Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by PH196

  1. IT seems you've foudn the overARCHing conspiracy. You have found the correct plot ARCH in the story. It all begins and ends with the ARCH.
  2. to summarize: arch is often added to a word to denote chief, or principal. It is used to show rank or place. For example Archangel Michael trampling Satan. The image denotes his authority over unclean spirits, the chief of whom is the the devil or satan. Michael is the Supreme Commander of the Heavenly Host, hence he is given the title ARCHangel.
  3. To be fair, you haven't boiled anything down to anything. It's an absurdity to a limited mind who hasn't seen what the baddest of the bad in God's creation can do. You are pretty much giving the idea a snapshot glance and saying 'absurd, not a chance' and dismissing it, because....??
  4. Anyway...I can see the direction this post's conversation is going. Im not saying my ideas are gospel truth but you should consider them with an open mind, I have arrived at those conclusions after much deliberation and consideration.
  5. One thing I need to explain: why didn't jesus save the dinos?
  6. Same as the other guy, read my post. Can you answer the question: why does the mortal creation die? I can present you with an adequate explanation which you will reject because #reasons. The mortal creation dies because it is unreal in the first place, it does not even exist. And the reason it is supposedly 'born' or conceived also happens to be the reason it dies. This is stated not just by Christianity but also Siddartha Buddha" Do not say that the Tathagata is pleased. Now, to get pleased is an inverted mind. An inverted mind is birth and death. Birth and death
  7. You seem to have some internalized issues that are irrelevant to my original post. But since you seem fixated on sex;its relevance to the biblical fall insofar as I can tell, is that the mortal creation is propagated via lust, which logically makes lust the basic component of the mortal creation, and is also the reason it dies. Meaning: the reason the mortal is born is the reason it dies, i.e. it was not spiritually conceived by God and therefore does not really exist. It is an imaginary character that is unreal to God. Anything that does not exist for infinity does no
  8. How do we know there was no rebellion? Can you explain the origin of the Archons/Fallen Angels without interjecting some sort of 'split' where higher consciousness became completely disconnected with 'the One' i.e. God? That is in effect ignoring the darker aspect of our reality because it is unpleasant. It's all too easy to label biblical revelations as myth, in fact, it's trendy. Now I'm not a fundamentalist who is trying to convince you to repent or be damned, but the bible is allegorical and cannot be correctly interpreted by most. For example: there was no literal apple on a l
  9. For the record, this is exactly what David Icke says in his books as well. The archons 'downloaded' a fake counterfeit copy of golden age earth - eden, and entrapped souls within their AI simulaiton matrix. Except everything within their matrix reflects death. Is this not the law of this place, i.e. the survival of the fittest? The law of death permeates all of 'nature'.
  10. I'll attempt to explain this using the parable of the wheat and the tares. “The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field; 25 but while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat and went his way. 26 But when the grain had sprouted and produced a crop, then the tares also appeared. 27 So the servants of the owner came and said to him, ‘Sir, did you not sow good seed in your field? How then does it have tares?’ 28 He said to them, ‘An enemy has done this.’ The servants said to him, ‘Do you want us then to go and gather them up?’ 29 But he said, ‘No, le
  11. Yea exactly. No one person has all the pieces but when brought together and discussed the larger picture comes into focus. David Icke is pretty much 2nd to none when it comes to exposing the global conspiracy. My research is more top down - knock out the higher philosophical questions and then the rest can start to come into focus.
  12. Thank you, I put a lot of consideration into that. It's my conclusion after years of research. Not saying its 100% accurate but its a good start, and is consistent with a lot of David Icke's work on the nature of reality. One topic I forgot to mention which is relevant to this post is the origins of evil and its purpose, other than simply 'opposing God'. In order to fit the definition of an infinite being, God must be increasing without bound. The question then becomes: increasing into what? You can regard the null domain where God is not as the 'void' into which
  13. yea he has some good stuff to say and i think we are in agreement; but I haven't the slightest clue who Mollision is or why he is being cited as relevant, especially after I glanced at his Utube channel.
  14. Yes, thats what I'm saying. Just in a different terms. The biblical 'hack' or fall is their attempt to sustain themselves despite willfully choosing to rebel against God. In order to rebel against the source of life, you need to conceive of states of being that are foreign to God i.e. the mind of hatred, darkness, anger, jelousy, lust, fear etc... all states of being which are contrary to God. And it is that emotional energy that they feed off of. The reptilians are (likely) as you said, an ET race that was corrupted by the 'fallen ones' and simply do their bidding. I think the a
  15. This might be too deep for these forums. Way too much truth chalked in there for one post...
  16. This is a long post, so bear with me, and as Icke would say, keep an open mind. I was reading some of his latest book ‘the answer’, and correct me if I’m wrong, but there is quite a bit of overlap between Mr. Icke’s work and contemporary Christianity. Yes, he does make the distinction that the whole ‘savior’ concept is seen throughout many religions, including pagan religions i.e. Horus, but if he is citing Gnostic literature to support his claims on who the archons are, then he can’t entirely ignore Christ. After all, the information contained in the Nag Hammadi texts can ultimate
  • Create New...