Jump to content

HAARPING_On

Members
  • Posts

    694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by HAARPING_On

  1. Max Igan was suggesting the same thing... hmmmm
  2. It's not just a case of telling them... they need to be provided with the correct information to make their own mind up... For example: The recovery rates and the real level of risk of dying of covid (99.99% in the UK, statistically zero risk of dying) The number of healthy young people who have died of covid (only 9 in the UK so far) The level of death and serious injury caused by the vaccine (1,196,813 adverse reactions, 1,645 deaths in the UK alone) That should be enough to make an informed decision.... Here's the government data from the beginning of August:
  3. @Mr H ... Paragraphed for clarity and easier to pick out the bullshit and lies... Dear Colleagues, UPDATE ON OUR COVID-19 RESPONSE FOR AUTUMN AND WINTER This afternoon I set out our plan for managing Covid this autumn and winter. Thinking back to where we were last September as schools went back and the colder months approached, in one way our position today is more challenging. We have higher levels of daily cases – thousands more, but in many other crucial respects the British people – all of us collectively and individually – are incomparably better placed to fight the disease. We have more than 80 per cent of all over 16s now double vaccinated. We have Covid antibodies in around 90 per cent of the adult population. We have seen the extraordinary vaccine-induced falls in deaths and serious disease. Depending on your age, you are up to 9 times more likely to die if you are unvaccinated, than if you have had both jabs. The result of this vaccine campaign is that we have one of the most free societies and one of the most open economies in Europe. That is why we will now continue with our current strategy. We will continue to offer testing, and continue to urge people to be sensible, to be responsible, to wash hands, use ventilation, consider wearing a face covering in crowded places with people you do not know, to stay at home if you feel unwell, and to download and use the app. We are investing massively in our NHS to meet the pressures of Covid with an additional £5.4 billion in England over the next six months, on top of the almost £36 billion over the next three years to help our NHS recover and fix the long-standing problems of social care. We are helping to vaccinate the world with 100 million doses for developing countries by next June. This country should continue to be very proud that the OxfordAstraZeneca vaccine remains the workhorse of global immunisation. We will keep further measures in reserve – a Plan B. We do not see the need now to proceed with mandatory certification but we will continue to work with the many businesses that are getting ready for such a scheme. Indeed over 200 events have already used it voluntarily. It is simply not sensible to rule out this kind of option now when we must face the fact that it might still make the difference between keeping businesses open at full capacity or not. - 2 - We will also keep the option of mandating face masks or advising people to work from home, reflecting the fact that when a large proportion of the country has immunity, smaller changes can make a bigger difference and give us the confidence that we will not need the lockdowns of the past. We will of course continue to update our advice based on the latest data. But in the meantime we are confident in the vaccines that have made such a difference to our lives. We are now intensifying that effort, offering jabs to 12 to 15 year olds on the advice of the Chief Medical Officers who have given this advice based on the health, wellbeing and educational prospects of children themselves. For over 50s – and at risk under 50s – we are now going ahead with the booster programme, meaning they will receive a third dose six months after the second – building even higher the walls of vaccine defence. The UK Government has procured at scale jabs for every part of the UK and we will be sending doses to the Devolved Administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Covid sadly still remains a risk, but I am confident that we can keep going with our plan to turn jabs into jobs and protect the gains that we have made together. You can read our COVID-19 Response: Autumn and Winter Plan online on gov.uk here. Yours Sincerely,
  4. Yes, they struck him off from the Society of Independent Funeral Directors but his response was "I don't need them anyway" so he really is independent now... I see the original interview has had a colossal amount of view now, over 830,000 hits on bitchute alone, you can see why TPTB are getting twitchy, same as when David's Londonreal interview got an absolute avalanche of viewers...
  5. I guess we all knew this would happen... :-/ https://davidicke.com/2021/09/21/funeral-director-john-olooney-is-banned-from-twitter-for-exposing-the-truth-about-deaths-from-the-fake-vaccine-a-fake-vaccine-circulated-by-the-same-cult-that-controls-twitter-facebook-google-a/
  6. Different building materials have been in short supply at different stages of this whole situation, plaster was unobtainable for a short time last year, timber has skyrocketed in price and yes, concrete and concrete or cement derived products have also been affected, roof tiles for instance.
  7. The UK Column did an article on this last week and they were saying that the "justifications" for the price increases weren't believable... I think they've got a point.
  8. I am with Bulb and I've just been on to check my statements just in case anything happens today and there was a message informing me I need to increae my monthly payments by £10.00 to stay on track with my current energy usage... Just going to sit tight for now and see what happens...
  9. Interesting developments in the energy markets over the last month culminating in a number of small firms going to the wall and Bulb announcing today they need a "government bailout".... the timing of this is very convenient with the COP26 talks imminent... are we heading for power cuts in the UK this winter? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-58620167
  10. Not exactly a medic speaking out, but a funeral director, which is just as important, the info contained in this interview is absolutely damning of the government lies and propaganda... Please share far and wide, this really needs to be seen... https://www.bitchute.com/video/gigUyK3yLtMU/
  11. Just watching this now, if there's any cast iron proof that this whole thing has been engineered then this is it. Brilliant video. If you do one thing today WATCH THIS.
  12. In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus...wrong by Jon Rappoport (To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.) In a CDC document titled, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020,” under the section, “Laboratory Criteria,” we have this: “Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical or autopsy specimen using a molecular amplification test.” The test referred to is the PCR. And as you can plainly see, it is detecting, not the virus itself, but a piece of RNA. A piece of RNA ASSUMED to come from the virus, SARS-CoV-2. I say ASSUMED because, where is the actual virus? Where is the virus isolated from all surrounding material? If you don’t have an isolated specimen of the virus, you can’t say, with any degree of certainty at all, that you have a piece of it (the RNA). As I’ve described many times, “isolated” is a term that is tortured by researchers, so that it means just the opposite of what it is supposed to mean. Numerous studies that claim the virus has been isolated actually turn out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. The soup contains various types of animal and humans cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and other genetic material. The virus is completely surrounded, but it is there. We know this, because some of the cells are dying, and this dying must be the result of infection with the virus…” This argument not only turns the definition of “isolation” on its head, it reveals, upon a moment’s consideration, that the dying of the cells could come from the action of the toxic chemicals and drugs; and on top of that, the cells are being starved of nutrients, so they could be dying as a result of that deprivation. Therefore, to say “the virus must be in the soup in the dish in the lab” because is killing cells…well, this is completely unproven, and therefore… There is no reason under the sun to claim that the virus is there in the soup at all. Hence, the claim that the PCR test is detecting a piece of RNA from the virus is unwarranted. Because, again…where is the virus? Where is the truly isolated virus? Nowhere. And on that basis alone, the PCR test is irrelevant, useless, and deceptive. It is set up to look for and detect a piece of RNA material that has never been proved to come from this un-isolated phantom ASSUMPTION, called “SARS-CoV-2.” A few more moments of clear thought, and you realize the whole string of “science” that leads to the lockdowns and the economic devastation is not science at all. It is what is called, in the intelligence community, a cover story. A story launched to justify crimes. In this case, capital crimes against humanity. ~~~ (The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.) (Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
  13. The gallows is the only acceptable fate for this psychopath, or failing that, Nuremburg trial.
  14. Heartbreaking story of what happened to a fit, healthy and radiant 63 year old woman as a result of having 2 of these shots... you know how this ends up but I'm sure this story will resonate with a good number of people, myself included. https://www.bitchute.com/video/zzLdieJuwu6x/
  15. Do you have the Delta Variant? It’s illegal for you to know. The latest piece of sheer insanity from the US government by Jon Rappoport (To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.) As my long-time readers know, I’ve spent the past year demonstrating that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist. Therefore, the Delta Variant is a fantasy based on a fantasy. However, I make forays into the official bubble where, of course, millions of people believe the virus and the Variant are real. I show that within the bubble, all sorts of internal contradictions and absurdities abound. Recently, I quoted official sources who stated that the current PCR test can’t differentiate between SARS-CoV-2 and the Delta Variant. Only through deeper genetic sequencing of patients’ swab samples---a procedure that isn’t routinely done---can testers tell whether a person has the original SARS-CoV-2 or the Delta. In order to know whether the Delta is widespread, a predictive computer model would have to be assembled. These models are notoriously inaccurate. The bottom line? The tidal wave of propaganda asserting the Delta is everywhere, and is responsible for the escalation of COVID cases, is a sheer fabrication. The propaganda is based on a computer model. That’s where the official bubble is, or was, when a new revelation surfaced. Buckle up for this one. On the scale of fabrications, it ranks right near the top. You see, the genetic sequencing process, carried out to determine whether a patient’s swab sample reveals the original SARS-C0V-2 or the Delta…that process hasn’t obtained certification from the US government. It hasn’t been approved in any way, shape, or form. The labs who do the genetic sequencing are on their own. They have the final word on their own procedures. And because of that, the labs are legally FORBIDDEN from reporting to patients whether they have the original SARS-CoV-2 or the Delta Variant. Yes, FORBIDDEN. So a patient can’t learn that information. It would be illegal for the lab to report. And since the genetic sequencing process looking for the Delta Variant hasn’t received any sort of government certification…any and all claims about how widespread the Delta is would be based on an unapproved procedure. Official Science “experts” always proudly claim their tests have the government seal of approval. But in this instance, the test on which these experts are relying has NO certification whatsoever. Getting the picture? Here is the source on this latest piece of madness: Business Insider, August 23, 2021, “You aren't legally allowed to know which variant gave you COVID-19 in the US, even if it's Delta.” “The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS), which oversees the regulatory process for US labs, requires genome-[genetic] sequencing tests to be federally approved before their results can be disclosed to doctors or patients. These are the tests that pick up on variants, but right now, there's little incentive for the labs to do the work to validate those tests.” “'I don't think there's a lot of motivation, quite honestly, to get that done,' Kelly Wroblewski, director of infectious diseases at the Association of Public Health Laboratories, told Insider.” “So far, Wroblewski said, more than 50 public labs in the US are capable of sequencing coronavirus samples to detect variants. But she's not aware of any labs that have completed the validation process to get federal approval.” "'The process of validating a next-generation sequencing test is burdensome,' Wroblewski said. 'It takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of data. It takes a lot of resources…'” “For a sequencing test to be validated, a manufacturer needs to collect data to show that the test does a good job of detecting a specific variant, then request emergency authorization from the Food and Drug Administration. Alternatively, laboratories can validate their sequencing tests 'in house,' meaning they collect the same data so CMS can approve their test.” “'The letter of the law from CMS is that if you don't go through this full validation process, you cannot release the results with patient identifying information,' Wroblewski said.” So…getting any sort of official approval for the genetic-sequencing test is a lot of work. It takes a great of deal of time. Therefore, yawn, why bother? Therefore, shrug, just let each lab set its own standards and make its own claims. Who cares? And meanwhile, the patient can’t find out what his test showed. And THIS is the insane system forming the foundation of claims that the Delta variant is everywhere. Thus ends today’s episode of The Bubble and the Bubble Brains That Populate It. ~~~ (The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.) (Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
  16. COVID 19 TEST CENTRE MARKET STREET MANCHESTER UK https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=MWHG7OS46G3X Final comment, "Not interested in what is being said as long as they are getting paid a wage." Just about sums it up.
  17. Excerpt from the Pfizer BioNtech EUA Fact sheet showing adverse reactions in children aged 12-15 years old – these figures speak for themselves. :-(
  18. THE most blatant example of Orwellian doublespeak I've heard this year. Absolute disgrace.
  19. CDC/FDA smoking gun of smoking guns They confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus; they “contrived” a model by pretending to find what they wanted to find; it’s called a self-fulfilling prophecy This is the con and the crime that drove millions of lives, and economies, into ruin by Jon Rappoport (To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.) The CDC has issued a document that bulges with devastating admissions. The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively: “After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.” Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” The CDC isn’t saying that at all. They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2. CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020---right up to this minute. In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect. Actually, that statement is too generous. Every test result of every PCR test should be thrown out. To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here is a killer quote: “During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.” Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2. This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.” Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus---the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results. THE PCR TESTS USED CONTRIVED SPECIMENS OF THE VIRUS WE DIDN’T HAVE. BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests. In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW. They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth. If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan. Here, once again, I report virology’s version of “we isolated the virus”: They have a soup they make in their labs. This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus. This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients, and that starvation could kill the cells. There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists. Yet the researchers call cell-death “isolation of the virus.” To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, “We assume, without proof, we have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” equals, “We’ve separated the virus from all surrounding material.” Virology equals “how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world.” Other than that, it’s perfect. ~~~ (The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.) (Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
  20. Gladys Berijerkov rules ze world... https://www.bitchute.com/video/caEvLjaaCWGB/
  21. Someone should have run up from behind and booted that dog in the nuts. Then we'd have seen some fireworks!!!
  22. This is a perfect example showing the police to be absolutely clueless as to their job, their role and who they serve. (Common Purpose reframing in full effect) Credit to these people for stating their case in a calm and respectful way by stating these officers merely have "obligations and roles "under that uniform and that they won't be able to hide behind it. Would love to have seen their expressions under those bloody masks when they were told the would be held personally liable in a Common Law Court if they didn't bring the Inspector down. Fantastic stuff.
×
×
  • Create New...