Jump to content

Are we living under water?


Dawn
 Share

Recommended Posts

Admittedly, this is a whacked out theory in its infancy, but it crosses my mind from time to time. I have had luck in the past posting my craziest thoughts on this forum and getting a piece of information I needed in response, so please throw what you have at me.  
 

The crux of my theory begins with the fact that we are not living in base reality. We are living in some kind of artificial construct. As to the nature or purpose of the reality matrix that we live in..that’s where it gets hazy for me. 
 

Light Critters. How many of you see the translucent light creatures floating around in the sky on a sunny day? They look like enlarged strands of bacteria, or something else that you would see under a microscope. The medical community dismisses them as eye floaters. But I’ve seen on my hippie message boards that much like me, there are plenty of people that have seen these light critters for all of their lives. And just like me, they are now seeing the light critters more frequently, in larger and more complicated forms, and the critters aren’t rushing to get out of sight like they used to. I was looking at the light critters the first time it occurred to me that they moved as if they were underwater. 
 

Then other things came to mind. You’ve probably all seen the old Hebrew conception of the universe. The most interesting part to me is the notation of, “The waters above the firmament”. Where did the ancient Hebrews get this idea? I think scholars would likely say that the Hebrews assumed the sky was water because it was blue like the oceans. But scholars are always in a big ol’ hurry to dismiss ancient wisdom. I think there may be more to it. 
 

Other random thoughts on the subject:

 

Why is unsupervised contact with dolphins, whales, and other intelligent marine life prohibited? (I’m not buying the altruistic facade) 


Why is it not common knowledge that the dolphin and human genome are pretty much the same? We are more closely related to dolphins than apes. Dolphins just have a few extra genes that give them sonar etc. But this info is suppressed. 

 

Why do they downplay how much of this world is water? You always see the statistic that 71% of the earths surface is covered by water. But that is just surface area. If you take into account the depths of the oceans...95% of this planet has to be water. 
 

Why have we (supposedly) explored space more than our own oceans? They discover a new species every time they do a deep dive, some of which defy all laws of biology. “Oh this animal here has evolved to not need sunlight or oxygen. It just breathes nitrogen from deep sea vents and then illuminates itself.” Species like that, that challenge everything we know about what life requires...you think there would be more interest, more funding, more expeditions, more ramifications realized, connections made etc. But nah, everyone seems fairly bored with the ocean. 
 

Why do humans have a subcutaneous layer of fat that only fish and mammals that live in the water have? 
 

Why do humans all have a little webbing in between their fingers and their toes? Apes don’t. Why is it a common birth defect for us to have additional webbing between our fingers and our toes? That genetic memory wouldn’t be there if we had never lived in the water. 
 

Why do some humans have gills behind their ears? 
 

Why did the movie Waterworld get bashed so hard? (Kevin Costner had gills behind his ears) 

 

Why was the discovery channel’s “Mermaids” which presented the aquatic ape theory get so bashed? 
 

Why do we breathe fluid in the womb? 
 

Why do infants instinctively know how to swim? 
 

Doesn’t it seem like people with Down syndrome are a little closer to fish then the rest of us? The eyes and the parted mouth.. The method they use for Down syndrome testing is called FISH testing. It kind of seems to me like that is what it was casually called and then someone made up a shitty acronym, Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization to cover the truth. 
 

Why do so many people feel more at peace when they are close to water? I know the water is the place that most feels like home to me. 
 

So thats what’s flying around my brain right now. I’ve thought for a long time that a step of evolution was left out of the textbooks. That we had to have spent a significant time in the water to have the amount of telltale signs on our bodies as we do. It has just recently occurred to me to connect this line of thinking to my thoughts on the nature of the matrix. 
 

Could we be just be swimming around the ocean with an altered consciousness that makes us think we are experiencing this artificial land reality? 
 

Are there deep underwater “Abyss” style dome cities? That’s what the light critters remind me of...the tubular water entity that visits their rig in the Abyss. 
 

Anyhow, I don’t think I’ve honed in on it yet, but I definitely feel there is an aquatic piece of the puzzle that I am missing. Your thoughts appreciated. 
 

 


 

F37E83D8-E69C-424E-BB1B-50E53487876B.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On light critters it's great to hear I'm not the only one.

 

To me they look like parasites and assume that they are parasites.

 

Lots of talk about parasites across the whole alternative spectrum which makes me think that's what it is.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting @DawnI wouldn't call it a whacked out theory at all, ill be following this closely. I love water myself, however when I really think about it, its more the sound that I am attracted to. In terms of the of the new species found in the oceans and other bodies of water, some are very strange, alien like even. Unfortunately we just do not know for sure how much of the ocean has truly been explored and certainly how truthful they would be about disclosing it . I do find it incredibly strange the vast amount of water that appears on earth 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...
  • 1 month later...

its only "whacked out" if you fall for all the conditioning, automatically the word water "likely" makes you think of the stuff you drink or  something you can visibly see, could you just be referring to a liquid as opposed to water, which is very different? What about water you cant see, like humidity? To that extent I guess we are "under water"  Even deserts retain some humidity.  You will probably find the atmosphere is saturated with water. Sadly human conditioning (ridicule )would have you believe, its not possible for us to be under or in water based on the perception that water can only been seen or touched and to be under water prolonged means using an breathing apparatus. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reality has two natures that are one and the same. From the human perspective, we are surrounded by water, and also above us and within us. Different densities and the bodies are primarily based on water. From a perspective still unknown to humans, it is a different kind of multidimensional state. Which can be accelerated and slowed down and shaped. Pictorial ideas of the ancient world and also attempts at explanation are, like the current ideas of science, very relative. All this has to do with limited perceptive capacity. Spatial expansion of the state should be defined as intelligent design what humans would currently define as impossible. To put it mildly, we lack certain basic abilities to imagine and think on such a scale. It could be quite challenging to focus on it and here we do not decide when the next step can be taken to perceive it from a differentiated perspective.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/11/2021 at 12:09 PM, Origin said:

Reality has two natures that are one and the same. From the human perspective, we are surrounded by water, and also above us and within us. Different densities and the bodies are primarily based on water. From a perspective still unknown to humans, it is a different kind of multidimensional state. Which can be accelerated and slowed down and shaped. Pictorial ideas of the ancient world and also attempts at explanation are, like the current ideas of science, very relative. All this has to do with limited perceptive capacity. Spatial expansion of the state should be defined as intelligent design what humans would currently define as impossible. To put it mildly, we lack certain basic abilities to imagine and think on such a scale. It could be quite challenging to focus on it and here we do not decide when the next step can be taken to perceive it from a differentiated perspective.

Hi Origin

 

What is your profile image?

 

Kinda looks egg shaped, with something inside?

 

jus curious....thanks 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch Lloyd Pye's "Everything you know is false."  We did not evolve from primates.  We could not have evolved from a primate to homo sapien in 200,000 years:  It's impossible.  Thus, comparing ourselves from primates is one of the most ludicrous theory mankind has ever created.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Anam Chara said:

Hi Origin

 

What is your profile image?

 

Kinda looks egg shaped, with something inside?

 

jus curious....thanks 

This is a cloud. I just like things that appear within reality. Humans have defined what reality has to be, then it is a cloud.

 

542525240_ovallikecloudspottedoverReykjavkIceland1.jpg.f0c681c037115179868bf7de1be7da7d.jpg

CAUGHT ON CAMERA.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Origin said:

This is a cloud. I just like things that appear within reality. Humans have defined what reality has to be, then it is a cloud.

 

542525240_ovallikecloudspottedoverReykjavkIceland1.jpg.f0c681c037115179868bf7de1be7da7d.jpg

CAUGHT ON CAMERA.jpg

Thank you Origin for reply.

 

A most unusual cloud formation indeed!!!

 

To other photo of a moon?

Is equally intriguing indeed!!

 

Cheers

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anam Chara said:

Thank you Origin for reply.

 

A most unusual cloud formation indeed!!!

 

To other photo of a moon?

Is equally intriguing indeed!!

 

Cheers

They are demonstrations that contain partial aspects. Behind each demonstration there are answers that are nested within each other, that involve many other aspects. This concerns all so-called anomalies at any spatial extent. There is no limit. And that is how this intelligence always ensures that certain questioners feel addressed.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

  

On 10/6/2020 at 9:43 PM, Dawn said:

Why do they downplay how much of this world is water? You always see the statistic that 71% of the earths surface is covered by water. But that is just surface area. If you take into account the depths of the oceans...95% of this planet has to be water. 

 

On 6/11/2021 at 1:07 AM, Harmony said:

its only "whacked out" if you fall for all the conditioning, automatically the word water "likely" makes you think of the stuff you drink or  something you can visibly see, could you just be referring to a liquid as opposed to water, which is very different? What about water you cant see, like humidity? To that extent I guess we are "under water"  Even deserts retain some humidity.  You will probably find the atmosphere is saturated with water. Sadly human conditioning (ridicule )would have you believe, its not possible for us to be under or in water based on the perception that water can only been seen or touched and to be under water prolonged means using an breathing apparatus. 

 

I was thinking about this just the other day, while stood outside at work looking up at the clouds.

 

Yes, when people talk about water, we always instantly think of the 'wet stuff', ie water in its liquid form.

 

Water is present everywhere on this planet in all three states of matter, liquid, solid (ice) and gas (water vapour).

 

After nitrogen and oxygen, water vapour is the next most common constituent of the air in our atmosphere, more so than carbon dioxide, though due to its nature the amount of water vapour does vary.

 

Major constituents of dry air, by volume[8]
Gas Volume(A)
Name Formula in ppmv(B) in %
Nitrogen N2 780,840 78.084
Oxygen O2 209,460 20.946
Argon Ar 9,340 0.9340
Carbon dioxide
(December, 2020)(C)[13]
CO
2
415.00 0.041500
Neon Ne 18.18 0.001818
Helium He 5.24 0.000524
Methane CH4 1.87 0.000187
Krypton Kr 1.14 0.000114
Not included in above dry atmosphere:
Water vapor(D) H2O 0–30,000(D) 0–3%(E)

 

So yeah, it is fair to say that there is a lot more water than what we can 'see'.

 

And even in the air, we are surrounded - to some extent - by water, and we breathe it in and breathe it out.

 

I wouldn't say we are living 'under water', but it is all around us.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/6/2020 at 9:43 PM, Dawn said:

the old Hebrew conception of the universe

 

the bible begins with the waters which could be seen as the underlying substrata of reality

 

then the voice of God passes over the waters and the creation process begins out of which all forms arise. This could be seen as active frequency passing through the underlying substrata of reality, moulding that passive underlying strata

 

Perhaps they could also be termed spirit and matter

 

Under this conception we would all be a wave of the sea, formed out of divine frequency and distance and separateness would be an illusion

Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...