Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by skitzorat

  1. 1 hour ago, Morpheus said:

    Fuck off 🤣


    Look into my eyes, not around the eyes, but between the eyes..... Now you're under! 


    As if that is even possible, not buying that bollocks. Mind you, would be easier than shoving a cotton bud up to your brain. 

    or up your bum!!🤣


    It's just more bullshittery to warm us up for the coming dystopian nightmare....

    • Haha 1
  2. From DARPAs chip to this..

    Rollout of eye-scan test for coronavirus targeted by German firm

    MUNICH (Reuters) - A Munich-based company hopes to help usher in a new era of coronavirus testing with an eye scan that, it says, takes just three minutes to identify carriers of the disease and has a hit rate of 95%.


    Semic RF has developed its scanning app with colleagues in the United States and, pending regulatory approval, hopes to start rolling it out there by the end of next month, says its managing director, Wolfgang Gruber.

    It uses a photo of the eye taken with a smartphone, and identifies the virus by means of a symptomatic inflammation called “pink eye”.


    “We managed to isolate COVID-19 from over two million different shades of pink,” Gruber told Reuters.


    He says the app, already tested on over 70,000 individuals, can process up to a million scans per second and the option to expand that capacity further - potentially allowing crowds back into mass-attendance events like concerts and football matches.


    “You take your app, take a picture of both eyes, send it for evaluation, and then you can have the evaluated result stored as a QR code on the tested person’s smartphone,” Gruber added.

  3. So it's 940pm Tuesday night here in NZ so 1040am in the UK and this was from a while ago... Forgive me, but wasn't it just YESTERDAY that pubs reopened in England?


    How the actual F can people NOT WAKE UP to the bull. yet?




    • Like 1
    • Haha 3
    • Confused 1
  4. On 4/11/2021 at 2:18 AM, EnigmaticWorld said:




    Fark I hate her supercilious treasonous face - selling out my country to the NWO, Gates and the Chicoms with a smile (not that she's the only one to have done that - but she's so deviously "kind" it makes me sick




    Jacinda Ardern meets Bill, Melinda Gates during New York ...


    FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST. Jacinda Arden correspondence with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 2020:
    'Talking Points'
    - Commend the Gates Foundation for its leadership on global health over the last two decades
    -seek Gates view on the prospects for the successful development of a con-vid1984 jab
    -seek Gates views on the likelihood of a global pooled mechanism (of delivery)
    -suggest that further discussions take place between the Gates Foundation & NZ officials
    And her mentor Globalist Clark
    Former PM Helen Clark says birth of first baby sends 'powerful statement' |  Stuff.co.nz

    Coronavirus pandemic a chance to 'build back better', ensure there's future 'pandemic readiness' - Helen Clark


    "Out of crisis always comes opportunity for change, for transformation, for innovation, and that moment needs to be seized around the world," she said.


    "We're not short of agendas, what we've been short of is action. And one hopes the catastrophe the world's been going through with COVID might be a catalyst for saying, 'for heaven's sake, we have roadmaps, could we get back and focus on what needs to be done'."


    In the reset, health, environment, and sustainability need to be addressed holistically, Clark said.


    The Planetary Health framework is as good a framework as any. It's very consistent with the general direction of the sustainable development goals, the Paris Agreement, and the other good global agreements that are out there."


    The Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on Planetary Health says human health and the health of the planet are inextricably linked, and that civilisation depends on human health, flourishing natural systems, and the wise care of natural resources.


    "The worst thing to do is despair because we do have opportunities to reset and build back better everywhere," Clark said.


    [There should be a focus on] building and maintaining a public health system with infrastructure that can snap into action, pandemic readiness - it's not going to be the first time that we face this, it will come again," Clark said.



    [timestamp] We will BUILD BACK BETTER from the covid crisis


    • Like 1
  5. COVID-19 Vaccine Injury in NZ: Jane’s Story

    by Alia | Mar 25, 2021 


    Over the past month, NZ has witnessed the rollout of the new, experimental COVID-19 Comirnaty vaccine from Pfizer to border workers, frontline staff and their families.

    The government and media report that there has been high uptake from within this industry and there has been no mention of ANY adverse reactions in the news. But this is not what we are hearing behind the scenes from people within the industry.

    We have spoken with border workers up and down the nation and they report that many of their colleagues have made the choice to delay or decline this vaccine. In some regions, that number is close to 50%.

    We have also heard about vaccine injury.

    Jane* has recounted to us the distressing story of her experience with workplace coercion and of suffering an adverse reaction to the vaccine she was administered back at the beginning of March.

    Here is her story…

    Jane is a healthy young mother of three children. She is the breadwinner for her family and whilst she didn’t actually want to take the COVID-19 vaccine, she was left with little choice – to take the vaccine and keep her job, or decline and be unable to continue in her role within the organisation. Voices for Freedom have confirmed that this same messaging has also been communicated to border workers (in the same role) in another part of the country.

    She described the speed with which the rollout took place within her workplace and how she felt ill-informed and rushed into a decision prior to the administration of her vaccine.

    She tried to look up information surrounding the potential adverse reactions, as well as other reactions experienced by people in NZ and Australia but came up against brick wall after brick wall; this information, it seems, is not easily accessible to members of the public, especially if you don’t know where to look. All we get are the generalised mild reactions described in the Ministry of Health’s brief, glossy handouts. The SMARS database doesn’t yet appear to have the COVID vaccine option listed in its search criteria either, despite reactions having been lodged with CARM (the Centre for Adverse Reaction Monitoring at Otago University).

    When it was Jane’s time to receive the vaccine, she was given the brief “information” pack, asked a couple of questions about previous reactions or allergies, and was required to sign the consent form. This entire process took about 5 minutes. She did not feel informed.

    So, what happened to Jane?

    Below is an account of the timeline of events that unfolded after Jane received her jab…

    The vaccine was given on Tuesday, March 2, 2021.

    Jane became really tired, had blurred reactions, and couldn’t think clearly. She drove home from work and fell asleep.

    Jane still felt weak. She couldn’t form a fist and described having no strength. She was ON FIRE internally with burning pain in her bones and organs

    Jane’s body said “no more” and she needed to rest all day. A sore throat and cough began in the afternoon. She experienced fever and sweats all night long. 

    Jane couldn’t get up in the morning; her symptoms continued and she STILL had no energy or strength.

    She had a mild temperature, body aches, a pounding head, noise and light sensitivity, a tight chest and TROUBLE BREATHING. She called Healthline in the early evening and explained her condition. Healthline advised she be seen immediately and they dispatched an ambulance to take her to the hospital.

    When the ambulance arrived one of the ambulance officers was incredibly hostile and told her there’s “No way you’ve had a reaction to the vaccine”. The ambulance officer refused to go inside to help the patient but was reprimanded by their partner and forced to assess Jane whilst wearing full PPE.

    There were discussions and phone calls within the system to decide which hospital they could take her to.

    Once in the ED, the Medical Officer of Health called and spoke with Jane on the phone. He told her that he was “So sorry this has happened” to her. He also spoke with Jane’s mother and placed both houses on their property into lockdown. This interaction is in Jane’s discharge notes.  

    Jane was still experiencing body sweats, noise and light sensitivity, her organs continued to feel like they were on fire and she had a headache that made any movements difficult. She begged the doctors for pain relief. She was given medication and discharged from the hospital to recover at home. 

    Important note: While Jane was in the hospital another patient in the same area of the building alerted us to the fact a border worker had been admitted following a serious adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine. This person witnessed Jane’s condition from an adjacent room, the staff discussing her vaccine reaction, and multiple admissions of the fact the two events appeared to be related. Voices for Freedom contacted the hospital the following morning and the Communications Manager stated that there was no such patient fitting that description in their care.

    There is no record of the vaccine reaction in Jane’s hospital files.

    Jane continued to experience quite severe pain in her body and head. She had a persistent dead leg that came and went, which at times caused pain in her lower abdomenShe experienced insomnia from day 12 and a feeling of anxiety from day 15. Her cough and extreme fatigue persisted and only began to ease three weeks later. She continued to experience daily sweats, stomach cramps, diarrhoea, blood in her urine, and cold sores that covered her entire chin area up to her nose, again easing at the three-week mark

    Jane’s GP simultaneously suggested that her condition was viral, and that her adverse vaccine reaction was “good” and that it “meant her body was responding”. Jane challenged her doctor on the viral infection claim, and asked: If this was viral, how come none of the other close contact family members had caught it despite VERY close living? The doctor didn’t have an answer to her question.

    Jane insisted that her GP add her vaccine reaction to her file and she self-reported her reaction to CARM as her medical centre refused to. Remember: her reaction began three hours after the administration of the vaccine and continued from that point for three weeks. 

    There has been no further follow-up from the hospital or the Medical Officer of Health after Jane’s discharge from the hospital.

    This afternoon (Thursday 25 March), following an interview with Peter Williams on Magic Talk yesterday morning (watch below), Jane was finally called by a doctor from CARM – two weeks after reporting her reaction.

    Jane has questions and obvious concerns:

    • Why are the people we’re meant to trust (medical professionals and authorities) failing to acknowledge, or worse, hiding adverse vaccine reactions?
    • Why can’t we access information surrounding these reactions in NZ like people can overseas?
    • Why is nobody hearing about the stories from those who have had adverse reactions? Why is the majority of the mainstream media disinterested and silent?
    • We hear about the negative health effects in COVID patients, but why not vaccine recipients?
    • What happens to data collection when reactions aren’t acknowledged or reported as part of post-marketing surveillance?

    It took until AFTER the vaccine for Jane to realise that:

    • The Pfizer vaccine is still in trial (until 2023).
    • The Pfizer vaccine doesn’t stop infection. 
    • There are more reactions to this vaccine than there are listed on the consent forms.

    Jane has requested help from Voices for Freedom to share her experience. She hopes that by reading her story, the NZ public can make an informed decision about whether to accept or decline the COVID-19 vaccination. She isn’t telling people not to get the vaccine, rather she hopes that they educate themselves on what this product has to offer them in terms of limited personal protection as well as the potential risks and adverse reactions that are possible.  


    *Jane’s real name has been protected for safety and privacy reasons.



    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
  6. On 4/9/2021 at 7:38 PM, dewin said:

    Worth posting again as a reminder.


    Freedom of Information requests sent to HUNDREDS of international govts, universities and official medical/health departments/institutions "seeking records that describe the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient."


    ALL replied in the negative. Copies of letters/statements in the link.




    May be an image of 1 person and food

    NBC Nightly News 23 Jan 2021

  7. On 4/9/2021 at 6:28 PM, vinny79 said:

    Paywall locked


    what if you don’t have a phone


     if covid is real lol, they want to touch my phone?




    anyone have full article



    A lot of the time paywalled articles can be read when you put them into the archive.


    Here you go




  8. On 4/7/2021 at 6:40 PM, BossCrow said:

    it probably helps if you can get to them early - that's why kids start school/brainwashing so early.

    "get them while they're young, Evita, get them while they're young."


    Such was the Marxist revolutionary Che Guevara’s advice to Evita Peron, at least in her story as told by Sir Tim Rice and Lord Lloyd-Webber in their famous musical. lol

    CheHigh.jpgEvita”. I was browsing the channels on TV some… | by Jeanalyn Sandler |  KeepIt112 | Medium


    May be an image of 6 people, child and food

  9. On 4/7/2021 at 6:31 PM, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

    recall David Icke spoke of a researcher that discovered variations in ice crystal forms from water labelled with opposing intend like love and hate. The crystals from the jar labelled hate were distorted as opposed to the beautiful crystals from the jar labelled love. The implications are mindboggling.

    What would happen if TPTB/medical institutions told everyone to love/heal/imagine their bodies [made of water] becoming healthier and healthier instead of peddling mRNA jabs that, I believe, will disconnect the mind/body from  Spirit. Imagine if we were all taught that we are, in essence, atoms vibrating at a higher/lower frequency and that our bodies are constantly, without our conscience effort, rebuilding itself towards optimum health and vitality. Imagine if we were told that our POWER can even manipulate atoms on the other side of the world!!  We're a hologram.


    Power of Intention: Water Crystal Experiments by Dr. Masaru Emoto

    "The study used data gathered from a three day period, using 1,900 people in Austria and Germany who focused their intentions towards water samples located inside an electromagnetically shielded room in California."
    Book page image
    • Like 1
  10. 2 hours ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

    Did I really just read that?

    Fucking Clown World.

    Its truly unbelievable, isn't it... just found it so thought I'd share what the aussie govt news agency is telling people... Vit C is a myth a healthy diet doesn't do jack..


    my favourite is


    we have no .......adaptive immune system

  11. 13 hours ago, Bee said:

    Aren't marines supposed to be smart?

    My American cousins' dad is a lifetime Marine based out of San Diego and he took it....no matter how much info she sent him or nearly cried to persuade him...because  "he's in his late 60s and was worried about his diabetes." [covid]


    The brainwashing/demoralising/propaganda has been THAT well done.



  12. "I get that it's a personal choice...I get that it's between the Hosts and their health care providers, but everybody else is doing it, right...all across television, all these anchors, are rolling up their sleeves ... why do you think we haven't seen the biggest stars on Fox News get vaccination or show us their vaccine selfie" 


    Fking disgusting 




  13. From the Australian Govt propaganda mouthpiece, the abc



    When it comes to vitamin supplements, new research has shown that Vitamin D won't stop you from getting respiratory diseases.


    There is also no scientific evidence that supports the use of vitamin C to prevent COVID-19 and getting a vaccine is the only thing that will boost your immune system.

    (my emphasis)



    which hyperlinks to an article from March 2020, where again it was shoving vaccines as our only savour.......



    Green vegetables, along with supplements, exercise and juicing, are often touted as immune system boosters; but as far as scientists such as Marc Pellegrini are concerned, vaccines are the only thing that will boost your immune system to prevent infection.


    "[Vaccines] boost the capacity of the immune system to a fight an infection, because you're exposing it to a pathogen that it will recognise next time," said Professor Pellegrini, an infectious diseases expert at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute.


    Although there is currently no vaccine to boost your immune system and prevent COVID-19, you can try to keep your immune system — and your body — healthy to give it the best chance of fighting an infection.

    (not my emphasis)



    and there's this gem...


    The problem with the new SARS-Cov-2 virus is that we have no antibodies or adaptive immune system

  14. Could mRNA Vaccines Permanently Alter DNA? Recent Science Suggests They Might.


    Research on SARS-CoV-2 RNA by scientists at Harvard and MIT has implications for how mRNA vaccines could permanently alter genomic DNA, according to Doug Corrigan, Ph.D., a biochemist-molecular biologist who says more research is needed.


    Over the past year, it would be all but impossible for Americans not to notice the media’s decision to make vaccines the dominant COVID narrative, rushing to do so even before any coronavirus-attributed deaths occurred.


    The media’s slanted coverage has provided a particularly fruitful public relations boost for messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines — decades in the making but never approved for human use — helping to usher the experimental technology closer to the regulatory finish line.


    Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (“transcribes”) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make.


    By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm.


    According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and most mRNA vaccine scientists, the buck then stops there — mRNA vaccines “do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way,” the CDC says. The CDC asserts first, that the mRNA cannot enter the cell’s nucleus (where DNA resides), and second, that the cell — Mission-Impossible-style — “gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.”


    A December preprint about SARS-CoV-2, by scientists at Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), produced findings about wild coronavirus that raise questions about how viral RNA operates.

    The scientists conducted the analysis because they were “puzzled by the fact that there is a respectable number of people who are testing positive for COVID-19 by PCR long after the infection was gone.”


    Their key findings were as follows: SARS-CoV-2 RNAs “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed” (a phenomenon called “retro-integration”) — and there are viable cellular pathways to explain how this happens.


    According to Ph.D. biochemist and molecular biologist Dr. Doug Corrigan, these important findings (which run contrary to “current biological dogma”) belong to the category of “Things We Were Absolutely and Unequivocally Certain Couldn’t Happen Which Actually Happened.”


    The findings of the Harvard and MIT researchers also put the CDC’s assumptions about mRNA vaccines on shakier ground, according to Corrigan. In fact, a month before the Harvard-MIT preprint appeared, Corrigan had already written a blog outlining possible mechanisms and pathways whereby mRNA vaccines could produce the identical phenomenon.


    In a second blog post, written after the preprint came out, Corrigan emphasized that the Harvard-MIT findings about coronavirus RNA have major implications for mRNA vaccines — a fact he describes as “the big elephant in the room.” While not claiming that vaccine RNA will necessarily behave in the same way as coronavirus RNA — that is, permanently altering genomic DNA — Corrigan believes that the possibility exists and deserves close scrutiny.


    In Corrigan’s view, the preprint’s contribution is that it “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.”


    Reverse transcription

    As the phrase “reverse transcription” implies, the DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not always a one-way street. Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA, allowing the latter to be integrated into the DNA in the cell nucleus.


    Nor is reverse transcription uncommon. Geneticists report that “Over 40% of mammalian genomes comprise the products of reverse transcription.”


    The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome.


    The authors suggest that while the clinical consequences require further study, detrimental effects are a distinct possibility and — depending on the integrated viral fragments’ “insertion sites in the human genome” and an individual’s underlying health status — could include “a more severe immune response … such as a ‘cytokine storm’ or auto-immune reactions.”


    In 2012, a study suggested that viral genome integration could “lead to drastic consequences for the host cell, including gene disruption, insertional mutagenesis and cell death.”


    Corrigan makes a point of saying that the pathways hypothesized to facilitate retro-integration of viral — or vaccine — RNA into DNA “are not unknown to people who understand molecular biology at a deeper level.”


    Even so, the preprint’s discussion of reverse transcription and genome integration elicited a maelstrom of negative comments from readers unwilling to rethink biological dogma, some of whom even advocated for retraction (though preprints are, by definition, unpublished) on the grounds that “conspiracy theorists … will take this paper to ‘proof’ that mRNA vaccines can in fact alter your genetic code.”


    More thoughtful readers agreed with Corrigan that the paper raises important questions. For example, one reader stated that confirmatory evidence is lacking “to show that the spike protein only is expressed for a short amount of time (say 1-3 days) after vaccination,” adding, “We think that this is the case, but there is no evidence for that.”


    In fact, just how long the vaccines’ synthetic mRNA — and thus the instructions for cells to keep manufacturing spike protein — persist inside the cells is an open question.


    Ordinarily, RNA is a “notoriously fragile” and unstable molecule. According to scientists, “this fragility is true of the mRNA of any living thing, whether it belongs to a plant, bacteria, virus or human.”


    But the synthetic mRNA in the COVID vaccines is a different story. In fact, the step that ultimately allowed scientists and vaccine manufacturers to resolve their decades-long mRNA vaccine impasse was when they figured out how to chemically modify mRNA to increase its stability and longevity — in other words, produce RNA “that hangs around in the cell much longer than viral RNA, or even RNA that our cell normally produces for normal protein production.”


    It is anyone’s guess what the synthetic mRNA is doing while it is “hanging around,” but Corrigan speculates that its enhanced longevity raises the probability of it “being converted over into DNA.”


    Moreover, because the vaccine mRNA is also engineered to be more efficient at being translated into protein, “negative effects could be more frequent and more pronounced with the vaccine when compared to the natural virus.”


    Dollar signs

    Corrigan acknowledges that some people may dismiss his warnings, saying “If the virus is able to accomplish this, then why should I care if the vaccine does the same thing?”


    He has a ready and compelling response:

    “[T]here’s a big difference between the scenario where people randomly, and unwittingly, have their genetics monkeyed with because they were exposed to the coronavirus, and the scenario where we willfully vaccinate billions of people while telling them this isn’t happening.”

    Unfortunately, the prevailing attitude seems to be that the “race to get the public vaccinated” justifies taking these extra risks.


    In mid-November, after the Jerusalem Post told readers that “when the world begins inoculating itself with these completely new and revolutionary vaccines, it will know virtually nothing about their long-term effects,” an Israeli hospital director argued that it’s not worth waiting two more years to ferret out mRNA vaccines’ “unique and unknown risks” or potential long-term effects.


    In the U.S., enthusiasm for mRNA technology is similarly unfettered. Just a few days after the CDC released updated data showing that more than 2,200 deaths of individuals who had received either the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccines had been reported as of Mar. 26 , The Atlantic praised the technology, suggesting that the “ingenious” synthetic mRNA technology behind Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID vaccines represented a “breakthrough” that could “change the world.”

    Rather than dismiss the prospect of retro-integration of foreign DNA as a “conspiracy theory,” scientists should be conducting studies with the mRNA-vaccinated to assess actual risks.


    For example, Corrigan believes that while in vitro data in human cell lines (one of the data sources examined by the Harvard-MIT researchers) offer “air tight” results, there is still a need to conclusively demonstrate real-life genomic alteration through “PCR, DNA sequencing or Southern Blot … on purified genomic DNA of COVID-19 patients” — and vaccinated individuals.


    Yet instead of addressing these research gaps, companies are salivating over the potential to use human-edited mRNA to “commandeer our cellular machinery” and “make just about any protein under the sun.”


    A March 10 press release pronouncing mRNA vaccines the clear winners of the COVID-19 vaccine race noted that all major pharmaceutical companies are now “testing out the [mRNA] technology by entering into license agreements and/or collaboration with well-established RNA companies.”


    In old Disney cartoons, viewers often witnessed Donald Duck’s rich uncle, Scrooge McDuck’s, “bulging eyes [turn] into oversized Vegas slot machine dollar signs” when contemplating opportunities to increase his already immense wealth.


    Judging by pharmaceutical company executives’ willingness to overlook mRNA vaccines’ long-term — and possibly multigenerational — risks, they must be similarly entranced by dollar-sign visions of a never-ending pipeline of “plug and play” mRNA products.


    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  15. 2 hours ago, gibby said:

    why mot pulp the food in to a liquid and drink through a straw??      Or a one way valve open and closed via a fucking plastic face box

    Now I'm certainly no socialist/commie but thank you market capitalism



    Masks with zippers: Houston women launch coronavirus-era masks that provide  access to your mouth









    Yes, the zipper is a working zipper, it opens.
    By scranm1 on March 9, 2021
    • Haha 1
  16. 2 hours ago, Seeker said:

    their stupidity and ignorance is going to cause the downfall of humanity as a collective. 

    THIS is what makes me so angry/scared too.....their selfish dumbfukery is going to enslave all our unborn grandchildren

    • Like 1
  17. Blah blah blah blah



    All white on the night: the perennial problem with TV panel shows

    The format should give comic talents a time to shine. So why don’t our flagship shows reflect the diversity of comedy in 2021?

    Clockwise from top left: QI, Would I Lie to You?, Have I Got News for You and 8 out of 10 Cats Does Countdown.

    Clockwise from top left: QI, Would I Lie to You?, Have I Got News for You and 8 out of 10 Cats Does Countdown. Composite: BBC/Channel 4


  18. The History of Rome Podcast by Mike Duncan -  one of the best podcast series ever..





    After THoR he's produced a series on Revolutions..


    English Civil War

    American Rev.

    French Rev.



    currently finishing up on the 10th and last Russian.







  • Create New...