Search the Community

This was my main argument to support my never taking part in this vaccine program. It's a subtle point you need to look at very logically to grasp. If this vaccine program was designed to save lives, why should issues around the country of origen, or economic block matter? China, Russia, India. Much as I would refuse the Sputnik vaccine same as all the rest, it appears thus far to have yielded less side effects than AstraZeneca. The latter has left several people I know unwell for weeks, and many more clotting victims that may have been hushed. Yet, the EU is demanding "select" vaccines for use essentially as a "passport". I quote: "The European Medicines Agency (EMA), which is the agency of the European Union responsible for the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products, has approved only four Coronavirus vaccines so far, which are: Comirnaty (BioNTech, Pfizer) COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna Vaxzevria (previously COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca) COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen (Johnson & Johnson)" Two points: Many Russians I talked to rejected Sputnik because they tell me they consider any rushed vaccine too risky. I respond basically I would not want any rushed vaccine wherever it was produced. The bottom line is they were all rushed, at great risk to ourselves, because, pharmaceutical companies wanted to make billions from sales. Putin was the first to try and capitalise so Sputnik was rushed out. Other countries then felt the squeeze so rushed forward a vaccine of their own - to hell with any side effects that may over time create serious health issues for millions of people. Consider the following E.U. quote: “They say, Sputnik V is good, but Putin doesn’t care to use it as a cure for the Russian people – he offers it to the world as another hybrid weapon to divide and rule. This is neither new, nor good for mankind,” ???????????? I am no fan of Putin. Yet, does anyone seriously believe Sputnik was created as an international, divisive weapon and not intended as a genuine vaccine? Let's put it this way: If anyone is foolish enough to allow governments to dictate what medication they take, what does it matter what the ethnic origen of a vaccine is? What does it matter which company makes millions of dollars in sales of a toxic substance? Are these people supposedly claiming to save lives or not? What us their motivation, restriction of travel to and from borders, or revenue from rushed pharmaceutical products? Conclusion: I imagine I will look back in 5 years as relieved not to have been taken in by this vaccine-passport farce.

Heard today my brother's neighbour suffered a stroke 3 weeks after receiving her vaccine. Although nobody can prove a connection, the woman herself blames the vaccine. One other neighbour - a Jehova's witness - was shocked and "possibly" more likely not to vaccinate. There is more: On sharing this news today, one lady in a shop got upset with me and stormed off. "I'm sick of this conspiracy crap!" she yelled. What should be our attitude to those who follow official guidelines, often in the hope of future holidays? I think maybe the majority of us make mistakes. The psychology term here is "ambivalence" and was used to describe the schizophrenic thought process. This is where desire is split into two opposing opposites. The first desire may be to not have the vaccine. The second desire is to have the vaccine - the motive being this is justified by the ability to live a normal life. To justify this motive, the person reacts strongly against contrasting evidence. Put in simple terms self delusion. To refuse the vaccine requires acceptance of the fact we live in an unethical and corrupt society. That in turn requires resistance. It is much easier to delude yourself you actually want the vaccine. That nobody is forcing it. Everbody is having it. And yet, we know the truth is the ability to have any freedom at all depends upon set conditions. Governments claim they have the right to decide risk factors regarding medication and vaccines. Neither are these people scientifically literate. My own attitude is I feel sorry for the lady who suffered a stroke. If it was indeed connected. Now she has deep regrets yet there was nothing anyone could do.