Jump to content

Anna Brees ..... what do you think?


Recommended Posts

I decided to start this thread about the ex BBC and ITV presenter Anna Brees (who also worked for the Rothschild Bank in the Channel Islands 

in her youth) because there were many comments about her on the Coronavirus thread and I don't want that thread to be disrupted.

 

Anyway, I have serious doubts about her integrity, but I may be wrong. I don't want to be divisive, but from lots of information I have

gathered which I'll post later, if there is interest, she really does appear suspect.

 

Here is a tweet from her Twitter feed today.  So many people in "alternative media" who have jumped onto the Covid scam in the

past six months are asking for money.

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

In this video she's not interested in what Gareth Icke has to say, she keeps looking away to see how many people are watching her feed.

 

It's obvious to me, Gareth Icke tried to ignore her request to speak to David Icke. When eventually (after being pestered

by Anna Brees) Gareth did get David's attention to speak to Anna Brees, David decided to speak to other people instead!

 

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Golden Retriever said:

In this video she's not interested in what Gareth Icke has to say, she keeps looking away to see how many people are watching her feed.

 

 

Hey!

Did you copy my comment on youtube?? If you did, you can expect to receive a bill!   I said EXACTLY the same thing about ALL the people she interviewed last Saturday in London. She interviewed a couple of people before 12:00pm from where the speakers were gathering and wasn't remotely interested in what they were saying.  She was looking all round though, not just at her live feed info. 

A couple of days later she made a video of her in tears, standing in her hallway I think because of some bad news she had received? Who the 'flok' makes a video right at the moment they are most distraught? Normal people would wait for ten or twenty minutes to compose themselves or longer. 

I wrote a comment asking if she was mentally ill and that's still my opinion. That woman is a couple of spanners cards short of a full set.  

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Smokestack Lightnin' said:

 

Hey!

Did you copy my comment on youtube?? If you did, you can expect to receive a bill!   I said EXACTLY the same thing about ALL the people she interviewed last Saturday in London. She interviewed a couple of people before 12:00pm from where the speakers were gathering and wasn't remotely interested in what they were saying.  She was looking all round though, not just at her live feed info. 

A couple of days later she made a video of her in tears, standing in her hallway I think because of some bad news she had received? Who the 'flok' makes a video right at the moment they are most distraught? Normal people would wait for ten or twenty minutes to compose themselves or longer. 

I wrote a comment asking if she was mentally ill and that's still my opinion. That woman is a couple of spanners cards short of a full set.  

 

No I didn't copy or see your comment, honest Gov.  Thinking on the same wavelength.🙂

 

Edit

 

She was crying in that video because she received cash through the post from someone. She later deleted the video herself because I suspect

some people thought they were crocodile tears.

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was hopefull when I first saw her channel a couple of months ago, but I've had the opinion for a while that she's either controlled or VERY naive.

 

Haven't bothered looking at her videos from Saturday, and going by the posts here I won't bother.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If being ‘alternative’ is now going to become popular, i’m all for it. We all know she’s a sorry excuse for a pied piper (if that). But at least we know once your thinking changes and your 3rd eye opens. We know people will learn to only use her as a stepping stone into this sphere, rather than seeing her as gospel. I take what David say’s with a pinch of salt sometimes especially when he totally censors himself about WWI/II.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not a buisness person but wouldn't you make sure you had the money before you take on staff? Shes trying to make a brand which is fine. 

 

I like others starting watching the viewers uploading videos talking about their experiences a few months back and subscribed. Certain people started mentioning her being dodgy but the penny dropped for me after the 2nd protest in London with the middle aged guy talking about ex sas and military helping the people with the coordinates and dealing with the police.

 

I wasn't at the protest, but the strategy seemed to work. Her body language in that, and the words she was using and the way she swayed off topics sent alarm bells ringing for me. 

 

I hear also Alex Belfield (who i believe to be one of the good guys) is teaming up with her to do something he said. To me she just seems to be an 1opportunist  and her sanctomonious attitude does her no favours. 

 

"My mum told me to steer clear of nutters" 

 

"This old man was attacked by police". 

 

You are not exactly a spring chicken yourself sweetheart. 

 

Could be a "shill" but probably just another con job. Same ilk as Br1an R0se, but people say she is also involved with nefarious characters. Same with Sean attwood, James English (I really dont like that bloke) and perhaps even Jon Wedger who is another one i wouldn't trust. Bill maloney is a no brainer. 

 

Nah sorry all that crowd are not for me but if people get something from them fair enough. Its just an endless cycle of drama with that crowd.

 

I was subscribed to one of brian harveys middle aged ladies friends and she does live streams of her drinking wine and talking about which footballer as she so lovely puts it "has f**ked" or would "[email protected]". Just a lonely aging women and you get these people who are all linked. And they might have had illegal dodgy things being done to them but whos got time for playground gossip when we have a communist tyrannical takeover on our hands? 

 

But poor little brian would rather sit in his squaller making spoofs of david icke when we have the biggest threat to humanity currently underway. It pisses me off and it has to be said. Thats it Bri take the piss out of a genuine truth seeker and doing sod all about it yourself. He will still be making videos about ian puddick in 10 years from now. I believe brian is one of the good guys at heart, but he is being a victim and i have no time for people like that. 

 

Sorry for the rant. Just my thoughts don't have any solid evidence but i would be surprised if my gut instinct was wrong. 

 

Edited by Fluke
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Fluke said:

I am not a buisness person but wouldn't you make sure you had the money before you take on staff? Shes trying to make a brand which is fine. 

 

I like others starting watching the viewers uploading videos talking about their experiences a few months back and subscribed. Certain people started mentioning her being dodgy but the penny dropped for me after the 2nd protest in London with the middle aged guy talking about ex sas and military helping the people with the coordinates and dealing with the police.

 

I wasn't at the protest, but the strategy seemed to work. Her body language in that, and the words she was using and the way she swayed off topics sent alarm bells ringing for me. 

 

I hear also Alex Belfield (who i believe to be one of the good guys) is teaming up with her to do something he said. To me she just seems to be an 1opportunist  and her sanctomonious attitude does her no favours. 

 

"My mum told me to steer clear of nutters" 

 

"This old man was attacked by police". 

 

You are not exactly a spring chicken yourself sweetheart. 

 

Could be a "shill" but probably just another con job. Same ilk as Br1an R0se, but people say she is also involved with nefarious characters. Same with Sean attwood, James English (I really dont like that bloke) and perhaps even Jon Wedger who is another one i wouldn't trust. Bill maloney is a no brainer. 

 

Nah sorry all that crowd are not for me but if people get something from them fair enough. Its just an endless cycle of drama with that crowd.

 

I was subscribed to one of brian harveys middle aged ladies friends and she does live streams of her drinking wine and talking about which footballer as she so lovely puts it "has f**ked" or would "[email protected]". Just a lonely aging women and you get these people who are all linked. And they might have had illegal dodgy things being done to them but whos got time for playground gossip when we have a communist tyrannical takeover on our hands? 

 

But poor little brian would rather sit in his squaller making spoofs of david icke when we have the biggest threat to humanity currently underway. It pisses me off and it has to be said. Thats it Bri take the piss out of a genuine truth seeker and doing sod all about it yourself. He will still be making videos about ian puddick in 10 years from now. I believe brian is one of the good guys at heart, but he is being a victim and i have no time for people like that. 

 

Sorry for the rant. Just my thoughts don't have any solid evidence but i would be surprised if my gut instinct was wrong. 

 

Interesting what you say about Alex Belfield,I too thought he was good but now im not so sure.See his video he did about the 200 uni students not what i expected.Not sure if hes controlled or not or just cant decide what side hes on. The video on the students seems strange.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Alex could well be. I wouldn't 'trust' many people these days. He comes across as relatively asleep about the governments and how they operate. So he is still in the trap so to speak. He has a very awake following as far as i can tell. Its normally the sort of show thatbis far too mainstream for me but he has to be careful as themtube could pull the plug. It remind me of late 90s early 2000s radio, tommy boyd, and nick abbott style (before nick became a leftist) perhaps a bit of nostalgia is there. 

 

I cant remember what he said he was going to do with anna only that they have been in contact (as she is former bbc) alarm bells perhaps? But if he gets on with her good luck to him. The way i see it she has weazelled her way to him as he is the most successful independent radio show he claims anyway.

 

This was on wednesdays show towards the end and a caller mentioned her and warned him and he sang her praises. 

Edited by Fluke
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Captainlove said:

Interesting what you say about Alex Belfield,I too thought he was good but now im not so sure.See his video he did about the 200 uni students not what i expected.Not sure if hes controlled or not or just cant decide what side hes on. The video on the students seems strange.

 

I tried calling his show one night after listening to a few of his videos. Alex Belfield seems only to be doing videos from home o how much is that paying? His missus will be keeping him afloat if he's married. He sounds pretty grounded until it comes to 'the virus' and Covid-19. He's keeping onside just in case that wonder job at LBC or Talk Radio radio materializes. He's got no f***ing chance of ever been employed again on any UK radio station if he goes down the route of 'there is no virus folks - it's all a hoax to introduce a fascistic police military state'.      

I would have told him that if I had got through. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

why the fuck would anyone pay her for a newsletter??

 

she hasnt got any concept of business.

 

Newletters are just that! A newsletter.

 

The only reason she probably has to pay i because she has 1000's of email addresses.

 

You don't beg for money because you start to employ someone.

 

She's a scammer and bring nothing of value whatsoever. Not even any research

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Smokestack Lightnin' said:

 

I tried calling his show one night after listening to a few of his videos. Alex Belfield seems only to be doing videos from home o how much is that paying? His missus will be keeping him afloat if he's married. He sounds pretty grounded until it comes to 'the virus' and Covid-19. He's keeping onside just in case that wonder job at LBC or Talk Radio radio materializes. He's got no f***ing chance of ever been employed again on any UK radio station if he goes down the route of 'there is no virus folks - it's all a hoax to introduce a fascistic police military state'.      

I would have told him that if I had got through. 

I like alex belfield he does seem to be the only one online who is trying to get facts correct.But then as you say the plandemic thing comes along and he's stuck.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Jack said:

why the fuck would anyone pay her for a newsletter??

 

she hasnt got any concept of business.

 

Newletters are just that! A newsletter.

 

The only reason she probably has to pay i because she has 1000's of email addresses.

 

You don't beg for money because you start to employ someone.

 

She's a scammer and bring nothing of value whatsoever. Not even any research

Walter Mitty or Charles Pooter.

Edited by Nobby Noboddy
Link to post
Share on other sites

She doesn't bring any fresh content.

I am sure most of her videos are of people making videos for her.

So the people are making the content for her.

 

She's probably trying to monetize her you tube channel hence why she is careful of what she says.

 

She's supposed to be selling media courses, but her content and skillset is crap.

She's using Alex because he has a bit of the gift of the gab, and his content is quite short but its at least of some interest and quite well made.

 

Anyone who gives her money has got a screw loose, and she's milking the vulnerable

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding Alex Bellfield, he posted a video about 9/11 on the anniversary just gone, it was only up for a very short time and the majority of the comments were saying it was an inside job. The fact he took it down so quick got my spidey senses tingling. And as others have said this new one about the students in Coventry is bizarre.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, mishy said:

Regarding Alex Bellfield, he posted a video about 9/11 on the anniversary just gone, it was only up for a very short time and the majority of the comments were saying it was an inside job. The fact he took it down so quick got my spidey senses tingling. And as others have said this new one about the students in Coventry is bizarre.

Yeah I dont like him.

 

He' calling for the SNP MP to be locked up.

 

I don't care what BOJO, Cummings, Corbyn etc get up to.

 

Although there are trumped up fines etc, wouldnt want them to get them either.

 

Sure any fine they have to pay is pennies compared to the average joe on the street

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/2/2020 at 1:38 PM, mishy said:

I was hopefull when I first saw her channel a couple of months ago, but I've had the opinion for a while that she's either controlled or VERY naive.

 

Haven't bothered looking at her videos from Saturday, and going by the posts here I won't bother.

 

I hoped she was on 'our' side. Now I just don't know?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

From 27 minutes Anna Brees talks to a pro vaccine GP, and from her smiles and nodding, Anna Brees is

on board with the pro vaccine message.

 

The GP states she needs to CONVINCE her patients vaccines are safe, when there is much evidence that

this is not the case for some people.

 

It's good to read the comments on Youtube call Anna Brees out on this.

 

 

We don't need a vaccine for a flu virus. What we need to do is push back and just say no more. There is an agenda at play here and its not for our benefit.

217

 

 

 
Please stop talking about vaccines, the average healthy person does not need one ,we,ve got our own vaccine , it's called our immune system

125

 

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

She needs to acquire informed consent. The organisation she works for telling her she needs to convince ... someone's (?) ... patients, needs to acquire informed consent.

 

The problem with the 'informed' qualification of that requirement is that no doctor can be deemed to be operating with basic skills of reason if they believe this qualification can be satisfied when there is information censorship from patients happening both through media and search engines as well as the medical profession itself. Doctors without the capacity gor reason can do unconscienable things.

 

I want to see the unreasonable ones thrown into the milgram furnace to see if theres any pure qualities that can be usful for medicine from these potential Dr Deaths.

 

Brees is another attempt by the fake stream media to reinvent itself. The whole thing about the main stream media crying foul on the mainstream media like they themselves werent mainstream media was a failed strategy. Brees is just more flapping about from a dying sea monster trying to save its reputation for speaking truth when the very boat its now flapping about on know all to well it will never speak it even with its last breath.

 

But look at all the little fishes out there, speaking truth that feels like truth that resonates like truth where no psychological trickery or fancy makeovers are applied. The gutenberg bible is perhaps the first type of journalism there was and it contains alot of truths that people need to hear. What do the people with superficial skin have to say about this type of journalism? Oh if it becomes popular again, theyll be experts, theyll be the people with views we need to hear so we can have our views on these matters predicated by those who present thrmself as the very bastions of truth when in fact they go out there way to create a false narrative behind which the actual truth is concealled. Look at the 5,000 value of the brees company on paper and compare the assets of it on display. Truth? Hmmmm! She looks physically attractive though doesnt she?

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/3/2020 at 3:22 PM, shadowmoon said:

 

I hoped she was on 'our' side. Now I just don't know?

I go with my gut instinct and ability to read body language.

 

She has dead soulless eyes,in my opinion,and is using people for her own agenda.

 

You can tell she is not really listening to her interviewees,there is a coldness there which I have seen in other people over the years.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I know this thread isn't about Alex belfield but starting to agree with what others here have said about him. He cut his entire show Sunday because a caller was saying something he didn't like and then made a response video the next morning explaining why 🤣. Narcissistic personality trying to gaslight his audience. That was it for me.

 

Don't mind the "banter" and his arrogance. But his callers are more interesting than him. But he talks over them. Strange little man. 

 

He won't touch certain subjects. People like this are too invested in the mainstream narrative unfortunately and his head explodes when asked to think outside. 

 

Anna Brees will just ask what you think without gathering information and forming her own points. 

 

The user odds used to call me out for sharing Carl Benjamin videos and molyneux and looking at it now I can see why. These people are contemptible. Alt right dicks is something I never thought I'd use in my vocabulary but that's what they are. 

 

When their followers stop begging the government to do something and realise the mass immigration is planned? They think it's incompetence from the government. I beg to differ. 

 

These are the sorts of people (Carl and Stefan) that claim to want the state out of their lives but wouldn't tread outside and refuse to talk about our rights being impended on daily from a so called deadly virus. 

 

Unless these idiots wake up and smell the coffee they'll be making videos of something like "army forces old aged pensioners out from gunpoint" with shock faced emojis. You see most of us here realise that there is a method in the confusion. If you are one of the people following the rules and waiting to get the latest on restrictions then it will bewilder and confuse you. It's gaslighting. It's intended. 

 

A lot of these "alternative" are just trapped within that paradigm. Harking on about politics and trump. Most I assume aren't shills but there is something a bit sinister about Brees. She is definitely suspect. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Fluke said:

Sorry I know this thread isn't about Alex belfield but starting to agree with what others here have said about him. He cut his entire show Sunday because a caller was saying something he didn't like and then made a response video the next morning explaining why 🤣. Narcissistic personality trying to gaslight his audience. That was it for me.

 

Don't mind the "banter" and his arrogance. But his callers are more interesting than him. But he talks over them. Strange little man. 

 

He won't touch certain subjects. People like this are too invested in the mainstream narrative unfortunately and his head explodes when asked to think outside. 

 

Anna Brees will just ask what you think without gathering information and forming her own points. 

 

The user odds used to call me out for sharing Carl Benjamin videos and molyneux and looking at it now I can see why. These people are contemptible. Alt right dicks is something I never thought I'd use in my vocabulary but that's what they are. 

 

When their followers stop begging the government to do something and realise the mass immigration is planned? They think it's incompetence from the government. I beg to differ. 

 

These are the sorts of people (Carl and Stefan) that claim to want the state out of their lives but wouldn't tread outside and refuse to talk about our rights being impended on daily from a so called deadly virus. 

 

Unless these idiots wake up and smell the coffee they'll be making videos of something like "army forces old aged pensioners out from gunpoint" with shock faced emojis. You see most of us here realise that there is a method in the confusion. If you are one of the people following the rules and waiting to get the latest on restrictions then it will bewilder and confuse you. It's gaslighting. It's intended. 

 

A lot of these "alternative" are just trapped within that paradigm. Harking on about politics and trump. Most I assume aren't shills but there is something a bit sinister about Brees. She is definitely suspect. 

I agree with you Alex Belfield is a strange one. Sometimes i watch him and hes right on the money,and then as you have said he gets a caller who he doesnt like and just closes them down or is rude. I think when he did that video about free speech,I did understand where he was coming from as hes afraid he will get chucked of u tube and has to stay within there rules.I get that and it must be hard. I do still watch his vids as they do contain some intresting things,But i dont take it in too much.

Ann Brees is a lovely looking woman,but that aside i dont like her,she shows contempt for truth seekers and other free thinkers. Remember they both worked for the BBC.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...