebut our allegations, and in the absence of the same, we will pursue a Private Criminal Prosecution based on the statements made herein. 


30.Of the 50,335 deaths which occurred in March to June 2020 involving COVID-19 in England and Wales, 45,859 (91.1%) had at least one pre-existing condition, while 4,476 (8.9%) had none. It is for those people and their families that we so urgently seek a just outcome in this the most serious type of criminal proceedings imaginable.


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Questions About Allegedly Murderous UK Government Policy


31.How much 1mg 5ml Midazolam Hydrochloride ampules were used in England between March and May 2020?


32.Of 1mg in 5ml Midazolam Hydrochloride ampules used between March and May 2020, where were they prescribed, and in what proportion, i.e. what went into the community, and what went into hospitals?


33.What was the UK stock of 1mg 5ml Midazolam Hydrochloride ampules held for the months October 2019, November 2019, December 2019, January 2020 and February 2020?


34.How much 1mg 5ml Midazolam Hydrochloride ampules were left in the UK in October 2020?


35.What was the UK stock of 10mg 2ml Midazolam in the months October 2019, November 2019, December 2019, January 2020 and February 2020?


36.How much 10mg 2ml Midazolam Hydrochloride ampules were left in the UK in October 2020?


37. Who ordered the 22,000 extra packs in May 2020? Was it the DHSC, and if so, which minister signed off the order? If it was not the DHSC please specify who it was?


38.What was the cost of the order of the 22,000 packs?


39.Moving on to the Health and Social Care Committee. Oral evidence: Preparations for Coronavirus, HC 36, Friday 17/04/2020, ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 17/04/2020, what does Dr Luke Evans mean when he says, “a good death”?


40.Does he mean euthanasia, which this term commonly refers to?


41.Assuming he does mean this, why did Dr Luke Evans openly discuss government policy of causing “a good death” by administering fatal dose of drugs like Midazolam and Morphine, via hypodermic syringes, when to do so is tantamount to an implicit confession of mass murder by policy?


42.Euthanasia and assisted suicide are both illegal under English Law. Assisted suicide is illegal under the terms of the Suicide Act (1961) and punishable by up to 14 years’ imprisonment. Depending on the circumstances, euthanasia is regarded as either manslaughter or murder.


43.Are Dr Luke Evans’ remarks a result of the Confidential Pandemic Influenza (CPI) briefing paper dated 08/09/2017, which states, and we quote: “There is significant discussion in the paper about ceasing or changing care to patients in the HRG categories; however a decision may more appropriately be taken to treat patients in the listed HRG groups rather than influenza patients, dependent upon likelihood of survival……… Total excess death rate would be in excess of 7,806 per week of the peak of the pandemic if all these services were stopped. So, in the peak six weeks of a pandemic (recognising the typical profile of increasing and decreasing case numbers either side of the peak weeks), 46,836 excess deaths could be expected. On the one hand, this is likely to be an underestimate as it only considers the top 14 HRG codes and it does not consider additional deaths occurring particularly in the elderly and frail across primary care where HRGs are not coded.”


44.Give the CPI and Dr Luke Evans’ remarks, is there a culture within government, Public Health England and indeed the NHS to enact the supposedly defunct Liverpool Care Pathway, to end lives at the behest of the treating doctor, which of course is illegal as described above?


45.If the answer is “no”, can you please explain why the NHS drew up the CPI and included within it plans to withdraw hospital care from people in nursing homes in the event of a pandemic, which also included refusal to treat those in their 70s and instead offer “support” to use so-called “end of life pathways”.


46.The CPI states that the Health Secretary (at the time) could authorize medics to prioritize some patients over others and even stop providing critical care altogether. Was such a decision taken by the Health Secretary at the time, (Matt Hancock), in relation to care home, hospital and community residents over a certain age?


47.Government ministers have repeatedly insisted that care homes were not abandoned by the NHS during the coronavirus crisis, despite more than 42,000 residents in England and Wales dying during the “pandemic”. Given this, what is your proof that this was not because of decisions made by the DHSC, and/or PHE and NHS chiefs, which then resulted in thousands of needless deaths?


48.Care homes were asked by NHS managers and GPs to place DNR’s on all residents at the height of the “pandemic” to keep hospital beds free – in breach of guideline 3. Blanket DNR’s were also imposed on people with learning disabilities “who were not near the end of their lives”, showing a concerning disregard for disabled people. Who made the decision to ask care homes to do this, and were these decisions taken because of the CPI?


49.In making his remarks at the Health and Social Care Committee, Oral evidence: Preparations for Coronavirus, HC 36, Friday 17 April 2020, why did Dr Evans and indeed all those present, completely ignore the declassification of COVID-19 from an HCID to a NOID on 13/03/2020, meaning that such nefarious measures as those mentioned in the CPI were never necessary?


50.Moving on, we attach a selection of graphs regarding the prescribing of 10mg 2ml Midazolam hydrochloride ampules for various years and months. Can you please explain why the enormous increase in Midazolam prescriptions for 10mg 2ml Midazolam hydrochloride ampules coincide with implementation of the UK Government’s COVID-19 Battle-plan in March 2020?


51.How much 10mg 2ml Midazolam hydrochloride ampules, were held in the UK in January 2020, and what wholesalers held them? How does the DHSC, PHE and the NHS keep track of what stock it has of 10mg 2ml Midazolam hydrochloride ampules, and indeed all other Midazolam products?  


52.We attach a final graph comparing all-cause mortality but distinguishing between NON “COVID-19” deaths and deaths “with COVID-19” for the period March 2020 to April 2021, compared to Midazolam prescribing for the same period. Can you please explain why there is such a tight correlation between the “COVID-19” deaths in April 2020, and the prescribing of Midazolam 10mg 2ml Midazolam hydrochloride ampules?   


53.As Midazolam is not a treatment for “COVID-19”, and the prescribing in April is, in the main, into the community, and NOT hospitals, can you please answer if it is in fact the case that 10mg 2ml Midazolam hydrochloride ampules were prescribed and used to end the lives of people in care that had a chance of surviving, and those deaths were then labelled as “COVID-19”?


54.For the avoidance of doubt, the appropriate answers to the above questions must be delivered without prevarication, obstruction, or unnecessary delays, whilst we reserve the right to lay this information in a criminal court without further notice, for the purposes of preventing any more harm being done to the People by UK Government policy.




1 Eurosurveillance | Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR

2 FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever – Fluoride Free Peel

3 ‘Plausible’ evidence that Covid may have been circulating in Italy in October 2019 (telegraph.co.uk)

4 High consequence infectious diseases (HCID) – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

5 20200317-NHS-COVID-letter-FINAL.pdf (england.nhs.uk)

6 Excess mortality in England, week ending 03 July 2020 (phe.org.uk)

6 out of 10 people who have died from COVID-19 are disabled | The Health Foundation

7 Care homes have seen the biggest increase in deaths since the start of the outbreak | The Health Foundation

8 Number of prescriptions for the drug midazolam doubled during height of the pandemic  | Daily Mail Online

9 Number of prescriptions for the drug midazolam doubled during height of the pandemic  | Daily Mail Online


11 Care homes: Visiting restrictions during the covid-19 pandemic (parliament.uk)

12 Third of UK hospital Covid patients had ‘do not resuscitate’ order in first wave | Coronavirus | The Guardian

13 Lockdowns are ‘the single biggest public health mistake in history’, says top scientist (telegraph.co.uk)

14 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7457966/

15 Unrevised (parliament.uk)

16 Pandemic-Influenza-Briefing-Paper-NHS-Surge-and-Triage.pdf(Shared)- Adobe Document Cloud

17 Care home residents put on ‘do not resuscitate’ orders without consent (telegraph.co.uk)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...



Overwhelming Evidence of Midazolam Murders By Government Policy



When the British people know the truth about the Midazolam murders and that those crimes were the result of government policy that is tantamount to targeted euthanasia, which is still a crime in this country, there will be nowhere for the Four Horsemen of COVID-1984 and their army of accomplices in white coats to hide from justice.

In relation to which I will elaborate by way of this PCP update, in an attempt to convey in words the indescribable, gut-wrenching horrors of the prima facie evidence we have now assimilated into PUB’s Private Criminal Prosecution against everybody in the murderous Midazolam supply chain, which we will lay in a Magistrates Court at the earliest opportunity.

For the purposes of which, please watch the short video below, whether you’ve already seen it or not, so that you can fully appreciate the deservedly precarious positions which each of the defendants now finds themselves in.



Especially when we can now prove beyond reasonable doubt that, in the nefarious game of COVID-Cluedo, it was Hancock et al, in the cares homes, hospitals and the victims’ families’ properties, with syringes and syringe drivers full of Midazolam, the infamous benzodiazapine, which is used to varying degrees of success in lethal injections of Death Row prisoners in the US.

We also have an incendiary peer reviewed study which records that medical professionals within the NHS were reporting trends of fatal adverse events prior to the start of COVID-1984, after three patients died following overdoses of Midazolam between just 5 and 12mg. 

Given that since then elderly and sick people have been injected with up to 60mg a day, only a fool could fail to see the plainly murderous intent of the defendants.

Anatomy of Genocide

During the second weeks of the scamdemic, Hull & East Riding Prescribing Committee distributed guidance on treating COVID symptoms, which stated that:

“For patients with distressing breathlessness at rest and unable to take oral medications, please consider starting continuous subcutaneous infusion via a syringe driver of:

Morphine sulphate 10mg + Midazolam 10mg subcut / 24hrs

OR if severe renal impairment (eGFR<30 mL/min): Oxycodone 5mg + Midazolam 10mg subcut / 24hrs (doses may need to be increased if severe symptoms; please ring palliative care team for advice).

NOTE: patients can still have additional PRN medications as required”

Fatal Symptom Management

In summary, they recommended giving subcutaneous 10mg doses of Morphine and Midazolam to patients suffering from severe breathlessness, using syringe drivers if they were not able to take the deadly drugs orally.

This is why so many of those who died as a result were first induced into comas, in order to prevent the administration of medicine by mouth; and almost always after they were forced to sign a Do Not Resuscitate notice, as their last conscious act and almost always without having any contact with their loved ones before their premature death.

Furthermore, the following passages are taken from the Hull & East Riding Prescribing Committee’s recommendations for assessing people with suspected COVID symptoms, which were in reality caused by the graphine oxide in the masks, the tests and the vaxxes imposed upon them prior to their diagnosis.

“Symptom assessment and rationale for selected management should be clearly documented. For patients approaching end of life, non-pharmacological management and care for the person/their family along with clear and compassionate discussions are key. Remind carers of the non-drug measures that can help symptoms – some suggestions included below. Please refer to local guidance and documentation for care of the dying person.”

Yorkshire and the Humber End of Life Care Group drew up the regional guidance for the NHS, which became the guidance for dealing with ANYBODY they said had COVID symptoms, complete with the following disclaimer for insurance purposes:

“These guidelines are the property of the Yorkshire and Humber Palliative and End of Life Care Group. It is intended that they be used by qualified medical and other healthcare professionals as an information resource, within the clinical context of each individual patient’s needs. The group takes no responsibility for any consequences of any actions taken as a result of using these guidelines. Readers are strongly advised to ensure that they are acting in line with current accepted practice and legislation, as these may change. These include, but are not limited to, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the NICE guidance on the prescription of opioids, the British National Formulary (BNF) and the Palliative Care Formulary (PCF). No legal liability is accepted for any errors in these guidelines, or for the misuse or misapplication of the advice presented here. In difficult situations, please seek advice from your local specialist palliative care service.

The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) have produced a central rapid guideline: Managing COVID‑19 for the management of individuals with COVID‑19 in all care settings (including end-of-life care).”

Midazolam Safety Warning

Neither Hull & East Riding Prescribing Committee nor NICE have any sustainable excuse for not knowing that Yorkshire and Humber HIEC and Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group published a report in January 2013, which drew urgent attention to the following Midazolam overdose warning, when it was being used as a component in anesthetic:

“In 2008 the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) issued a rapid response patient safety alert to reduce the risk of overdose with midazolam injection with adults (NPSA, 2008). This followed the receipt of 498 reported midazolam safety incidents between November 2004 and November 2008, whereby 3 patients died and a further 48 were moderately harmed.

Since the release of the alert, a further 417 incidents have been reported relating to wrong dose/strength errors, many (203) of which were related to administration of the medicine from a clinical area, and some (14) of which were related to monitoring/follow up (NPSA, 2012). The NPSA guidelines indicate that for adults, the intravenous injection of midazolam should be given slowly at a rate of approximately 1 mg in 30 seconds.

In adults below the age of 60 the initial dose is 2 to 2.5mg given five to 10 minutes before the beginning of the procedure. Further doses of 1mg may be given as necessary. In adults over 60 years of age, debilitated or chronically ill patients, the initial dose must be reduced to 0.5-1.0mg and given five to 10 minutes before the beginning of the procedure. Further doses of 0.5 to 1mg may be given as necessary (Roche Pharmaceuticals, 2008).”

Nevertheless, Hull & East Riding Prescribing Committee and its equivalent in every borough nationwide followed government approved NICE guidelines, which stipulated that the initial dose should be 2.5-30mg of Midazolam for symptoms of severe breathlessness, agitation or delusion, in any suspected COVID case, whether they be adult or child.

Moreover, those 3 deaths in 498 Midazolam safety incidents reported within the NHS extrapolates into a mortality rate of 0.6% [600 deaths for every 100,000 injections].

NICE Palliative & End-of-Life Care Guidelines

As alluded to above, the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence dictated that these guidelines be adopted by every health authority nationwide, to treat what they very broadly term agitation, restlessness and insomnia, in people of any age suspected of having or being likely to catch the government lurgy, all of which were experienced by the majority of Britain during the lockdowns.

“Agitation/terminal restlessness: Consider reversible causes (for example hypercalcaemia, constipation, urinary retention) and non-drug management. If panic, anxiety and restlessness predominate – use benzodiazepine [of which Midazolam is one].

For altered sensorium with delirium, hallucinations, disorientation and disturbed sleep/wake cycle – use antipsychotic..

Oral: Haloperidol 500microgram to 1.5mg 4 hourly PRN Lorazepam 500microgram sublingual PRN (maximum 2mg in 24 hours).

Buccal: Midazolam can be used under specialist advice.

Subcutaneous: Haloperidol 1.5mg stat or 1.5 to 5mg/24 hours in a driver.

Levomepromazine 12.5mg stat or 12.5-50mg/24 hours in syringe driver.

Midazolam 2.5-5mg stat or 10mg -30mg/24 hours in syringe driver.

Higher doses of both drugs can be used under specialist advice.

Benzodiazepines may cause a paradoxical increase in agitation.

Midazolam 2.5-5mg stat or 10mg -30mg/24 hours in syringe driver” for agitation, restlessness or insomnia. Higher doses under specialist advice.”

These UK Government approved guidelines were drawn up and issued by NICE in full knowledge of the National Patient Safety Agency warning about the lethal dangers of over prescribing Midazolam in amounts above 0.5 – 2.5mg across all cohorts.

Given Hancock’s sworn confession to the House of Commons COVID inquiry, in which he confirms that he had procured, ordered and engaged enough Midazolam, Morphine, syringe drivers and the NHS staff to administer the lethal doses, in order to give the murder victims what Dr Luke Evans MP called “a Good Death” – a term which is synonymous with euthanasia – it’s no wonder that he was thrown to the lions in the aftermath of these undeniable facts being publicly exposed, in addition to the high court judgments against him for handing lucrative PPE contracts to his friends and family.

However, I hereby preemptively prescribe that the lives of the former secretary of state, the other three of the Four Horsemen and their endless stream of conspiring accomplices are about to become a whole lot more agitated, restless and sleepless, on the basis that we now have prima facie evidence which proves every single element of the most serious crimes that have ever been perpetrated. 

Preemptive Prescribing at the End of Life

Indubitably, NICE has emphatically shown that they are about as far from nice as one could possibly be [yet another Sabbatean inversion], by laying down what can only accurately be described an instruction manual for placing people of any age on the end-of-life pathway, before they are showing any signs of shuffling off this mortal coil.

Moreover, according to the Cygnus Report, this is the direct result a UK Government policy driven initiative to save as much money as possible on keeping people alive, when they are preemptively considered unworthy of that which they mistakenly believed they had a legal right to receive and arbitrarily placed on the end-of-life pathway to lethal injection.


These are a guide for prescribing for patients not currently requiring opioids or antiemetics. For other patients, please seek advice. More information can be found in guidance associated with My Care Plan.

Morphine sulfate 10mg/mL injection 2.5 to 5mg sc hourly PRN

For pain or dyspnoea Supply 10 (ten) x 1mL ampoules

Midazolam 10mg/2mL injection 2.5 to 5mg sc hourly PRN

For agitation, distress or dyspnoea Supply 10 (ten) x 2mL ampoules

Hyoscine butylbromide 20mg/mL injection 20mg sc hourly PRN

For respiratory secretions or colic Supply 10 x 1mL ampoules Seek advice over 120mg/24 hours

Haloperidol 5mg/mL injection 500microgram to1.5mg sc 2 to 4 hourly PRN max 5mg/24 hours

For nausea or agitation/delirium

Supply 5 x 1mL vials Seek advice over 5mg/24 hours”

Pre-emptive prescribing of Midazolam and Morphine to people not currently requiring them means prescribing in advance of either empirical diagnosis or the onset of symptoms, using the same drugs Dr Luke Evans MP stated [before the House of Commons COVID-19 inquiry in April 2020] were required for ‘a good death’, thereby guaranteeing the premature exit of many thousands of people.

Since we can adduce similar policy documents for every borough nationwide, the evidence of a thirteen year conspiracy to create an efficient administrative infrastructure to euthanize targeted demographics is now simply overwhelming.

Harrying of The North II

By way of a shocking example of that documentary evidence, the extract below is taken from the 2016 Palliative and End of Life Care Guidelines for Northern England, where there has been prolific Midazolam prescribing during COVID-1984, following five years of quietly implementing this genocidal policy of anticipating the onset of illness to justify the prescription of lethal pharmaceuticals.


• Massive haemorrhage is often preceded by smaller bleeds. Oral/topical treatment may help (see below). When planning ahead, agree an Emergency Health Care Plan.

• Review risk: benefit balance of anticoagulants. Correct any coagulation disorder if possible.

• Consider referral for radiotherapy or embolisation if patient has an erosive tumour.

• Review resuscitation status and treatment options with patient and family. Document carefully.

• Dark towels should be available nearby to reduce the visual impact of blood if haemorrhage occurs.

• Prescribe anticipatory midazolam (10mg IV/IM/SC/buccal/sublingual) as a crisis one-off dose.

If resuscitation is inappropriate

• Try to remain calm. This will help a dying patient to achieve a peaceful death.

• The priority is to stay with the patient, giving as much reassurance/explanation as possible to patient and family.

• Use dark towels to absorb blood loss.

• Consider the use of crisis midazolam (10mg by appropriate route) to relieve distress in a patient that may be imminently dying.


Consider and treat common causes of restlessness: eg urinary retention, faecal impaction and pain.
Support a calm environment, familiar voices and faces, gentle and usual routine.

Patients on regular or long term benzodiazepines should continue to receive a benzodiazepine. Give midazolam by SC infusion to prevent rebound agitation/withdrawal.

The doses given here are a guide. In complex situations seek specialist advice.
If patient is distressed or agitated, use midazolam.

Where there is delirium or to avoid excess sedation, use haloperidol.

Levomepromazine is an alternative for delirium, though more sedating.

Renal failure: Midazolam is a good first choice, as toxin accumulation increases seizure risk.

Anticipatory (Just in case) prescribing

Planning ahead is important even if a patient is not currently symptomatic: it is a risk in the dying phase.

Prescribe either midazolam 2.5mg SC 1-hrly as required (up to QDS), or Haloperidol 1.5mg SC 1-hrly as required (up to BD).

Doses should be titrated or regular treatment prescribed as below if symptoms develop.”

COVID-1984 Minority Report

All of which proves that it was and remains government policy to prescribe Midazolam [and Morphine] to people, with or without any symptoms of COVID-19, on the anticipatory presumption of a man or woman in a white coat that they will in future contract and die from a cause of death which doesn’t exist and might never arise.

In other words, this is akin to witnessing a real life version of Minority Report, only instead of predicting crime and locking people up before they commit it, they are predicting death and murdering people who would otherwise live for days, weeks, months and years.

“Review within 24 hrs

If breakthrough doses needed, increase midazolam syringe driver dose by the equivalent of the extra doses given.

If midazolam dose > 30mg/24hrs – consider adding haloperidol 1.5 – 5mg/24 hrs SC or levomepromazine 25mg/24 hrs SC.

Continue breakthrough doses of midazolam 5mg SC 1-hrly as required.

Common dose range midazolam 10-60mg/24hrs (above this dose, seek advice).

Unresolved or severe symptoms

A few patients become extremely agitated when they are dying. This can be a very difficult situation and may require very high doses of medicines. Specialist advice should be sought. It is vital that patients are not left in distress.”

From which we can reasonably conclude that, in the event a patient becomes extremely agitated when they are preemptively placed on the end-of-life pathway, after testing false positive [or negative] for COVID-19, they are silenced with enough Midazolam to kill them.

That’s straight out of One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest. However, rather than being the responsibility of a few errant health professionals, it is the direct result of a dictatorial government policy of eliminating the most resistant to their murderous ends, as well as the most vulnerable to such lethal preemptive prescriptions.

WHO Needs UK Needs Rounds

The WHO approved UK Needs Rounds policies were tested in Australia and when nobody realised in time to stop them proceeding unencumbered, its architects deemed it a success and it was imported here, as per the cartel’s plan.

Nevertheless,what the agenda amounts to is clearly mass murder by government policy, dressed up as a programme of social justice, care and compassion, so it’s about as heinous as one can get.

“Poor end of life care exposed by the pandemic

Covid-19 has had devastating effects on care homes across the UK. Disproportionate numbers of excess deaths have been recorded amongst care home residents and there are increasing reports of people dying alone. Discriminatory responses have included transferring older adults from hospitals to care homes, pressure to use do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) / CPR orders, rationing according to age, and a lack of testing and PPE. This has significant justice and human rights implications, including the right to life, to health, and to non-discrimination.

Whilst issues of death and dying have undoubtedly been amplified by Covid-19, the need to improve care for people in their final weeks and days has been a priority for some time. Prior to the pandemic, up to 56% of care home residents died within the first year of admission and it is estimated that by 2040, care homes will be the most common place of death in the UK.

Yet, care home residents often experience poor end of life care as a result of avoidable hospitalisations, unmanaged symptoms, and inadequate communication, interdisciplinary working and advance care planning (ACP). This can be extremely distressing for residents and their relatives and must be urgently addressed.”

Damning 2020 Midazolam Study

However, despite the government policy of treating “unmanaged symptoms”[in hospitals, care homes and residential properties] with overdoses of Midazolam since April 2020, this damning study, published three months earlier, warned that the drug takes much longer to be cleared from the bodies of the elderly and the seriously ill to whom it has been routinely prescribed.

“One report in adult palliative sedation found mean midazolam doses of 29 mg/day (median: 30 mg, range: 15–60 mg/day).81 A recent study in an Israeli hospice found average doses of midazolam up to 79 mg/day.82 Mercadante and coworkers found mean doses were 23–58 mg/day.83 Midazolam is useful for palliative sedation in the home setting for pediatric patients.84 Initial doses were in the range of 0.02–0.08 mg/kg/h.84 Mean dose was 0.02–1.0 mg/kg/h.84 In treating terminal restlessness and agitation, Bottomley and Hanks15 used continuous infusion of subcutaneous midazolam in 23 advanced cancer patients in hospice. The investigators achieved symptom control in 22 of 23 patients using initial doses of 0.4–0.8 mg/h. The mean maximum dose was 2.9 mg/h. Dosing varied between patients highlighting the need to individualize dosing. Midazolam along with droperidol or olanzapine remains a treatment option for agitated patients in the emergency room.85

Adverse effects

Besides somnolence, most adverse effects are of low frequency.68 Clinical trials show that midazolam is safe to give with opioids for the treatment of dyspnea in advanced illness.69,70 Hiccups occur with an incidence of approximately 3.6%.71 Benzodiazepines cause disinhibition reactions to occur in both adult and pediatric patients, and midazolam is no exception.72 However, benzodiazepines in combination with antipsychotics help control delirium.73 Vorsanger and Roberts reported two cases of athetoid movements after receiving midazolam as a premedication.74 Physostigmine reversed the movement. Midazolam can cause prolonged anterograde amnesia.75–77

Advanced illness

Terminally ill patients experience significant physiologic changes affecting drug disposition. Loss of body weight and cachexia can lead to a decrease in Vd (volume of distribution). Decreasing Vd leads to increases in drug concentration and effect for lipophilic drugs like midazolam.32 Low albumin levels, commonly seen in advanced illness, decrease the clearance of midazolam.33


Midazolam clearance decreases in the elderly. Prolonged elimination of half-life occurs in the elderly.34 Liver blood flow decreases with age, and midazolam is a drug with a low hepatic extraction (0.3), so elimination prolongs in low hepatic blood flow states.32,35″

Those last two paragraphs are very important, as the study concludes that Midazolam remains in the bodies of the most vulnerable cohorts for much longer than the other cohorts, which means that it takes much less to kill them than it does a healthy adult or child.

Nevertheless, the overdoses prescribed are pretty much identical to those recommended by the UK Government as a matter of public health policy, despite Midazolam never having been licensed for manufacture and distribution by the MHRA. In fact, the drug remains a ‘controlled substance’ under UK law.

But all they had to do to achieve their genocidal targets was put the old and sick on the end of life pathway, get them to sign a DNR and give them the recommended doses on the hour, until they were dead.

Which amounts to joint enterprise conspiracy to commit criminal fraud and mass murder by government policy.

A Nefarious Alibi For Mass Murder

Having said that, in this case we don’t have to prove fraud to proceed before a jury in a Private Criminal Prosecution any more because we are laying murder charges.

Nonetheless, the evidence we are adducing amply demonstrates that the fraud of COVID-1984 was concocted to provide the perpetrators of these truly heinous crimes with a plausible deniability.

In other words, they needed to manufacture the fake public health emergency so they could falsely claim everybody murdered with doctor prescribed Midazolam in the hospitals, care homes and in their own beds died ‘from’ or ‘with’ COVID-19, rather than from the potentially fatal illnesses they already suffered from, or didn’t, as the case may be.

Which necessarily means they needed the Coronavirus Act 2020 to lock the condemned inside care homes and their own domiciles, as well as to suspend autopsies on all suspected COVID deaths, otherwise the resulting postmortems would have revealed the killer drug’s abundant presence in the blood of the murder victims.

A profoundly nefarious alibi for mass murder, if ever there was one.

Heartfelt Gratitude

Despite the heavy subject matter of this post, I can’t put a full stop on it without paying tribute to everybody who has supported my work over the past eighteen months, in whichever ways you have been able to.

Not only have you assisted in dramatically expanding of the reach of my content, which is currently seen by millions of people every month across all platforms, you have also helped keep all my content ad and paywall free for everybody, with the generous tips you have thrown in the Tips Jar, for which you will all soon receive an invitation to claim an equally generous reward in a new credit-based cryptocurrency [which is on the brink of launch] to show my appreciation.

In addition to all of that, this blog now has more that 15,000 subscribers, with a collective average engagement rate of 82% and an average IQ of at least 125; whilst my various social media platforms currently have in excess of 100,000 followers between them and the continue to grow rapidly every month.

Considering that we are living in an real life Idiocracy, in which critical thinking is bordering on a criminal offence, I am both honoured and humbled by the fact that so many critical thinkers are engaging in the increasingly wide dissemination of the eclectic and heavily censored work of a notoriously blacklisted, subversive Geordie recalcitrant, such as myself.

From the bottom of my heart, thank you to each and every friend, follower and subscriber. Never underestimate how essential your support, in whatever form it comes, is integral to the success of our mutual struggle to end the tyrannies which continue to abound on these ancient shores.

In The Names of The Midazolammed

No matter how much effort it requires, one day, sooner than you might think, we will all wake up in a land where the unalienable rights of the individual are protected from the tyranny of collective government.

In such a land, governed under the Common Law of Do No Harm But Take No Shit, the administration of the COVID-1984 Genocide would be a lawful and practical impossibility, which is why the Trustees of Universal Community Trust and myself will do all within our capability to bring about that outcome peacefully.

Nevertheless, to do so we must first indict all the defendants we allege have committed joint enterprise mass murder by government policy of an estimated 136,000 people, from April 2020 to June 2021.

For the purposes of which, please share this post far and wide, telling everybody you know that justice must and will be done, in the names of the victims who were #Midazolammed by UK Government policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...