Messenger Posted October 13, 2020 Share Posted October 13, 2020 As I was watching this short doc on the Nighthawk F117 "stealth" airplane, something provoked my thought regarding their mission in Panama. Knowing that the US is run by crazy black magicians who want control over everyone and everything, I had wondered if the US conducted a coup in Panama much like they have done in so many other parts of the world. I wasn't really privy to politics way back in 1989. (Older people be like way back? lol). I had never thought over the years to look into Panama but this vid sparked that intrigue. Then I thought, was this the NWO apparatus removing Manuel Noriega because of his traditional beliefs, perhaps also his genealogy...? Was Noriega pro NATO or against it? What he for or against the UN? Which nations were his allies? Were they being threatened by the US? By Noriega? The US obviously had a superior Military over Panama, so it's not like Panama would threaten the US, in 1990. Lol. Now my mind is wandering so let me go back. The pilot describes his location at a base in New Mexico. He further explains the plane was used for the first time in combat in operation "just cause" when they went in to get Noriega in 1989. He then explains the aircraft, angle of attack, the tubes feed flight control information to the computer. Also a device that allows them to see in the dark using a temp sensor. He explains how they conduct "attacks on targets" using a infrared laser beam device on the belly of the craft that ho[l]mes to its target. (SWIDT) Eleven years go by, from 1989. At least a decade, before 9-11 happened. I mean the final 9-11, because don't forget there were a previous attack. I think you see where this is going. How in the hell did some alleged arab hijackers with cessna and flight simulator training, get by the "defense" system of the US military industrial complex? What. A. Fucking. Joke. So the US MIC could use this stealth aircraft to go in and remove some guy in Panama who probably just wanted a fair price on his exported bananas and mangoes. Yet they couldn't stop 19 jockeys from supposedly flying two large not so stealthy, not so nimble aircraft from hitting two buildings? The "stealth" aircraft Nighthawk bad ass was MIA on 9-11! Imagine that! But in 1989 it was ready and waiting to bully a nation without a billy bad ass Nighthawk stealth F117.4208XYZ Playa. Over a decade of aircraft and "defense" technical and hardware refinement, and intelligence, and then we get 9- 11 -2001. Some "defense" system. Just goes to show that the military don't even know who the enemies are within their own ranks! Oh snap! Or that they cover for them by simply pleading ignorance. No for real. "Deep state". But agents on the net be like, no way bruh. Yeah sure. I'll piss on your deep state corn flakes, and on a Monday morning too. Dude just wanted to export some bananas and mangoes. 9-11 WAS an INSIDE job. In-Depth look at the Elusive F-117 Nighthawk Stealth Fighter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldnah Posted October 13, 2020 Share Posted October 13, 2020 Not sure where your going there - but the stealth fighter - which was really a stealth bomber has no relevance to 9-11. As for how did they get past the US defences - They didnt There was no need to - they started from within the US - the defences were fixed solely on aircraft approaching the US - USAF did not deal with aircraft in the US unless they went near restricred airspace (area 51) Why ATC were so slow in reacting to the situation is another question - associated failures then prevented the military from reacting effectively. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Messenger Posted October 13, 2020 Author Share Posted October 13, 2020 2 hours ago, Eldnah said: Not sure where your going there - but the stealth fighter - which was really a stealth bomber has no relevance to 9-11. As for how did they get past the US defences - They didnt There was no need to - they started from within the US - the defences were fixed solely on aircraft approaching the US - USAF did not deal with aircraft in the US unless they went near restricred airspace (area 51) Why ATC were so slow in reacting to the situation is another question - associated failures then prevented the military from reacting effectively. My point is that this stealth bad ass aircraft was available to use in a coup in Panama by the thug corrupt US government but then twelve years later they couldn't use it to protect the USA from "terrorists" flying 737's? That like police using modified 1990 fox body Mustang's to chase down 1960 Lincoln Continental's. The US military industrial complex, largest military on the planet other than Russia or China, with everything someone could imagine but they couldn't stop 19 dumbarses from flying two heavy clumsy 737's into the world trade center towers. Lets not give any excuse to absolve the US military from responsibility in protecting the USA. I mean, isn't it their job to protect the USA from foreign AND domestic enemies? Yeah, it is. But with all that tech and "intelligence" they failed. Speaking of intelligence, isn't that what the CIA is for? Apparently not. Seems the only thing the US government are good at is using aerospace tech and hardware to meddle in everyone else's affairs, conducting coup's in every country to steal resources and implement fascism. When I think of the CIA and US military I feel the sudden urge to vomit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldnah Posted October 14, 2020 Share Posted October 14, 2020 As I said previously - the stealth fighter was really light bomber It was Subsonic - It isnt going to intercept an airliner except head on IF they just happen to be perfectly positioned - Thats what F15s are for It carried no A2A weaponry It had no radar It is irrelevant to 911 and air defence - think of it as a faster B17 As for USAF - it was structured organised and tasked to deal with aircraft approaching the US - not within it. The failings on the day do not lie with the US airforce - If you believe it was all a set up and everything was a false flag - then the operation was set up in such away that USAF was isolated and prevented from acting/ If you believe there really were terrorists and the CIA let it happen then the operation was set up in such away that USAF was isolated and prevented from acting If you believe the official story then the CIA failed and because of that the USAF was not in a position to respond. As for the Facism remark - seriously? Trump and the US may be guilty of a lot of things but being or spreading facism isnt one of them. Of course it supported a few fascist states - at a time the USSR supported Communist ones - each doing so to stop the other gaining ground - despite both being differrent cheeks of the same arse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wideawake Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 On 10/14/2020 at 2:40 AM, Eldnah said: As for USAF - it was structured organised and tasked to deal with aircraft approaching the US - not within it. The failings on the day do not lie with the US airforce - I don't think so, that is exactly what the US Air Force was "training " for on that day. That is why they couldn't intercept the commercial planes... too busy. On 10/14/2020 at 2:40 AM, Eldnah said: If you believe it was all a set up and everything was a false flag - then the operation was set up in such away that USAF was isolated and prevented from acting/ True statement here. On 10/14/2020 at 2:40 AM, Eldnah said: If you believe there really were terrorists and the CIA let it happen then the operation was set up in such away that USAF was isolated and prevented from acting Yes, there really were terrorists but they weren't Arabs with box cutters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.