Jump to content

DarianF

Members
  • Posts

    9,634
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

Posts posted by DarianF

  1. 4 minutes ago, jesuitsdidit said:

     

    From https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4595889/pg1

     

     

    https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4347/rr-4#

     

     

    Covid-19 vaccine candidate is unimpressive: NNTV is around 256

     

    Intended for healthcare professionals

     

     

     

     

     

    Rapid response to:

     

    Covid-19: Vaccine candidate may be more than 90% effective, interim results indicate

    BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4347 (Published 09 November 2020)Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4347
     

    Rapid Response:

    Covid-19 vaccine candidate is unimpressive: NNTV is around 256

     

    Dear Editor

    Pfizer’s vaccine “may be more than 90% effective.” (Mahase, BMJ 2020;371:m4347, November 9) Specific data are not given but it is easy enough to approximate the numbers involved, based on the 94 cases in a trial that has enrolled about 40,000 subjects: 8 cases in a vaccine group of 20,000 and 86 cases in a placebo group of 20,000. This yields a Covid-19 attack rate of 0.0004 in the vaccine group and 0.0043 in the placebo group. Relative risk (RR) for vaccination = 0.093, which translates into a “vaccine effectiveness” of 90.7% [100(1-0.093)]. This sounds impressive, but the absolute risk reduction for an individual is only about 0.4% (0.0043-0.0004=0.0039). The Number Needed To Vaccinate (NNTV) = 256 (1/0.0039), which means that to prevent just 1 Covid-19 case 256 individuals must get the vaccine; the other 255 individuals derive no benefit, but are subject to vaccine adverse effects, whatever they may be and whenever we learn about them……We’ve already heard that an early effect of the vaccine is “like a hangover or the flu.” Will vaccinees who are later exposed to coronaviruses have more severe illness as a result of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (ADEI), a known hazard of coronavirus vaccines? Is there squalene in the Pfizer vaccine? If so, will vaccinees be subject to autoimmune diseases, like Gulf War Syndrome and narcolepsy that have been associated with the adjuvant?

    We already know that current Covid-19 vaccine trials are unlikely to show a reduction in severe illness or deaths. (Doshi, BMJ 2020;371:m4037, October 21) Will they be like seasonal influenza vaccines, which have not proved to be lifesavers, and may even have increased overall mortality in the elderly? (Anderson et al, Ann Intern Med 2020;172:445) We need a lot more time and a lot more data, especially in view of massive uncertainties about Covid-19 case definitions and statistics.

    ALLAN S. CUNNINGHAM 13 November 2020

    Competing interests: No competing interests

    13 November 2020
    Allan S. Cunningham
    Retired pediatrician
     
     
    Cooperstown NY 13326 USA <[email protected]
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Copyright © 2020 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd     京ICP备15042040号-3

     

    Bookmarked [ https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4347/rr-4 ]. Thank you.

  2. Hey everyone. Just quickly logging in from work. Wanted to get this news to you. South Australia going into Victoria style police state lockdown. 'Circuit Breaker' term being used as in the UK: https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/coronavirus/circuit-breaker-sa-in-full-lockdown/news-story/0a167b4e08e2f6ff4b38895e7a400dcf

  3. 2 minutes ago, jesuitsdidit said:

    I imagine that initially there won't be huge Vaccine Damage coz they know we will be watching plus the fact that it's a double shot may mean that the damage isn't done till receipt of the second shot if it's a Binary Bioweapon.

     

    You can tell what's coming from the fact they explicitly made manufacturers immune from liability [ https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/distributing-vaccines-and-treatments-for-covid-19-and-flu/consultation-document-changes-to-human-medicine-regulations-to-support-the-rollout-of-covid-19-vaccines#civil-liability-and-immunity ].

    • Like 1
  4. 4 hours ago, Macnamara said:

     

    they are seeking to psychologically prepare the public for what is coming but we must not let the outrage dwindle

     

    What goes into your body is your most fundamental right. To attack that right is medical fascism

     

    They love talking about their high and mighty principles of informed consent, in normal times. Examples...

     

    Australia:

    https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/sq20-030_-_fact_sheet_-_informed_consent_-_nsqhs-8.9a.pdf

     

    USA:

    https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/informed-consent

     

    UK:

    https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/consent-to-treatment/

     

    UN:

    http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

     

    ... All sounds good, until a barely deadly rebranded flu comes along, then all these principles get thrown in the toilet. Which only means one thing: They meant NOTHING in the first place. Like George Carlin famously said:

     

    Quote

    "Rights aren't rights if someone can take them away. They're privileges. That's all we've ever had in this country, is a bill of temporary privileges." https://youtu.be/m9-R8T1SuG4

     

    • Like 2
  5. Just now, Bullys Special Prize said:

    Thanks DarianF. I already know about the list of exemptions as I do use them when out shopping and at work. I just shout I'm exempt and I'm left alone. I've had no dealings with the coppers though.

     

    I do suppose the filth would give you more hassle for not wearing a nappy.

     

    Let them harass and illegally arrest you – if they insist. Then let a good lawyer sue their arses off, on your behalf.

  6. 1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

     

    They are talking about a set of symptoms that they are describing as 'acute respiratory distress' which they are calling 'covid 19'

     

    So the question is whether or not those symptoms are being cause by a brand new virus and whether if they are being caused by a new virus that new virus is any more of a risk than the flu

     

    There are no facts supporting the existence of a new virus that is worse than the flu. What does exist is an annual uptake in flu every autumn/winter which then kills of a proportion of people who tend to be older and/or have co-morbidities

     

    other things to consider that might cause respiratory issues that could mislabelled 'covid 19' include 'viral interference' caused by the flu vaccine which is generally given to older people as well as the harmful effects of exposure to damaging frequencies of microwaves such as those produced by 5G, the roll out of which has coincided PERFECTLY with this 'covid 19' hysteria

     

     

     

    I think in a few years from now, when all the data is analysed, we will know what exactly happened. However, by then the agenda will be so far advanced, it really won't matter.

  7. 2 minutes ago, Clansman82 said:

    Haha, a mask and a shield, well... you can't be to careful, it's all such a show. If these people/machines were really that fearful then they would go full biohazard suit and really be safe, but then again these are the people that are to lazy to think logically so putting on a biohazard suit every day would be to much work.

     

    As far as I've seen, it's almost all virtue signalling. They're not really scared of the virus. They just want to be 'seen to be doing the right thing'. They go out of their way to virtue signal. The rest are just complying because they are worried about receiving a fine they can't afford.

  8. 3 minutes ago, Bullys Special Prize said:

    Hello. Has anyone on this forum had any bother off the police whilst not wearing a mask and telling them that they are exempt ? Did the police accept the reason or did they require more 'proof' ?

     

    This chap had a hard time.

     

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8954419/Coronavirus-UK-Lidl-shopper-handcuffed-not-wearing-mask-200-fine-quashed.html

     

    "If you have an age, health or disability reason for not wearing a face covering: you do not routinely need to show any written evidence of this; you do not need show an exemption card. This means that you do not need to seek advice or request a letter from a medical professional about your reason for not wearing a face covering." https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/face-coverings-when-to-wear-one-and-how-to-make-your-own/face-coverings-when-to-wear-one-and-how-to-make-your-own#exemptions

  9. 3 minutes ago, zArk said:

    have you listened to this interview with michael wann??  maybe not your thing but the olympics, james bond link is fascinating  for this prick who was guilty of phone hacking but somehow ran to the USA, without impedance, never got slated when he returned to the UK and continues as if it never happened. Piers is a made man , no getting away from it, he was pushed into the jobs, protected and now is doing the bidding of his sponsors.

    time stamped v

    Michael wann interview on THC

    defo use these  show notes

     

    hope you enjoy

     

    Thanks for the tip

  10. 1 minute ago, Clansman82 said:

    I was walking out in the countryside today when I saw this couple about 50 metres away, all looked fine, next time I looked up they were ready for surgery with their replica surgical masks on.

    These peoples lives must be one clown show after another. I bet if the government asked them to wear a pair of Micky Mouse ears they would, "the TV told me they whack the virus away like a tennis racket!"

    What a pair of dipshits!

     

    The ones walking their dogs after midnight are the funniest. Masks and face shields on. No one around for miles. You drive past and just have to laugh. Poor sad brainwashed morons.

×
×
  • Create New...