.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Not-me
-
Posts
46 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Not-me
-
-
2 minutes ago, Odie Hatzcats said:
What the same as flu, which now doesn't cause any deaths? Actually doesn't exist anymore!
You are repeating gossip. The steps taken to limit the spread of covid-19 are fairly effective in limiting the spread of influenza. I am just amazed that you think healthcare workers are not aware of the differences between flu and covid-19, because that is your implication.
-
7 minutes ago, Basket Case said:
When damp they lessen oxygen level intake and raise CO2 levels in the blood / brain. Not good short term and very not good - long term.
Yep. Hate the things. Short bursts when coming into contact - at the shops, on buses, trains. That works, not for extended wear. God I couldn't do a shift at the hospital wearing one!
-
2 minutes ago, FrankVitali said:
Fuck me thats your reply?
Well yes. That is a ridiculous and unfeasible expense. It's ok for selective localised outbreaks, but for a pandemic it won't work unless you spend enormous amounts to create safe environments for dressing/undressing/disposal.
Thanks for your detailed response.
-
18 minutes ago, Orange Alert said:
The people who wear those pathetic face coverings who are frightened of the COVID virus are not sheep, but cabbages, sheep have more sense.
Needlessly confrontational nonsense.
18 minutes ago, Orange Alert said:There is this so-called dangerous killer virus in the air, which has been stated to be 0.3 microns in size and people are wearing flimsy 50p masks made in a Chinese or Indian sweatshop.
The virus is not floating around like a free-radical. It invariably bonds to something and in terms of airborne particles, usually a fine droplet of mucus or saliva. THAT is what the mask stops and that is how it is effective.
18 minutes ago, Orange Alert said:If you want protection from an airbourne virus one needs a suitable respirator with proper filters. Budget versions are around £20 to £30, a quality respirator is going to cost from £80 upwards.
Yeah, except it can get on your respirator and then your hands when you take it off. The small masks work to a reasonable level of effectiveness. The objective is to bring down the R number not stop it entirely.
-
3 minutes ago, FrankVitali said:
This is what real men wear for protection against deadly viruses:
So they wear these proper virus suits for Ebola, but not for Covid, why do you think that is?
Supply and demand. Plus, that is a once wear apparel and the chance of infection is high during removal, unless done in a controlled environment. They aren't very practical for extended use.
-
Just now, Ziggy Sawdust said:
THREAD DERAILMENT ATTEMPT UNDERWAY.
Nope, I was talking about masks. Most of the derailing is coming from idiotic comments like yours and my stubbornness in wanting to reply. Try getting back to masks.
-
4 minutes ago, Bombadil said:
For me personally the problem is not so much wether a mask is effective or not. The main problem now is that if there is real pandemic it would be logical for 5he government to regulate the type of masks used. Clearly an enormous difference between all makes. Too much profiteering and not enough done to guarantee as much effectiveness as possible.
Also any mask is only as effective as it seal. The space around the nasal to mouth area with for example standardised paper type masks is quite large.
yet again if this is all real, the government should really be clamping down on profiteering over health protection.
I don't disagree with any of that. I've seen too many mask wearers wearing blue masks caked in a thousand times worn shite.
-
5 minutes ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:
Warning: All potential members MUST agree with the consensus. If you don't, you get the cold shoulder from "team knowledge". Funny how all the troll comments are coming from those addressing me, yet, here you are........
-
2 minutes ago, smashstuff said:
What claims?
The ones I am talking about concerning the actual thread subject. Try it.
2 minutes ago, smashstuff said:Who are you working for?
Area 51 and Groupthingy 77. I applied via Shills-r-us,com
2 minutes ago, smashstuff said:I'm challenging you do admit what you're doing here.
I accept your challenge and demand you tell me what you are here for! I just popped back to report a mimic and say hello.
2 minutes ago, smashstuff said:Are you afraid to admit that Covid is an overblown flu used for other agendas?
Great claim. I cannot admit something when it seems the opposite is true, however unlike you I am open to persuasion.
-
1 minute ago, smashstuff said:
Hancock gives him £2 WHSmith book token per post.
What exactly is your fear here? It's almost as though your puny responses are trying to stop me posting becase you don't like being questioned. Shut me up with argument. If you have to target me personally, try and imagine how much of the tiniest rat's bottom I could give about your opinions.
-
1 minute ago, DarianF said:
It really doesn't concern me either way. It's a media virus. I'll worry about actual dangerous things.
Listen. It concerned you enough for you to post your article about the mask effectiveness. But when I post MY article showing the microbe size and the way the mask IS effective you avoid it.
It is exactly what I expect, confirmation bias and the never ending evasion of anything that doesn't fit.
Mask work with large viruses, not so much with tiny microbes. It is a non argument. Still hate the things.
-
1 minute ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:
22 posts in your first 2 hours here.
Are you on wizz?
No, just getting lots of responses - good to talk huh? How about you respond to the content and not the user?
Sheesh, are you people afraid to get your claims challenged? Why??
-
Just now, Odie Hatzcats said:
well if you have clocked up 40000 posts then I guess the truther forums are more accepting of different views than the mainstream forum who do just ban you with a few posts!
Hmmm, That's with quite a few userids - all banned. I think they tolerate me for a short while. But enough about me, just stick to the debate and behave yourself. Ad hominems and targeting users is not allowed.
-
1 minute ago, smashstuff said:
In with the 'I know someone who's had it, and oooh, it was bad all right, so just wear the masks for another ten years, even if you're not sure it's real'.
Yeah how about that. Maybe Lewis Hamilton was lying. Maybe I am. Maybe I don't know people who work at my local hospital and can tell the difference. I respect your choice on the matter and sincerely hope it goes away, preferably before any of you get it
-
Just now, DarianF said:
Okay. I'll take your word for it. But I'm sure the PCR testing was rigorous.
You didn't respond to my post before about the virus size and mask efficacy.
-
1 minute ago, Odie Hatzcats said:
No they dont.
They just remove your posts and ban you immediately.
Thank god they don't do that here. Much.
-
2 minutes ago, DarianF said:
I'd have more chance dying of a gently squeezed elevator fart, rather than this virus. So I'll take my chances. But I appreciate the concern.
Not made from concern, just debating stuff for the hell of it. I'm pleased in your confidence in not being infected and hope that you never catch this "whatever" thing. I know people who have and they don't share your confidence. It wasn't the flu.
Hey, how come you avoided my response? Did you even read that article, or is it just ones that work for your claims?
-
1 minute ago, smashstuff said:
See, you write like a university twat, that clever clever way, so you probably are employed by other twats to come here and try to cause trouble. Why are you here? Just to prop up the establishment narrative while pretending to be curious about all sides of the argument? Seen it all before.
Thank you for your very concise and informed ad hominem response. It seems that you are afraid to have your beliefs questioned. I am here because somebody had the audacity to use my former screen name and I got the hump.
I've seen all your behaviour before too. You fail to address the content and target the poster. That is something that those who oppose your views do not do.
-
1 minute ago, DarianF said:
How are the pay rates and benefits in the Brigade? Just curious.
3p per post. Maybe you need to join the debate and quit bitching?
-
2 minutes ago, DarianF said:
Even in the most obvious settings, their effectiveness is questionable:
"... we examined the evidence base behind the use of surgical facemasks. Examination of the literature revealed much of the published work on the matter to be quite dated and often studies had poorly elucidated methodologies. As a result, we recommend caution in extrapolating their findings to contemporary surgical practice. However, overall there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination. More rigorous contemporary research is needed to make a definitive comment on the effectiveness of surgical facemasks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/
Yeah, sound reasonable. However, we aren't talking about sub-microbial infections here. The sars-2 virus is quite a large microbe.
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) by the numbers (nih.gov)
Works as designed.
-
1 minute ago, smashstuff said:
Signed up an hour ago, what are you, 77th brigade? You're not funny, and you come off like a massive shill, who's just trying to be 'reasonable'. I see through your bullshit.
Yes. I am 77th brigade and employed by shill.com. You are one of the smartest people I have come across and it's no surprise you can see through the bullshit. Well done, the game is up and I concede.
Perhaps if you spent enough time researching things that contradict your opinions you would be in the lofty position that most research undergraduates find themselves in. Look at it all data properly and not just the confirmation bias shite.
-
2 minutes ago, DarianF said:
Masks are a great idea. They help me identify compliant, submissive sheep.
Great observation, So conversely the ones not wearing them are all super informed, rebellious non-compliant world saving heroes.
-
10 minutes ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:
Send him a note, don't mess about with evil stuff otherwise he'll go straight to hell. Or alternatively get some sort of grasp on his reality poking fun at it all.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Basket Case said:
The rise in bacterial lung infections.
Masks don't let you exhale toxins and other junk properly..
Good reply. The link can certainly be attributed to the wearing of masks, but so can the laziness associated with not cleaning them properly and/or using the same one over and over. Plus the more plausible directive is to wear them in close proximity enclosed spaces. The ones who wear them everywhere are taking it too far and any directive to do so should ensure clean masks are used each time. I hate the damn things.
-
1
-
Coronavirus Mega-Thread.
in Covid-19 & NWO
Posted
But YOU people are making the trouble. This is fucking ridiculous.