Jump to content

kilowon

Members
  • Posts

    492
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by kilowon

  1. And yet here you are, wasting your time with me. What does that say about you?
  2. Read the documents. The judge personal opinion have no bearing on the matter. That is why an expert was appointed by the judge and even he, a germ theory believer and of course not a real expert since viruses does not exist, have major issues with the six papers from Bardens. You are out of your league here.
  3. the whole thing is the relevant section. I have already posted it, in english to boot
  4. This is a meta analysis. Not an actual experiment. Please explain what the mock control was?
  5. Real scientists with knowledge of virology? There are no real scientist when it comes to virology as it is a completely made up science with no actuality in reality. No one, in the 150 years of germ theory, has ever shown any scientific proof that a so called virus exist in a living being as the only means to look at that phantasm is through the electron microscope, which can only look at dead things. No one has ever shown that virus exist outside of a cell culture in a lab as the only way to look at virus is through an electron microscope which can only look at dead thing. No one has ever shown that a virus can leave a host and enter another host as the only way to look at virus is in cell culture through an electron microscope which can only look at dead thing. No one has ever shown a virus in vivo as the only way to supposedly see virus is through and electron microscope which can only look at dead thing in cell culture, not living processes and certainly nothing within a living being. How would they even be able to rip Lanka Control experiment to shred when they themselves do not do control for their experiment. In 150 years, every time scientist have tried to infect someone with a virus they have failed. I posted all the link to those failed experiment above which i noticed you conveniently refuse to comment on. Just as you seem unwilling to answer the question on how a non-living piece of materials with no agency of its own can seek and invade cells and hijack them and forced them to reproduced
  6. Nope. That was only one of the reason. FFS, I have posted the actual court document in english which anyone can read and you still carrying on with that MSM lie?
  7. He will not be able to do so as most of the covid papers had no control.
  8. no doubt. I am thinking of starting a topic specifically on Terrain theory but i hope grumpy owl can guide me if it is a good idea or better to just post my research in existing thread about the non reality of virus.
  9. I also noticed that you have not commented on how a non-living piece of materials with no agency of its own can seek and invade cells and hijack them and forced them to reproduced.
  10. No virology would questioned the existence of virus because it would mean their whole career was a lie. It is not the same with climatologist because no one is claiming climate does not exist. A climatologist who claimed that climate change is not caused by human activities would still have the rest of the feild of climatology to work in while if a virologist claimed virus does not exist then he/she has to find another job or admit his/her lifework was a lie. Two completely different situation.
  11. You got to be having me on. Of course, if they give those answers to Engelbrecht it means they admitting the limitations found in their papers. They admitting they did not purified any virus. DUH. Of course there was error in their papers, they did not purified the virus and they admitted to it. So why have all those papers not been retracted? And the second part of your answer is pure scientism. You believe that scientists are godlike being and thus verifying what they claimed is totally unnecessary. Only religious fanatic act like this. Of course, you should verified what they claimed before believing them. The fact that papers pushing the covid narrative have not been retracted by the deeply corrupted medical system should be of no surprise.
  12. The CCP and Iran leadership are both owned by the globalist death cult. Mao was a Rockefeller goffer. All you see is political theatre. It is funny to me how people do not trust the CCP about anything and yet trust them when they said they have discovered a new virus. Does people here seriously believe that the ultra secretive and authoritarian Chinese government would have revealed to the world that it has discovered a new virus in Wuhan? Come on, no one here should be that naive
  13. I have been telling you that he/she is displaying classic gatekeeping behaviour. To the point of claiming he agree with 99percent of what Icke says but yet unable to state clearly what he agrees with icke about. I have asked him that question a number of time and he never give a straight answer. For example, in my case, i have no qualm in stating clearly that the royal family are indeed reptilian, or at very least, possessed by reptilian spirit.
  14. Where does other virologist get their money from?
  15. Addressed the point in my post, I did not mentioned Lanka at all there. Why are the virologist themselves admitting that they did not follow proper procedure to prove that sarscov2 exist and that it is the cause of a disease. Again, where are the literally tens of thousand of scientific papers that confirm the original finding. The fact that you yourself have not read tens of thousands of papers about sarscov2 isolation shows again that you are just parroting and have no idea if that is so.
  16. Na Zhu et al. (NEJM): “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones” Wan Beom Park et al. (Journal of Korean Medical Science): “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” Myung-Guk Han et al. (Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives): “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris (Nature Medicine): “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus Sharon R. Lewin et al. (The Medical Journal of Australia): ““The nucleic acid extraction was performed on isolate material recovered from infected cells. This material was not centrifuged, so was not purified through sucrose gradient to have a density band as such. The EM images were obtained directly from cell culture material All these quotes come from the first papers that claimed to have discovered the sarscov2. Even the virologist themselves are admitting that their processes for discovering the virus, were at the very least, incomplete.
  17. And his constant use of the word thousands, millions and everyone. No way anyone knows what the thousand of retired scientists think since most of them are not even talking about this issue. Plenty of people go through life doing works that they do not believe in just for a pay check.
  18. BTW, Rapapport precede cowan and Kaufmann with the no virus idea. In fact, those two guys are newcomers to this idea. I also noticed that you have not commented on how a non-living piece of materials with no agency of its own can seek and invade cells and hijack them and forced them to reproduced.
  19. Unlike the scientist who are paragon of virtue and would never lie for the benefit of their paymasters. As I have said before, your dismissal and constant insult of anyone who do not kowtow to Rockerfeller' medecine/psuedoscience says a lot. Like people like Icke and Rappaport are just going to based their belief in the nonreality of virus around just Cowan and Kaufmann. Like those guys are not going to do further research for themselves.
  20. So show the control done for the thousands other papers.
  21. so you admitting there was no control done for Zhou et al? But you just said that control is always done in virology. And why were they rushing when at the time of Zhou's paper there were very few cases of the so called convid virus? There were no emergency. More character assassination of Lanka from the shill
  22. I know exactly where you got that wall of text from. Do you ever post anything that is your own opinion or based on your own research? Bot like behaviour. And what exactly is a proper scientist. Is it someone who work at the behest of big pharma? Is it someone taking grant money from Bill gates and the likes? So are we saying now that virus can be infected by bacteria? How does that even work? And how is fetal cow serum or dye benign. Now about the controls for the zhou et al paper since you said they are always done
  23. If you are not lying maybe you can show me the control in Zhou et al paper, or where that paper that started it all was replicated
×
×
  • Create New...