Child Circumcision in Exposing Child Abuse Posted January 20, 2021 · Edited January 20, 2021 by Percy 23 hours ago, MarpatV2 said: It was only Paul who said it wasnt required, not Jesus or his disciple. Paul was annoyed by the amount of people in Rome who wanted to become fully jewish, like Jesus was, and so he came up with the circumcision of the heart nonsense. He probably realise that he would get more people through the door by not requiring it. Jesus' message was that He had fulfilled the law (including circumcision), and that all people needed to do was believe on Him. Paul just drove this message home. The circumcision of the heart was mentioned in the Old Testament (Deut 10:16), so certainly wasn't invented by Paul. People were prepared to be fed to the lions for their belief in Jesus. If eternal life really did require removal of an excess flap of skin, I doubt this would present anymore than a minor inconvenience. 22 hours ago, Odie Hatzcats said: The bolded part. States all I need to know about you. Take that as you will. If parents want to chop bits off the babies they have then they are satanic cunts. End of story, no more to say. I don't believe in vaccines, if that's what you're getting at. But some people sincerely believe in them. Free will (i.e. freedom) is more important than being right. If I stopped those parents vaccinating their children, I become a tyrant. Instead, the aim should be to convince people of their error, rather than force them into a mould of our design. 22 hours ago, Odie Hatzcats said: If parents want to chop bits off the babies they have then they are satanic cunts. End of story, no more to say. It's a small piece of skin we are talking about, not just any other parts. And it is in the bible, and has been practiced for 1000s of years. Your culture has indoctrinated you into the belief that your views are right, and you are therefore justified in imposing these views on others by force. However, this is still tyranny, and is wrong. Our way should be to convince others, not to force them. 22 hours ago, Odie Hatzcats said: Why not finger nails? Rip all the nails off of a baby. Dirt gets under them and so it is for the best. You can get in-growing hair, best to shave all the hair off a child then. It is utter bullshit. Also don't use the removed foreskins (from kids or anyone) to create facial products ya sick fucks! Removing finger nails is not in the bible, and I'd argue it has no benefit in addition to causing pain and danger. I don't advocate using foreskins as facial products. That is gross, and I'd argue a type of cannibalism or vampirism. 21 hours ago, MarpatV2 said: Dont the catholic church claim to have the foreskin of Jesus and put it on display? Ewwww. So gross. I thought the bone relics of saints was as low as they stooped.