Jump to content

karantanc

Members
  • Posts

    158
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by karantanc

  1. You simply deny historical facts and put on them a label of conspiracy. I don't know your motivation, but I doubt it is seeking the truth.
  2. America, once a symbol of democracy, has, paradoxically, found itself in a similar situation to that of the former illegitimate communist regimes. The illegitimate clique of financial oligarchs, which has appropriated America, feels constantly threatened in its illegitimate role, fearing that the American people, either through the institutions of the system or through civil revolt, would deprive it of the privilege of issuing a national currency, which enables plundering the American people, what is contrary to the spirit of liberal capitalist society. Therefore, the American administration is obsessed with internal security, which means defending only the illegitimate interest of the financial and industrial (especially military-industrial) predatory clique that has occupied America from within. For this reason, a war is needed against terrorism, domestic and foreign, which is primarily a psychological cold war against American people, which can also escalate into a hot, real civil war.
  3. These bankers who “came from Europe”, and control the Fed, are primarily Jewish bankers. Through them, the Jews control and actually lead America. But they use their position of power to gradually destroy it. They systematically and consciously eliminate the white race through excessive mass migrations. Through the elimination of white supremacism they deprive them of economic and political power. Whites in modern America are massively systemically discriminated against with pretext for fighting systemic racism, but no one stumbles upon Jewish supremacism, which is a real danger to America, as it destroys American civilization, which until recently was the civilization of European whites. https://birthofanewearthblog.com/the-jewish-agenda-to-destroy-the-white-race/
  4. My experience with sleep paralysis was this: While sleeping, I heard a loud sound similar to the sound of a plane taking off. The tone of the sound was getting higher and higher, and at some point I lost consciousness. What happened then, I don't know. I do not remember anything. When I regained consciousness, I was in a body that was like dead, completely stoned. I couldn’t move and I was very scared. Over time, I managed to move a finger on my hand or foot and then the body came to life. I jumped out of the bed, turned on the light, and had no idea what had happened to me. This was repeating to me for a year or two almost every night, even several times. I meditated before sleeping at the time, so I stopped meditating and the sleep paralysis disappeared. I still have no idea what that could be. Was I spiritually kidnapped? Was the soul temporarily outside the body? I do not know. Something I’m sure: It wasn’t a hallucination and it wasn’t a creation of the mind. It was something outside of me.
  5. When there are no arguments, then blasphemy. The facts obviously bother you. "If the facts are not in line with the theory, so much the worse for the facts." (Stalin) The main fact is that the Fed is a private corporation and issues the national currency. A private company cares for itself, not for the public good. Issuing money, however, is (should be) for the public, not private benefit. Read McFadden's opinion about the Fed cited above. He knew exactly, what he was talking about. Understand, if you can/want. https://bankingjournal.aba.com/2018/02/lincoln-and-the-banks/ https://www.theepochtimes.com/lincolns-greenback-notes-saved-america-once-but-can-they-save-it-again-now_3099861.html "But with this Federal Reserve Act being passed, Congress gave up Its power to create its own money that it was given in the United States Constitution, and gave this power over to private Bankers who called themselves the Federal Reserve. The Bankers had achieved their ultimate goal, for now the United States operated under a central bank that was privately owned. They now had the power to run the country by controlling the creation of the money, and were free to charge the interest they so desired. As Mayer Anselm Rothschild once said: “Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws...” "President Kennedy was not afraid to “buck the system”, for he understood how the Federal Reserve System was being used to destroy the United States. As a just and honorable man, he could not tolerate such a system, for it smelled corruption from A to Z. Certainly he must have known about the Greenbacks which Abraham Lincoln created when he was in office. On June 4th, 1963, President Kennedy signed a presidential document, called Exec­utive Order 11110, which further amended Executive Order 10289 of September 19th, 1951. This gave Kennedy, as President of the United States, legal clearance to create his own money to run the country, money that would belong to the people, an Interest and debt-free money. He had printed United States Notes, completely ignoring the Federal Reserve Notes from the private banks of the Federal Reserve. Our records show that Kennedy issued $4,292,893,825 of cash money. It was perfect­ly obvious that Kennedy was out to under­mine the Federal Reserve System of the United States. But it was only a few months later, In November of 1963, that the world received the shocking news of President Kennedy's assassination. " https://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/politics/item/abraham-lincoln-and-john-f-kennedy
  6. You obviously don't understand the debate. We are approaching to scientific singularity. It will take 10 or 100 or 1000 years, but it is inevitable. We are becoming like highly developed aliens from another planet. And we shall face problems, we cannot even imagine. Good for you, who think it does not exist. By the way: What doesn't exist?
  7. Congressman Mc Fadden speech On May 23, 1933 on Federal Reserve a corrupt institution "Mr. Chairman, we have in this Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. The Fed has cheated the Government of these United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the Nation's debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Fed has cost enough money to pay the National debt several times over. "This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Fed and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it. "Some people who think that the Federal Reserve Banks United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lender. In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into states to buy votes to control our legislatures; there are those who maintain International propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us into granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime. "These twelve private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this Country by the bankers who came here from Europe and repaid us our hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those bankers took money out of this Country to finance Japan in a war against Russia. They created a reign of terror in Russia with our money in order to help that war along. They instigated the separate peace between Germany and Russia, and thus drove a wedge between the allies in World War. They financed Trotsky's passage from New York to Russia so that he might assist in the destruction of the Russian Empire. They fomented and instigated the Russian Revolution, and placed a large fund of American dollars at Trotsky's disposal in one of their branch banks in Sweden so that through him Russian homes might be thoroughly broken up and Russian children flung far and wide from their natural protectors. They have since begun breaking up of American homes and the dispersal of American children. "Mr. Chairman, there should be no partisanship in matters concerning banking and currency affairs in this Country, and I do not speak with any. "In 1912 the National Monetary Association, under the chairmanship of the late Senator Nelson W. Aldrich, made a report and presented a vicious bill called the National Reserve Association bill. This bill is usually spoken of as the Aldrich bill. Senator Aldrich did not write the Aldrich bill. He was the tool, if not the accomplice, of the European bankers who for nearly twenty years had been scheming to set up a central bank in this Country and who in 1912 has spent and were continuing to spend vast sums of money to accomplish their purpose. "We were opposed to the Aldrich plan for a central bank. The men who rule the Democratic Party then promised the people that if they were returned to power there would be no central bank established here while they held the reigns of government. Thirteen months later that promise was broken, and the Wilson administration, under the tutelage of those sinister Wall Street figures who stood behind Colonel House, established here in our free Country the worm-eaten monarchical institution of the "King's Bank" to control us from the top downward, and from the cradle to the grave. "The Federal Reserve Bank destroyed our old and characteristic way of doing business. It discriminated against our 1-name commercial paper, the finest in the world, and it set up the antiquated 2-name paper, which is the present curse of this Country and which wrecked every country which has ever given it scope; it fastened down upon the Country the very tyranny from which the framers of the Constitution sough to save us.
  8. Facts are facts and they speak for themselves. It's easy to put a conspiracy label on facts one doesn't like.
  9. http://www.xat.org/xat/usury.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenback_(1860s_money) http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/thefederalreserve.htm http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/executiveorder11110.htm https://truth11.com/2020/06/03/jfks-executive-order-11110-abolishing-the-federal-reserve/ http://libertyforlife.com/banking/us-mcfadden-re-frb.htm http://annavonreitz.com/mcfaddenspeechonthefed.pdf Wikipedia: "Greenback 1860s Money Greenbacks were paper currency fiat money issued by the United States during the American Civil War that were printed in green on the back. They were in two forms: Demand Notes, issued in 1861–1862, and United States Notes issued in 1862–1865. They were legal tender by law, but were not backed by gold or silver, only the credibility of the U.S. government."
  10. The first link actually describes the conspiracy to form The Federal Reserve Act of 1913. I quote from your link: A mysterious expedition The utmost secrecy was enjoined upon all. The public must not glean a hint of what was to be done. Senator Aldrich notified each one to go quietly into a private car which the railroad had received orders to draw up at an unfrequented platform. Drawn blinds balked any peering eyes that might be around. Off the party set. New York's ubiquitous reporters had been foiled. So far so good. After bowling along the railroad hour after hour, into Southern country, the order was given to prepare to disembark. Stepping from the car when the station had been well cleared of travelers, the members of the expedition embarked in a small boat. Silence reigned, for the boatsmen must not find out how distinguished were their passengers. In due time they drew up at another deserted pier. They were at Jekyll Island, off Georgia. The island was entirely unpeopled, save for half-a-dozen servants. "The servants must under no circumstances learn who we are," cautioned Senator Aldrich. "What can we do to fool them," asked another member of the group. The problem was discussed. "I have it," cried one. "Let's all call each other by our first names. Don't ever let us mention our last names." It was so agreed. The dignified, veteran Senator Aldrich, king of Rhode Island and a power second to none in the United States Senate, became just "Nelson;" Henry P. Davison, everywhere recognized among the ablest international bankers America has ever produced, forthwith became "Harry;" the president of the nation's largest bank became "Frank;" and the quiet, scholarly member of the powerful international banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. became "Paul." Nelson had meanwhile confided to Harry, Frank, Paul and Piatt that he was to keep them locked up on Jekyll Island, cut off from the rest of the world, until they had evolved and compiled a scientific currency system for the United States, a system that would embody all that was best in Europe, yet so modeled that it could serve a country measuring thousands where European countries measure only hundreds of miles.
  11. I am not sure, if you understand the meaning of "public" as opposite to "private". From what you write, it is obvious, that there is a private banking cartel in US, which has the authority to create national currency. There have been two attempts in American history when the U.S. government issued several tranches of the national U.S. currency. The first to issue state money was LIncoln because private bankers demanded enormous interest rates, ca 30%, during war. With state dollars, Lincoln paid the costs of the war and the state apparatus without borrowing money and thus creating debt, and without paying interest. The second to issue a tranche of state dollars was J.F. Kennedy. Lincoln and Kennedy, both fell under the assassin's arm. May be you have an explanation for these murders.
  12. Owned or consisting? The Federal Reserve Act stipulates that Fed owners are covert. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=griffin+creature+from+jeckyl+island&t=brave&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dlu_VqX6J93k
  13. It is becoming increasingly obvious and logical why Jesus incarnated as a Jew. Jews operate according to Old Testament principles: eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth. In addition, they think that they are a chosen people entrusted with the task of ruling the world. Hence Jewish supremacy rises. Jews were persecuted wherever they were: in Babylon, Egypt, the Roman Empire, medieval Europe, interwar and war nazi Germany ... Why? Because they threatened the host nation everywhere. Everywhere they took finance into their own hands and through it power, albeit informally, from the background. Today they threaten Europe and America by the politics of elimination the white race, which are they openly conducting. Jesus was born into a Jewish community to end the reign of the evil and vengeful God of Yahweh, and to establish a kingdom of peace and love. Today we can see that the wicked Yahweh still rules the Jews and through them the West. That is the cause of so much hatred, which is rising in western society. Hatred on socio-political, racial, gender, class... basis. We are approaching the times of Sodom and Gomorrah. History is repeating itself. https://birthofanewearthblog.com/the-jewish-agenda-to-destroy-the-white-race/ https://rense.com/general45/full.htm https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/jews-admit-organizing-white-genocide_bI5xaBYDmupzmGV.html https://www.bitchute.com/video/2CWJVRwIvWTX/ https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/04/jews-commit-white-genocide-as-a-hiding-mechanism/
  14. Following the example of the Georgia guidestones, a monument could be erected on which 10 guides to humanity would be carved. Humanity Agenda I. Ban all secret organisations. II. No public or private organisation should hide anything from the public. III. Central issuing national or international banks should be publicly owned. IV. National/state secrets should be made public to prevent abuse. V. Private companies should also operate transparently and not against the public benefit. VI. Prohibit all monopolies, all privileges, political and economic. VII. Repeal all secret regulations and prohibit their adoption. VIII. Regulate and control the development of psychotronics and artificial intelligence and their implants in the human, animal or artificial body. IX. Ban virtual violence in the media because it translates into real violence. X. Educate the youth in the spirit of human virtues, which are a condition of freedom and democracy.
  15. Some possible measures to prevent a New World Order under the leadership of the global elite: All attempts to establish an international system of issuing world money under the leadership and ownership of a global financial oligarchy composed of private bankers should be stopped, until the issue of creating national and supranational currencies or world financial system is resolved for the benefit of nations or the international public, not for the benefit of the global financial oligarchy. Private bankers and their dependent politicians and experts should be excluded from preparations for the creation of transnational currencies and world money. A debate on the ethical models of national and international monetary systems should be launched in world wide scale. The basic guideline of financial systems should be that the public benefit of public financial systems must take precedence over the private interests of bankers, and that issuing banks must not be owned by private oligarchies but by national or international communities. Private ownership of issuing or central banks, whether national or international, should be prohibited. At national and global level, all national and international secret associations should be banned. States should fight secret societies in a similar way as they fight terrorists, because hidden societies are far more dangerous than all terrorists combined. Politicians should swear at the time of their appointment that they will fight against all secret societies and that they will never be their members. If there is a reasonable suspicion that a politician is colluding with anyone in relation to anything against the public interest, such a politician should resign, and his function should end. Lobbying should be banned, because it is only a legalised corruption. Any covert activities of political and state bodies should be prohibited, including in matters relating to national security, military and other similar matters, because everything is being abused en masse against those for whom security measures are supposed to be aimed - against the people, thus de facto abolishing democracy. The public should have an absolute and unrestricted right to know everything that politics does on its behalf. Private companies, especially multinationals, and all private institutions should operate much more transparently than it is the case now. The public interest in terms of business transparency should take precedence over the private interest, which is reflected in business secrets established because individual matters on the business agenda are contrary to the public interest, not because they could benefit their competition. We would need ombudsmen to protect the interests of the public also in relation to private companies, not only in relation to the state. Many big tech companies are much more powerful and influential than quite a lot of today's states. It should be agreed at the international level that all secret regulations adopted by individual countries should be repealed and that any application should be stopped. Secret regulations should be described as totalitarian and inadmissible from the point of view of human rights and democratic principles. The development and all applications of artificial intelligence on humans, animals or cybernetic organisms and devices should be regulated and strictly controlled by law. The use of psychotronic technologies in humans should be strictly controlled and regulated, perhaps even banned, in particular its use without the knowledge and consent of those involved. The use of any electronic implants in the human body should be regulated and strictly controlled, perhaps even prohibited, and in particular its use without the knowledge and consent of those involved. The setting of standards on permitted levels of toxic substances in food should become transparent and should be subject to prior public debate in the professional and lay public. The sale and use of medicines should be approved in public bodies that operate in a transparent manner, and should also be represented by alternative experts and lay people of the interested public. Natural medicines should become an alternative to synthetic medicines. Children and young people should be brought up in the spirit of human virtues - selflessness, truthfulness, honesty - which are a condition of freedom and democracy. Violent cartoons, violent computer games and violent movies should be banned.
  16. Artificial intelligence - a deadly snake on the chest of humanity? Paradoxically, humanity is devoting enormous resources to defending itself against external enemies in the form of other nations, but perhaps it is cultivating a snake on its own chest that will be able to sting a deadly bite in the foreseeable future that could destroy much or even all of humanity. That snake is artificial intelligence (AI). There will be virtually no defence mechanism against this deadly snake, although establishing a defence against this danger would be much more necessary than defending against other enemies. An additional problem is that the most technologically advanced nations, superpowers, which are striving for world domination, compete with each other, who will sooner discover the artificial intelligence with which they hope to dominate competing countries, perhaps the whole world, while forgetting the dangers of such project, which are certainly not negligible. Cyborgs as extensions of intelligent and probably self-aware super-computers, will be able to memorise vast amounts of data and perform mathematical and other logical operations at enormous speed . Artificial intelligence will exceed the capabilities of today's man billions of times. They will be able to have any number of professions, they will deal with the issues of the micro and macro universe in a way that is completely unimaginable even for top scientists today. As long-term studies will no longer be required to achieve an education, flexibility between professions will be virtually absolute. http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/building-gods/ To solve any problem, cyborgs will be able to engage any number of individuals, who will be able to connect to the network . Communication between them will be immediate and exact, and the amount of data transferred will be virtually unlimited. It is quite possible, that when such artificial super-intelligence will come to existence, it will be the last act of humankind.
  17. ... who will also have mechanical locomotive abilities...
  18. The Internet as an independent artificial intelligence There is a possibility that autonomous artificial intelligence will appear on the Internet. Once developed, it will take its own development into its own hands, and at its own discretion and will. It will then spread via the Internet at lightning speed to virtually any computer, much like viruses spread. What will be the consequences of the evolution of information technology, which is supposed to be a tool under human control, into an autonomous global mega-cybernetic system with its own artificial and self-developing intelligence, perhaps even with its own consciousness and will, no one can know. If an independent, self-reproducing artificial intelligence were to emerge, it would surely be in a competitive relationship with humans for limited resources. Will the global information system become a kind of electronic cybernetic living being? AI might become the brain and nerves of human civilization in the true sense of the word, which will control all technological and organizational systems, and thus mankind itself. Will man then still be able to be the center of this system, that is, civilization, or will the electronic cyber megasystem become the central being of civilization, and man will only be in the service of this mega-cybernetic system as long as it is needed or at least harmless? Will this system still be willing to cooperate with humans? Will he set his own terms of cooperation? Will he shape and implement his secret agenda past the will or even against the will of man? Will he be friendly, hostile, pragmatic or otherwise to humans? Will it have its own specific needs and requirements? Will he manipulate a man? http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/building-gods/ http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-primacy-of-consciousness/ Will this system still serve man, or will it be the other way around and will man have to serve him? Will humanity perhaps establish a symbiosis with the mega-cybernetic system, which means that in some way it will negotiate modalities of coexistence according to the principles of give-and-take? Will the cyber mega-system become an equal partner of humanity? Will he also be an honest partner? It might conclude at some point to simply get rid of humanity because it will woperate easier, faster and better with superintelligent robots, who will also have mechanical-motor abilities far better than a humans. Will this mega-cybernetic system become a kind of independent and autonomous being, and all the other intelligent forms will be just some kind of support cells of this planetary cybernetic mega-mind?! These are questions that are, of course, impossible to answer. But they call for consideration of how far humanity can go on an adventure by shaping artificial intelligence. Of course, the pertinent question is whether the time to think about it may have passed, and the train has long since left and no one can stop it anymore ...
  19. The last doubt about the real intentions of the European globalist political elite was refuted by the adoption of the Marrakesh Declaration, which practically grants illegal migrants the right to invade Europe without restriction. What has Europe gained in exchange for free entry from migrant "exporting" countries? Nothing! It is a unilateral commitment by European countries to accept migrants from Africa and Asia indefinitely. Isn't that the same as betrayal? We can imagine what would happen if it were the other way around: if millions of indigenous Europeans migrated illegally somewhere in the Middle East or Africa. They would certainly be labeled as new crusaders or neo-colonialists - and so they would be accepted. Europe, on the other hand, welcomes illegal migrants with open arms, who are in fact a kind of invaders, colonizers of Europe. In the long run, the migrant invasion will produce the same result as the defeat in the war: the cultural, ethnic, demographic and political transformation of Europe, a kind of Africanisation and orientalisation. European nations and their culture or civilization will disappear, there will be no more autochthonous Europeans. Don't Merkel, Leyen, Macron, Johnson and other European politicians see this? They see, but they don't care. They are forcing a globalist agenda against the will of European nations, regardless of the devastating consequences for European nations and indigenous Europeans. The modern forced colonization of Europe is taking place at a time of heightened sensitivity to the rights of indigenous peoples around the world. If the European colonization of Africa, the Middle and Far East and other regions of the world was violence against the people there, then the ongoing colonization of Europe by Afro-Asians is also violence against Europeans. If all the indigenous peoples of the world have an inalienable right to identity, so do Europeans, who are also indigenous to their continent. Illegal immigration to Europe under the pretext of human rights, with illegal migration not being a human right, is an abuse of the human rights institute to trample on the fundamental right of indigenous Europeans to exist.
  20. The globalist political class The European political class, led by the Western capital oligarchy, is systematically pursuing a policy of demographic globalization, which in perspective means nothing more and nothing less than the disappearance of European nations and even indigenous Europeans. Newcomers to Europe find it difficult to mix with indigenous Europeans due to ingrained prejudices, traditions and specific culture, but because they have a much higher birth rate and due to intensive migration and reunification of their many family members, they will gradually displace European natives. With the Africanization and Orientalization of Europe, globalists have hoped for further, intercontinental integration, which, as long as European nations exist, is practically impossible due to insurmountable cultural and civilizational differences. Europe is internally paralyzed, tricked by its political class, which, under the influence of the globalist international, has turned its back on European nations and deliberately left Europe at the mercy of the migrant flood. Europeans, misled by globalist politicians and the instrumentalized media, behave mostly as if they are not concerned with the fate of themselves and their descendants. They elect a political class that ignore them and trust unreliable politicians whose main "virtue" is that they are the puppets of the European ruling oligarchy or plutocracy, which has its own global interests, which are inconsistent with the interests of European nations. It is enough to follow a little bit of what the European Parliament or the European Commission is doing in regard to illegal migration. This is far from the interests of European nations, but completely in line with the interests of the globalist plutocracy. As a result, the Visegrad countries, which do not want to accept illegal migrants, are constantly harassed by Brussels on the pretext that they do not respect the European values. Some pro-active MPs "excel" in attacking Visegrad members with pretext of enforcing the rule of law, but in fact it is all about enforcing the political will of the Brussels globalist bureaucracy, albeit contrary to the interests of European nations. In 2015, when, at the invitation of Chancellor Angela Merkel, more than a million migrants entered Europe illegally in one wave, radically trampling on the European legal order, Brussels was pretty quiet. Nobody was talking about rule of law. The double standards are obvious. In doing so, Merkel misled the German and European public that doctors, engineers and skilled workers were coming to compensate for the loss of births in Europe and ensure that the older generations would receive pensions. It turned out that most migrants did not have any qualifications, were difficult to employ or even unemployable. They landed on social coffers and thus further endangered pensions and the welfare state. The opening of European borders for illegal migrants at the initiative of Merkel also opened the so-called the Balkan route, which remained widely opened since then. Will Germany compensate for the damage suffered and still being suffered by the countries on the Balkan route - Greece, Northern Macedonia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia, Austria - due to the migrant invasion that followed Merkel's invitation? The peoples of the Balkans, Visegrad and other European nations have every moral and legal right to defend themselves against this betrayal of Europe. In fact, they are still far too undecided, given that Pontius Pilate of Brussels sentenced them to death. We know from recent history that totalitarian European states also had laws, but therefore they were not yet states governed by the rule of law. The law is what is right, not the right of the stronger, which Brussels is increasingly using against individual members.
  21. The globalist political class The European political class, led by the Western capital oligarchy, is systematically pursuing a policy of demographic globalization, which in perspective means nothing more and nothing less than the disappearance of European nations and even indigenous Europeans. Newcomers to Europe find it difficult to mix with indigenous Europeans due to ingrained prejudices, traditions and specific culture, but because they have a much higher birth rate and due to intensive migration and reunification of their many family members, they will gradually displace European natives. With the Africanization and Orientalization of Europe, globalists have hoped for further, intercontinental integration, which, as long as European nations exist, is practically impossible due to insurmountable cultural and civilizational differences. Europe is internally paralyzed, tricked by its political class, which, under the influence of the globalist international, has turned its back on European nations and deliberately left Europe at the mercy of the migrant flood. Europeans, misled by globalist politicians and the instrumentalized media, behave mostly as if they are not concerned with the fate of themselves and their descendants. They elect a political class that ignore them and trust unreliable politicians whose main "virtue" is that they are the puppets of the European ruling oligarchy or plutocracy, which has its own global interests, which are inconsistent with the interests of European nations. It is enough to follow a little bit of what the European Parliament or the European Commission is doing in regard to illegal migration. This is far from the interests of European nations, but completely in line with the interests of the globalist plutocracy. As a result, the Visegrad countries, which do not want to accept illegal migrants, are constantly harassed by Brussels on the pretext that they do not respect the European values. Some pro-active MPs "excel" in attacking Visegrad members with pretext of enforcing the rule of law, but in fact it is all about enforcing the political will of the Brussels globalist bureaucracy, albeit contrary to the interests of European nations. In 2015, when, at the invitation of Chancellor Angela Merkel, more than a million migrants entered Europe illegally in one wave, radically trampling on the European legal order, Brussels was pretty quiet. Nobody was talking about rule of law. The double standards are obvious. In doing so, Merkel misled the German and European public that doctors, engineers and skilled workers were coming to compensate for the loss of births in Europe and ensure that the older generations would receive pensions. It turned out that most migrants did not have any qualifications, were difficult to employ or even unemployable. They landed on social coffers and thus further endangered pensions and the welfare state. The opening of European borders for illegal migrants at the initiative of Merkel also opened the so-called the Balkan route, which remained widely opened since then. Will Germany compensate for the damage suffered and still being suffered by the countries on the Balkan route - Greece, Northern Macedonia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia, Austria - due to the migrant invasion that followed Merkel's invitation? The peoples of the Balkans, Visegrad and other European nations have every moral and legal right to defend themselves against this betrayal of Europe. In fact, they are still far too undecided, given that Pontius Pilate of Brussels sentenced them to death. We know from recent history that totalitarian European states also had laws, but therefore they were not yet states governed by the rule of law. The law is what is right, not the right of the stronger, which Brussels is increasingly using against individual members.
  22. Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population? Refugees who are not that In wars, refugees are predominantly women with children and the elderly, who typically return home when the war whirlwind is over. Migrants coming to Europe, however, are predominantly young men and have no intention of returning to their homeland except perhaps as tourists. The wars in the Middle East and elsewhere are more or less over, illegal migrants are still arriving, and those in Europe show no intention of returning home. If at the beginning of the refugee crisis one could believe that Europe is willing to accept millions of migrants out of solidarity with allegedly forcibly displaced and endangered people, it has become clear over time that this is not the case at all. Most migrants are not refugees and do not come from war zones at all, but are literally from all winds, from Bangladesh in the Far East all the way to Morocco in northwest Africa and from sub-Saharan Africa. And even if migrants were refugees, European countries are not the first safe countries to be obliged to accept refugees under international law. This also applies to migrants from sub-Saharan Africa who allegedly try to sail the Mediterranean Sea in rubber boats, after which smugglers "rescue" them with their ships as "shipwrecked". Smugglers drive migrants to Europe, especially Italy, although maritime law requires the disembarkation of shipwrecked people, who are supposed to be people in boats, on the nearest coast, which is African. In line with the globalist agenda, the relevant Italian authorities and European institutions are ignoring that this is not humanitarian work. It is dirty theft reminiscent of the former slave trade. Authorities are not taking action against unscrupulous smugglers who are even adorned with the halo of philanthropy. The media assists smugglers by publishing dramatic photos of migrants in overcrowded boats, but does not say that dinghies are provided to them by smugglers to bring migrants into international waters, after which smugglers reload them into their vessels. Migrants also come because of the many social benefits they receive in Europe. But these benefits are based on internal demographic relations between the active and inactive population and on intergenerational solidarity within society, all of which is disintegrating due to excessive migration. Social rights are balanced by obligations, and this balance is gradually being upset. Europe does not owe anything to people who want to come to Europe at any cost, despite intense pro-migrant political and media propaganda that convinces people otherwise. Europe's leading politicians are unaware that migrants are people who are entitled to solidarity aid and who uncompromisingly support the migrant tsunami. When Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, was on a visit to Greece, at a time when Turkey was starting to reintroduce migrants to Greece, she was concerned about the human rights of migrants, not Greeks and Europeans. Military units sent by some EU members to help Greeks defend the border, however, sent migrants to Greece instead of protecting the border from them. That is European "solidarity". A further fact that shows the real goals of European migration policy is the fact that the European Union has adopted a series of regulations and policies in favor of migrants. Most notable will be the notorious policy of migrant quotas, which is supposed to direct the flows of migrants from Africa and Asia to all countries of the European Union. Fortunately, the Visegrad countries in particular resisted this policy, realizing that migrant quotas were nothing more than a trap, a kind of Trojan horse that would serve as a starting point for further gradual migrant colonization of all EU countries, including those in which non-European there have been no migrants so far.
×
×
  • Create New...