.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Bee
-
Posts
338 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Bee
-
-
Just spent 8 days in hospital after admission via A&E.
Really don't like what I saw. Lots of elderly patients unable to feed themselves. Not being assisted to eat by staff. The elderly patients were also not drinking and yet no drips were put up for them. No mouth care being given. Three deaths on the ward in the time I was in. I've been in hospital 15 times in the last two and a half years and this is the first time I have seen this. I was left wondering if this is part of the governments covid policy to basically off the 'useless eaters'.
It wasn't just me who noticed it. I was in a bed next to a lovely lady who trained as a nurse in the 1960's. We both picked up on it and were appalled. I feel the elderly continue to be thrown under the bus and are just being left to decline and die. The lady next to me (in her 70's) felt so strongly she was determined she would not end up at their mercy in hospital and would end her life before it got that far.
There were very few English nurses on the ward. Most of the nurses were foreign (many bought in from the Philippines) with many whose level of English was not up to standard; it was clear they did not understand what their patients were saying to them. Cant say anything though can you as straight away you will be branded as racist.
Was an exceptionally depressing experience and I did not feel safe. I have more confidence in my cats vets than I do the majority of the medical profession. This is not a society to grow old in. Perhaps it never was.
-
3
-
1
-
-
On 7/16/2021 at 7:51 AM, Orange Alert said:
Is Tesco going to switch off their traffic lights at the shop entrance doors or are they going to rename them freedom lights?
Every time I don't give my money at a chain supermarket, for the COVID-1984 shopping experience, it is a great feeling.
IMO, shop at an independent local shop for local people, as much as possible.
Where we live, many of the local businesses are every bit as bad! Job ad from one yesterday (the job was packing up 'artisan' popcorn) stating that the successful applicant must prove they had received both injections. We have a pub landlord (the pub is independent and not part of a franchise/chain) who is stating you cant drink in his pub unless you prove vaccination. Completely bonkers!
-
1
-
-
-
18 hours ago, Daithi said:
Hmm, if it's on youtube in 2021 it's just more MSM content IMHO. Citing the Daily Mail and the Guardian, two outstanding purveyors of fear porn. I just cannot take this Ice Age farmer guy too seriously.
Yes, clearly there is a psyop propaganda narrative streaming out from the dark overlords but I am fairly comfortable at this point that it is as dangerous as the Convid-19 Plandemic.
If you choose to buy the lies your sheepy life as you knew it will crumble to dust. If you stay awake, yes, there are crap bits, but for the most part it's forcing us to face upto our own responsibility to not take this crap anymore.
So if you're still absent mindedly, lazy bastard, only ever using big box supermarkets for your food then feel free to reconsider your choices. There are loads of local producers we can use instead for our food shopping and stop this great reset bollocks in its tracks. They only win when we let them.
My husband works for one of the largest supermarket chains in the country. He and his colleagues have certainly noticed the difference. Where lorries were previously coming in full of pallets, they are now often turning up with only 4 and night shift who unpack are left twiddling their thumbs. The majority of people are being far too short sighted and blasé about the supply chain and food production. Their choice I guess.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Mikheil said:
So where is the petition to STOP the bullshit?
Makes me laugh that anyone can possibly still believe a petition is going to achieve anything!!! Even if a petition gets enough signatures all it actually achieves is a brief consideration/discussion by a bunch of psychopathic, corrupt liars otherwise known as parliament. The time for petitions is long past.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Starchild said:
With regards to disgarding my 'smart' devices. Unless you're close to 100% self sufficient or indeed that way inclinded, I doubt that anyone will disgard all of their devices.
Which is exactly why building the smart grid that will control us all is so very easy for the elite and has been a done deal for a long time.
Its amazing I and those of my generation survived as a teenager/young adult with no internet, no crappy Netflix/Amazon Prime/Britbox etc to binge watch, no mobile phone, no inclination to watch much TV as we were too busy being out and enjoying ourselves, no sat navs in cars because we could read maps. How on earth we all survived and made it is amazing!!!!
-
6
-
-
-
15 hours ago, Sea Sean said:
My work has just sent a letter out saying that the HSE are directing our company to carry on wearing masks after July 19th....
Does anyone know if this is lawful Irfan they do it?
No one has ever been forced to wear a mask; all who have done so have chosen to of their own free will. People can make all the excuses they want but that's the fact; if someone has worn a mask they have done so out of choice. I have two friends who are health care workers who haven't worn a mask from the first. Both stood their ground against the threats made against them by their employers, both went to HR etc and in both cases both were successful and their employers backed down. Some have the confidence, conviction and courage to stand up for their rights and some (many) don't.
Just say you are exempt.
-
4
-
-
17 hours ago, Beaujangles said:
Didnt say it wasnt new... I was pointing out to others what i knew was happening. I used to work for NHS... I wouldnt say it has always been a postcode lottery.
I too worked for the NHS. It is a postcode lottery and has been for a very long time with regards to many different types of treatment. Its a well known and thoroughly documented fact.
-
8 hours ago, Beaujangles said:
Well it is definitely true from the source who told me of their experience and the people around them having same issue.
So different people are having different experiences. Hardly anything new is it?
Getting decent NHS treatment has always been a postcode lottery.
-
On 6/19/2021 at 8:21 AM, screamingeagle said:
they won't mess with a food,it's to dangerous for the elite
masses could go berserk,controled chaos is the only think that works for them.....
I beg to differ. Check out Ice Age Farmer on youTube - he covers some really important stuff. I cant believe how little conversation there seems to be about food, the supply chain etc.
-
On 7/5/2021 at 12:03 PM, Starchild said:
I doubt I'll ever get rid of my smart phone or TV tbh.
So why ask the question if you are not prepared to do whats needed?
And when exactly was Britain ever "great"?
-
3 hours ago, Beaujangles said:
In the west of England according to people I know there, you cannot get a NHS dentist to take you on at the moment. Apparently, having spoken to approximately a dozen different dentist offices one of them was told that the dentists are not being paid for any NHS patients currently, and that the dentists are only dealing with private patients because of this..
Sorry but in my experience not true. I had a tooth infection and had to have a tooth out a few weeks ago. It was sorted by the local NHS dentist who I was not even registered with within the week with no issues whatsoever.
-
8 hours ago, Anti Facts Sir said:
Hmmmm.
?
-
11 hours ago, Macnamara said:
yeah i do think that is your game here yes
you haven't established that
You can think what you like - quite frankly I really couldn't care less if I tried :)
Your reaction to simple, straightforward questions about Davids actions over Savile is very illuminating :)
-
13 hours ago, Beaujangles said:
First of all I didn't twist anything... and I have been watching DI for the whole time of his works... so far from lazy. If you think I am unhelpful for having an opinion...then you are free to believe that...as for derailing a thread... thats a joke. My opinion is as valid as yours. It is interesting that you feel so threatened by my views...which of course I am equally entitled to.
It seems you want to know what David did to out Saville, but are you sure he needs to tell you...after all I`m guessing those approached could also become as culpable as you suggest David is. All presumption.... Instead of pointing fingers at David Icke...maybe you yourself should be less lazy and dig around and try to see who would have been in Davids surroundings at that time...or maybe do a freedom of information and see if a report was made. ( I doubt they would provide it if it was). I simply see your post as a direct attack... thats my opinion and the fact that you dont like it...is irrelevant. Accusing me of being lazy and unhelpful is somewhat funny when what you say is merely an opinion that is based on you wanting DI to talk to you personally and absolve yours `concerns`. Whereas, my opinion is that I see that not everything is as clear cut as you surmise. I dont think all you care about is truth, again that is an opinion, I think you are causing a stir on a website that belongs to the man you want to create a stir about... you are surmising he heard RUMOURS !!!
How about instead of brandishing accusations, albeit veiled, you provide some insight into what you feel could have been done by David and what the fallout may have been.. it was and is just a suggestion.....just as my opinion is just my opinion. What would be wrong with you putting forth some possibilities.....maybe in actual fact he did actually do that which you may come up with. Sorry that my opinion doesn't jive with you... but your words do not sit well with me either.
The very fact you see basic questions as 'attacking' David, 'pointing fingers', making 'accusations' at David etc speaks volumes.
Again you have deliberately twisted my words. You twisted my words before and it was that act of twisting my words to suit your narrative that I referred to as being lazy. I did not refer to you as a person being lazy. You've followed David for all his works, so have I. What is this, a pissing contest?! Why don't you try reading what I have actually said and not what you think I have said? It might help.
Where did I say I feel he 'needs to tell' me?! Once again, you are being deliberately very disingenuous. David has publicly stated multiple times that he outed Savile before he died. He has told anyone who will listen via interviews, articles etc that he outed Savile before Savile died.
My questions are simple; did David know about Savile in the 1980's or didn't he? Bill Oddie has said of that time that it was a "running sick joke" about Savile's activities and 'the idea that youngsters were prey - everyone knew that'. Nick Murray, ex Radio 1 presented has said that "absolutely everyone knew about Savile's behaviour". Janet Street Porter who worked for the BBC in the late 1980s has stated that "A lot of people in the BBC knew what was going on".
There was also a News of the World report in 1971 about Savile - "The Truth about Top of the Pops" which alleged that young girls on the show were being picked up for sex and pornographic pictures were taken after recording. Allegations of corruption were also made. An inquiry was instigated but when two girls came forward to complain they were dismissed by the BBC.
If David outed Savile before Savile's death then where is the evidence of this? With respect, I'm not the only one to have looked and who cant find anything, there is certainly nothing in his books written prior to Savile's death. Why didn't David name Savile in his books? One can hardly say he is not being brave enough to speak about people whilst they are alive! David have repeatedly made the claim that he outed Savile before his death. Those assertions saw a big change in how others perceive David. Those who automatically dismissed him and even ridiculed him before, began to revise their opinion.
David only spoke publicly about Saville in 2011, after Savile had died. He has stated he was told in the 1990's by "unimpeachable sources" about Savile's 'true nature' and that he told "those who would listen" about Savile's true nature, peadopjhilia and necrophilia etc. In a newsletters David published in late 2012 he stated that he had "named" Savile as a predator and peadophile 'such a long time ago'. This is all rather vague.
I don't understand why my questions seem to be perceived as being complicated and controversial? The fact that you are making false accusations about me suggests that, in your eyes at least, David must not be questioned in any way. I find this very strange especially as David himself is the first to say question everything and how important the truth is.
-
Comments from mainstream already saying that Rod (the employee of The Raven pub) was spreading 'dangerous misinformation'...........................
-
1
-
-
It wont change a thing sadly because its not on the BBC.
-
1
-
-
-
29 minutes ago, allymisfit said:
For some reason, I can't get an email from the surgery.
The one they send emails from, you can't reply to and when you ask (as I've done recently for something else), they're reluctant to give it to you and I didn't even get it in the end. I was needing it so another medical provider could communicate with them.
Hopeless in some cases unfortunately :(
They have to give it to you, they can't refuse. I was polite but assertive. They asked why I wanted it but I said the matter was confidential.
If email doesn't work you would always print out a letter and post it? :)
-
1
-
-
2 year old dies after having the Pfizer vaccine :(
-
On 4/17/2021 at 9:10 PM, Shining-one said:
Well done. Getting involved helps always.
Thank you. I have emailed lots of Medical Centres. I kept it factual and polite. WHo knows, it might make a bit of difference. It's better than doing nothing hopefully!
-
On 4/16/2021 at 9:04 PM, Macnamara said:
'no' as in you actually were the apprentice and are now back to try and cause damage to david's public image or 'no' as in you weren't the apprentice but are still here to try and cause harm to david's public image?
Look, I have no idea who the apprentice is/was and really couldn't care less either. You're just another one trying to derail the thread. I find it very interesting that you find simple, basic questions about David somehow threatening. Are you saying no one is allowed to question anything David says? Is he somehow beyond scrutiny then? I have followed his work for many many years but he is no messiah and is not above question. None of us are or should be. Me asking simple questions that lead you to accuse me of being here to "damage" David public image actually says a lot more about you than it does me. A truthful person has nothing to hide. It might not bother you that David may have lied about outing Savile before he died but it bothers me as once a liar always a liar.
-
16 hours ago, Beaujangles said:
As for ``Bee`` if you think David should have done more to out Saville, give us an idea of what you would have expected...followed by how you think the outcome would have been. Thanks.
Don't twist what I have said - its lazy and unhelpful. This has nothing to do with what I think David should have done so stop trying to derail the thread.
Other testimonies have been very clear from a significant amount of ex BBC employees that it was well known about Savile as far back as the 1970's and that it was actually a running joke how Savile liked young girls etc.
David worked at the BBC in the 1980's on national, keystone programmes that were massive in their day (I remember). So many people at the BBC knew about Savile that I find it next to impossible to believe that David was not aware of any of the rumours during his almost 10 years working for the BBC.
David has stated many many times that he 'outed' Savile before Savile died. I can find no evidence for this whatsoever. All I've asked is how did David 'out' Savile before his death? He didn't write about Savile in any of this books prior to Savile dying as far as I can see. When he says he 'outed' him what does he mean? Who did he 'out' Savile to? Did he go to the police for example?
As already stated, all I care about is the truth and David has had a great deal of mileage out of his claim that he outed Savile before Savile died. I just want to know the truth; did he know about Savile in the 1980's whilst working on major national BBC programmes or not? If he did, why didn't he speak up at the time, after all he has criticised enough other people for not doing so. If he didn't know about Savile in the near decade he spent at the BBC then when did he 'out' Savile; how did he out Savile and was it before or after Savile's death?
These are very basic straightforward questions surely? A man who writes a books called 'The Truth Shall Set You Free' should not fear any scrutiny surely?
"Fear the witch, for it is you" - good blog post
in General Chat
Posted
https://underdogsbiteupwards.wordpress.com/old-babblings/fear-the-witch/?fbclid=IwAR0vB7p6dDgGv-04kb69J26wHJlpXC5s0C9xF37Pv2iy02ZefdMmADWPBsA
*Not my blog, just thought some of you might find it interesting* :)