Search the Community

How long can a virus, pathogen, bacteria, protozoa, live on a particle of aluminum or on aluminum surfaces? How much aluminum is in my body currently and where is it held? What are the pathways responsible for removing heavy metals from the human body? What role do a fatty liver kidney and spleen triad play in hindering heavy metals and free radicals removal from the physical body? How much aluminum, carbon monoxide, and other metal particles are in the atmosphere and around major city centers? If I compound an air soluble proton/neutron micro substrate attached to nanoscale particulate of aluminum, how then could I infuse it into a city center or make it airborne for 30 days or longer given humidity and other conditions? How do fluorine, chlorine, bromine, and other halogens react with aluminum in the body along with other metals known to be consumed in the food supply through breathing and pharmaceutical applications along with the health makeup and food industry? How many particles can be held in one small nano micron in a nanite? Among the halogens, only fluorine reacts with elemental carbon. Some simple carbon compounds can be very toxic, such as carbon monoxide (CO) or cyanide (CN-). I find this statement profound given the choice of adding it to the water supply. Keep in mind that small dots spread across large patterns come together to hurt, slow, and poison the human body. Dot connector yeah? This list and sporadic web site links chronicles my week long research into the topic has given me as I wanted to write up all I found to shed some light and from my forensic background to talk about how I came across Alcoa aluminum, how it is tied to the Reynolds family (known cabal family) and the science behind my postulation. I feel like the difference between a conspiracy theorist/new age whack a doodle is long term research, empirical studies, dot connecting the rational in an effort to allow a human to ask their own questions to garner an educated perspective on the long term agenda of aluminum in the air, how the emf lands harder on your brain when riddled with heavy metals and the free radical hydroxide release that occurs while the body is bogged down with excess protein, iron, copper, and zinc folate vitamin A poisoning occurring to those eating general mills cereals of all types. My intention is to introduce data, give resources to think about, and to start a conversation around how to remove these metals from the body and what will happen if a massive coronal starburst hit the earth and the human body is riddled with these metals. A table of data on carbon: Read more: https://www.lenntech.com/periodic/elements/c.htm#ixzz6cqRQQ43D Carbon 14 is one of the radionuclides involved in atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, which began in 1945, with a US test, and ended in 1980 with a Chinese test. It is among the long-lived radionuclides that have produced and will continue to produce increased cancers risk for decades and centuries to come. It also can cross the placenta, become organically bound in developing cells and hence endanger fetuses. Journal of Applied Chemistry, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jctb.5010200702 The oxidation of high‐purity aluminum sheet in dry oxygen, moist oxygen, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide (at total pressure 1.333 × 103 Nm−2) was studied in the range 673–923°K, using a vacuum microbalance to follow weight gains. High‐temperature oxidation of aluminum in various gases How does aluminum react in different states when in water, gas, solid?https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276243767_The_reaction_of_aluminium_clusters_with_water_A_quantum_chemical_investigation https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0584853987800296 Activation of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide at aluminum surfaces Issues of particles surviving on aluminum surfaces for long periods: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7091010/ Aluminum nanoparticles industry applications. https://www.nanoshel.com/aluminium-nanoparticles-application https://nanografi.com/blog/facts-about-aluminum-al-nanoparticlesnanopowder/ https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=201.323 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995234/: it will be described how aluminum can exert oxidative stress by stabilizing superoxide radicals either as mononuclear aluminum or clustered in boehmite. The possibility of promotion of Fenton reaction, (The Fenton reaction is a catalytic process that converts hydrogen peroxide, a product of mitochondrial oxidative respiration, into a highly toxic hydroxyl free radical.) The Fenton reaction results in the creation of hydroxyl radicals from hydrogen peroxide and an Iron (II) catalyst. ... This reaction allows for hydrogen peroxide created by radiolysis of water to diffuse to the nucleus and react with Iron (II) to produce hydroxyl radicals, which in turn react with DNA. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=1076&tid=34 https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/hydroxyl-radical Hydroxyl radical is the most reactive free radical and can be formed from ·O2– and H2O2 in the presence of metal ions such as copper or iron. Hydroxyl radicals have the highest 1-electron reduction potential and are primarily responsible for the cytotoxic effect in aerobic organism. Hydroxyl radicals react with lipids, polypeptides, proteins, and nucleic acids, especially thiamine and guanosine. Break down · Air Aluminum cannot be destroyed in the environment. It can only change its form or become attached or separated from particles. Aluminum particles in air settle to the ground or are washed out of the air by rain. However, very small aluminum particles can stay in the air for many days. · Water and soil Most aluminum-containing compounds do not dissolve to a large extent in water unless the water is acidic o How acidic is our environment now, how acidic is most humans body given the toxic load currently? What would an elderly person have more of in the bones and body especially growing up during the industrial revolution? Today, almost all electrical networks in Canada and the United States are made of aluminum or aluminum alloys, bare or insulated, as well as a large number of underground cables. How intriguing, aluminum is crisscrossed all over and throughout North America. I wonder how aluminum in your body would react with aluminum wires that are electromagnetically charged. How is the human body relaying data information sets through the electrical wiring system in the nerves? The nervous system is the body’s “electrical wiring” and control system. It includes both the central nervous system and the peripheral nervous system If you blanketed the earth with a varying particular level waveform via orbiting satellites, off-planet satellites and moon-based technology that gyroscopically produces waves could not you land binary programming sets at a quantum level into the human body and brain? What role do heavy metals play in allowing these particles to affect and heat human physiology? What metal do you never put in the microwave? Intriguing right? How do you get human bodies to absorb more microwave, radio, and many other spectrums of EMF? Consider the role a nonoxidizing cheap metal such as aluminum plays in this insidious game, https://www.hyperhistory.com/online_n2/History_n2/index_n2/einstein_theory.html Quantum packets and relativity. In March 1905, Einstein created the quantum theory of light, the idea that light exists as tiny packets, or particles, which he called photons. Alongside Max Planck's work on quanta of heat Einstein proposed one of the most shocking ideas in twentieth-century physics: we live in a quantum universe, one built out of tiny, discrete chunks of energy and matter. https://www.ccmr.cornell.edu/faqs/why-cant-you-put-metal-in-a-microwave/ Microwaves happen to not pass right through the water. Nor are they completely reflected by water. So, when we put something with water in it in the path of microwaves, say a potato or popcorn kernel, the water molecules start tumbling and jostling like crazy. The energy of the rubbing water molecules turns to heat. Your potato or popcorn heats up. When these waves hit metal like aluminum foil or gold paint, the metal absorbs the microwaves like an antenna. The energy doesn’t turn to heat, roughly because the metal is not water. (You know that, too.) The microwave energy has to find a place to go. It usually forms sparks that jump from air molecule to air molecule back to the metal sides or bottom of the oven. Where the sparks come and go from the aluminum foil or metal paint, it gets hot. The energy is concentrated. It often burns a tiny hole or pit in the metal. It’s energy just looking for a place to spread out. If you have certain metals stored in the bones blood and organs will you be distorted and taking in these microwaves and emf spectrums? Aluminum in very small airborne amounts can float about in the air for long periods and given the studies which show that viruses can and do live on aluminum surfaces, (why not use copper in hospitals you ask, oh wait for it, your thinking they have your health in the top category of priority? If you want to turn off DNA and create a right nasty free radical cascade that interacts with the iron in the body and production of hydroxyl radicals: Characterization of aluminum interaction with biomolecular building blocks: amino acids, phosphates, etc. so that fundamental understanding of the intrinsic affinity of aluminum for functional groups representing the building block motifs of biomolecules can contribute to the elucidation of aluminum binding sites in biological systems. https://www.intechopen.com/books/electromagnetic-fields-and-waves/the-interaction-of-microwaves-with-materials-of-different-properties: The interaction of microwaves with Materials of different properties., This article speaks of the interaction and absorption of aluminum and copper in EMF microwave radiation. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/adjuvants.html This CDC link explains away the safety of aluminum salts as an adjunct to trigger the immune response. Well, thank you, CDC you are looking out for me, right? https://www.griffincole.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/iaomt-sources-of-fluoride-exposure-chart.pdf References the naturally found fluoride versus the chemical: fluosilicic acid. Cole palmer is a major producer of the type of fluoride and wait for it. GTCR initially acquired Cole-Parmer from Thermo Fisher Scientific in 2014. There is Thermo Fischer scientific again, a leader in nanotechnology and plasma stem cell research equipment. Thermo Fischer percentages According to company figures, 46% of its sales are in life sciences, 20% in healthcare, and 34% in industrial/environmental and safety. Look into Thermo fisher scientific company they already produce nano nanite technology at large scale leading the field in paints that correct and heal themselves when scratched or dinged. In the near future nanite in biology will correct and heal cells. This exist and will be mainstream very soon. But if you put these nanites in your system how at risk are you to be controlled and integrated into techno totalitarianism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermo_Fisher_Scientific https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/aluminum-dust-from-geoengineering-fueling-super-wildfires-according-to-author-300707890.html, this link speaks of the effect nanoparticle of aluminum and barium is having on wildfire spread. Think about why they put aluminum into vaccines, what role does it play in allowing the pathogen to promulgate through the human body system. Why very early on does the introduction of aluminum begin to coagulate with fluoride and chlorine in the drinking water and in toothpaste. The Reynolds family is a known cabal family having a foothold of control in the aluminum industry providing, you guessed it, aluminum foil and the soda pop industry with aluminum products along with the cigarette industry the Reynolds family, RJ Reynolds anyone? Places large quantities of aluminum in cigarettes to act as a buffering agent for the uptake of nicotine and other chemicals when smoking. See the connection wildfires burning brighter and stronger, cigarettes being more addictive? Oh yes did I mention what cigarettes are lined in. That’s right foil made from aluminum. Winston-Salem is famous for what burnings? Wake Forest University? You mean the collegiate education system is a sham and feeds cash to the cabal families? No say it is not so, https://thetab.com/us/wakeforest/2017/02/02/wake-forest-illuminati-1926 https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/FC/FC2F5371043C48FDD95AEDE7B8A49624_Springmeier.-.Bloodlines.of.the.Illuminati.R.pdf The Reynolds family and the Illuminati What can be confirmed, for certain, is the impact the Reynolds family has on our campus. For example, the Z. Smith Reynolds Library, Reynolds Gym, Reynolda Hall, hell, even our campus is named the Reynolda campus. They are the main reason our campus is even in Winston-Salem. Our connection to the Reynolds family, however, may mean we’re connected with a lot more than we bargained for. In fact, according to the book “Bloodlines Of The Illuminati” by Daniel Lazar, the Reynolds family is known to be one of the most prominent families of the Illuminati with at least three members allegedly confirmed members. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_Group_Holdings https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcoa Founded in 1888 headquarters in Pittsburgh, (you have heard Lisa Renee talk about this being a hotbed for cabal activity yes? https://www.actionpa.org/fluoride/aluminum.html Yes it gets betters fluoride interacts with aluminum creating a right nasty toxic mess. Fluoride, aluminum, chlorine in synergy are the leading case of so many mental and neurological issues in humanity. I needed to work this out in words as I have thought it thru in detail for months now and I hope to introduce a trail of data and supporting studies to support If it intrigues, you would dig seeing more let me know I will share. These are the two major suppliers, distributors, and purveyors of aluminum to many faucets in the industry. The one that sticks out to me centered in Pittsburgh is Alcoa aluminum. Which state is vital and crucial in the election today? Yes PA. Take a look at the symbol and then look at the Tetractys a known masonic symbol. Reynolds company sold to Alcoa aluminum. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_Group_Holdings As a side note we (my family forensic accounting firm) worked on a forensic analysis of Alcoa to value the stock holding in a divorce case we worked on and this is how I came across the company. Did you know the Moon rules the metals silver and aluminum? Now why would the elite families want control over the moon metal and to introduce it to your body? What really is the moon? What is on the moon? What are we not told about moon cycles? How do pagans worship the moon? What does this have to do with occultism? What does the moon chain lineages do to assert control and domination over the inhabitants of earth? Reynolds Metals became known for the consumer product Reynolds Wrap foil, as well as for developing and promoting new uses for aluminum. (Do you find the submarine name intriguing because I sure do.) Underwater cities and inner earth access by ocean anyone? Its RV Aluminaut submarine was operated by Reynolds Submarine Services Corporation.https://www.reynoldsonline.com/Page/Industrial-Sales. Oh joy, after looking at his site it seems the Reynolds name now supply’s the industrial industry with all sorts of gadgets to further the poisoning of the planet. If you are building a skyscraper, they will provide all the aluminum wiring or transformers you could ever need. I wanted to show the symbol and the base ten Tetractys used commonly in masonic lodges. This is the Alcoa company symbol, do tell, what does that look like to you? This figure was in itself, as a whole, emblematic of the Tetragrammaton, or sacred name of four letters, for Tetractys, in Greek, means Four, This arrangement of the ten points in a triangular form was called the Tetractys or number four, because each of the sides the triangle consisted of four points, and the whole number of ten was made up by the summation of the first four figures, 1 + 2 + 3 +4= 10. TETRACTYS Source: http://www.masonicdictionary.com/tetractys.html These two triangles to the right are from this site and look like the movie about zombies symbol for viral contagion. If you saw the zombie movie resident evil you will recognize it: It is the umbrella corporation. Looks a little like the catholic Maltese cross also, I think. In closing, if you wanted to send packets of code to introduce data sets and instill states of consciousness to impact emotional wellbeing and psychical energy levels the addition, absorption, and introduction of aluminum, fluorine, chlorine, and many other heavy metals along with radioactive isotopes rampant currently in our environment and on our planet is a sure-fire way to progress thermal dictation at a molecular and subatomic degree. The following are tools I find useful in purging all heavy metals including aluminum. Lowering protein intake from carbon based life forms (animals). Using detoxadine (nascent iodine) to clear out the thyroid, glandular system and to assist in pulling metals from glands. https://globalhealing.com/nascent-iodine-detoxadine Parsley, Cilantro and other herbs known for chelation. Silica supplementation and mineral water rich in magnesium and silicate. (Blue ridge parkway and NC have silica rich soil) https://www.aitinstitute.org/aluminum_toxicity.htm excellent site on homeopathic clearing of aluminum and other metals Research how to assist your body in glutathione production as this is so important in purging heavy metals of all types. If any other technique, data, or web links, are known and needed to further the case study and the assist in purging the aluminum from bones please list them and comment of other international conglomerates in the aluminum business.

Greetings, My name is Clint and I’m reaching out to you in dire a plea for help with exposing the fact that COVID-19 is legally classifiable as a biological weapon, and that Dr. Anthony Fauci (NIAID) along with the NIH issued US tax-payer money for the creation of this disease. In other words, the Dr. leading the public health efforts on this pandemic is the one who appropriated funding to engineer the virus, and there are statutes that can be enforced to pursue this violation of US and international law. Included below is a documentary and written summary with primary evidence detailing the origins of COVID-19 as a bio-weapon that was genetically engineered through lab mutation experiments backed with federal grants from the NIAID and NIH. In the interest of public safety, supporting medical freedom and raising the most awareness, you have my express permission to reuse or redistribute the research in any way that you see fit (and I implore you to do so). Wagging the Dog: The Story Behind the Story of COVID-19 “There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease – and we certainly have a large burden of that – but also there will be a surprise outbreak.” – Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration, January 10, 2017 Prerequisite: Understanding Dual-Use, Gain-of-Function Research “Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) is life sciences research that, based on current understanding, can be reasonably anticipated to provide knowledge, information, products, or technologies that could be directly misapplied to pose a significant threat with broad potential consequences to public health and safety, agricultural crops and other plants, animals, the environment, materiel, or national security. The United States Government’s oversight of DURC is aimed at preserving the benefits of life sciences research while minimizing the risk of misuse of the knowledge, information, products, or technologies provided by such research.” – National Institutes of Health “Gain-of-function (GoF) is the euphemism for biological research aimed at increasing the virulence and lethality of pathogens and viruses. GoF research is government funded; its focus is on enhancing the pathogens’ ability to infect different species and to increase their deadly impact as airborne pathogens and viruses. Ostensibly, GoF research is conducted for biodefense purposes. These experiments, however, are extremely dangerous. Those deadly science-enhanced pathogens can, and do escape into the community where they infect and kill people. What’s more, this line of research can be used for biological warfare.” – Alliance For Human Research Protection Many potential pandemic-causing pathogens have been modified through GoF, dual-use research to give them additional properties that make them more contagious, deadly, drug-resistant, and patentable. Examples include: SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, and more recently SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). GoF research has been a controversial for at least a decade, most notably due to research conducted on highly pathogenic H5N1, which was genetically modified to give the disease airborne transmissibility in mammals by NIH NIAID-funded lab work performed by Ron Fouchier and Yoshihiro Kawaoka. Force-evolving viruses through direct mutation or reassortment to provide enhanced pathogenicity, transmissibility and host range is justified as a necessary risk to better understand the potential threat of those diseases and for the advanced production of therapeutics such as vaccines and antiviral drugs. Key points to consider regarding dual-use, gain-of-function research: Viruses modified through GoF research are engineered to have attributes that are acknowledged as being highly unlikely to ever occur in nature and only exist because of GoF research. GoF research is said to be conducted in preparation against certain potential pandemic pathogens, which again, are widely acknowledged as being unlikely to occur except by way of the fact that those pathogens now exist in laboratories due to GoF research. That pathogen is then subject to being released on the public through the misconduct of a research facility or the malicious actions of someone who obtains the resulting research. In the US, GoF research is largely tax-payer funded through the NIH, which claims to only fund projects that are not classified. However, the publication of that GoF research is then made available for anyone in the public, including agencies who may use the information for classified projects (such the DoD) or any parties with the means to pursue malicious interests. Even discounting all potential for malicious use of GoF research, there is significant historical precedent for accidental lab releases of pandemic pathogens, not least including SARS-CoV-1. Testing lab technicians for potential infection is challenging if not impossible because they are often vaccinated against strains of the pathogens they’re researching, which ensures that their blood contains antibodies of the root virus structure. Likewise, anyone who has ever been exposed to any natural or synthetic strain of the coronavirus in the past (including the common cold) will have antibodies that invalidate results from the go-to “PCR” for SARS-2 COVID-19. One of the primary benefits proposed for governmental-funding of GoF research is the for-profit production and stockpiling of novel therapeutics such as vaccines and antiviral drugs. There are conflicts of interests throughout the public oversight and advisory for GoF research as well as the sources of research funding, recipients of that funding, the eventual corporate production of therapeutics, and the inevitable patent portfolios derived from GoF research. Pandemic pathogens are altered to be drug resistant and because those pathogens do not and very likely would not occur in nature, people lack a natural immunity to those man-made diseases and consequently require the for-profit therapeutics that have been produced. Corporate parties seek to control and patent man-made viruses along with the drugs that are used to treat them as their property in the interest of maximum profitability, and the way research and development is structured eliminates most or all governmental liability. Vaccines are produced and stockpiled as a therapeutic option against one-time, mutated viral strains, but because the virus will mutate again (naturally or unnaturally), those vaccines will become useless against any newly-mutated strain. This generates profit from both the stockpiled waste as well as future unused vaccines that must be wasted when the virus mutates again. In the name of studying things that have not happened and likely will not happen in nature, and that can only be proven through artificially mutating pathogens, GoF research increases the likelihood of a pandemic occurring – if only through a laboratory accident – and ultimately jeopardizes millions or billions of lives (or possibly even the extinction of the human race). The dual-use aspect of GoF research cannot be emphasized enough as there is no fundamental difference between what is called basic “legitimate” or “peaceful” research, and biological weapons research – they are considered the same thing by government agencies and the Biological Weapons Act. Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 (BWATA) The Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 (BWATA) drafted by University of Illinois international law professor Francis Boyle was enacted into law on May 22, 1990 and defines several terms related to biological warfare: vector, toxin, biological agent and delivery system. “Biological agent” is defined by the BWATA as: “any micro-organism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product that may be engineered as a result of biotechnology, or any naturally occurring or bioengineered component of any such microorganism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product, capable of causing death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind or deleterious alteration of the environment.” While the previous US interpretation of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC – an international treaty that explicitly bans the use of biological agents) was in line with the BWATA definition, now the US maintains that Article I of the BWC does not apply to non-lethal biological agents. In other words, the most deadly of viruses can be trafficked, studied, reconstructed and genetically altered to be more contagious and deadly if the research is simply labeled as “peaceful” or “defensive,” making the provisions of the BWATA almost impossible to enforce – especially when the NIH funds a majority of that “peaceful” or “defensive” research (again, under the term “basic research”). According to the Federation of American Scientists, current US work on non-lethal agents greatly exceeds limitations set forth in the BWC. “The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk.” – Richard Ebright, molecular biologist and biodefence expert at Rutgers, via Nature “The fact of the matter is that if the H5N1 research that we’re discussing today that NIH sponsored had been sponsored by the department that I work for – the Department of Defense – for exactly the same scientific purposes, it’s likely that the United States would have been falsely accused of violating its treaty obligations and the State Department would be busy defending ourselves against charges of US continuing to maintain a illegal offensive biological weapons program… People who are intent on doing bad things with biology are drawing on the same science that all of the people in this room are drawing on. There isn’t a separate set of science that’s biological warfare.” – Dr. Seth Carus, speaking on a panel at the International Consultative Workshop on Gain-of-Function Research on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses, December 17-18, 2012 SARS-2 COVID-19 Funded and Created With Aid From NIH and Fauci “There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease – and we certainly have a large burden of that – but also there will be a surprise outbreak.” – Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration, January 10, 2017 Dr. Anthony Fauci and the NIH have been long-standing proponents of gain-of-function research, perhaps most notably during a year-long moratorium on GoF research back in 2012 – a moratorium that resulted from GoF researchers modifying the H5N1 virus for aerosol transmissibility in mammals. Dr. Fauci and industry representatives gathered at an international workshop to discuss the risks and benefits of GoF research, and to establish guidelines for continuing that research. That moratorium began in January 2012 and concluded in January 2013 despite initially being called for 60 days. Controversy over GoF continued in the following years, including a halt of US government funding on GoF research in October 2014 due to concerns of biosafety and biosecurity risks – concerns that arose not least due to laboratory accidents that occurred at the Centers for Disease Control in July 2014. However, prior to that ban on federal funding for GoF studies in the US, the NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease – of which Dr. Fauci is the director) along with the NIH granted $3.7 million in federal funding for a five-year project that concluded in 2019 to study bat coronaviruses. In particular, that initiative financed Shi Zhengli, a virologist from a Wuhan lab, and other researchers to surveil and catalog bat coronaviruses. Shi Zhengli was part of Dr. Ralph S. Baric’s team at North Carolina University which released a paper in 2015 demonstrating potential for emergence of bat coronaviruses in humans – a study that was published shortly after their project was defunded by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). (More recently, Shi Zhengli co-authored a paper published in 2019 calling for further study into GoF-related coronavirus research.) Facing a moratorium in the US, Dr. Fauci outsourced GoF research in 2015 to China’s Wuhan lab and licensed the lab so it would keep receiving US aid for researchers in China to continue GoF project(s). Again, this R&D was at least partially funded with grants from the US despite a ban on GoF funding. In December 2017, the NIH lifted its three-year ban, resuming federal funding for GoF research and opening the door to begin the second phase of the NIAID project involving GoF coronavirus research. In 2019, coronavirus research was granted a second round of $3.7 million funding over six years from the NIH (with backing from Dr. Fauci and the NIAID) for the continuation of surveillance along with GoF research on bat coronaviruses to determine whether the pathogen could mutate and infect humans. The project proposal approved by the NIH states: “We will use S protein sequence data, infectious clone technology, in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that % divergence thresholds in S protein sequences predict spillover potential.” “Spillover potential” refers to the ability of a virus to jump from animals to humans, which would require the virus to have the appropriate genetic properties for attaching to receptors in human cells. Note that the exact orthologs referred to in this proposal are seen in SARS-2 or COVID-19, which uses the S protein sequence data, and through GoF research HIV spikes were added to COVID-19 for receptor binding to the human ACE-2 receptor (located in the lungs, heart and other places where COVID-19 attacks). Also that there are dozens of “similar projects” listed which are NIAID-funded. Speaking with Jason Liosatos, Francis Boyle (author of the BWATA) highlighted several points that underscore the gain-of-function-based origins of SARS-2 COVID-19, which is essentially SARS (an already weaponized version of the coronavirus that has leaked out of laboratories) with new properties that have been genetically engineered through GoF to create the new virus – hence SARS-CoV-2. The functionality added to SARS-1 through GoF research allows SARS-2 COVID-19 to be more transmissible, more virulent, and enables the ability to attach to the ACE-2 receptor in humans. A summary of Francis Boyle’s findings: Referencing a study published in Antiviral Research on February 10, 2020 (The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade) “This furin-like cleavage site, is supposed to be cleaved during virus egress for S-protein ‘priming’ and may provide a gain-of-function to the 2019-nCoV for efficient spreading in the human population compared to other lineage b beta-coronaviruses.” Referencing a study published in the National Library of Medicine on December 21, 2015 (SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronavirus shows potential for human emergence) “Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system, we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicated that group 2b viruses encoding the SHC014 spike in a wild-type backbone can efficient use multiple orthologs of the SARS receptor in human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2), replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells and achieve in vitro titers equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV. Additionally, in vivo experiments demonstrate replication of the chimeric virus in mouse lung with notable pathogenesis. Evaluation of available SARS-based immune-therapeutic and prophylactic modalities revealed poor efficacy; both monoclonal and antibody vaccine approaches failed to neutralize and protect from infection with CoVs using the novel spike protein. On the basis of these findings, we synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo.” Referencing a study published in Virology in October 2010 (Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) proteins of different bat species confer variable susceptibility to SARS-CoV entry) “The final piece of evidence here is an archive of Virology 2010. And this is research done with the Australian Health Laboratory and again, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where they DNA genetically engineered SARS and HIV to make a weapon. And they got a grant here from the Chinese Ministry of Science, Technology etc. to do this…” Boyle notes that this research is “only useful for offensive biological warfare activity and it’s so dangerous it’s typically only conducted in either a BSL4 or BSL3 facility,” and incidentally that the only BSL4 facility in China is located in Wuhan. “…And so my reading of these three articles (the above research studies) is that they (China) took the technology from this death factory at North Carolina, they took the technology from this Australian research project, brought it back to Wuhan BSL4 and tried to genetically engineer it all together as sort of a turbo-charged biological warfare weapon that would consist of SARS – which is already a weaponized coronavirus – GoF properties, and HIV. And as you know, those Indian scientists already did an analysis of the coronavirus [SARS-2 COVID-19] … and HIV was clearly in there.” In summary: Through gain-of-function research that has been funded over the last decade at least in part from US tax payers, Dr. Fauci (NIAID) and the NIH have participated in commissioning GoF research that took SHC014-CoV of the coronavirus, brought in the backbone of the SARS coronavirus, then inserted HIV orthologs to create a more virulent pathogen – one that would otherwise have little chance of being transmissible from animals to humans, and certainly not from human to human. GoF research is conducted largely – if not entirely – through loopholes that violate the BWATA and BWC. GoF work on pandemic pathogens has been allowed to continue (even in foreign states) with aid from US tax-payer funding by merely referring to such dual-use research as “peaceful” or “defensive” biological weapons research under terms such as “basic research,” despite the fact that those pathogens (biological agents) would otherwise be recognized as bio-weapons according the BWATA and BWC. “We at NIAID being major funders of most but not all of these people (doing GoF, dual-use research), were obviously connected to that because they (the researchers) wanted to know what kind of research will you (the NIAID/NIH) fund… and the purpose from a pure research standpoint is to review the key issues related to the gain-of-function of these viruses: scientific, public health, biosafety, biosecurity – and importantly for the decisions we have to make now, is the considerations of the possible criteria for funding by HHS (i.e. NIH, CDC) of gain-of-function research on highly pathogenic avian influenza.” – Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, An International Consultative Workshop on Gain-of-Function Research on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses December 17-18, 2012 According to 18 US Code 175 (prohibitions with respect to biological weapons), the following sentencing guidelines are provided for those who violate the BWATA: “Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both.” Further Reading: Direct Quotes & Additional Points of Interest “And it isn’t who we fund that people are concerned about but it’s the people who will then use the research from the people we funded. So the real fundamental question is, when we make a funding decision, do we have to make a decision based on funding even the most careless most unregulated [researchers] because they’re going to use the information. That sets an extraordinarily high bar for what you’re going to fund or what you’re not going to fund because essentially if people are going to use this information, they may use it with no biosafety or no biosecurity concerns.” Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, An International Consultative Workshop on Gain-of-Function Research on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses, December 17-18, 2012 “As part of our research endeavors, clearly interventions in the form of diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines were important. But on the lower part of the slide, you see basic research, and that has always been and will continue to be an important part of our mission and our activities. If you look at basic research as we’ve approached it, through the years – long anti-dating the appearance of H5N1 highly pathogenic virus – as part of that influenza basic research was intensive study host adaptation, transmissibility of influenza viruses, pathogenesis and virulence. And integral to that study has always been the issue of gain-of-function research, not only for influenza, but essentially for all infectious disease research.” Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, An International Consultative Workshop on Gain-of-Function Research on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses, December 17-18, 2012 “Now there are a few ways to look at gain-of-function research: 1) there’s the naturally occurring mutations which naturally give gain-of-function and investigators study these effects on the phenotypes of interest – does this mutation make something more transmissible, more pathogenic, or adapt to hosts better; 2) or what historically investigators have done is to actually create gain-of-function by making mutations, passage adaption or other newer genetic techniques such as reverse genetics and genetic reassortment. When we do that, often some phenotypes appear and others disappear. For example it is commonly seen when you increase a transmissibility, you may see a decrease in pathogenesis or vice-versa. You may deliberately increase pathogenesis and see a decrease in transmissibility. But the bottom line is that gain- and loss-of-function research is critical to understanding disease pathogenesis anti-microbial resistance and host responses, as well to developing better techniques of surveillance, vaccines and therapeutics.” Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, An International Consultative Workshop on Gain-of-Function Research on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses, December 17-18, 2012 “Specifically to gain-of-function research on HPAI H5N1, what we’re talking about now is the gain-of-function research in studies that increase predominately the transmissibility – as was the case that I’m about to get to in a moment – as well as pathogenesis and alteration of host range of the virus. Now the reason we are here today in this room with H5N1 highly pathogenic influenza and we’re not in this room discussing so many of the other gain-of-function research that we do, is because naturally occurring HPAI H5N1 cause a reported almost 60% mortality in humans, which triggered a concern – understandably, clearly – that if you give a gain-of-function of a pathogenic virus to make it more transmissible, that’s a whole different story than some of the things we face.” Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, An International Consultative Workshop on Gain-of-Function Research on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses, December 17-18, 2012 “That’s the smoking gun for an offensive biological warfare agent. Gain-of-function properties are a tip off. It’s only useful for offensive biological warfare activity and it’s so dangerous it’s typically only conducted in a BSL4 or BSL3 facility, and there in Wuhan you have the only BSL4 facility in China… Gain-of-function means its DNA is genetically engineered to be more lethal and more infectious – clearly what we’re seeing now with this coronavirus (SARS-2 COVID-19). [COVID-19] is basically SARS, which is already a weaponized version of the coronavirus that has leaked out of [a] laboratory at least twice before, and then it [has been] given gain-of-function properties.” – Francis Boyle, author of the BWATA, speaking with Jason Liosatos, March, 2020 GoF research on bat coronaviruses was conducted at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, which has a biosafety lab level 3 (BSL3), “and I had previously condemned them for using gain-of-function work on MERS… [which] is like SARS only more dangerous [with] a 33% lethality rate – and they were doing GoF work there to make [MERS] even more lethal. Well it turns out if you read the article, they admit they were doing this with SARS – they were giving it a gain-of-function activity. And it turns out part of their team was a researcher from China, Zhengli-Li Shi… and they (China) gave a grant to the University of North Carolina, to get their scientist in on this extremely dangerous, Nazi-type biological warfare work. So it appears that what happened was, instead of stealing this technology, China bought it. And they bought it from the lab there at the University of Carolina. They put there person in there and they brought it back to the Wuhan lab. And it also appears that the North Carolina lab got cells from Fort Detrick, which is the US major facility for the research, development, testing and stockpiling of biological weapons… And they made it clear the work they were doing was to increase the pathogenicity of SARS by giving it this gain-of-function activity.” – Francis Boyle, author of the BWATA, speaking with Jason Liosatos, March, 2020 “So that I think is what we are dealing with here. We’ve never seen (at least released in the public) a biological warfare agent this dangerous, except the Amerithrax [after 9/11]… that was super weapons-grade anthrax [with] a hundred grams a spore. It too traveled in the air [and] seemed to be based on nano-technology… and at the time I publicly stated it came out of the US biological warfare weapons program, and probably Fort Detrick, which was later confirmed… So the Amerithrax was of course supremely dangerous but not as infectious as what we’re seeing here.” – Francis Boyle, author of the BWATA, speaking with Jason Liosatos, March, 2020 “The dual-use nature of biological weapons agents, production equipment and advances in biotechnology can make it hard to distinguish between offensive and defensive work.” – E. William Colglanizer, US Department of State, An International Consultative Workshop on Gain-of-Function Research on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses, December 17-18, 2012 “We have four different strains of H5N1 that we have over the past seven years maintained.” – Robin Robinson, An International Consultative Workshop on Gain-of-Function Research on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses, December 17-18, 2012 “…the breadth of misuse scenarios, which I think the term bioterrorism does not capture and may be misleading… In terms of the consequential research, it’s clear that the stakes are much higher with the research we’re discussing today than almost any other form of scientific research where the great risk is wasting money or possibly not spending money which would have higher scientific return. Here we are evaluating the risk of generating – whether accidentally or deliberately – a global pandemic, potentially putting millions of lives at risk. And weighing that against the risk that failure to do research would leave us less prepared for such a pandemic that might break out naturally. I think we have to be extremely humble in assuming we can know or understand the motives and the capabilities of those who might want to create harm on a massive scale. The concerns include those that go beyond and in fact I think have little to do with what might be called bio-terrorism, if by terrorism we mean acts to inflict harm against non-combatants or civilians for a political objective.” – Gerald Epstein, An International Consultative Workshop on Gain-of-Function Research on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses, December 17-18, 2012 “In terms of what shouldn’t be done, I would look at the actual phrasing of the NIH proposal that we’re evaluating today. For example, one type of experiment that I think would be hard to defend, would be creating strains that would be extremely unlikely to arise if it were not for the fact that we were creating it. And in that case we would be accepting the risks of such a work but we would not be obtaining any benefit because we would be anticipating a problem that would be extremely likely to happen.” – Gerald Epstein, An International Consultative Workshop on Gain-of-Function Research on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses, December 17-18, 2012 “In terms of gain-of-function I think as the life sciences converge with biology – but with physics, mathematics and engineering – gain-of-function is absolutely essential. The cyber-physical program at the National Science Foundation actually is premised upon that fact. That if we can actually engineer something in and predict its properties, that is gain-of-function. If the life science research and this particular field is to go forward with all the reason behind it, we have to do gain-of-function experiments, we have to put them in the context of mathematics, physics and engineering or else we will make no progress. We have been asked to survey the landscape of international agreements and how does it affect infectious diseases. Well, the capabilities are quite different but the rules and regulations and the advisory committees are legion… There’s a whole area now of biological research looking at stochastic (unintended) events. That’s why this notion of a common but differentiated capabilities as a fundamental for a global governance structure is really important, because it leads to a way to incentivizes countries to participate…” – Harvey Rubin, An International Consultative Workshop on Gain-of-Function Research on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Viruses, December 17-18, 2012 Wagging the Dog: The Story Behind the Story of COVID-19 “This is the first part of my master class revolving around the so-called ‘science,’ medical, pharmaceutical, corporate and governmental structure that promotes an industry of harm and death to the general population. We cannot fight what we do not know, and we cannot treat a disease while the very government that funded it's lab-grown creation lies to us daily about is origin. In Wagging The Dog Part 1 we look at dual-use, gain-of-function research and its devastatingly frightening implications on life and life as we know it. Herein is definitive proof of not only the man-made origin of SARS-1, MERS, and now SARS-2, but of every other viral disease known and unknown to man. Science and its methodology has been replaced by a religious cult called scientism, and their sociopathic agenda crosses over into what in my own lifetime was only imaginable in the most dystopian science fiction movies. Futurism, immortality, transhumanism, and eugenics (today called genetics) are just the surface of what is being funded by your government and its institutions, from military to health to DARPA. This is a must watch for those that seek the truth about the who, what, where, why, and when this current outbreak of COVID-19, and to prepare you for what is without a doubt coming next.” Clint Richardson – Independent researcher. Documentary filmmaker. Radio show host. Book author and blogger. Former Hollywood sound designer turned full time activist. Full documentary download: http://www.mediafire.com/file/evoh5dedwybvxrv/Wagging_the_Dog_-_The_Story_Behind_the_Story_of_COVID19.m4v/file Low-bandwidth download: http://www.mediafire.com/file/uevx7tr60140lv0/Wagging_the_Dog_-_The_Story_Behind_the_Story_of_COVID19_%28480p%29.m4v/file (All work in this film and article are 100% free to use and distribute as you see fit.)